How does /g/ perform?

File: test.jpg (38KB, 818x630px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 818x630px

>>54889817

File: Capture.png (66KB, 1280x824px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1280x824px

>>54889817

File: 3.png (125KB, 1415x2032px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1415x2032px

>>54889817
Canary 53.0.2757.0 (64-bit)
IE11 11.0.10240.16841 (64-bit)

File: wat.jpg (15KB, 443x327px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 443x327px

I used a 10 year old dell notebook which overheated and rebooted during the first take then in the second it got better than 71% of the users. Wtf? People stopped buying computers 10 years ago?

File: bmark.png (37KB, 448x270px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 448x270px

>>54889817
ThinkPad T420s

File: 2016-06-03-123208_1920x1080_scrot.png (84KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1920x1080px

e5450, fedora 24

I imagine less browsers/monitors would improve the score

File: edge.png (32KB, 410x241px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 410x241px

>>54891623
same machine but in edge (first was chrome)

File: Screenshot_20160603-191237.png (156KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1080x1920px

Mobile Phone

File: fur g.png (67KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1920x1040px

4670-k with nightly

File: Capture.png (92KB, 720x424px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 720x424px

Surface Book i5 with GPU

Got 53 points, better than 9% of the users...

File: Its Literally twice as slow as a 8400gs wat.png (12KB, 300x108px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x108px

What the fug

File: file.png (47KB, 831x298px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 831x298px

wahey
i7-2600K stock
Radeon HD 5670 (waiting for the RX 480 to hit)

File: wirplebmark.jpg (41KB, 865x688px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 865x688px

FF Nightly 49a1
R9 280X
2560x1600

File: ss+(2016-06-03+at+09.16.33).jpg (31KB, 783x592px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 783x592px

Firefox 46.0.1
Windows 10
i5 4460
280x

File: youve been raped by a mac.png (176KB, 2587x1472px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 2587x1472px

>Macs are shit

File: what_did_i_win.png (94KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1920x1080px

No reason to upgrade

>>54894076
>better than 99% on your os/browser
not exactly proof of much, m8

>>54895450
Are you retarded? Exactly 1 line above what you read it says that he scored in the 99th percentile for all users.

File: Selection_018.png (32KB, 375x145px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 375x145px

Guess I win, arch with chromium
4790k
980

File: Capture2.png (32KB, 302x139px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 302x139px

4770k @ 4.4ghz + 970. using chrome on windows 10

File: 2016-06-03 17_51_04-BMark - A HTML5 3D Benchmark.png (53KB, 1044x662px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1044x662px

>>54889817

File: image.png (141KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 750x1334px

iPhone 6s. Better than I expected.

File: Screenshot_20160603_175750.png (45KB, 836x653px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 836x653px

ArchLoonix
FX-8150
GTX 560 Ti
Chromium 51.0.2704.63

File: benchmark.png (48KB, 864x676px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 864x676px

i5 4460 & GTX960 SC

File: Screenshot (208).png (206KB, 3200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 3200x1800px

While running a game in background

>>54896550
Is that Blackbox? How do you get that theme

>>54895707
That doesn't void the statement by the person you're replying to.
You seem to be lacking an understanding of statistics, newfriend.

File: ss+(2016-06-04+at+01.56.21).png (35KB, 802x605px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 802x605px

>>54896550
>Kraftwerk
>reddit & Facebook
aaahh so conflicting
Also this is on HD 7850 and i3 6100

>>54896250
3570k at 4.4ghz and got same shit as you on chromium debian
gtx760
& people cry about amd performance.. faggots

File: ss+(2016-06-03+at+08.34.00).png (48KB, 848x666px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 848x666px

AMD A10-7850k
R9 290

not bad?

File: ayy.png (91KB, 1359x1020px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1359x1020px

okay I suppose

>>54896550

What theme is that on Firefox?

File: www.wirple.com screen capture 2016-06-03_18-42-16.png (85KB, 1566x855px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1566x855px

opera beta on xubuntu 14.04 64bit with an intel i7.

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-03 22-41-36.png (239KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1920x1080px

>>54889817

File: scrit.png (49KB, 496x277px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 496x277px

Canvas and webgl are cancer. Anything that brings us closer to a future where nobody actually has copies of their programs is bad for society. Let's just ignore the accessibility issues for everywhere that isn't the united states of just buy a new computer for a second.

>>54889817

Ran it on my main potato.

better than 47% of all on firefox, 512 Points
better than 39% of all on internet explorer (for good measure), forgot the score.

But it doesn't render particles in FF. Also Anti Aliasing neither in FF nor IE.

File: Capture.jpg (34KB, 808x607px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 808x607px

>>54889817

File: Screenshot_2016-06-04-07-19-35.png (138KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1080x1920px

Oneplus X

File: ss (2016-06-03 at 11.34.10).jpg (26KB, 395x227px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 395x227px

>>54889817
>Chrome latest
>Windows 7
>4690k @ 4.5Ghz
>Sapphire R9 390

File: ss+(2016-06-03+at+09.34.44).jpg (28KB, 501x276px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 501x276px

AMD Phenom II x4 965 Black Edition
8GB DDR3
GTX 570 DirectCUII

Windows 10, Latest Chrome version

>>54900867
>mac
>chrome
>adblock plus
absolutely an hero worthy

File: Clipboard01.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>54889817

File: srse.png (1MB, 1079x1917px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1079x1917px

4690k @ 4.7 with an r9 290 using chrome.

>>54901489
here's your (You)

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-04 14-52-48.png (79KB, 1333x940px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1333x940px

OS: Ubuntu
Browser: Firefox

File: Screenshot_20160604-080507.png (124KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1440x2560px

>>54889817

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 5.04.25 PM.png (335KB, 2556x1744px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 2556x1744px

5K iMac with i5-6500, m390 and streaming on Safari.

File: bmark.png (35KB, 797x601px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 797x601px

i5 4460
Intel HD 4600
8 GB RAM
Windows 10 and Chrome

Opera 12.16
C2D E8335
Radeon HD 2600 Pro

File: Girls.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>54889817
> /g/
>how to take a screenshot

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 2.19.12 AM.png (54KB, 314x105px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 314x105px

>>54902786
whoops

>>54902820
How new are you?

>>54902820
Is joek

File: Screenshot_2016-06-04-09-33-36.png (106KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 720x1280px

Galaxy S3 CM 13

File: opera_2016-06-04_02-40-15.png (68KB, 563x317px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 563x317px

idk if this is good compared to the rest of /g/'s or not
What I do know is that the test took way too friggin long

File: 89.jpg (39KB, 854x659px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 854x659px

That's not bad.

File: yay.png (60KB, 1919x967px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1919x967px

>>54889817

File: bmark.png (34KB, 372x194px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 372x194px

i5k 4.6GHz
16GB
GTX970

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-04 01-23-51.png (87KB, 1040x294px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1040x294px

Was able to get a much better score when forcing all cores to max freq, before that I was in the 2300 range.

>>54895754
Flawless victory, annon

File: Untitled.png (77KB, 1284x976px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1284x976px

>>54889817

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-04 13:50:09.png (79KB, 1614x889px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1614x889px

>>54889817
Chromium 50 on 4.3.0 running on a T420.

File: thinkpad t420.png (32KB, 352x149px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 352x149px

>>54889817
T420 didn't seem to fair too bad.

File: Capture.png (32KB, 349x133px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 349x133px

That's pretty good

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 16.42.13.png (55KB, 575x300px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 575x300px

MBP 2012 i5 8gb

>>54896853
>>54898284
Nightly Fox stylish theme with custom picked colours. It leaves some artifacts behind when you alt tab like you can see on the top left corner of adress bar sometimes though its not perfect.

File: test.png (57KB, 283x236px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 283x236px

>>54889817
Firefox's and Chrome's

File: wirple.jpg (31KB, 802x600px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 802x600px

>>54889817
This was on FireFox

>>54889817
too lazy to type that url but not too lazy to write this.

>>54901568

ITS THAT GUY WITH THE BIG ASS MONITOR

>having webgl enabled
>>>/out/

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 1.26.49 PM.png (114KB, 834x452px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 834x452px

Macbook Pro with Iris Pro integrated graphics.

File: Screenshot_2016-06-04-14-30-34.png (149KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 2560x1600px

>>54889817
Nexus 10, Chromium 53

>>54909948
And a lot of private tabs on the background

File: image.png (101KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 640x1136px

iPhone 5 16gig, 9.3.2

File: Screenshot_20160604-143828.png (216KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1080x1920px

>>54889817
Nexus 5, Opera Beta 37(Chromium 50)

File: wirple_win10_edge.png (144KB, 1082x739px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1082x739px

I tested Edge, IE11, FF48 in Windows and Linux(FF only). Here's the first one

File: wirple_win10_ie11.png (122KB, 1000x735px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1000x735px

>>54910437
IE11 on Windows 10

File: wirple_win10_ff48.png (169KB, 1011x723px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1011x723px

>>54910456
Firefox 48, on W10

File: wirple_debian9_ff48.png (76KB, 1014x684px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1014x684px

And the last one, Firefox(or Lagfox?) on Debian testing

>canvas and webgl
this site is collecting browser fingerprints to identify people.

File: Screenshot - 06042016 - 09:20:13 PM.png (54KB, 495x300px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 495x300px

>pale meme
>debian
>10 year old pentium laptop (T43p)

File: bmarkresult1.png (33KB, 702x378px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 702x378px

i5 4690
Chrome 64-Bit
Win 10

File: score.png (44KB, 843x649px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 843x649px

here is my score 100% better than people with my my browser/os, firefox/win10

96% better than over all, pretty good?

File: bmark.png (65KB, 1852x792px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1852x792px

ubuntu 16.04 using open source AMD drivers. Not great results.

>>54889817
i don't know since you didn't even provide the FUCKING LINK

File: image.jpg (131KB, 2048x1340px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 2048x1340px

Based iPad mini

File: okay.png (34KB, 383x190px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 383x190px

Okay, I guess

>>54911099
Liturlly in the url in the jpg in the urlbar.

File: useless-pc.png (77KB, 1355x1056px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1355x1056px

>>54889817

File: Screenshot_2016-06-04-22-39-50.jpg (70KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 540x960px

Sony Expedia E4g Chrome

Got better than 82% of all users
But only 60% or so on people that use the same OS/Browser

File: Capture.jpg (40KB, 866x693px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 866x693px

Benchmark sucked, I was at like 38% CPU utilization the whole time.

>thought it was a coding test
>it's a shitty hardware test
disappointed, but then again i shouldn't be surprised seeing the poster turnout

OP here, I'm surprised to see my thread still going after 24 hours. Anyway, can you guess my cpu/gpu setup from the score?

iPhone SE - 370/408/576/535 on Safari, 40/49/20/20 on Opera

Old Insprion 530, running Debian and a Q6600 (incl. graphics) - 275/285/14/156 on Opera, 183/90/12/30 on Iceweasel, and I'm pretty sure Iceweasel had rendering errors.

>>54901827
Anon, please get a higher res wallpaper, this made my eyes melt

File: a.png (46KB, 822x645px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 822x645px

>>54892307
Same CPU here, mate.

File: Otter Benchmark.jpg (26KB, 433x227px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 433x227px

Otter Browser 0.9.09
Windows 10
i7 4790k
Fury