/loose/

these fits aren't nearly as good as the ones in the old thread, someone fix the situation please

someone post a pic of op's mum ;)

File: 1457962656533.jpg (101KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 640x640px

I posted most of my stuff in the previous thread. Anyone want to dump something in this one?

File: 1458189625053.jpg (109KB, 500x681px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 500x681px

I don't remember this guy's name but I'm sure someone here will. I like his fits but I think he "over layers" if that makes sense.

File: 1456993696982.jpg (493KB, 1366x2048px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 1366x2048px

The way the trousers taper into the cuff, the turtleneck collar with the knit, the fit of the top in general, it's just top tier YYPH to me.

File: 1459011051555.jpg (111KB, 828x828px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 828x828px

>>11462242
>>11462256
post more jin fits mate

>>11462265
WHERE CAN I COP A JACKET SIMLAR

Difference between loose and baggy? Thrifted a size 36 pair of khakis (usually a size 30) cuffed them but side and back fit look like elephant man and tried to layer with baggy top.

File: 00180fullscreen.jpg (109KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 683x1024px

The pants just arrived, so dope.

>>11463432

Nice. I have these too, they're great but since they billow out every time you take a step, its so easy for them to snag onto something and damage the fabric.

>>11463296
nice one

>>11463402
baggy pairs are cut like rectangles (like this >>11461047) while looser cuts from designers tend to have a inverse parallelogram cut with a slow taper (somewhat like this >>11462263) or a cut that widens out from the hip then tapers down mid thigh (like this >>11462335)

the difference between loose and baggy is what separates an outfit from being one that actually interestingly plays with proportions and fit to one that has no clue on proper fit

>>11464785
Wasn't this fit posted in the first thread?

whew lad, is it really time for a bump?

>>11464650
now your just injecting your opinion where it doesn't belong

>>11465910
I don't necessarily agree with the definition but I think the argument is right. There's a difference between baggy and loose, although I'd generally categorise baggy the same as oversized. It often looks bad.

>>11461033
>loose
more like you laugh you lose
and i just lost because that fit is shit!

Post some loose "streetwear", old baggy jeans and stuff senpai, channel that 90s suburban art type you got inside

>>11465910
its true tho in most cases

File: _MIY0408.jpg (707KB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 2000x3000px

The textured knees are fucking siiiiick

>>11461041
w2c jeans that fit like the ones in the middle?

File: issey-miyake-2015-fall-winter-homme-plisse-jackets-0.jpg (307KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1280x853px

>>11467246
fuck off

>>11467905
yea boiii

mah nigga issey. check out the homme plisse collections they're equally as sick

Is no one on /fa/ rocking the loose fit and willing to show us some fit pics?

this will never look good on white men. too goofy loose ninja try hard shit like in >>11461033

>>11469404
Half the models wearing this on the runway are white.

>>11469425
yet it barely even holds together under the context of a runway show

>>11469456
k

>>11463317
W2c, or at least I'd plsss.

>>11469818
Sorry I meant id.

File: 851b6eea_august-sander-gypsy.jpg (46KB, 468x640px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 468x640px

posting some great depression core which is basically people looking rugged as fuck with loose fits

File: sanders___people_of_the_20th_century_0.jpg (543KB, 1111x1600px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 1111x1600px

>>11470017

File: 9cce6e6e_HenriCartier-Bresson2210.jpg (88KB, 614x411px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 614x411px

>>11470026

File: c1c21768_525x412px-LL-b6b715c1_LWAD_6.jpg (105KB, 525x412px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 525x412px

>>11470034

File: e4b02a60_525x415px-LL-ac6d53ba_LWAD_7.jpg (73KB, 524x415px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 524x415px

>>11470037

File: 805fa080_LWAD_1.jpg (56KB, 640x509px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x509px

>>11470039

File: ccc2c09f-4947-469b-b872-04f2075479c5.jpg (56KB, 550x826px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 550x826px

>>11470050

File: bafd0676-5e36-4ee5-8308-2350c8abaea6.jpg (199KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1080x1920px

>>11470060

File: 008479e1-64b9-45c4-a475-cae07a186f9a.jpg (412KB, 937x780px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 937x780px

>>11470064

File: f424af4e-d9b5-462a-93fa-f979de406e0d.jpg (136KB, 532x799px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 532x799px

>>11470073

File: 79067611-58ad-4944-84b1-b40d089fb53f.jpg (278KB, 900x1352px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 900x1352px

>>11470091

File: 915fac25-1453-4cac-bcdc-ac8e8fabcf06.jpg (106KB, 1280x849px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1280x849px

>>11470096