/d/ Meta Thread II: The Re-Shitpostening

>>7507633
Or we could just drop the topic and wait for our current batch of reddit-tier mods to get replaced.

I mean, that's what we've always done in the past when some idiot started thinking he was going to start deleting specific kinds of content on /d/.

People have sent emails to Hiro, and have gone to 4chan feedback, I don't really know what else to do. I just want my lewd cyoas man, they've got no other reliable place to call home, for what purpose are they banned.

This is really disappointing as the only reason I use 4chan anymore is for the NSFW CYOA threads

>>7507657
theres eightchan, deviantart, tumblr, /trash/, discord, or you could go make your own website. you have a lot of options.

>>7507572
>The janitors remove things reflexively and the mod(s) eventually remove a subject that gets annoyingly high amounts of reports.
Then we can prove a point by targetting whatever thread we like and getting it banned.

Lewd CYOA and EFG are some of the few threads here besides /d/rawthread that consistently get their own OC. And they indeed really don't have anywhere else to go.
Voice thread is weird, but I guess it fits the "alternative" moniker on itself, before even getting into content.
Captions... Eh. Just post them in threads appropriate to the picture. They don't need their own dedicated thread. Better still, post the unaltered pics and paste the captions in the comment section.

im glad all the shitty edit threads got banned after months of complaints

looks like the mods do listen after all

>>7507657
did anyone actually get banned for them or were they just removed? The ban stories people were saying before sounded like the caption ones. because that would at least say what rule they thought it violated

>>7507646
Like I was saying in the last one, its almost certainly the users (who change more often) spamming reports of content they don't like.
>>7507572
Other people in that thread made it clear that they would report captions if they didn't like the font, there's some pretty incredible levels of stupid at work. Mods/janitors aren't going to stop and read through a text wall to figure out if its actually shit or not, they remove it if it gets reports, if they get too many reports, they'll start nuking the threads for it

>>7507675
if all the OC is bad, or the majority of it is, thats violating rule 6 friendo. doesnt matter how much OC you have if its shit. no quality control means your threads got banned, suck it up.

>>7507657
They are alive and well right now in /trash/ anon.

>>7507675
to be fair, voice stuff isn't hentai, they probably should have expected to be removed even if its fetishy enough for the board. Captions have been removed on and off for a long time.

>>7507674
by being more autistic than them, great plan. That's how you destroy the board.

>>7507680
the mods delete shit that gets reported if its against the rules

if you file a false report you get banned

>>7507672
>eightchan
lol
>deviantart, tumblr
Maybe for finished products, but they don't work well for long-term community-assisted building. Rings CYOA has changed four devs in its almost year-long lifespan.
>discord, own website
No staying power, no visibility. All Discords eventually become massive circlejerks without new people flowing in or passing by.
>/trash/
Way too fast, and again, no visibility.

>>7507690
>I don't know how 4chan works

>>7507687
>alive and well
>and well
Hahahahahahahahaha

>>7507690
I've accidentally reported all kinds of things I shouldn't have and never gotten banned for it (though I've been warned once). Meanwhile you'll notice the very subjective quality standards that come up in this, how do you think they decide that? by people reporting it.

>>7507689

calling the mods autistic for enforcing the rules probably wont win us any favours either

we are looking to have an exception to the rules made for us due to our popularity. this isn't helping much either.

also using a name on /d/ is going to attract a lot of hate if youre not posting content and need a name for a reason.

>>7507700
I'm talking about the kids reporting other people's content, try reading posts before criticizing

>>7507692
there are dozens of independent /d/ based external communities anon and they are all pretty successful. unless you dont think they exist?

>>7507683
Show me the majority.

>>7507677
>poor grammar
>sucking mod cock
Ah, shitposter-kun is here early.

>>7507703
you should be more worried about how people interpret your posts than being argumentative. especially when they are just screencapping things to take them out of context to give you guys a worse rep than you already have.

>>7507705
Circle-fucking-jerks, anon.

>>7507687
You've obviously never lurked in /trash/ long enough to see how things are in that pit.

>>7507683
Should they ban drawthreads too? Because theres "no quality control"?

You guys could go make your own private website or discord or whatever at any time. There's nothing keeping you here. You would be successful if your community is a good community. If you guys don't think you would be successful it suggests you don't think this community of yours could exist outside of /d/, in which case its not a very strong community.

>>7507692
>lol
???

>>7507705
If jerking of the circular variety is "successful", then I'd rather be a failure.

>>7507713
There is quite a lot of quality control in the draw threads... that's why people like them. They make good stuff.

>>7507710
you just insulted a LOOOOOT of people...

>>7507717
Eightchan is incredibly stagnant. Saying it's close to the internet equivalent of a coma isn't much of a stretch, if it even is at all.

Really, I'm only interested where the /efg/ thread goes from here. I was a long time lurker and it was the only thread on here worthwhile to me.

>>7507710
>>7507718

I know a few chatrooms who would love to know that this is your opinion of them.

>>7507722
the joke is that its one of the most active other chans right now, which is more a statement of how the others have all died. 7's /b/ gets what a post every day or 2? The last few years haven't been kind of rest of the chans and all the other ones I've followed are dead.

>>7507721
Just another day on the internet then?

That's not fair, actually. Even 4channers have standards compared to other places on the internet. We aren't Anita Sarkeesians here or anything like that.

>>7507718
well shit, all of the external communities are circle jerking cunts according to you guys? really?

>>7507724
Well by all means if you have such a burning desire to go run and tattle to them about that one anon, go right ahead. It might give them a nice break from all the circle jerking.

>>7507728
Not ALL, but a good number if not a majority.

>>7507710
>>7507718

You just called a few dozen communities circle jerkers, but you are the guys who keep making meta threads to circle jerk about how oppressed you are. At least we don't take up everyone's time and shit up the board.

Pretty sure everyone on our IRC wouldn't piss on you guys if you were on fire at this point. Good job.

>>7507730
Wow. I was sympathetic to you guys until now.

If that's how you feel then fuck you.

>>7507735
Then kindly go back to your IRC, hide this thread so you can't see it, and kindly keep your mouth in a closed position.

And don't urinate on me, that's your kink not mine.

MR CRABS I HAVE AN IDEA
What if we make caption threads but instead of putting caption on the images we put the captions in our posts and include a related image?

>>7507689
>great plan
What's yours?

>>7507719
But EFG makes good stuff too, with same QC of "if it's shit, you get a ton of angry (you)s".

>>7507738
Now, now, there you go judging an entire group based on the words of a few. Give it a bit. It's late on one side of the world, most of the better anons are probably asleep.

>>7507744
The mod essentially said "If you say anything at all about the image, either by text on the image, or something in your post, you're getting banned"

else why would /efg/ be banned?

we should just post fart pictures and fat threads all day without any discussion at all, don't wanna get banned by the supreme godly mods who can't do anything wrong and are so perfect and get all the good boy points and all the tendies they could ever want cause they just can't do any wrong, EVER! :)

>>7507747
Too late anon. This is what we mean by quality control. If you had gotten rid of those guys from your community, they wouldn't be here to represent it now.

>>7507744
I have a better idea. How about we don't make an entire separate thread for them, but instead find thread where the caption is appropriate and post it there with the pic of your choice? Innovation in motion, man.

>>7507745
I just want to see what the official is on why they got rid of the cyoa ones. After that its waiting for them to change their minds, as they likely will.

Don't know if you remember any of the times they tried getting rid of the globalized fetish threads or that this isn't the first time this has happened to caption threads

>>7507716
We shouldn't have to migrate because of a mod being a crusading bag of dicks. They should answer for their idiocy, not get away with it.

>>7507757
>change their minds

That's why /bdsmg/ got unbanned. Oh wait they didn't. And even they didn't go so far as to make a massive shitstorm thread, so I wouldn't get your hopes up.

>>7507753
I mean, guys in amputee thread were once trying to talk a guy out of cutting off his fingers for an entire week, mostly in plain text without pictures, and nothing happened to them. Discussion is clearly allowed, it's just nazi mods that only want to make space for another couple of futa and fart threads.

>>7507759
you guys are pretty fucking dickish too by the sounds of it

maybe stop kinkshaming others, shitposting in other threads and calling everyone who isnt you either autistic or circlejerkers?

>>7507729
>>7507730
>>7507710
>>7507718

wew lads, you have no idea how big a mistake you just made

>>7507744
Well.... It might work. How about you give it a shot and report back? Just wait a bit so a troll or shitposter doesn't blow the whistle, DON'T call it a caption thread, and see if it gets nuked or not.

And no I'm not being sarcastic. Go try and let us know.

>>7507730
haha... oh wow

>>7507741
>go away this is our private thread
>shut your mouth you meanies

You don't just insult a huge group of people and expect them to leave you alone.

>>7507769
could you fuck off with your gay pedophile dog-fucking chatroom already?

You all fucking suck and I just want to fap with a short story to go with my dickgirl image. whoever keeps deleting the threads can eat fermented shit from a dead horse.

>>7507705
What are they?

>>7507718
at least we aren't banned, faggot

>>7507710
aaaaand there goes any chance of anyone ever giving a shit about you guys...

>>7507760
there's an explicit global rule for guro which bdsm normally gets mixed in with. They're never going to allow it on /d/... has someone been trying that recently?

This isn't even close to the same issue (disagreeing on what amounts to low quality content), they'll stop caring about this, probably fairly quick.

>>7507769
I'm sorry, I seem to have given you the impression I actually care about what a separate, insular community thinks. My mistake!

>>7507781
No one really cares what people outside of /d/ thinks fuckface

go back to r*ddit

>>7507778
I use around 6 IRC rooms. And a cursory check tells me they're all just now finding out what you guys think of them.

>>7507780
Is "faggot" really the best you can do? Hell, people use that word so many damn times it isn't even that much of an insult anymore.

>>7507778
b/d/smirc
yellowirc

those are the ones i use but theres a lot more

>>7507777
Tell ya, post them alongside pics in futa threads. Or if you made a giantess caption, post it in giantess thread. It'll be easier for everyone. Nazi mods don't have to gas as much, those who want captions have easier time finding a caption that suits their fetish, those who make captions have a better chance of getting evaluated by people who actually have the fetish. I always avoid caption threads because they're mostly futa, for example, but I'd gladly read some shorts about amputees if they were posted in the amputee thread.

>>7507793
And we're supposed to care because...? Do they hold the keys to the /d/ board? No?

Then who gives a flying, flaming fuck?

Can we at least get the cuck censorship threads perma-banned?

Spamming non-porn on a porn board and getting away with it because you write middle school tier fanfiction in which the image is mocking you for not deserving to see it uncensored is approaching the universal maximum for sheer lameness possible.

If anything those threads should be over on /sci/ so they can fucking dissect and study it like metaphysical phenomena.

At the very least, force these pathetic wastes of resources in the cuck thread, which should really, really be confined to /h/, because it's just vanilla porn 99% of the time, with one character being cheated on.

>>7507708
>>7507710
the irony of these two posts being right next to each other is delicious

>>7507754
You can't exactly get rid of people if this is an anonymous website. Who's to say it's not someone falseflagging? We don't know. Is this your first time on an imageboard?
And I don't have a stake in this. The threads I go to aren't banned. However, that doesn't mean I think these should go. Like, futa isn't my thing at all, but I wouldn't want it banned from /d/ because a few mods don't like it.

File: 1.png (231KB, 412x356px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 412x356px

>>7507799
>kinkshaming on /d/

>>7507793
They're furry IRC rooms, right? No one thinks they're important and valuable more than furries, so that's probably why you're acting like an actual 3 year old, right?

>>7507755
Except for the fact that the mod(s) delete those captions too, even if they're relevant to the thread.

so people have been calling you all whiny entitled cunts and then you insult basically everyone who might have been sympathetic to you.

good job.

>>7507806
Eh, it's gonna happen no matter where you are. You're still kinda right though.

Except Nazi threads. That's just racism hiding behind boobs.

>>7507817
I love you :)

>>7507710

I was so sure this was edited to make you guys look bad until I came to see it. Jesus you guys are just the worst kind of unlikable fucks aren't you? No wonder you got banned.

>>7507811
Now that is some bullshit we shouldn't let mods get away with.

>>7507817
I'd rather not have the sympathy of furry IRC rooms, and I doubt they had the power to help to begin with.

>>7507818
racism is someone's fetish

I'm a little bothered by the idea that they removed those threads

>>7507810
If that's what you really think then I hope you shitlords never get unbanned.

>>7507827
your r*ddit is showing kid

>>7507822
see
>>7507747

>>7507825
>hating a fetish because /b/ told you to

>>7507710
Haha. It's funny because you think we're unsuccessful and you guys don't even have a thread. And from the sounds of it you don't deserve one.

Please keep these pricks banned, mods. You're doing gods work.

>>7507710
>>7507718
>>7507692
>>7507729
yeah they weren't joking

>>7507834
>banning based only on how much you like the people in the threads
that's exactly what mods shouldn't be doing

>>7507757
>After that its waiting for them to change their minds, as they likely will.
"great plan"

>>7507832
/b/? God don't compare me to those sickos. They get off to decapitated dog threads. It made me cry.

And I don't HATE furries. Dislike yes but hate is a little too strong.

>>7507806
It's not a kink. It's fucking stupid.
Literally jerking off to being cucked by images.
Literally censoring porn to make it non-porn and then putting cliche, low-tier fanfic writing on it mocking the viewer.


That's just ridiculously stupid. Since it's censored, you could post it in a multitude of other places. Since it's not porn, it doesn't belong on /d/. Since the quality is so abysmally low, it probably shouldn't even exist in the first place.

Worst of all, it's all reused content! You pathetic fucks take images from elsewhere on /d/ and /h/ and block out the sexy bits and add text to them, so they're the same old recycled images, just made infinitely worse!

Oh, and the shitty censor jobs make it impossible to reverse image search the originals.


See? Literally every single aspect of the porn censorship threads is fucking retarded. They should be purged and their users should be literally sent to concentration camps and put to work building their own gas chambers.

File: akarin.png (191KB, 419x398px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 419x398px

>>7507842
>kinkshaming on /d/

>>7507747
man that damage control is pretty poor anon

Fuck us? Maybe fuck you guys. Enjoy being banned, assholes.

>>7507842
Hey now concentration camp for that is waaay over the line. That's like raping a guy's daughter because his dog keeps crapping in your yard.

>>7507840
the site is theirs, you're not going to do better than that. A lot of those dead other chans were made by people who thought they could do better.

>>7507845
>damage control

?

So first they get all the mods to hate them. So they shit post in other threads to get other communities to hate them. Then they get all the off-site communities to hate them.

I can't figure it out guys. I know its all part of a master plan to get unbanned but it's too complicated for me to figure it out yet.

Wow you guys seriously can't do a single thing right.

Fact: there are whole sixteen futa threads active right now. Half of them can be easily merged together,so "A thread died for this" argument is not applicable here.
Another fact: those CYOAs and stories have all the same fetishes this board and this board only allows. /b/ doesn't count because the threads die way too fast to post stuff.
And another one: writing these takes way more effort than reposting same pictures from pixiv over and over again which most threads do.

>>7507847
I hate porn censorship threads so much I think their dogs should be raped and their daughters should be forced to crap outside in the yard.

Wait. Oh no. Those fucks are so pathetic they probably already sexually assault their own dogs and they will never, ever reproduce, so we can't make their daughters crap outside.

I revise my wish, genie: I wish porn censorship cucks would get anally raped by a dog whilst taking a crap outside in their lawn.

Every.
Single.
Day.

>>7507859
take a chill pill, man

>>7507857
/d/ is literally for "d"ickgirls, so an abundance of futa is intentional.

Futa also has much wider appeal and variance than any specific fetish. It just mixes with every other fetish because futa is not a behavioral fetish, but a fetish of essential character.

>>7507859
Damn. Just....damn.

>>7507861
Futa has lower variance than captions.

>>7507863
No it doesn't.
Also, futa is common in caption threads.
Elzi threads were 90% futa conversions as well and those were the best on the board.

>One guy keeps calling everything a circle-jerk and these guys in irc chats think he represents everyone who cares about the issue

I just want cyoas back dude, they were usually good quality wise, interesting, fit /d/, and they encouraged oc. Their threads started getting deleted for no other reason then the mods don't like them, and I think that's unfair. That's literally my entire stake in this issue, and you guys are seriously stretching for reasons to see anything wrong with being pissed because threads people liked are being deleted even though they don't break any rules.

>>7507855
>mod hate
Hopefully just the one mod. It can't be ALL of them acting that stupid.

>shitpost in other threads
I was unaware of this and don't support it

>off-community hate
Again, why should I care about that?

yellowirc admin here

anybody from your communities who tries to join after today will be turned away and permanently banned. why would you guys want to join a bunch of circlejerk groups anyway, right?

>>7507859
going to point out that this is where the problem is coming from. Kids like this are spam reporting certain threads, eventually mods remove the threads rather than deal with them

'The fuck do you mean the lewd CYOAs are gone?

>>7507870
Thanks for the info~

>>7507873
a few days ago they started getting pulled down, no official explanation as far as I know

>>7507870
>trying to spin this as being solely due to the one guy who kept calling shit circlejerks

fuck off, I saw you in the last thread shitposting

>>7507861
>>7507863
Look at amputee thread. They fit everything from a few fingers to complete nuggets into one friendly thread despite the extreme difference in appeal- from determination to overcome the disability to extreme, irreversible submission respectively.

>>7507744
What if the voice thread only dubs over hentai scenes?

>>7507884
There's another idea. Just don't blatantly call it a voice thread.

>looks at current state of thread

And give it a couple of days before you start.

>>7507872
I actually don't think I've ever reported such a thread.
I vomit in my soul when I scroll past them, but I still just scroll right past them.

I used to report NTR back when it was banned on /d/ and considered /h/ content, which is still should be.

Only /d/ NTR should be on /d/. Vanilla NTR belongs on /h/, imo.

Sure, if I had mod powers I'd permaban porn censorship posters. They are literally antithetical to the fucking board. Their thread stands in opposition to everything a forum like /d/ IS. Coming into a space of porn and censoring it and fucking up so many other things because they are so broken over being worthless irl that they have to make their porn insult them as well crosses a line that guro, loli, and furry porn never, EVER did.

FART threads are better than porn censorship threads.

>>7507879
Amputee threads often have futas in them.

Bashing futa threads on a forum named after /d/ickgirls is like complaining, "There are too many threads about women here on /h/! Why isn't all the porn about female characters in one thread?!"

>>7507889
I actually have never visited the voice thread since early days of soc. Did they get banned there and moved here?

>>7507877
Yeah, no shit you saw me... because I was...? That's how seeing things works. I never said I wasn't. The thing is now everyone here agrees with me. Anyway, hope you guys fade into obscurity like you deserve.

>>7507892
k bai~

>>7507870
what if I join with a name like NotFrom4ChanAnon

>>7507856
>>7507855
>>7507846
>>7507835
>>7507834
>>7507827
>>7507822
>>7507817
>>7507793
>>7507781
>>7507780
>>7507775
>>7507771
>>7507769
>>7507766
>>7507738
>>7507735
>>7507728
>>7507724
>>7507721
>All of this shit spawned from like one or two guys

Ok sure, we all deserve this because two random assholes hurt your fee fees

>>7507890
Its the mentality, you're not the only person that's thinking that and many of them are going to be sending those in.

a lot of things on here should be on /h/, I get the feeling /h/ just bans anything slightly weird.

I'm not going to pretend to understand that fetish, which is like cuckolding in the "fetish for not having sex" thing (other than a guess its submission related). That still doesn't mean it should be removed, /d/ only works when people are civil to the other weirdos.

>>7507891
I have no clue. I just noticed they were getting knocked off the board by the hammer happy mod we've been cursed with.

>>7507892
And why do we deserve that, exactly?

>>7507892
>hopes we fade into obscurity

And I hope you choke on a cheeto.

And all of a sudden when you guys are getting unpopular a whole bunch of off-topic threads are being made on /d/, like a kind of shitty protest that was talked about all last thread.

What. A. Coincidence.

>>7507906

Funny, it looks like it only started when the non-4chan super sekrit no-anon-allowed IRC clubs showed up.

Almost like they're picking a side and the side is mods, hmmm?

>>7507906
>a whole bunch
>actually two
>could be any random asshole
>could be shitposters from this thread
>could be you
Good evidence anon

>>7507870
>Claiming to be an off-site official
>no tripcode or other way of confirming validity
>unenforceable blanket ban on anonymous people

No clue what this shit is, but if you're for real it's probably dumb.

>>7507890
>Amputee threads often have futas in them.
Just shows how making spearate threads for [insert fetish]+futa is stupid. Should thhere be a separate thread for amputee futas? No, not before they can be separated into separate nugget and handicapable threads because these are two entirely different fetishes unlike futa+something. And yet they get together better than different futa threads do, annd even agree to stay together.

>>7507914
Was wondering when somebody was going to call out that particular part of his bullshit.

>>7507897
At least if we learn nothing else from this thread, we'll have learned that IRCfriends are 100% grade A cancer.

>>7507914
You're not welcome in muh special treehouse REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>In the past week, several thread subjects, including the NSFW CYOA general

well i have infinite time on my hands now.

who do i need to spam to get these white knight janitors back into neethood?

>>7507926
>no anonymity option
Well, fuck your treehouse then, I guess.

>>7507934
It ain't janitors, its a mod who gets very triggered when someone posts captions, cyoas, or text relating to an image posted. Basically "STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE" the mod.

>>7507945

the problem isn't that mod himself, although it's a problem, that can be handled by other mods.

The problem is all the other mods have decided to back him to the hilt in some retarded THIN BLUE LINE shit instead of telling him to stop the autistic screeching and do your job without nuking that which he does not like.

>>7507868
Agreed. CYOAs are fun and different, and give a little extra personality to the same types of pictures.

it does seem very inconsistent, like someone keeps picking up and then dropping a crusade against certain types of threads. at any rate it's completely out of line with what /d/ is about and whoever is doing it needs to knock it off.

>>7507923
Welcome to 2006.

so are is the /cyoa/ on /tg/ still up we could atleast host them on some sort of image hosting site or something.

File: 1474375983099.jpg (978KB, 3500x5000px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 3500x5000px

>>7507633
>The banned content is by low quality, whether by definition or in high enough proportion to not allow it at all.
This board is flooded with low-quality content. From my POV, most of the shit in the macro/size/giantess threads is garbo. We need to have standards for content, or we'll become, first of all, a laughing stock. Some of you are fine with being ridiculous, but I for one prefer to my chicks with dicks to have some fucking class.

>The content is against existing /d/ rules, and enforcing defunct rules requires no notification.
Well, you can be efficient with things, but not people. It might be nice to create a well-thought-out sticky and spell out the rules very specifically, but a large number of people won't bother to read it. But at least a mod can delete/ban/warn with "read the fucking sticky".

>They are off-topic for /d/, and are better served on another board
Captions can include dickgirls, giantesses, tentacle monsters etc. So why would they move outta here just because they're captions? If I want to browse /d/ content, I go to /d/. Something I'm missing here? Granted, the captions I find are usually shit quality, and I filter out those threads.

>>7508000
We need mod mods. Someone like upper management who can just make an executive decision and have the mods abide by it. Problem isnt so much hey we dont wan't this in here, it's the lack of communication and that there's no real suitable place for it and moving it will just get another mod all pissy.

>>7508008
His name is Hiroshima Nagasaki Moot.

>>7508008
That wasn't actually a reply. I just clicked on a number to get the quick reply box.

>>7508011
Ritual to summon mootikins hasnt worked in quite a while.

File: 1432006358516-2.jpg (94KB, 850x647px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 850x647px

>>7507633
>>Captions, CYOAs, stories, and voice quotes are not fundamentally worse quality than any other erotic media, and should not be judged solely by their worst examples.
Well, while I do appreciate all manner of kinks showing up on this board, I also wouldn't want this board to become a welfare state for shitty content. I really think this board needs some VERY FUCKING CLEAR guidelines about what content is "high" quality vs "low" quality. If we don't have guidelines, posting here is a crapshoot. Make a strawpoll or some shit to determine what each thread type values. I don't know.

>>These media have been consistently allowed on /d/ for several months, and any radical shift in the enforcement of rules deserves some official announcement
Yeah, there seems to be a toxic environment round here. I saw at least one post saying IRCniggers aren't to be trusted. Here's the thing. We all like /d/ material or we wouldn't be here. We're all on the same fucking team, so stop acting like niggers. And no, I'm not just talking about mods.

>>The only other boards that can accommodate these topics are /b/ and /trash/, which are not suitable long-term homes for many reasons including posting speed, forced anonimity, poor board culture or undesired topics of discussion, and general obscurity.
I give you a DIRE WARNING against creating a welfare state for shitty content. If you don't have any fucking standards, why the fuck are you wasting my time with a .gif thumbnail of a dickgirl that looks like a retard drew it?

>>7508008
>We need mod mods. Someone like upper management who can just make an executive decision and have the mods abide by it. Problem isnt so much hey we dont wan't this in here, it's the lack of communication and that there's no real suitable place for it and moving it will just get another mod all pissy.
Not sure if shitpost. What you're talking about is a slippery slope. Where does it end? What you think is efficiency is really just plate-spinning complexity that makes shit more complex without improving anything. What is this, the Soviet Union? I think you can imagine a better solution than that, Anon-kun.

>>7508016
It's mootykins, newfag.

/d/ cyoa threads are about half the reason I come to /d/. Clearly other people really like them too as the threads keep getting made.

This fetish cherry picking is extra annoying in this case because most of the other fetishes that can be found on this board can be explored elsewhere, but I've never seen anything in the vain of /d/ cyoas anywhere else on the internet.

>>7508047
Hoooleee shit. If you're not from /d/ or willing to obey our customs, you can fuck the fuck off.

>>7508047
Don't worry about it.

>>7508049
>>7508050
I've been browsing /d/ regularly for over ten years and I'v never been aware of this supposed "offsite mafia". The whole incident feels very bizarre, why would people from of site care what random anons are doing and vice versa?

>>7507633
i'm a fan of the cyoa stuff, it's a lot of good art compiled together normally, with some saucy text
doesn't seem low quality to me
but i can understand the countless posts of peoples choices being low quality

>>7508064
It's on /trash/ now >>>/trash/10131153 and SFW CYOAs on /tg/ as usual.

>>7508057
All of 4chan would be better off if outside elements were removed. People from nonanonymous communities don't mix well with regular anons.

>>7508067
If they follow the rules, fine. They will adapt. But if they throw a tantrum about our customs...get the cross.

>>7508066
Something on /trash/ may as well not exist.

>>7508051
>>7508052
>>7508053
Don't worry about it.

File: o0666089810498362629.jpg (446KB, 666x898px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 666x898px

>169 replies, 37 posters
>wtf

I agree with the counterpoints, mods have shit taste in quality control.
General threads are not suited to /b/ or /trash/. I am surprised the few /trash/ generals stay as long as they do.

>>The faggots need to go back to being reddit mods.

>>7508087
Well gee, where else do you think they came from?

>>7508086
needs more cocks

>>7508090
Listen, we're all uptight ITT, but let's not create an us vs mods dynamic. Not saying they're infallible. Also, we don't know for a fact that the bad mods are from reddit.

>>7508096
Not saying *all* mods are assholes.
Just these ones who made a pretty significant change without even thinking about it.
And reddit tier mods are pretty much a meme at this point.

>>7508096
Every bad thing on 4chan comes from reddit, unless its from tumblr.

>>7508103
The list is much longer friendo.

When will the /d/ mods stop fucking up? Just when the anti-western crusade lightened up a bit, now this.

Look, it's simple: If there's a decent contingent of /d/ users who likes something, then give it 1 (one) thread. Is that too much to ask?

>>7508105
Not really, it all boils down to reddit/tumblr. At least all the gaia fags died years ago.

Pointing out origin doesn't mean attacking the cesspool.
I agree. Reaction images are more constructive.

>>7508118
The only reason outsiders post low-quality content consistently is somebody rewards them for doing it. I can't tell you how pissed I've gotten when I've pointed out an image in a thread is low quality, but everyone says "T-THEY TRIED THEIR BEST, ANON, D-DON'T BULLY". And we're not talking shit that's just not to my taste. I swear to fuck if I see one more 3d image or thumbnail or really terrible PS2-tier rendering, I will lose my shit.

File: 1321946153735.jpg (368KB, 700x1000px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 700x1000px

>>7508095
I haven't counted to see if there are more dicks here or not.

>>7508125
>3d images
report and ignore

>>7508133
>ignore

>Doesn't seem to understand my post.
>In my browser extension, it would be "hide". Not ignore. You don't ignore people on 4chan.

Are you an outsider?

CYOAs got the axe? damn they were fun, I feel that's kinda unnecessary to get rid of them, I mean they were pretty /d/ most of the time.

>>7507683
One man's shit is another man's scat fetish.

>>7507891
>I actually have never visited the voice thread since early days of soc. Did they get banned there and moved here?
No they're alive. I honestly have no idea why the voice people are up in arms about this when they have alternative threads on this site that have been running for YEARS without interruptions. Just go to FSA and MSA on /soc/. And no, they aren't more vanilla than /d/.

>>7507633
What is the fucking problem with the mods?

>>7507719
No there isn't. Last few thread have had some horrific "art" and yet they're still going. IMO they're even worse due to the same damn requests being requested for dozens of threads and never getting filled yet those autists keep making the same request.

>>7508074
Pretty much this.

>>7507690
Only if you report for illegal content. Mods only sometimes give a fuck about rulebreaking content reports.

Man, caption threads are the only reason I visit this board. It's a legitimate form of content.

>>7507890
You know what?

I never though about the porn censorship threads like that before. Like, every time I saw them I'd just think either "This is a meme fetish, surely." or "Can these guys just get off to white backgrounds with black bars on it?" and that'd be the end of that.

But now you've made me think about it, yeah they are non-porn. How is that /d/?

I don't give a hoot about the cuck aspect of it, it's just the fact that it's not even porn anymore.

Lately the CYOA quality lvl did go down. Always the same cyoa. Or even if was new, then it were very low level.
So maybe a little pause is needed.

File: 146.png (557KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1024x1024px

>>7508215
>it's just the fact that it's not even porn anymore.
Go ahead and post it on a blue board. See how long your post stays up. Protip: Not very long. It's still censored porn and explicitly against the rules.

I don't see the difference between a caption story and a caption meme image, getting rid of one means getting rid of both, and if you are willing to go that far, you may as well just shutdown the whole site.
Captions have been on 4chan since it's inception as an offshoot of SomethingAwful.
There may not have been many stories, but the memes Jack, they still existed.

I feel that the two or three mods that are forcing their beliefs on how /d/ should be run should issue a public apology and be moved to different boards or bused down to janitors.

>>7508219
So are you saying that if I go to, lets say, /k/ and make a thread of naked chicks with gun with massive black bars calling the viewer a cucked faggot covering anything remotely sexual while still showing guns that it'd get removed?

Specifically because it's porn?

I don't have the time nor the photoshop knowhow to test this mind you.

>>7508225
I have posted the image I posted just now on blue boards and gotten banned for posting censored porn.

>>7508227
Come on, you know just as well as I do that is not of the same caliber as cuck censor threads.

Anyway, this detracts from the main point, that being that cuck cencor threads are definitely not /d/ material.

File: 6pnYQUv.jpg (53KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 960x720px

>Caption and CYOA threads killed again
For fucks sake, must we really go through this cycle again and again? What is it that drives these mods to be such crusading faggots?

I want my CYOA, you can take the rest.

>>7508268
Large part of the bitching seems to result from them crusading, but not crusading actively enough. If bannable content is left alone for months, it's not surprise if people are unhappy when the crusade against it begins again, based on some overly vague and subjective reason like "quality".

Btw, any idea why /dgg/ survived this purge?

>>7508228
We have plenty of "non-porn" porn here, for example flattening and vore stuff in general.

>>7507633
The whole situation is being handled extremely poorly, why isn't any mod explaining the whole situation? Killing off 3 threads and providing zero explanation is just extremely unprofessional.

>>7507657
I went to 4chan feedback and saw that last reply from a mod was 09/07/15, but I sent feedback anyways and I suggest everyone to do the same https://www.4chan.org/feedback

/d/ is gonna just be another /h/ but with dickgirls soon, "western" art is being pushed into /aco/ as well.

>>7508128
Good now with brundlepenis

File: 1427618146460.jpg (134KB, 422x437px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 422x437px

I LITERALLY ONLY CAME TO /d/ FOR THE WEIGHT GAIN THREADS AND CYOA THREADS AND THEYVE BOTH BEEN NUKED

WHY

THIS SHIT WAS HERE FOR YEARS AND NOBODY CARED, YOU CAN'T MAKE THE ARGUMENT OF IT BEING TOO NICHE BECAUSE THERES THOUSANDS OF FLAVOURS OF FUTA CLUTTERING THE BOARD EVERY DAY

GOD JUST KILL ME I GET SHAT ON FOR THIS FETISH EVERYWHERE I GO IM NOT A FAT ACTIVIST OR FAT IN REAL LIFE I JUST WANT TO FAP

I wonder what thread they will ban next, since all 3 threads wasn't banned simultaneously. One disappeared after the other, no explanation has been given so one can only assume a mod is banning all the fetishes he doesn't like. The question is, is your fetish and favorite thread next up for the chopping block block?

>>7508291
Because mods have decided /d/ is /h/ but with dickgirls.

>>7508295
Mind control next, it's usually shitty captions anyway.

>>7507633
>This is a departure from previous moderator behavior
>>These media have been consistently allowed on /d/ for several months, and any radical shift in the enforcement of rules deserves some official announcement
Wrong, caption threads were deleted in the past as well. Just because they didn't get to it for a while, doesn't mean the policy changed. I mean, changing the policy without saying anything is one of the reasons people are pissed, right?

>>7508296
Where does weight gain goes then? Is it not alternative enough?

>>7508299
What about the voice /d/ voice thread and the weight gain thread?

>>7508299
Could you link to the last time caption theeads were wiped?

>>7508302
Inflation is already banned, look it's simple pocture you are browsing /h/ and you think man it'd be great if there were dickgirls here" then that's a threas that's allowed.

>>7508289
I'm okay with /aco/ and /d/ split being like that, ugly realistic shit on /aco/ and glorious nippon kanji-inspired paintings on /d/.

>>7508304
I'm not familiar with the history of those.
>>7508305
Yes.

>>7508307
You didn't answer my question.

>>7508314
Look it doesnt go anywhere d is h but woth dickgirls simple
>>7508311
Do et.

>>7508317
>Do et.
No, look for it yourself you lazy faggot.

>>7508320
Concession accepted bruh, was it that hard to accept you were wrong?

>>7508321
>Concession
>you were wrong
I have no idea what you're talking about, everything I said is right. You're just trying to point out something irrelevant which you can do just fine by linking something yourself.

File: 440ed15763ad9d633fb39aec4c5f6b778c8f5e5f.png (11KB, 468x60px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 468x60px

>>7508317
What's the point of [Alternative] then? Just call it plain and simple, Dickgirls. Only dickgirls are allowed. Preferrably add a separate board called Hentai/Alternative, /ha/ or something, for fatsies, amputees and all the "banned" shit.

>>7507633
But I liked NSFW CYOA generals and erotic fiction generals on /d/
;_;

Just wanted to say that the TG/Gender Bender thread was deleted too. There was a discussion about lesbian vs straight tg at the end, but I don't think that could be reason enough to do so instead of just deleting said posts.

>>7508346
and a good caption can greatly enhance the fappability of a picture

>>7508348
That fucking bastard! See, this is what I was afraid would happen. No one with the authority (or ability through hacking) is stopping this one mod from abusing his position and now it's starting to spread. If this shit keeps up, worst case scenario is the entirety of /d/ getting nuked or having so little content it might as well be.

>>7508348
There's been TG in the captions before, so it's probably some guilty by association bullshit.

Jesus, I just wanted the new sissy CYOA anon promised to make.
He had some good ideas and collected tons of fetishes. Fuck.

You know, it sucks this faggot of a mod is moving on to other targets now, but if more threads start getting removed, more people will be up in arms, and Hiro will have to get involved if it starts impacting /d/ as a whole. Maybe this faggot's powertrip is the thing we need to get everybody's threads back

>>7508348
>Just wanted to say that the TG/Gender Bender thread was deleted too.

OMG >>7505097
http://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/7499174/#7505097

Anyone want to risk a ban by making a new one and seeing what happens?

>>7508348
Okay, I didn't have a stake in this before, but now I do. That thread is one of the main reasons I come to /d/. That particular thread even had fresh content flowing through. Dammit, mods.

When this is (hopefully) all over and done with, I hope everyone who migrated to other boards because of this debacle returns to /d/. Including Elzi!

Hey as long as we're on the topic of a /d/ meta thread.

I would like to buy hentai from a site like Digiket, but they only sell to people who live in Japan. They do accept bitcoin though.

Is there anyway I could get someone to buy it for me and I give them the money?

>>7507777
thats's like a line straight out of avgn

>>7508307
why is inflation banned

>>7508436
I can imagine it's because it's mostly western garbage? Basing this on just seeing it in my periphery though.

>>7508436
>>7508307
Inflation is banned?

>>7508420
look up proxy services

>>7508268
It's just one of those things you see in real life all the time, someone gets a promotion and they immediately want to start throwing their weight around, even if it means fixing things that aren't broken. I'm sure anyone who's suffered through retail has experienced something similar.

>>7508348
Somebody posted a link to a paywalled F_TSF release, maybe he DMCA'd? The proper response should've been just removing the one post, in that case, though
For those who don't go to the TG threads, he's a writer who keeps commissioning paywalled manga and comes over here to yell at people in Japanese.

File: 1498403143499.jpg (1MB, 1190x1684px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1190x1684px

I am the person who created the second /d/voice thread and the Return of the Dorse Brigade Thread. Both broke no rules, but they were both deleted. All I asked in the voice thread was that a Mod tell me why the other one was sent to trash and why mine should be deleted. It follows the rules more so than the dgg games thread and near as much as /d/raw. The subject is having your favorite Doujinshi Alternative Hentai given voice dialogue. I don't even care for an answer as of late because it doesn't change the lack of respect Mods have for users. I even asked multiple people to tell me how /d/voice breaks the rules and the Games thread doesn't, and they couldn't tell me jack shit. Mods just delete what they want (whether it's reported) and move on. I already know the excuse Mods have been using, and they don't work. If you don't have the time to use your power to enforce the rules and only the rules (not your own), then give it to someone else who is.

>>7507884
The thread I created was called /d/voice Doujinshi Hentai Request, and both the thread I made and the one before specified in the thread that it's purpose was solely for requests of Hentai in respect to /d/

>>7508444
I'm not a mod. I can't speak for them.
But if I were to take a guess, I'd say the voice threads were deleted because the rules explicitly state this board is for the posting of images. Not vocaroo links or what have you.

If you have a voice thread and post links but include an image or post images that does not match a thread theme, then you're probably obfuscating the fact that you made the thread for the expressed explicit reason to post voice clips. I mean, that's what the threads say they're for? Sharing voice clips and such?

>>7508447
Requests belong in /r/, unless they are worksafe requests. Regardless of the content of the request.

Weirdo autists trying to control my porn. They get triggered by autistic stuff like font and box sizes, while low quality and western art that doesn't trigger their autism gets a pass.

>>7508348
/d/ moderation has been overtaken by a clique of weirdo autist trannies who have really weird hang ups about porn and sexuality. They get triggered and then justify with discord/irc co-ordinated astro turfing in these threads. Crazy shit, but what else can autist and tranny mods do with their free time?

But why kill the writethreads?

>>7507633
>forced anonimity
>bad
Woah woah woah I agree with the rest you said but that is a positive. Namefags need to fuck of.

>>7508458
Names are good for exactly one thing, knowing you're talking to the same person, which would help for requests and OC.

>>7508456
Once again, just guessing, probably the same reason as the voice threads got axed.

Also, despite everything, complaining about the rules and moderation is still against the rules. The moderators enforce what the rules state and are. Not what hiroyuki says in a single post. Despite what he believes, the moderators in the end are going to elect whether or not to ban you, unless it's the admin. But most of the time it's going to be a mod and the mods enforce the rules and policy. Unless Hiroyuki told the mods to layoff (he didn't) then it's entirely possible for this thread to get axed and any or all of its posters banned.

>>7508450
This entire site is for the posting of images. I may be wrong, but it doesn't change much about what mods do. I always thought that the threads are to discuss anything the images are about. dgg /d/ games is not about images, but about games. Even if the games include images, the thread doesn't even post images or even talk about games, whether complain about developers and be random. /d/raw is a thread dedicated to Fanart. /d/ voice is in the middle. It is more relevant than gaming because the focus isn't just the voices, but creating dialogue /turning you favorite Alternative Hentai's into audiobooks and even though /d/raw is entirely withing the realm of drawing, it breaks one of the categories main rules directly. That still doesn't explain why the Dorse thread was deleted. Mods are just deleting and trashing what they personally find distasteful.

>>7508468
There are definitely places on this site where images are only needed to start a thread, and it's not punished to posted an unrelated image just to discuss something. /d/ is different though, so this (my) comment is pretty useless in this context. Not him btw.

>>7508468
>I always thought that the threads are to discuss anything the images are about. dgg /d/ games is not about images, but about games. Even if the games include images, the thread doesn't even post images or even talk about games, whether complain about developers and be random.
And you'd be mostly accurate. There are some boards that are more geared towards the discussion side than the image side. Obviously this is a more image posting related board, whereas boards about specific hobbies and interests tend to lead towards more towards discussion, but other boards jump between the two.

>That still doesn't explain why the Dorse thread was deleted.

You're right. It doesn't. I'm honestly as confused as you about that one. I'm wracking my brain here to find something. It's alternative. It's not like the original content isn't eastern in origin or the fetish itself which comes from a pixiv artist from japan if memory serves. So I have no idea. Deleted in error? Perhaps someone made a mistake? If it happens again I'd want some clarification for sure because to me, that seems really hard to find a reason justifying it and I'm TRYING hard here.

The ONLY thing I could possibly guess would be if it had an inordinate amount of reposts. But that seems unlikely.

File: 3b730e29f758146af465f679f463db0ed6f804809aa3bd89224ed8ec4b481794.jpg (177KB, 700x929px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 700x929px

>>7507633
I'm makign a Dorse thread right now and I'm inviting everyone who hates the Mods to be apart of it to show your disdain for how this site is being handled.
>>7508479

>>7508480
I honestly don't hate the mods nor do I enjoy dorses but there's no reason why your thread should be removed and if I had any content I'd willingly share it with you.

>>7508444
>Both broke no rules
:^)

>>7508480
Just so you know, that thread is against the rules I think. Complaining about moderation is still against the rules, even on /d/, regardless of what you post next to it.
I'm merely discussing /d/ in /d/'s meta thread.

File: 200_s.gif (23KB, 294x200px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 294x200px

>>7508482
Honestly, I'd be happy just having that comment on the Dorse thread, because it did hurt having two threads I looked forward to being in one day get deleted for no reason.

>When you're a mod of a hentai board

>>7508498
At the risk of semantics:
Mods are global.

File: 0003.jpg (257KB, 1057x1500px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1057x1500px

>>7507799
>those threads should be over on /sci/ so they can fucking dissect and study it like metaphysical phenomena
>implying /sci/ studies
The only worthwhile thing /sci/'s ever done is write their sticky.

Well, since it probably won't get deleted here, might as well
For all those former /e f g/ posters currently adrift, everyone seems to be regrouping at the /trash writethread

>>7508505
That's not something I'd do. Mods'll just say "See, they feel nice in a trashcan, why would we let them out of it?".

>/d/ Caption thread banned
>/d/ Voice thread banned
>/d/ CYOA thread banned
So up until now people could speculate that the mods where banning these threads because they didn't consider them porn or there was "too much text" or they thought it was low quality content or insert whatever excuse here.

>Weight gain thread banned
>Inflation thread banned
>Queen's Stallion / Dorse thread banned
Now this is odd, these threads have nothing to do with too much text, these are hentai pictures and by definition they are porn, the pictures posted are drawn by hentai artists and not random anons and are of "high quality" (although I would argue that the deleted content was also of high quality). What excuses are left?

Let's face it, some mod has decided he don't like some of /d/'s fetishes and decided to abuse his powers and ban everything he dislikes with /d/. What other logical explanation is there left?

File: 1470416787030.jpg (508KB, 1064x1500px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1064x1500px

>>7508420
buyfag.moe

>>7508512
Genderbender/TG also banned, see: >>7508348

>>7508512

>Weight gain thread banned
>Inflation thread banned

The first three you listed make some sense.

These do not. I am honestly confused by this decision. As I said before, if I try really, REALLY hard to find a justification, the best I can come up with is, "Maybe they had a lot of reposts?"

>>7508512
>the pictures posted are drawn by hentai artists and not random anons and are of "high quality"
I disagree. Which means mods can disagree, which means they can be against the rules depending on if the mods find them high quality enough or not.
Besides, they invite shitty western artists as well.

>>7508517
the queen's horse thing was invented by some Japanese artist whose name I forget.

>>7508519
k?

>>7508512
It's a mod outright abusing their power to force the board to only display and post content that they like, users be damned.

>>7508521
Vast majority of it is not western.

I'm saying this as someone who doesn't like it. It doesn't seem to be breaking any rules.

>>7508513
Is it really banned? That thread ended up having plenty of stuff that might have caused a random mod who stumbled upon it to simply delete it with stuff like F_TSF dropping by and people talking about a western artist getting banned from deviant art.
I wouldn't assume that gender bender is banned just yet.

>>7508524
>Vast majority of it is not western.
k?

>I'm saying this as someone who doesn't like it. It doesn't seem to be breaking any rules.
And you're basing this on only the things you said? Because then you're uninformed. I'm not even sure they banned though.
>>7508512
>>Weight gain thread banned
>>Inflation thread banned
>>Queen's Stallion / Dorse thread banned
I don't even see any of these in the archives, and the ones I do see aren't deleted.

>>7508505
I made the mistake of trying to follow the last two /d/ caption threads and the C&D thread to /trash/ when they went there. That is not a mistake I will ever make again.

>>7508529
>And you're basing this on only the things you said? Because then you're uninformed.
What rules do you think it's violating?

>>7508531
I'm not going to repeat something I said less than 10 minutes ago you lazy fuck.

>>7508514
some mod is being a twat, deleting shit he doesn't like and/or trolling the userbase. there's your explanation.

>>7508532
But we kinda established that most of it seems to be not western. Don't visit the threads, so I can't comment. But if it's mostly japanese/eastern stuff, how is saying "it invites western content" accurate when just about any other fetish gets more western content then this particular one does?

>>7507765
Well, light discussion might be allowed, but any sort of story crafting clearly isn't.

>>7508537
>But we kinda established that most of it seems to be not western.
No we didn't. We only talked about one of the three.

>But if it's mostly japanese/eastern stuff, how is saying "it invites western content" accurate when just about any other fetish gets more western content then this particular one does?
I'm fairly sure most inflation/weight gain content is drawn by western people. Besides, it doesn't matter how much is drawn by people, only how much is posted.
Also, why are you focusing so much on a sidenote?

>>7507859
Hey, Anon.

Did you ever consider that, instead of letting your day get ruined by a thread you don't like, you could just filter the thread?

>>7508511
Have the mods ever backed down on something like this before? No, they haven't, so it doesn't really matter

>>7508538
Why is the mod promoting a war against literature, literacy, and reading?

File: proof.png (3KB, 545x28px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 545x28px

>>7508529
>I don't even see any of these in the archives
The TG thread isn't in there, though.
>>7499174

>>7508549
I didn't talk about the TG thread, and it most definitely is in the archive. Pretty spectacular to be wrong 2 times in a 7 word sentence.

>>7508544
>No we didn't. We only talked about one of the three.

>>7508529

>Vast majority of it is not western.
>k?

>>7508544

>Also, why are you focusing so much on a sidenote?
In this instance, the detail is:
"Does this thread violate the rules?"
I'm not convinced - unless you visit these threads and can tell me how much is posted that is western or not?

>>7508553
>>Vast majority of it is not western.
This "it" refers to Dorse, i.e. one of the three and not what I originally talked about.

>In this instance, the detail is:
>"Does this thread violate the rules?"
>I'm not convinced - unless you visit these threads and can tell me how much is posted that is western or not?
There are more rules than just "no western" you dip.

>>7508554
>There are more rules than just "no western" you dip.
I routinely see shit art in threads I DO visit and I can't say shit because people whine about how there's a lack of content or they feel bad criticizing shit artists.

>>7508205
Yo literally same. Mods ruin everything. Why do I even bother coming to this shitty site anymore.

>>7508548
I have no fucking clue. They probably just don't understand that erotica is one of the the highest forms of pornography and thus is going to be a major interest of people who visit a board catering to what is considered "extreme fetishes" on a site full of extreme fetishists.

>>7508555
>and I can't say shit because people whine about how there's a lack of content or they feel bad criticizing shit artists.
Well that's just wrong. If you really feel it's such low quality, you should just report it because clearly you think it's breaking the rules then. And if you don't want to do that, you can still call it shit in the thread. Those two reasons are terrible reasons not to call out sub-par art.

>>7508556
>Why do I even bother coming to this shitty site anymore.
I don't know, why don't you fucking leave if you hate it here?

>had to migrate to /d/ from /tg/ for erotic fiction
>now /d/ is banning it

Yo what the fuck.

>>7508556
>>7508561
Remember, this is what the mod is trying to do with their actions. Get people to leave. Do not, or you will be rewarding their behavior.

>>7508560
One person making a report will not get a post removed.

One person calling out bad art is going to get people reporting you for disrupting the discussion or trolling and they might just have a point about the former. And since the majority of people will defend it, you're more likely to get reported by multiple people and banned. Shit sucks, but, sometimes you have to go with the flow.

>>7508564
Sounds to me like you never bothered either solution. You don't get fucking banned for being mean.

>>7508561
Habits are hard to break my dude. Been coming to this site since 2009. Slowly seen all my favorite boards go to hell due to mod jackassery.

File: uwot.png (90KB, 894x727px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 894x727px

>>7508552
But it isn't in the archives. The two hits on the ctrl-f are from /tg/ at the top and bottom of the page, and using your eyes shows that it's not there.
Also, I knew that you didn't mention TG, but I don't fap to inflation, weight gain, or dorses so I didn't have a tab open to provide proof that the mods have been deleting _those_ popular and entrenched threads outright.

>>7508563
Yes, just be an obnoxious asshole for everybody else!
>>7508568
In that case it shouldn't be a surprise that caption threads aren't allowed.

>>7508567
>You don't get fucking banned for being mean.

I was once banned for saying romance in video games is for fags.

>>7508571
Unfortunately, from the packed threads dedicated to how your actions are pissing people off, you are actually the obnoxious asshole in this scenario.

>>7508569
http://desuarchive.org/d/thread/7499174/
Of course deleted threads aren't going to be in the official archive, but who seriously uses that especially for seeing moderation behaviour?

>Also, I knew that you didn't mention TG, but I don't fap to inflation, weight gain, or dorses so I didn't have a tab open to provide proof that the mods have been deleting _those_ popular and entrenched threads outright.
They don't seem to be in the archive at all though, as if they were never created. I was basically saying he was false-flagging and that those generals never existed and thus weren't banned.

>>7508572
That's not really being mean, that's just posting unsubstantial shit, i.e. low quality bait.

>>7507777
This, I need to fap to a story/situation, not just a picture.

>>7507633
These are the /d/ rules:
>"Alternative" images including: futanari, bondage, tentacles, etc. are welcome. Caveats below.
>Images depicting bestiality, guro, scat, or generally seen to be "extreme" in nature are not to be uploaded.
>Western drawn/styled ("toon") pictures and fan drawn ("fanart") images are not allowed.

Nowhere do I see mentioned that written porn, either in a caption or a whole story, is not allowed.

>>7508562
Welcome to the wonderful world of a mod with a grudge, dog.

>>7508574
I have no idea what you're talking about. Are you saying that I'm being obnoxious for posting in one thread? Because I'd consider making a bunch of threads that keep getting deleted is more obnoxious. I'm just discussing the topic of this thread.

>>7508562
The writefaggotry thread in /aco/ got nuked too. This whole thing is coming off as some weird anti-intellectual crusade.

>>7508577
>Nowhere do I see mentioned that written porn, either in a caption or a whole story, is not allowed.
Because it's not specifically that that's not allowed.

>>7508576
It wasn't trolling nor was it unsubstantial. Honest opinion about a topic it was brought up in.

Suffice to say:
"That wasn't a nice thing to say so I banned you."

Oh look the thread is still all about a few groups making everything about them. What a surprise.

Lets start a different topic. Is there too much Futa on this board or is just supply and demand?

>>7508579
I'm not "talking" about anything. Complaining about moderation is against the rules, after all. But using your own definition of an obnoxious asshole, the mysterious person you're defending (who of course is not connected to you at all) is being much more disruptive than any individual in this thread.

>>7508581
And honestly the whole quality argument falls to the wayside when you consider we're on a fucking image board. Who goes here for curated content?
>>7508589
Wot
Nice sliding faggot

New Gender bender/TG thread is up.
>>7508585
Let's see what happens...

>>7508584
No, I completely disagree. The way you said it, the fact that it's only 5 words, the fact that you used basically a standard sentence without thought, all these facts together make it seem low quality. That it lines up with your opinion is irrelevant, it just means that your opinion (at least that small part of your opinion) is not enough.

>>7508590
Oh okay, you're just calling me a mod. That's fucking retarded.

File: Sad_Sanguinius.jpg (34KB, 198x328px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 198x328px

>>7508578
>>7508581
It's a sad time for write smut lovers.

>>7508591
>Who goes here for curated content?
I do. I don't expect the best of the best, but I expect not-shit, or "high quality" content.

>>7508594
>No, I completely disagree.
So did I. The mod however disagreed with both of us when I brought it to him.

>The way you said it, the fact that it's only 5 words, the fact that you used basically a standard sentence without thought
Brevity is the soul of wit. Being terse is not the same as giving something little thought.

>>7508589
FUCK YOU NO ONE CARES ABOUT THAT

OUR THREADS GOT BANNED FOR NO REASON SO FUCK OFF UNTIL WE GET ANSWERS

>>7508589
>Is there too much Futa on this board
Yes

>>7508598
>The mod however disagreed with both of us when I brought it to him.
No he didn't, because clearly he banned you and clearly that means he's agreeing with me. Unless you lied or held back vital information or something.

>Brevity is the soul of wit. Being terse is not the same as giving something little thought.
Sure, that's not what I said though. If you quote me out of context that might be what think I said, but the part you didn't quote is essential here.

>>7508597
I should specify, since I come here over, say, /r/genderotica and its endless fucking stream of self-promoted captions- I come here for content that the userbase defines as high-quality, not what the mods do. People flame bad content and save the good stuff, which makes it so that over time the threads are generally good. Mods coming in and being sole arbiters of taste are a fucking mistake, since there's like twenty of them against hundreds of anons.

File: image.gif (891KB, 325x252px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 325x252px

So I've been lurking pretty much everywhere but /efg/ for a while, which is the only place I posted. I am not an artist, but I am a writer, and people seemed to genuinely enjoy the content and quality of what was provided.

To those saying "leave and go somewhere else" there isn't anywhere else, not that will give the same level of actually helpful critical feedback while still allowing the author (in this case me) to post anonymously.

Yes, like any medium, there will be shitty content producers, and decent ones, but judging all of us by a few handfuls of third grade english is just damaging something that has been a pleasant little corner on the board since I started lurking here in '05.....

(And yes, we do still post images, because why write something without a cover?)

>>7508596
Really feeling the Black Rage right now.

>>7508608
>Mods coming in and being sole arbiters of taste are a fucking mistake, since there's like twenty of them against hundreds of anons.
It's not like they act completely alone.

>>7508606
>No he didn't, because clearly he banned you and clearly that means he's agreeing with me.

I took the ban to IRC because it was so gobsmockingly stupid. Sure enough, his reply was that it was too mean.

>>7508614
Sure.

File: 1493058755053.png (431KB, 640x478px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 640x478px

>>7508611
Seconded.

>>7508603
What makes you think so? Those threads seem to get a lot of content to fill them out.

>>7508599
>>7508591
Glad to see nothing's changed from the last thread. You guys deserve everything you got.

>>7508610
Why can't /tg/ go back to being "The only board you'll ever need"

I missed those times.

>>7508596
>>7508611
>>7508620
This is cringey as fuck guys.

>>7508618
Not lying anon, sorry. Caught a ban for saying romance in games is for fags.

Something that really doesn't break any rules. It's no stretch to think that if you're disrupting a thread and being the only person who is complaining about content and everyone else in the thread reports you, that you might catch a ban that way too.

>>7508629
>Not lying anon, sorry.
Sure.

>>7508629
Why don't you show us a screencap of your ban report then?

>>7507782
>BDSM is Guro

Is this guy geniunely retarded?

They got banned for being a shitty community who caused trouble. That's it.

>>7508633
Glad we've come to an agreement on this. Now you understand why throwing a shitfit over a thread with shitty art is a bad idea?

>>7508628
Where do you think we are?

Like holy shit.

>>7508637
Clearly I was being sarcastic. No way anybody is going to believe this shit just because you're saying it.

>>7508634
Why would I still have that after however many years?

>>7508642
Making up a lie like this wouldn't benefit me.

>>7508644
Because it's an incredibly silly situation? Because there's no reason to delete a 1MB~ .png? Because you thought you were banned for wrong reasons? I have a ban screenshot from like 6 years ago.
>>7508647
It's literally your only argument, yes it would benefit you.

File: perturbed bird.jpg (614KB, 1296x2619px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 1296x2619px

>/d/orse dorse dorse

I checked both desuarchive and loveisover just in case there was an outage that caused something to slip through the cracks on either one of them and searched the following terms in OP post: /d/orse, dorse, stallion (for queen's stallion), and brigade (since you said the thread name was Return of the Dorse Brigade).
http://desuarchive.org/d/thread/7383849/#7383849
http://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/7383849/#q7383849

In case anyone can't be arsed to click that, that thread is 63 days old, there have been no other recent dorse threads except the one they just made. It was not deleted and in fact enjoyed a healthy conversation spanning 300+ posts before falling off the board.

>>7508444
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3hTwsvJV_A

>>7507680
>Other people in that thread made it clear that they would report captions if they didn't like the font
That's the kind of community involvement and quality control that kept the Captions Threads alive for years without being banned.
>>7507757
>I want an official statement, then I'm going to wait to be unbanned, just a matter of time.
You haven't been arrested by the police, you got banned from a website. There's no money involved, you haven't actually lost anything. You don't own the 1's and 0's you put into this site. They don't need to give you a reason. I can't think of any other banned community that got unbanned after a public shaming like this one, and if you guys keep spamming in the meta threads, I can't imagine they'll even listen to you.
>>7507782
>bdsm gets mixed in with guro
You should probably clarify what you mean here dude, because people think you mean that there is some tendency to cross over between BDSM and Guro, or you think BDSM and Guro are somehow linked. If that's what you actually think, you're going to have a whole other problem on your hands.

>bans CYOA, Caption threads, etc
>doesn't ban WYR and Globalised Fetish threads

>>7508644
hello new friend, i'll be sure to take everything you say seriously now you've demonstrated how long you've been here

>>7508648
>Because it's an incredibly silly situation?
Indeed, but I didn't think it was something I'd ever need to prove to anyone.

>It's literally your only argument
It's literally not.

There's no reason to disrupt a perfectly good thread when you see it a thread with offending material. This is why you can be banned for announcing reports. The moderators wanted to encourage people to report and move on, not to bitch about something violating the rules. It's actively discouraged, and, if you look at the rule about bitching about the rules, you could easily argue that whining about posts that violate the rules is in fact, bitching about the quality of moderation. Which is against the rules.

File: ev_nat_20_05.jpg (170KB, 1152x720px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1152x720px

>>7508654
Now's the time to do all those things you said you'd do, clear out whatever backlogs you have, be the you you knew you always could be.

>>7508641
In a thread that is being heavily scrutinized and in which people are looking for any excuse to ridicule.

>>7508656
Have you noticed that there's a key difference between those two anon?

CYOA Posts massive images covered in text with tiny images. Caption threads cover images in text.

WYR and Globalized fetish threads post images on their own with no text, and post the text in the post itself. But they still post images.

They keep the thread on the imageboard about images, and the images are on-topic and board related.

>>7508659
>Indeed, but I didn't think it was something I'd ever need to prove to anyone.
You literally needed to go and prove it to a mod.

>It's literally not.
It literally was. Sure, if you add a new argument it isn't, but that still means it was your only argument, thus you would benefit from making it up.

You're a fucking idiot, and I'm not going to argue with you. Your new argument seems better, but arguing with a goalpost moving lying asshole is incredibly exhausting and I don't want to do that.

>>7508659
>The moderators wanted to encourage people to report and move on, not to bitch about something violating the rules.

This entire thread is bitching about the mods violating the rules.

>>7508668
>But they still post images.
Except of course when they don't.

>>7508655
>You don't own the 1's and 0's you put into this site.
Well, technically he does.
>Comments are owned by the Poster.
Just saying.

>>7508671
>You literally needed to go and prove it to a mod.
The mod can look up the ban easily.

>You're a fucking idiot, and I'm not going to argue with you. Your new argument seems better, but arguing with a goalpost moving lying asshole is incredibly exhausting and I don't want to do that.

You can't prove me wrong and won't and are now resorting to petty whining and insults. You lost

>>7508624
I think the problem with futa content is that it worms itself into topics that have nothing to do with it.
Ideally, you should only encounter futa when going to a futa dedicated thread. Muscle girls, gfd, large breasts, these are not the venues to flood with dickgirls, even if the dickgirls in question might be muscled, dominant or busty.

>>7508676
Can you show us an example of when they don't?

Also, even if they post a couple of images that are /d/ related, that's more than threads which post few or none.

>>7508668

Got it, lets ban all things that have text on pictures then, including manga and whatnot.

File: 1402181390842.jpg (464KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 600x600px

>>7508677
>I own data on the internet on a private website.