/d/ Meta Thread II

>>7510626
There's already a meta thread. Check the catalog before posting.
>>7507633

>>7510626
maybe if you had spent five seconds to fucking look youd see all your questions have already been answered in the meta thread which is still going

>>7510626
>I'm gonna make a thread in which I strawman the FUCK out of everyone who disagrees with me and horrendously misrepresents every single side of the issue
>Then I'm gonna pretend to not understand the repeated, numerous, thorough explanations about why my garbage posts are banned now so I can protect my fragile ego from confronting those facts

You are subhuman trash. This is a fucking child's approach to discourse. You've made it loud and clear from the outset that you're not arguing in good faith. That you're just being a stubborn, closed-minded, backwards piece of shit that's gonna throw a tantrum over being told to go to
>>>/trash/
instead of spam /d/ with garbage.

>>7510626
The mods deleted all the threads that were literally not even hentai
>censorship threads
>voice threads
I dont give a shit about how "subjective" these bans are, they remove threads that blatantly break the rules and thats that, just because there was a period where the rules were not enforced doesnt mean they disappeared.

>>7510691
That thread has 1200+ post and is on page 9

>>7510742
How hard is this to understand: "One meta thread at a time".

Good to see you guys are as bad at following rules as ever.

>>7510732
>cyoa threads
>caption threads
Stripping boards of their culture, and a slow one like /d/, makes shit stale. With this all there will be are constant repost and image dumps. This place will look like /gif/ if that happens. It's not even like those threads took away anything from the board

>>7510746
>you guys
stop posting like it's a unified group; not all /d/ posters browse /d/ 24/7 like you, and not everyone can be expected to comb through a 1200 post thread full of clashing information

>>7510749
That's where you're wrong in a very sad way, my man. Even /gif/ has x-change threads for the literate.

>>7510802
You're right, it's not like everyone has a Ctrl key and an F key on their keyboards. If everybody had that, then searching through a thread would be incredibly fascile. But no, you're right, every single person should make a new thread every single time they have a question.

>>7510806
kek'd

File: hurr.png (28KB, 125x150px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 125x150px

>>7510806
I can't speak for him (seems like English might not be OP's first language) but I can speak regarding caption/CYOA/etc/etc/etc thread users not being some unified bogeyman that's looking to destroy everything you hold dear. Get a fucking grip.

>>7510806
>mass deletion and banning of threads for seemingly no reason
>a simple question

>>7510818
nobody thinks youre boogeymen. we think you're scum.

now back to >>>/trash/ with you.

So glad /d/ is going back to it's former glory. Maybe people will start coming back now the shitlords are being banned.

>>7510626
looks that way

>weird fetish containment board
>can't talk about weird fetishes
>can't have quests with weird fetishes
>can't have stories with weird fetishes

shit's retarded and the mod is a dumb cunt, along with the ass kisser brigade.

>>7510834

>we

>>7510834
>we
This group think mentality is cancer. Like honest to god cancer

>>7510850
I agree with them though. Does that make us a "we" yet? Or does nintendo have to lose billions of dollars developing us first?

>>7510852

>them

we're about to have a lot more space in the catalog, so do you think we can justify having more specific threads now?

>>7510856
Bimbo Futa images that take place during the Fall and only involves brunettes

>>7510856
>futa blueberry inflation
>milf blueberry inflation
>robot blueberry inflation
>robot femboy blueberry inflation
>robot futa milf blueberry inflation
>fruit blueberry inflation

>>7510884
As long as the mods don't have to read then they'd be fine with this

>>7510626
Everyone's so hostile and tense. suddenly part of the community is "scum" because they like captions and CYOAs.

I just want to fap to words in peace.

>>7510893

BURN THE HERETIC!

File: 1490905137964.jpg (172KB, 1179x1400px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1179x1400px

>>7510846
>weird fetish containment board
>can't talk about weird fetishes
>can't have quests with weird fetishes
>can't have stories with weird fetishes

I just don't get it, does it really matter if people talk about their fetishes? If there's one thread where people are working together to create new OC instead of just scrolling down and clicking on images with their dick in hand? Where we have a little fun in regards to the fact that we're all perverts? Sure, I get it, people want images posted. I agree. I hate seeing posts in Pic Below You threads where some chucklefuck posts something like "GIVE ME BIG TITS GUYS" without a picture, and think that just to spite them each thread should start with the rule of "Your post isn't counted unless there's a picture" but shit, the Erotic Fiction General could be kept if people posted an image related to the story they're posting or want written. I was writing tentacle porn, I posted pictures of tentacle porn as I discussed the story I was writing. Someone tell me how it would negatively impact the board if EFG was allowed to exist with that rule? That posts should have a fitting image attached, because there were people doing that already and I know the other people who used EFG would be just fine with abiding by it if it meant keeping it on this place.

Just, explain to me why we can have Erotic Games General and not Erotic Fiction General. Look at it right now. 167 posts. 29 images. Explain to me how that's different. And I'm saying this as someone who enjoys EGG, but it has a far slower rate of OC creation because games take much longer to make, meaning it's mostly the same shit posted every thread.

File: 1488748095778.jpg (6KB, 250x164px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x164px

>>7510732
>blatantly break the rules
>"I don't like this type of content and therefore it's rule-breaking"

>>7510691
Holy autistic mod rage.

I am not sure about what the limit of what can and cannot be done is,i can't post like this....

>Original, fresh, high quality writing threads: BAD

>The same 40 fucking futa offshoots being posted ad infinitum until the heat death of the universe: GOOD

>>7510638
1235/76 HOW IS THIS ALLOWED

Seriously, that one took off quick. I'm sure the discussion is mature and will prove fruitful.

>captcha wants me to play pattern recognition on US military hardware

Whatever you say, Skynet-sempai.

If somebody made a font that was also technically hentai, could it be used in captions that do not break any rules?

This is so stupid. The quality was fine and those threads got more content than anything else. It's not like those threads were the ONLY threads like back when aco was made. SO arbitrary.

Tell me mods, what IS the difference between captions and >>7511199 ?

>>7511199
"For fairness we have banned all text in /d/ and turned off comments. This is an image board obv, no need for text at all."

Do we need to start editing the words out of doujins now or can we post them as long as they are untranslated?

>>7510691
Calm down autsy.

If you want nothing but 20 futa threads with the same reposts again and again, I'm sure you could just load up your filter and soak in your own dull fetish perfectly fine without needing to bootlick and expedite the rest of the board.

>>7510893
how is it sudden? ever since the good content creators left those communities have ALWAYS been shitty

File: 18.jpg (507KB, 987x1400px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 987x1400px

Might as well repost this poll after it was posted in the last thread for further feedback. I think it's always been pretty clear that this isn't us vs. them but instead more a few trolls getting (you)s from those supporting the deleted threads.

http://www.strawpoll.me/13312980

>>7510884
>futa on traps
>futa on balless futas
>futa on balled futas
>futa on guys
>futa on women
>futa on shemales
>futa on musclegirls
>futa on muscletraps
>futa on...

What I don't get is that no where in the rules that state the /d/ should not be chatty, or have no ERP.
It just says images of an "Alternative" nature are welcome except for the ones that are already listed example furry, guro, scat etc.
No rule that states that the majority of the content has to be images of "alternative" hentai just that alternative hentai is allowed here.

The low quality issue just needs the mod to tell the community of those two generals that they need to up their game with the image quality, no need to outright ban the threads.

For the final "rule" in this mods sticky;
>threads that are primarily for chatting also should not be started on /d/ or the porn imageboards in general.
Doesn't match with the actual rules.

If mods can just make up rules without any consequences how can you expect people to stay on this board for long?

>>7510732
You do know that just because a board is nsfw doesn't mean you're only allowed to post nsfw, right?

>>7511524
>how can you expect people to stay on this board for long?
It's hiroshimoot's secret plan to kill /d/ to justify having /bant/ while he said new boards are expensive.

>>7511524
>If mods can just make up rules without any consequences how can you expect people to stay on this board for long?
Because as we've seen from the other meta threads posters are cucks who refuse to migr-ate.

>>7511550
You know you're a cuck if you do migrate right?
>>7511540
/bant/ was a mistake because /pol/ is still shitty, and now they have two boards as their home.

Glad to see the banned babies are as mature as ever.

>>7511489
>>7511485
>>7511483
>>7511480

This is why I'm glad you got banned. This is the kind of person your communities were made up of. No one wants this kind of faggot on /d/.

>>7511570
you made those threads didn't you

>>7511572
Why the fuck would I want that stupid shit on /d/.

They keep making shitpost threads to try to ruin the board just because the mods decided to actually enforce the rules at long last. They've been doing it for more than a week.

>>7511558
No but I'd love to hear how you think that.

>>7511575
>Why the fuck would I want that stupid shit on /d/
you wouldn't, which is why you're spamming those threads

File: 2623892.jpg (8KB, 264x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 264x200px

>>7511581
>why would i want it here
>you dont want it here, thats why you put it here

>>7511582
well obviously yeah. a couple spammed threads that'll get deleted in 10 minutes will just piss off mods and make them even more against any threads like those, meaning you're less likely to see actual threads about it being made. it's simple logic.

>>7511558
>you know you're a buzzword if you follow the rules right?

>>7511588
Have you ever heard of Occam's Razor, anon? You should look it up.

>>7511591
not applicable. please don't spam the board.

>>7511589
You know you're a <insert buzzword here> if you follow made up rules yeah?

File: 30.jpg (353KB, 1107x1600px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1107x1600px

>>7511582
this is elementary school stuff, it ain't hard

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

also post a fucking /d/ image next time you miserable crossboarding bastard, like holy shit reaction images on /d/ should be banned

So let's talk about things which actually matter and try to ignore the idiots until they leave.

Did we come to any kind of a consensus in the last thread about multiple threads?

>>7511627
>>7511620
>>7511624
they're still doing it

>>7511600
this doesn't make any sense, those threads are already banned, what more is false flagging going to do to them?

>>7511630
>one guy
>they

"All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster."

>>7511634
they doesn't specify a number of people anon, they can refer to a single person

e.g. "Where is Sarah?" "Oh THEY went to the store." "Why did THEY go to the store?" "THEY went there to get milk."

>>7511644
So Sarah is trans?

>>7511653
thatsa spicey memeaball

>>7511336
It's pretty clear the mods are enacting their own agenda here, but who can we appeal to? Short of them getting their powers revoked, there's nothing that can be done; anyone who rebels is instantly banned.

>>7511692
>their own agenda

Their agenda is to enforce the rules which have been ignored for years. That's quite obvious to anyone who isn't part of the Deviantart crowd.

>>7511644
PLEASE improve the clarity of your English before you post. The correct form is "he or she," or, if you wish to remain gender neutral while retaining clarity, "that poster."

If you were to use "they" in this situation, knowing neither the gender, number, or preferred species of the person(s) posting, anyone reading could easily misinterpret (as I did) the original post as supposing multiple people were spamming threads. Based on the threads being posted, that probably was not the case, and it's part of disturbing pattern of people saying that all people in favor of captions/cyoas/writethreads are trying to stir up trouble. Believe me, if everyone were doing what that one poster was doing, this board would no longer be usable.

>>7511700
Their justification for this is 'the post quality was insufficient'.

Not only is this an entirely subjective and arbitrary measurement that we have no way of quantifying, but this policy is not universally applied. It is ABUNDANTLY clear that there is personal prejudice at work here! The mods are failing to use their authority responsibly!

>>7511704
It is especially telling that this thread has been placed on auto-sage; a further attempt at stifling discussion, because they know they can't get away with just banning everyone here to enforce their personal biases!

>>7511700
this is bullshit

the only pertinent thing in the rules is "low quality" which translates to "whatever the mod doesn't like today"

but, here's a (You) for you, great job!

File: weird.png (188KB, 733x567px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 733x567px

I was thinking about board culture and whatnot, and that led me to moot's q&a. This part really made me happy/sad/think.

https://github.com/bibanon/bibanon/wiki/Moot%27s-Final-4chan-Q&A-Transcript

>>7511726
He didn't live up to his words either, so why would we expect that after he went?

I remember an anon once say I believe in one of the previous threads; "the mods are not robots, they are more like gardeners"
I find this funny because the way this mod is gardening is by grooming a bonsai tree with a chainsaw.

You guys know who you are right now?
Abusing people just there to enforce the rules?
You're this guy.
https://youtu.be/haYc7KDN2z4?t=96

You guys became this guy over certain fetishes being kicked off of an imageboard. Sleep tight.

>>7511863
It's more like ripping a feral cat off of your bonsai tree. Seeing as the cat doesn't fucking belong in the first place. Nice try though.

>>7511863
There is a set of clear rules. You guys aren't following them. If you left a bonsai tree alone for two years and didn't clip it at all, and came back and lo and behold, some branches have grown the wrong fucking way, you clip them off. You guys aren't special, you don't have any right to be here, because you don't have rights and civil liberties on a private website on the internet.

File: LETSGETDRUNK.png (20KB, 422x514px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 422x514px

hope you guys are still playing along at home, we sure are

what are you /d/eviants drinking tonight while this shitstorm slowly ebbs away?

>and as such the majority of content posted here should be in image form.
>role-playing, collaborative fiction, and threads that are primarily for chatting also should not be started on /d/ or the porn imageboards in general.
Why are threads like >>7475473 and >>7505157 still up then?
According to the rules they should be deleted.

>>7511895
Because they post good quality images, and provide good content for the board. Unlike the shit that got banned. As soon as those threads are full of low quality shit like the CYOA thread you can be sure people will start reporting it and they'll get deleted too.

>>7511897
So you're saying that a thread with 200 posts that only has 30 images gets a free pass because those are "good quality", even though they break explicitly stated rules?
That's hilarious, should've just said that some specific threads are banned and not try to make it seem so neutral, it just makes the bias more clear.

>>7511887
>>7511891
What rules? You mean the quality one you keep banking on? There's no rule against discussion about the topic along side images

>>7511922
"Good quality " just seems to be: "that's my fetish and I post there"

>>7511950
Good quality seems to be "wasn't drawn by angsty 12 year olds on deviantart."

>>7510842
what former glory? the glory of a "porn board" like the admins describe it now?

>>7512060
>he thinks cyoas and captions were all just made by angsty kids

lol ok

>>7512060
you know what you do where there are bad quality images on a thread? you delete the bad quality images. And you do so for a few weeks, and people will learn to post good quality. THAT is gardening.
But that requires to put a bit of work and attention into it (aka be a good mod) and our mods are too bored to do so. So they just bann the whole thread and all future thread with the same subject to hell. That is bombing the whole place, not gardening.

>>7512067
Yep. No fun. No community. No OC. Just a bunch of dead-eyed fucks pumping their semi-hard cocks listlessly as they scroll down the same shit they've seen be reposted thirty times over.

Congrats /d/. You made it.

Still waiting for shitposter-kun to qualify his and the mods arguments that captions are low quality. If most, if not all captions are low quality then going into the archive and taking literally 2 seconds to take a screenshot shouldn't be that hard, right?

>>7511891
Making up rules doesn't count, anon.

>>7511891
You know what else is a good rule? The one about not submitting false reports.

>>7512189
I'm just waiting for someone to respond to what I posted here. >>7510920

If EFG is filled with pictures, why can't it stay?

>>7512201
because words apparently trigger the mods autism

>>7512201
what's there to say?

the mod doesn't like something.
therefore it is "low quality" and against the rules
therefore deleted

some asshole got a moderator position and decided to fuck with the entire userbase, now he's probably giggling to himself while he reads these threads because hurr they're so buttmad

there's your explanation.

I remember when mod gave all vore content the boot and told to go to /aco/ regardless of origin, and banned those who didn't comply. It's obvious dude has his own agenda.

>>7512205
>>7512207
Why the fuck can't we just have an administrator who can step in when mods piss off the entire community? Instead we've got an Asian guy who just vanishes for months on end, and before that we had luggage lad.

>>7510920
No, no, no, Sally Jim.

This is a weird fetish IMAGE containment board.

People like you belong in the >>>/trash/ with the Loud House NSFW posters and the scrump of /aco/.

>>7512218
But it's a fucking porn board. How sad is that mod's life if they get their kicks modding a porn board

File: 1478651605483.png (71KB, 411x349px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 411x349px

>>7512230
>This is a weird fetish IMAGE containment board.

>>Someone tell me how it would negatively impact the board if EFG was allowed to exist with that rule? That posts should have a fitting image attached

So glad you could admit that you can't fucking read. Also, this entire site is an imageboard you fucking idiot. Let's make it so you can only post images of food on /ck/ but don't you fucking dare post the recipe behind it.

>>7511703
Tell that to Shakespeare. The gender neutral "they" has been around for centuries.

>>7512225
>piss off the entire community
if you mean a small minority of people so autistic they give a shit about what pictures are allowed on a website on the internet, then sure

Why doesn't everyone just ask for a board for written erotica?

>>7512207
>I took a shit on the floor in an art gallery
>HOW DARE YOU THROW ME OUT MY ART HAS AS MUCH RIGHT TO BE HERE AS ANYONE ELSE'S

>>7512332
there are people here to who the /d/ means a lot.
We aren't all wankers that come here to fap a bit, bust a nut and be done with it.

>>7512343
We just got rid of like 20 boards because A no one used them and B we have no money for them.

There is a board for shit threads that are just blocks of text with no images, it's called EIGHTchan.

>>7512353
A website is 1's and 0's on a server somewhere. If that matters to you, then you are genuinely autistic.

Who cares what fucking pictures are allowed and what aren't, what matters is that /d/ has a community, and if this banning shit has proven anything it's that we got rid of the right people.

Look at how they've been reacting. Is that the kind of person you want to hang around? Is that the kind of person you want to have a discussion with?

>>7511885
This anon was right. These entitled little shits needs to go. Do you want this board to be full of that guy?

OK, stupid question: where can we post and view /d/ images with captions?

>>7512379
>and B we have no money for them.
Bull. Shit. We have gotten, like, 4 new boards since Hiro took over. We have the money.

>>7512391
Then why should we make an entirely new board for you special snowflakes instead of bringing back any of the 20 other boards?

>>7512395
Because people seem to care about this. Does anyone here even remember the 20 other past boards?

>>7512383
this was a place where I could come, discuss and share on my fetishes with others that would understand me.
It is also, incidentally a place that helped me accept myself, and changed me from an edgy and fearful teen to somebody actually able to live and enjoy it.
Is it really that autistic if it breaks my heart to see the mods are considering this as a "porn board" good only to come bust a nut, and are enforcing this vision on us?
I honestly wasn't really a part of the threads that were banned, maybe sometimes the voice from times to times and, even more rarely the femdom ones. But what horrifies me is the vision those bans are carrying, which is in complete disregard of the /d/ community and traditions I loved, and which made me what I am.

Of course, there is always that special shit-spewing fringe of the community that can't do anything but rage, as there is in any community. And of course they are the most visible part of the reactions, as always. Maybe it would be clever not to judge a whole community on them. Maybe.

Well, here you got my reasons for not supporting those bans. And if they are autistic, then I'm not sure I want not to be autistic.

>>7512396
>our 2-3 threads are more important than everyone who ever used any of the 20 boards that got deleted
>our 2-3 threads deserve their own fucking board, but fuck all the people who ever used the boards that got deleted
>even though we should feel exactly as they do, and be sympathetic towards them, fuck them

Okay so let's recap. You've insulted every single /d/ related community, all of dubschan, and now 20 boards worth of users. And you guys are also shitposting in multiple threads and keep making new threads which you guys know are against the rules just to piss people off.

It's seriously like you guys are genuinely trying to make EVERYONE hate you.

>>7512405
don't forget all of the mods, even the ones who might disagree with banning their threads

Hey, hey. I'm not even a major participant in those threads. I just think getting a board for poster-written work would be a better solution. We have boards for other trivial things.

>>7512411
Okay, why don't you do all of us (and by that I mean the folks laughing their asses off) a favour and explain exactly why these faggots deserve THEIR OWN FUCKING BOARD when Deviantart and Tumblr exist.

>>7512405
>>7512411

>>7512412
Because why not? It obviously has a base here, so I see no problem with having a board made for it. You might as well say why does /ic/ exists and why doesn't everyone there go to Tumblr and Deviantart.

>>7512419
jesus fucking christ this is stupid

its like talking to a 4 year old

>I WANT CANDY

Well shouldn't we give the candy to people who had all their candy taken?

>NO I WANT IT GIVE ME THE CANDY ITS MINE GIVE IT TO ME

>>7512419
Okay so how are you going to fill AN ENTIRE BOARD with 2-3 threads worth of people anon? I want to see how far we can stretch your mongoloid logic.

>>7512419
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>7512419
>>7512411
This has got to be fucking bait.

>>7512423
I don't see your reasoning here. What kind of boards should also exist if one for user-written material is selfish?

>>7512427
It's obviously going to attract a variety of people for it's purpose, not just the people here.

>>7512435
Right. I'm not sure how to explain this to you, because you don't seem to understand that 20 entire boards worth of threads got deleted, and compared to that, nobody could give less of a fuck about you. You don't deserve your own board when there are 20 other boards which should be brought back.

If you're being serious, and I genuinely hope you're not, then are you the kind of person who goes to food banks and takes shit "because it's all free right lol"?

>>7512411
>>7512419
>>7512435
and there goes any respect I had for the people who got banned

>>7512436
You seem incredible hostile to the idea of written content getting their own board. Wouldn't it be the most reasonable solution to have it to so that the certain base that populates this site can have their own interests fulfilled and put an end to all the whining everywhere else?

>>7512440
I don't see what's so bad about it. Having a board seems like a giant problem-solver.

>>7512448
I'm not even insulting anyone and yet I'm getting berated for daring to have an opinion on the subject. I'm not demanding a board, I'm just saying it would be most reasonable solution to this issue.

>>7512449
>in my opinion we should kill babies
>WHY IS EVERYONE ABUSING ME ITS JUST AN OPINION

>>7512453
That's a very outlandish comparison.

>>7512455
we should actually kill babies, though

>>7512455
It's intended to show that your opinion is so fucking awful that you should expect a negative response. You must be a complete autist if you don't see why people are going to respond to the idea of you getting your own personal board after 20 boards were deleted.

>>7512440
>this one guy who had an outlandish idea represents all of the people in those threads that got nuked
What a fag. You can't back up your own argument so you just say 'This guy said something dumb guess I don't have to state my case'

File: 1498330107962.png (756KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

756KB, 1280x720px

>>7512465
I don't understand how it's “so fucking awful” other than some people being mad because a few pricks made some selfish comments in that other thread. I think the poster-written content has enough of a base to get it's own board. I mean, we have /c/, which is just about posting cute pictures anime girls. So what really makes this so bad?

>>7512386
(2x4)chan looks okay

File: 1441162441360.png (283KB, 623x469px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 623x469px

>20 futa threads
>7 big tits threads
>5 trap threads
>4 vore threads
>3 muscle girl threads
>threads about bag eyes and long hair
>a couple of threads that had text were the true problem

Thanks mods

>>7512479
Because you end up with shit like /mlp/. Writing won't hold up it's own board because it's a part of every board. Mods just need to stop being stubborn and learn to read

>>7512479
Once all 20 of the boards which got deleted come back, then maybe you might get your own board, does that sound fair?

>>7512479
>my neighbors house burned down
>my TV got stolen
>give me all the money I need it more

>>7511336
>hey look I made a notoriously easy to abuse poll!
>and I made the thing I want to get the most votes one option, and split all the other options up into 8 options
>and what a surprise, I didn't add any of the security options, so I can sit here and vote for what I want over and over

Actually kill yourself. You are the reason no one is taking us seriously.

Let's focus on actual /d/ related issues.

>>7487053
>>7497338
>>7491203
Could these be combined into a single thread?

>>7512572
What matters more is mods policing content that they don't like

>>7512345

dial it back bub. too obvious.

>>7512383

>Look at how they've been reacting. Is that the kind of person you want to hang around? Is that the kind of person you want to have a discussion with?

I'm curious. How would you react if your most visited /d/ threads were suddenly banned by an executuve mod order?

Hey so I did you guys a favour and posted your little strawpoll on all the discords, EIGHTchan boards, IRCs, and other communities you've been insulting, along with a kind of "best of" collection of screen caps and links.

Lets see what they think of you now.

>>7512615

I'd not care and go to any of a dozen other websites. I wouldn't throw an autistic shitfit like them if that's what you're impling.

There are literally dozens of other places I could go without having to spam an imageboard because my special snowflake fetish got banned in protest.

90% of the posters are here solely to fuel the shitstorm.

>>7512607
that's right, make it all about you

thats been working so well for you so far

>>7512621

as you said "you don't care".
let the people who do care express said feeling.

>>7512618
FUCK YOU THAT WAS A PRIVATE POLL

THEY ARENT ALLOWED TO VOTE HOW DO I DELETE THEIR VOTES FUCK YOU

THIS IS JUST LIKE TRUMP GETTING ELECTED YOU ASSHOLES CHEATED

>>7512635
>do you like killing people?
>no? well we do so let us kill people

Just because you feel strongly about something doesn't automatically mean you're right, and getting emotional over a fucking website ban is pretty much never the right response.

>>7512632
These threads have been about mods deleting shit

>>7512637

the point of a falseflag is making people believe the oposition is being stupid.
but that only works if its not obviously a false flag attempt.

>>7512618
>hey, i posted your poll on a bunch of communities that have little to nothing to do with /d/ along with cherry picked caption
>number of votes saying to ban all of the threads triple in twelve minutes
sure, dude.

>>7512641
yep, keep insulting them, I'm sure that'll help

they're more /d/ related than you guys will ever be

>>7512638

>equating murder to complaining on the internet.
Your sense of scale is off by a magnitude or two.

>>7512645
insulting? who's insulting them?

stop samefagging.

>>7512649
You literally just said:
>communities that have little to nothing to do with /d/

Theyre all communities based on /d/ fetishes, composed of old /d/ threads and current ones. But according to you guys of course they have nothing to do with /d/ despite, you know, some of them having been here for 5 years or more.

No no keep going dont let me stop you. You guys are the only REAL /d/ communities, fuck everyone else right? Bring on the damage control. Or will they double down and insult people more? Will Freiza ever stop sounding like a gay Frank from Always Sunny? Find out on the next episode of AutismBall Z!

>>7512653

dude, you're the only one blowing a gasket ITT.

>>7512654
Because most of us are just content to watch you guys burn every single possible bridge while at the same time demanding to be let back across the river. Please do not mistake our silent judgement for sympathy.

>>7512656

you speak for no one but yorself anon.
never forget that.

>>7512653
If they were here and have been for sometime why did you feel the need to spam the poll other places? They would have seen it here. If you're going to bullshit make it believable

>>7512654
maybe you're blind but have you not seen the shitstorm for the last god damn week

we're way beyond blown gaskets the censored caption fags are in full on nuclear meltdown

>>7512656
>>7512661
>us
>we're

>>7512498
Adding onto this, I can find all of the content in those threads on boorus. Why should I even go to /d/ now?

>>7512661

Hence the "ITT" part of the post.

>>7512660
By "here" I mean on /d/. If you somehow haven't noticed the majority of people are content to ignore you guys until you leave. That's why I had to tl;dr most of them with screencaps as some had no idea you guys were even banned, and some had never even looked at your threads. Just because they use /d/ doesn't mean they give a shit about you or the drama. You guys aren't important. You have a massively inflated idea of how much people who arent you guys care about what happened. To most people you would have just vanished into the night. But after your little tirades in these meta threads now at least some people know youre banned... and apparently theyre glad youre gone. Maybe its because you guys keep acting entitled, insulting everyone who isn't you, and screaming demands without acknowledging any of your own problems or other peoples viewpoints. Who knows...

>>7512664
scroll to the top of the thread anon, theres been plenty of shitshowering here too

>as soon as people who arent these fags see the strawpoll it swings massively in favour of the bans

top kek

>>7512671
mostly on the "fuck off" side of the argument though.

>stawpolls are a good representation of the board state as long as it lines up with my side!
Lads, both of you are stupid.

>>7512673
fuck off mod
fuck off troll
fuck off banned fag
fuck off autist

both sides are shit in this argument anon, difference is the rules say they're not allowed, and they shouldn't have been allowed in the first place, so it's all been a moot point from the start

heh moot

>>7512680
Just goes to show the mentality we're dealing with. The kind of people who think a strawpoll means anything on 4chan and get butthurt when it doesn't go their way. The kind of people who spam that strawpoll just to get it seen.

>>7512668
No I meant why go to different sites and post the poll? If they use /d/ they'll see it. Your cherry picked screen shots dont present the argument fairly. If those threads were a problem they would have been on here and voiced their support or opposition themselves. You already dont know who's voting, posting the poll outside of /d/ makes it skewed even further.

Also if people didnt pay attention to the threads or mind them why ban them? That shows there'seven less of a reason and the mod is just having a power trip. No one's acting entitled if a mod just up and bans several threads,that people didnt mind, for no reason outside of they didnt like it.

>>7512672
>as soon as you post it off the board where this matters the polls change
Really activated my almonds

>>7512688
>we're

careful now, if you suck mod-kun's cock any harder, its going to pop out of your ass.

>>7512699
>implying it's not the mod himself

>>7512383
>Is that the kind of person you want to hang around? Is that the kind of person you want to have a discussion with?

Moreso than you, you fucking ass kisser.

File: 1496929489446.png (20KB, 127x187px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 127x187px

>we
>us
>we're
He keeps using plurals. I swear he's one post away from saying "we r legun". That anon realizes he doesn't represent entire communities , right?

>>7512692
Why will they see it if they use /d/? Nobody is using this thread anymore since you guys made it all about you, everyones avoiding it like the plague. No one had seen it until I linked it to them.

It has been linked twice in two threads, its not exactly slapped on the front page in shining lights anon. I doubt even everyone in this thread has seen it.

Do you think most people on /d/ have nothing better to do than scour threads like this with no content that interests them constantly like you? I stumbled across that strawpoll and laughed at how isolated it was. The reason it was so hilariously one sided is you guys have alienated everyone from these threads by being so incredibly anti social. Its like you guys took a huge shit everywhere, got everyone to leave and then decided to hold a vote on whether shitting everywhere is okay. Everyone who might disagree with you has either left or has better shit to do with their time than read these threads which, as stated, are cringey as fuck and dont have any content.

You seem a little out of touch anon.

>>7512710

Yet here you are

>>7512709
they certainly dont, but our discord does

but hey, we're all a bunch of circle jerks anyway right? so who cares

>>7512713
Yeah, says alot about how pathetic I am. Which says even more about the bunch of you.

>>7512710
>Nobody is using this thread anymore since you guys made it all about you,

Yes we made this discussion about why things just got banned on /d/ all about things that just got banned on /d/. How dare we.

Stop trying to play the moralist you idiot. You don't give a shit about those other twenty boards, you don't give a shit about other communities, you're just trying to look like you're arguing from a position of moral rightness.

>>7512710

>Nobody, everybody, most people.
It keeps happening

>>7512694
>/d/ communities dont matter

here we go again, honey get the camera

>>7512718
No, you made it shitposting because you all got too emotionally invested in pixels on a screen for your own good, and now you're taking it out on everyone else.

>>7512710
>like you guys took a huge shit everywhere, got everyone to leave and then decided to hold a vote on whether shitting everywhere is okay.

just fyi

you are really bad at analogies

>>7512692
i had no idea this thread even existed until exalt dropped into IRC

also fuck you guys, you got everything you deserved

>>7512721
I didn't see it on the inflation discord. You do care about our /d/ community, right?

>>7512710
The thread was always about mods deleting threads, look at the OP. People are mad their threads are banned for no reason so they discuss that. Plenty off discussion on both sides happened in those first two threads and if they missed it the sticky is and the fact that the subject says "meta thread" are two big hints.
>The reason it was so hilariously one sided is you guys have alienated everyone from these threads by being so incredibly anti social.
Both previous threads had 1000+ post with 100+ anon

>>7512716

Do you understand that you are arguing, rather feverishly so, about the validity of certain niche smut on a cambodian fetish forum?
Get off your high horse.

>>7512692
this isnt reddit shit doesnt get uplikevoted to the front page of facebook, most people dont want to deal with your autism


gb2DA

>>7512714
How does a discord chat speak for a board?
>our
You cant help yourself can you. Its so easy to spot with the reddit spacing and plurals

>>7512729
That seems like a pretty accurate description of how you guys have treated these threads to me.

You guys arent allowed your own threads anymore, so you made this one into your own by being so aggressively autismal (and responding to equally autismal trolls) in order to make everyone else leave so you guys can feel like you're still relevant for a little while longer.

Speaking of which, how long ago would you have left if people didnt keep poking the autists in this thread for a reaction?

>>7512721
>places outside of /d/ get a say on /d/
Why not ask fetlife to participate?

>>7512731
I'm not on every discord, IRC, forum, etc. Theres a lot of em anon. You should post it there.

>>7512730
Oh shit you cant read. Are you the mod

>>7512739
Scroll my nigga

>>7512735
>banned for no reason

You guys have been banned for years, its just no one bothered to enforce it because you guys had good content. When every thread became the same stale unimaginative shit, they stopped making exceptions for you. You guys got special treatment for years and it's spoilt you.

>>7512744
the only reason these meta threads were made was BECAUSE of the banned threads.

>>7512755
Either way its the mod's fault.

>>7512750
>everyone i dont like is the same person
/bdsmg/ is that you? its like i stepped into a time machine!

>>7512757
All boards are allowed 1 meta thread. It has nothing to do with you guys. You are not the reason why every board is now allowed meta threads. They have been allowed for a long time.

>>7512755
>You guys have been banned for years, its just no one bothered to enforce it because you guys had good content
That's not how it works. Despite the quality if the threads were banned they would have been gone. Mods dont just say "I dont like this any more so i'll ban it". What sense does that make

>>7512759
No ones denying that, the mods that went without enforcing the rules for so long fucked up.

But ultimately these communities shouldnt have been posting on /d/ at all, its their own fault. Personal responsibility is important. Just because you dont have a tard guard slapping you on the hands 24/7 telling you not to do something doesn't mean its okay to do it.

>>7512762
Oh shit you took my joke as reality. Is it really you mod-tan

>>7512764
>missing the point.
people use the alloted meta thread when they feel there is a problem with the board in question, and these bans are the most recent problem

>>7512755
>You guys have been banned for years, its just no one bothered to enforce it because you guys had good content.

Isn't the only reason we're getting banned because of quality? If we had GOOD quality then how could we have been banned for years? We would have been breaking no rules because our only rule we've broken was the quality control rule. You're not making sense anymore anon.

>>7512766
You guys have been arguing for the days that the mods are biased and dont enforce the rules correctly. Now you're saying thats not the case. Which is it? This could be the backpedal of the century.

>mfw they want to delete /d/ but don't have the balls do to it and instead just want to run everyone off

The cowardice of the mod team amuses me to no end.

>>7512768
>people developing communities and creating OC
Ban It
>20 futa threads featuring the same shit
As God intended

>>7512775
You were supposed to be* banned for years. The mods just didn't do it. Who knows why. Anyway the new mods are enforcing the rules the way they should be. Thats pretty much end of story.

>>7512777
And what about your backpedaling? I addressed it here. >>7512775

>CYOA, role-playing, collaborative fiction, and threads that are primarily for chatting also should not be started on /d/ or the porn imageboards in general

So in other words "We want /d/ to be a booru knockoff, stop using words you fucking heathens!"

Gotcha, fag.

>>7512768

>But ultimately these communities shouldnt have been posting on /d/ at all,
See, this I don't agree with at all. What makes these communities so utterly incompatible with /d/ in your eyes?

>>7512780
Futa is popular and if its not western then its not against the rules. We were trying to discuss the multiple threads issue for the last few threads but the autismos kept losing their shit whenever we tried to change subject.

>>7512781
>You were supposed to be* banned for years. The mods just didn't do it. Who knows why.

But you just said we weren't banned because we had good content, and now we're banned because we have shit content. YOU CAN'T SAY WHO KNOWS WHY WHEN YOU POSIT AN ACTUAL REASON YOU IDIOT

>>7512766
Woah woah woah I thought the mods were biased anon? Why has your story changed? Can you read back the minutes please Ms. Redfoal?

>>7512788
Because the main topic of discussion is the banning of threads. Read the OP of this thread and the threads before it. Youre the one trying to make this about you. /d/ was fine before mods fucked with it.

>>7512788
We've been discussing the multiple futa threads issue for years you chucklefuck. Nothing has changed. Forgive us for talking about something recent that could be changed back, rather than something that has been part of /d/ for a goddamn decade.

>>7512789
Its almost like that was fucking sarcasm, and anyone who isnt severely autistic would have been able to tell that.

Thanks for making it obvious.

>>7512788
>We were trying to discuss the multiple threads issue for the last few threads

>Hey, we have too many futa threads, what should we do?
>I know! Make more space by arbitrarily banning shit that's not against the rules!
>GENIUS!

>>7512791
They are, youre hiding behind the lie that youre doing your job. The point is that if those threads were bannable they would have been banned or moved to /trash/ a long time ago. Now we have a new mod who wants to ban shit he doesnt like by saying "its because of quality". If that wasthe case they wouldnt have been up. Mod-kun I know you cant read but this is out of control.

>>7512794
God forbid other people are allowed to have a different conversation. This is why people keep saying you're making everything about you.

>>7512802
See>>7512792

>>7512801
Unless the mods played favourites or fucked up. Are you willing to go on record right now and say that is impossible and the mods are perfect?

>>7510691
>spam /d/ with garbage
So the millions of daily futa threads aren't garbage?

>>7512802

sure you can. Most people will not follow though, because they're focussed on the recent events.

>>7512806
If we only get one meta thread then why is no one else allowed to use it but you assholes? Its not just a thread for your shit and your shit alone.

So if I make a meta thread and the OP says no discussion of banned threads you guys are just magically not allowed to post in it?

Wow you really are cunts huh.

>>7512801
>new mod
It's the same old mods it's always been, he just has to show up and show his ass every couple of months to feed his power trip.

The bad thing is that they don't even delete things that break actual rules for days on end. I see furry pictures show up and not be deleted for like 2-3 days even after I report them. There was that Nazi thread that had like 3 /d/ pics, a bunch of /h/ pics, and a shitton of /pol/ reaction images and a fucking mile of some retard talking to himself. Reported it, and guess what? They selectively deleted posts. Not all the rule-breaking posts, just -some- of them. Why not delete the thread since it was 100% off topic? Or why not at least delete every off topic post? And they didn't even ban the guy, he was off rambling about shit for another 2 fucking days before they finally got off their fucking asses and deleted the thread.

Jesus christ these fuckers make me goddamn sick.

>>7512808
Only if words are in a 10 mile radius, if they're just images they're fine no matter the quality. A child's crayon drawing of a dickgirl is just as good as a Kamitora.

>>7512807
Or maybe it was never bannable in the first place. What rules did they break besides the subjective "Q U A L I T Y" one? Because if quality is the issue why are blueberry threads still up and people can post Shad?>>7512807

>>7512809
the problem is the people who lose their shit at us whenever we try to

>>7512815
Sounds like you're making subjective judgements about what is good and what is bad anon. Seems pretty hypocritical to then accuse the mods of doing exactly what you just did.

>>7512810
If you truly cared about duplicate threads you would have made a meta thread before. Quit trying to play victim

>>7512816

>"So let's talk about things which actually matter and try to ignore the idiots until they leave. "

Try again without prefacing stuff like this.

>>7512817
Well, no reason to not point out that the mod doesn't know the meaning of the word "quality" either, really. Just proves he's still picking and choosing stuff he doesn't like instead of actually moderating to the term of quality.

>>7512817
That's the point, that subjectivity is broad. Now show me what the rule was those threads broke instead of deflecting.

>>7512814
Are we insulting artists now too? And in doing so all of their fans for liking their art?

You don't have far to go. You've nearly insulted every single person alive who isn't you.

>>7512820
Grow some thicker skin? This is 4chan not a Tumblr comments section.

>>7512824
>Are we insulting artists now too? And in doing so all of their fans for liking their art?
If by "we" you mean the mod team, yes.

>You've nearly insulted every single person alive who isn't you.
Why would I not be included?

>>7512811
There's one up now >>7512340

>>7512824

Well, yeah. 90% of all art is shitty art.

>>7512831
Comedy fucking gold. The efforts of your glorious leader mods, everyone. Can delete all kinds of on-topic shit, but can't erase one shitpost thread.

>>7512829

you are adorable

Reminder that Hiro was a mistake. m00t might not have cared about us but he never allowed shit like this to happen, and prevented mods from arbitrarily making rules up since that was beyond their station.

Third nuke when?

>>7512822
>no deflecting after just deflecting

I'll do you one better anon, I'll stop responding and you can "win" a discussion which isnt supposed to be a competition because you sperged so hard people stopped wanting to be involved. And when you inevitably act that way IRL because it works so well for you online, and everything is an argument when youre autistic after all, and in 5 years wonder why youre always alone, I hope some part of you remembers today.

I really hope you get unbanned, because if you are this invested in a Chinese Caricature site then I seriously think you might not have much else in your life. And that is depressing as fuck. Please tell me how im projecting and then five minutes later follow it up with a "haha looks like I showed them" in an argument on the internet.

Man now I look back, this whole thing is depressing as fuck. If you guys are this assmad over a certain type of porn not being allowed, how fucking sad must real life be?

>>7512842
>HAHA, YOU CARE ABOUT SOMETHING! YOU FAG!

I'd rather be depressing instead of just bending over when people aren't doing their job.

>>7512842

You don't belong here.

>>7512844
wow, you think following the rules on a website is just bending over and taking it? do you scream rape when guys look at you too?

File: wheredoyouthinkweare.jpg (145KB, 510x755px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 510x755px

>>7512842

File: 1636262.jpg (32KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x280px

>>7512842
All I did was ask you to list the rule those threads broke and the reason why they were banned. It was a simple question

>>7512842

I cant wait to see the massive assblasted rant responses to this one

>>7512853
When the rule is a phony one, yeah. Mods can't make rules. They can enforce things, but that doesn't make it an actual rule, it just means the mod is overzealous and power-tripping.

File: mfw+I+could+buy+him+as+a+slave+and+make+_a6cfd3a95b00c547fc480bcb84c6f071.jpg (54KB, 800x804px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 800x804px

>>7512844
>caring about phillipino pictographs this much

>>7512853
What rule anon?

>>7512858
>>7512861

Yep, assblasts ahoy

When are you guys going to figure out theyve been baiting you for days, at this point its just incredible

>>7512842

am I supposed to feel something?
because I'm not feeling anything.

>>7512867
Bait implies it's fake stuff for the sake of a reaction. This is real shitmodding, not fake shitmodding. Therefore, it fails to qualify as bait.

>>7512867
Again what rule was broken?

>>7512868
That sounds a lot like Autism.

>>7512867

>merly pretending!
Good for you/them.

>>7512872
GR 17 - If the mod doesn't like it, everyone else has to stop liking it too, or else he takes someone else's toys back.

Sorry, tried to type it from memory and made a big mistake.

File: LOL-I-TROLL-YOU-1.png (106KB, 555x455px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 555x455px

>>7512874
The more things change, the more they stay the same

>>7512869
Its not the mods, unless they're on discord too. Its people making fun of you guys for being so easy to ruse. Theres entire discords and ircs coordinating to try to make you guys say stupid shit.

Sorry to peel back the curtain so obviously but its been a fucking week. You guys seriously think people care? The only reason people are here is the screencaps showing how easy you guys are to bait and they smell blood.

>>7512883

So?

>>7512883
>People are easy to ruse when those in "power" are shitting in their mouths.

Wow, it took an entire discord siege to discover that nugget of wisdom?

>You guys seriously think people care?

Of course not, but what the hell else can you do when someone comes by daily, sets your house on fire every time, and the police either don't care or are in on it? Futile complaining is at least relief of some kind.

>>7512883

are you going anywhere with this?

>>7512883
>Theres entire discords and ircs coordinating to try to make you guys say stupid shit.
If thats true that is really sad. Im in a thread wondering why my alt hentai thread got deleted but at least I had something I enjoyed. Youre just dedicated to feel smarter than others by shit posting. Youre probably going to say "But WE like it" still your entire point is just to stop other people from enjoying themselves. Youre like a villain on a children's show.

>>7512889
He's trying to prove he's not alone and has friends

when did /d/ get this toxic? it use to be one of the most chill communities out there but this is /v/ levels almost.

>>7512912
When the mod decided that things were going too well for his liking.

>>7512913
I hate to be that kinda guy but does this have anything to do with summer?

Because it always seems like any place with people gets just that much shittier during summer.

>>7512918
I doubt it being summer helps, but this happens pretty much every time the mod arbitrarily decides something is suddenly against the rules, which is much less seasonal an occurance.

>>7512922
Is it monthly? Is mod-kun spraying blood out their cunt? Cause I could fap to that

>>7512982
Nah, it's been going on ever since the /aco/ split and that was October '15. Every so often the mod shows up, throws everyone into a ruckus, and leaves without doing any real modding duties.

>>7512912
about 6 months ago, but its only getting worse

>>7512912
When people waste time with this piddling little non-issue and dont instead tackle the much more insidious (and deadly) problem on the multiple 1 image request threads that invade this board daily. Thereby pushing all other threads off the board.

But noooo, lets talk about our boring captions fetish.

>>7512912
/d/ was fine until mods stuck their big noses into everything

>>7512912

When autism mod decided /aco/ was a viable reason to break quarantine and /qa/ decided to shit up the board.

Was the reason for the bans or rule that was broken ever disclosed? If not it's just looking more and more like the mod really is just power tripping.

>>7513120
Yes.

>>7513121
What was it?
>inb4 "muh quality"

>>7513124
There were multiple, but it was mainly rule 6 yeah.

>>7513130
What other rules, besides mods being selective

>>7510626
Did Futa Quest ever get moved anywhere, or did the janitor just throw a fit and nuke it?

>>7513135
I think I've seen 3, 7, 8, and /d/ 3.

>>7512755
Every thread period is the same unimaginative shit.
>vanilla pregnancy thread #10
>the umpteenth futa thread and the other half dozen
>tentacle porn
>body swap / possession number welostcount
Almost every thread here is back after it 404s and almost every thread here repeats the same content. If you want to ban stale unimaginative shit, /d/ would have a post every week at most.

>>7513139
It was on /trash/ for a while, then got nuked altogether.

>>7511199
>a font that was also technically hentai
i want this.
it'd probably look like shit, but i still want to see this made.

File: dean_facepalm.jpg (16KB, 289x313px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 289x313px

>>7513147
Well shit.

I guess I'll just move to 8-chan or something then. If the mods are gunna be shitheads whenever someone wants to make content then there isn't going to be any before too long. Lord knows /d/ was already stale.

>>7511199
How the fuck can a font be "hentai"? But no, captions are captions, and considering that you know it's a caption (but with a different font) it's clear you're just being a dick.

>>7512912
this.
i've been on this board for years, i think most of us are outcast (or at least slightly messed up) so we're usually mature enough to accept ignore the threads about fetishes we don't have.
What's going on here? Who are all these people fucking shit up and supporting this carnage? /d/ has always been a slow board, so having a thread or two about really unconventional things isn't really an issue (even if some people consider it lower than shit)
Really, /d/ doesn't need any content banned or kink closeted (hell, i'm sure most of us would be fine with loli/shota being here), mods should just be on the lookout for spam, i'm sure quality could be handled by the users themselves (either trough reports or telling people to not post deviantart-tier crap directly)

>>7513151
at worst you could move to akun, no?

>>7513152
listen to this
a font is made of images representing letters
each letter is porn.
like, the A could be a guy (or a futa) kissing a girl while getting a handjob (standing)

Consider the following: Pick a better imageboard to go to.

>>7513182
>take it to >>>/trash/
Or I guess keep being shuffled around different sections of this one imageboard where the admins hate you and /will/ exercise the control they wield over you.

>>7513174
>listen to this
>a font is made of images representing letters
>each letter is porn.
>like, the A could be a guy (or a futa) kissing a girl while getting a handjob (standing)
Just use a wingdings tier font, that would surely make the quality better!
Man that must be a bitch to read.

>>7513174
>/d/ has always been a slow board, so having a thread or two about really unconventional things isn't really an issue (even if some people consider it lower than shit)
I don't think the issue was that it was just a couple of threads, but also that it was becoming more and more acceptable to do what those threads were doing. I'd have no problem with it if it was just those threads, but I don't think it would only ever be those threads.

>>7513193
yeah, it'd probably be ugly and borderline unreadable, but the novelty amuses me.

>>7513182
like where? /d/ was nice, it was chill, some of us are hoping it might turn that way again.

>>7513184
Or maybe we just get input from Hiroshimoot? If that lazy fuck could just come in and say Yay or Nay to all this it'd end everything. Like I said, we need an administrator who'll step in, because the mods and the community are at each other's and everyone else's throats and we'll never see eye to eye.

Petition the mods.

NOBODY wants this rule except a small number of brand new mods. I mean nobody was complaining. If anything people are complaining about the new rule.

FORCE them to change it back.

>>7513233
>Petition the mods.
How do you do that?

>>7512443
Yeah, that worked so well with /tg/ on quests. Oh, wait, /tg/ is FUCKING DEAD!

>>7513232
>If only the mods would clarify why then this mess will be over!
>Mods clarify
>If only the admin would clarify when then this mess will be over!
I'm honestly intrigued in what the next step will be.
>>7513233
>NOBODY wants this rule except a small number of brand new mods. I mean nobody was complaining.
No. Maybe you didn't see anybody complaining, but you there's a good possibility that people complaining still hold to the rules, i.e. not discussing /d/ meta on /d/ (aside from one thread at most).

>>7513247
>my lack of evidence is proof enough

>>7513238
This entire ban is orchestrated by 1 person who hates this type of porn. He went on a banning spree a few months ago citing 'no rolling allowed'. /d/ fought back and eventually we all agreed that ONLY the rollable /cyoa/ was bannable. This spared all other cyoa content.

>>7513260
>>my lack of evidence is proof enough
What the fuck are you talking about? I'm not claiming anything aside from the fact that "NOBODY wants this rule except a small number of brand new mods. I mean nobody was complaining." is untrue, which I know for a fact (because I'm one of them, and I'm not a mod). The person making the original claim should provide proof.

>>7513247
Look mate. You've done nothing but try and play the moralist this entire time. You've misinterpreted posts, actively admitted to cherry-picking posts when you posted the strawpoll, pretended to give a shit about twenty other boards when someone suggested an idea that would, in FINAL, get us off /d/ forever, and a bunch of other dumbfuckery. You're on a fucking korean scrimshaw emporium, trying to pick fights about porn. WEIRD porn. The fuck are you doing with your life mate? It's friday night here, which means it's daytime where you are. WEEKDAY daytime.

Get a job mate. I'm an autistic blob of useless dumbshittery and even I went to work today. Fucking Christ.

>>7513277
I have no idea what you're talking about, I only started posting a couple of hours ago. Do you really not believe there can be more than 1 person who disagrees with you?
I'd never use strawpoll, it's terrible.

>>7513279
I believe there are multiple. But I'm really fucking afraid that there could be more than one person who argues this badly.

I mean, one fantastic spastic is just a run of the mill genetic mutation that went the wrong way. Two that act alike? Something has entered the genepool. Where's the pornstar poolboy with the chlorine because we've got a poop in the pool.

>>7513285
Yes, people who disagree with you or who have different tastes are genetically mutated. That is the most logical option.

File: tumblr_osa09oCNAw1wsygy0o1_1280.png (397KB, 640x582px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 640x582px

For the people looking for where Futa Quest has gone since being killed, there was a brief thread on >>>/trash/ but the board is much faster than /d/ and has no archive so it didnt last that long with how frequently posts were made and fell off the board. OP is thinking of moving to /i/ or something. He will probably post where he's going to put the next thread and laso has all the updates on his tumblre here: https://futaquestarchive.tumblr.com/

>>7513288
Nah, just the ones who argue as badly as you two. Frankly, the only threads I give a shit about are the erotic fiction ones. And if you faggots had've argued like normal people I'd have been swayed. Suffer a small pain to remove a great evil, because the cucked image threads and the captions were dumb as shit.

But no, you (and your friend) acted like the most outrageous cunts possible. Your false flags were pathetic and your arguments were awful. If you AREN'T brain dead, then I'm ashamed to be homo.

>>7513292
>Nah, just the ones who argue as badly as you two.
Top kek.

>And if you faggots had've argued like normal people I'd have been swayed.
I'm not going to argue "properly" with people that act like retards. I've tried that, and it's extremely exhausting and they just proceed to shit on the argument anyway.

>But no, you (and your friend)
>Still only 2 people

>Your false flags were pathetic
Toppest of keks.

There's only a VERY small number of mods who want cyoa banned simply because they don't like it. They made up the rules so they'd have an excuse. They tried this a few weeks ago and now they're just making up new excuses/rules.

>>7513269
this is my plan. Follow the rules to the letter. IF this mod doesn't care about the rules, and just wants this "porn that doesn't agree with him" off his image board then following the rules will enrage him. He'll be forced to either ban in a way that's against mod rules and get himself in trouble, make new arbitrary rules to force /cyoa/ off his board (which will expose his motives), or give up.

Now if he did make up the new rules to remove cyoa, and doesn't care about the rules themselves, then after a few weeks after he's realized the new rules didn't remove cyoa, they'll stop enforcing the new rules. After all if the rules aren't serving their hidden purpose, why go through the effort of enforcing them.

>>7513296
in the mean time, while we wait for power tripping mods to learn their purpose/role. This will at the very least keep /cyoa/ out of /trash/

>>7513296
Yes, just toe the line instead of just following what the rules mean. That's what the mod meant.

>>7513295
>. I've tried that, and it's extremely exhausting and they just proceed to shit on the argument anyway.

Funny, I could say the same thing Mr Pigeon. Please stop shitting on the chess board.

>>7513300
This is what I meant. You're already twisting my words by saying I'm shitting up the argument, even though I already said I'm not arguing and never pretended to. Good example mate, thanks.

>>7513305
Mate, this entire thread is an argument. You can try and play the ignorant innocent and pretend you don't know what is happening, and act like only one side is being belligerent motherfuckers and oh me, oh my, how could these people be so dumb and rude!

But the fact is, this is an argument. It might be a messy, aimless argument. This is also 4chan. So that's par for the course. You're in an argument bucko, and your very participation is argumentative in nature. So is mine. Stop being a bitchbaby and get over yourself. You're not a protected commodity and should not be targeted.

>>7513311
I thought you thought that I couldn't be argued with, hence the pigeon analogy? Then why continue, if you believe any post is a participation in an argument?
Either way, you're a retard.

Nothing is going to get resolved if we're all arguing with each other.

>>7513318
We're boned then, that's all you can do here obviously.

>>7513269
and there goes that thread.
for posterity

>/cyoa/ NO talking allowed! fap quietly!!
>To comply with the new rules no chatting is allowed. Do not post your builds. Do not roll. Do not ERP. Please quietly post your /cyoa/ images and say nothing.

I'm unsure which rule I broke, but I'm sure they'll make something up. Gonna keep making threads. I wonder how many times they can delete and ban with no reasons valid given before they have their mod status removed?

>>7513328
>I'm unsure which rule I broke
The no CYOA one. Read the sticky, it invites shitty ERP and the like.
>delete and ban with no reasons valid given
>>>/global/rules/9
>>>/global/rules/10

>>7513362
>you broke the rule i just made up

>>7513378
It's been there for almost 2 days. But that's just to help you understand that shitty ERP is against rule 6 I think.
Anyway, the threads are shit, and aren't allowed (which is the only important part). That's my interpretation at least.

>>7513378
Things don't need to be defined in the rules for you and the mods to know it's not allowed or welcomed.

>>7513381
Two days compared to months or years of threads
>ERP is against rule 6 I think.
Mod taste doesn't determine quality

>>7513384
That just opens the door for mods to delete shit they dont like. If its not against the rules why should it be bannable

>>7513386
>Mod taste doesn't determine quality
Well, no. The person that's evaluating something determines the quality, because it's subjective. And in this case the mods are evaluating it, so in this case he does determine the quality.

>>7513390
>hat just opens the door for mods to delete shit they dont like.
Well yeah, that's the point.

>If its not against the rules why should it be bannable
Because it's not allowed or not welcomed. In short, it's shit.
You're clearly just being a rule evading dick. You know what you're doing, and the mods most likely do too.

>>7513394
>Well yeah, that's the point
That's not the point. It's to stop spam and shit like those poop threads on /b/
>Because it's not allowed or not welcomed. In short, it's shit.
Because a mod doesn't like it doesn't determine quality. So if a mod doesn't like muscle girls is it okay to ban those threads
>You're clearly just being a rule evading dick.
What rule? All you have is "quality" which is subjective as hell and those threads weren't stopping post you like

>>7513392
That rule is there for shitpost

>>7513402
>That's not the point. It's to stop spam and shit like those poop threads on /b/
Okay, I'll believe you over what mods have said previously.

>Because a mod doesn't like it doesn't determine quality.
They're literally the people that determine if a rule is being violated or not, they're the ones that need to determine if it's quality or not.
>
>What rule?
The rules. Nothing specific. You wanting it to be more specific is the reason why it's so clear that you are a rule evading dick.

I hope that clears it up.
>>7513404
... like CYAO.

>>7513406
>Okay, I'll believe you over what mods have said previously
And what's that? That they can delete as they please
They're literally the people that determine if a rule is being violated or not, they're the ones that need to determine if it's quality or not.
They enforce the rules. They don't make shit up and delete according to their taste. So it is okay to ban futa if a mod doesn't like it.
>The rules. Nothing specific
So you're admitting no specific rule has been broken. How am I evading if I haven't broken a rule
>... like CYAO.
How is an artist creating /d/ content with anon participation shitposting

>>7513415
>And what's that?
>>7513394
>Well yeah, that's the point.
>>7513415
>They're literally the people that determine if a rule is being violated or not, they're the ones that need to determine if it's quality or not.
Thanks for agreeing with me :^)

>They don't make shit up and delete according to their taste.
That's what's required to enforce the rules though mate. Or do you think that rule 6 is objective?

>So you're admitting no specific rule has been broken.
No, that's not what that sentence means. Read the context.

>How is an artist creating /d/ content with anon participation shitposting
By it being shit.

>>7513418
>Thanks for agreeing with me :^)
I just forgot to green text. If you want to ignore the rest then be autistic
>That's what's required to enforce the rules though mate. Or do you think that rule 6 is objective?
So if a mod hates futa it's okay for them to delete it all?
>No, that's not what that sentence means. Read the context
I was asking the rule and you said "no specific one"
>By it being shit.
>creating OC is shit
wew

>>7513421
>If you want to ignore the rest then be autistic
I only ignored the really stupid shit, or the straight up obvious.

>So if a mod hates futa it's okay for them to delete it all?
No, and I never implied that it was. I didn't reply to this before because it's just trying to put words in my mouth. I'm not going argue on a false premise like that.

>I was asking the rule and you said "no specific one"
Yes. You did ask a stupid question, and I gave the best answer I could.

>>creating OC is shit
Yes, those threads only consisted of good OC, nothing else.

>>7513428
>I only ignored the really stupid shit, or the straight up obvious
If you don't have an answer just say so
>No, and I never implied that it was. I didn't reply to this before because it's just trying to put words in my mouth. I'm not going argue on a false premise like that.
What's the difference? In both scenarios it's a mod deleting shit they don't like
>Yes. You did ask a stupid question, and I gave the best answer I could.
Asking which rule isn't a dumb question
>Yes, those threads only consisted of good OC, nothing else.
So do you just want this board to be repost? OC has to come from somewhere

>>7513446
>If you don't have an answer just say so
I don't even know what questions I skipped desu.

>What's the difference?
In one it's a mod deleting shit they don't like, in the other it's not.

>Asking which rule isn't a dumb question
In this context? It is.

>So do you just want this board to be repost?
No.

>>7512912
when we let a few shitty communities in

dont worry theyll be gone soon

Wow, these threads are getting a lot quieter. Maybe some of the banned faggots finally left. Maybe in the next thread we'll be allowed to actually have normal discussions.

>>7513452
>I don't even know what questions I skipped desu
It was the futa question
>In one it's a mod deleting shit they don't like, in the other it's not.
In both situations a mod is deleting shit they don't. In one it's futa here it's the threads that got deleted. What's the difference
>In this context? It is.
How
>No.
Then you'd be fine with OC from the CYOA threads

>>7513453
>we
>>7513457
>If I ban people talking about stuff maybe they'll finally pay attention to me

>>7513453
No, outside communities have always and always will be a cancer trying to enter chans and stir up shit. These meta threads are the perfect example. You might think stuff like reddit or gaia or ebaums were just people making up boogeymen, but they really do exist (and they really are circlejerks).

>>7512618
>>7512883

>>7513461
Dude the guy you responded to is the same person who posted those two post

>>7513457
it's the early afternoon in every part of the world that matters, you daft fuck

>>7513459
>In both situations a mod is deleting shit they don't.
No it's not. You're completely misunderstanding how things work around here.

>How
I never said you were breaking rules (for this particular thing you're asking about). I said you are being a rule evading dick. You don't need to break any rules to be a rule evading dick, you can just aspire to evade the rules in general, which is what you were doing. There is no specific rule, you're asking a stupid question.

>Then you'd be fine with OC from the CYOA threads
That's not true.
>>7513463
rude desu