So I'd argue that season 19 is less about SJWs and more about the facade and hypocrisy people build up to seem like better people.
>PCP has very PC opinions but is willing to violent and disturbing things to protect them.
>Instead of improving the situation for Kenny's family, the town thinks it's more important to disguise the area they live in as a hipster paradise.
>The people decide charity is less important than blocking out internet trolls.
>Everyone supports a non-existent gay romance without ever listening to the boys denial.
>Instead of helping the homeless the town just kicks them out.
Pretty much. Purely making fun of SJWs is fun and all, but they're merely a symptom of the real issue. If it's not SJWs of today that's doing it, it'll be another group that'll repeat the same mistake all over again in the future.
>>Instead of improving the situation for Kenny's family, the town thinks it's more important to disguise the area they live in as a hipster paradise.
That's not the point of gentrification. The point is to get the land; pricing out the poor people living there is just a side effect.
>hypocrisy people build up to seem like better people
Sounds like the same type of California liberalism they've been mocking since season 1, and of which SJWs are a derivative of.
Right, but you can be hypocrite that sees yourself as a good person while being an asshole and NOT be a SJW.
Like the people in the past that wanted to ban violent video games. They said they were doing it to protect people but really it's just a form of bullying to make you feel like a
big guyfor forcing people to do something you want.
I should marathon the whole season at some point, last time i did that was the Black Friday trilogy.
Yeah fuck South Park.
If you're whole moral is "Look at how hypocritical these people are" then go fuck yourself. Congratulations on pointing out the obvious. Within every ideology, including docuhebag libertarianism which the SP creators are a big fan of, there is hypocrisy. People preach one thing, then do another. That's human fucking nature. Just because some people within an ideology doesn't mean that the principals are invalid.
This whole SJW thing just highlights how shallow South Parks politics are. Instead of actually attacking an ideology they'll snipe the sins of the individuals. 19 fucking seasons of "political satire" and they haven't said shit about anything. Lazy fuckwads.
>Yeah fuck South Park.
>If you're (>you're) whole moral is "Look at how hypocritical these people are" then go fuck yourself. Congratulations on pointing out the obvious.
>Within every ideology, including docuhebag libertarianism which the SP creators are a big fan of, there is hypocrisy.
>People preach one thing, then do another. That's human fucking nature. Just because some people within an ideology doesn't mean that the principals are invalid.
>This whole SJW thing just highlights how shallow South Parks politics are. Instead of actually attacking an ideology they'll snipe the sins of the individuals. 19 fucking seasons of "political satire" and they haven't said shit about anything. Lazy fuckwads.
I quoted the parts of your post that show how you're an asstender SJW
Oh whoops it was the whole thing.
Matt and Trey fucking HATE elitists, which is why they mock both conservatives and liberals all the time. SJWs are pretty much the most annoying elitists outside of 4chan, and they're getting bigger, so of course they're a prime target for Matt and Trey this time around.
>Dat scene with the mayor missing her dead husband
>Dat scene of Barbrady getting fired and confronting his dying dog
Fuck sake Matt and Trey you made me tear up like a bitch this season. Tonight ep better not have an emotional scene where it shows how Jimmy does struggle with life with his disability, because I don't think I can handle bawwing like bitch three times this season.
Anyone who assumes someone is a SJW for not wanting to talk about SJWs all the time (not even OP's point, he's just saying South Park's message this season is attacking a category broader than just SJW) is, quite simply, a faggot of the highest caliber. Not everyone is as obsessed as you.
>you know me
>I like to help
What good does it do when history's revised with every cultural shift? If the mistakes of history aren't considered mistakes anymore, then people will be glad to repeat them.
It would surely have to be a parody, a not-anita if you will. If they went all out they'd be labelled misogyny apologists by our lovely friends over at tumblr. Even after they went as far as to placate them with pedophilic homoerotic pandering.
Only tards, young people and long time fans are watching SP any more. Tumblr covers two of those three criteria.
Sounds like a fruitless risk.
There is no stopping it. History has repeated itself cause higher powers want to keep control of the population. Only way for it to end is if everyone actually agreed on how the world should be ran and we've been taught that its wrong. You may think that you're better than SJWs but you're not. Both sides are just giving more power to the people that abuse it for personal gain
>You may think that you're better than SJWs but you're not. Both sides are just giving more power to the people that abuse it for personal gain
But anon...that makes me have to entertain the idea that perhaps my side might not be perfect even though they disagree with SJWs! You must be an SJW, that's it!
>You may think that you're better than SJWs but you're not.
>"Male University of York Student Commits Suicide on Day His University Ditches International Men’s Day After Pressure From Feminists"
I miss them too. The show worked better when it wasn't just flavor of the month political satire more episodes like finding out Cartman's father I miss him /co/
>and NOT be a SJW
>Like the people in the past that wanted to ban violent video games
You mean the past's exact equivalent of SJWs, before they were called that? There's basically a straight line running from medieval puritanism through Victorian-era moral crusders, prohibitionists and soccer moms to present day SJWs - People who hate anybody else having fun and doing or saying things they consider offensive.
The good news is, even after periods of having things their way they always lose, because most of humanity enjoys having fun.
You know why Sarkessian got to go to the UN to speak on whatever bullshit she spewed? Because of the attention she get. You know what kind of attention she get? More negative than positive. You can act like they're better but you're giving them as much power as any tumblrina
>Everyone supports a non-existent gay romance
>non-existent gay romance
As South Park's official tumblr said "Are you sure?"
You don't get it man, it ain't feminazis that thrive in the dark its the people that take advantage of feminazis and meninists anger, stupidity, and naivety to make them famous. But people on here will continue have an attitude like this>>77556649 and let this shit continue.
just saw sponsored content....
WE ARE FUCKING SKYNET NOW! It's so obvious now. The entire season is about humanity being warped by technology moving faster then we can handle it. also caitlin jenner is a murder we get it matt and trey
Feminists' methods are unsuound and evil. The more people are forced to confront the reality of feminism, the stronger the backlash, ultimately leading to growing realization of what all statism is, defeating those who want to take advantage of our empathy for parasites.
>keep feeding them hate so they can get stronger
Not the anon you're replying to, but I'm not convinced that's in any way the case. In fact, it seems to me like the louder they get the more people get sick of their shit and stop pandering to them. It doesn't help their cause that they find fault with literally everything and are impossible to please. That's why creative people are quickly realizing they're not a good consumer base and that if they give them an inch they take a mile.
They aren't ever going to get "stronger" because while they might find popularity on the fringes, in society at large (where people have to do things like jobs and get along with people of different opinions and ideas) these people are a laughingstock. Most adults with responsibilities just shake their heads at their pathetic first world problems. They're mainly comprised of school and college aged kids who will grow out of it when they actually have to face reality. Not everyone can make a living off being a professional victim, the Anitas of the world have that gig sewn up pretty tight.
Once again feminist don't matter. The "they" I was referring to was the Anitas of the world. You are right that people laugh off feminazis and meninist but I'm just saying that they (the profiteers) get more powerful off of it and make profit. I understand no one wants put blame on themselves for bad shit but these people are getting profit and fame from hate. Zoe Quinn is getting a fucking movie based on a fucking book made cause of the hatred that people including myself spread. Nothing will ever change cause idiots will fall for the same scapegoats they put out.
No I like that they're beating people over the head with it
I'm trans so I appreciate her message but it's important to remember that she's also retarded, a bigot, an idiot, and that she killed that woman. Almost literally nobody is talking about it.
>tfw I just finished the new episode
FYI this is nothing but spoilers
They went deeper into SJW than I thought they would, addressing the fact that SJWs are largely useful idiots for businesses and other organisations that would benefit from media censorship and control of narratives The fact that the PC frat was largely filled with self interested bros who wanted to use the veneer of PC to crush pussy accurately reflects the wave of white knights and those seeking to improve their image by virtue signalling. PC Principal represents the core of the movement that genuinely believes in the cause and wants to try and do good, albeit through flawed methods. His belief in the movement blinds him to the control being exerted by the aforementioned groups seeking to change society for their own ends, just like how the passionate believers in real life are blind to how they're being used.
This season is fucking great, not only is it one of the funniest seasons to date, but its also on point with the central message.
They always could have. They had to ok all the voice work, since they were doing it. They just didn't want to trample all over the creative process of making a video game because they didn't know shit about it.
>SJWs are largely useful idiots for businesses and other organisations that would benefit from media censorship and control of narratives
Bullshit. A retarded group complaining on tumblr doesnt force censorship on anything. And Im not seeing how these groups benefit from their agenda. Even if censorship is achieved, does it align with what they want censored? Not seeing how retarded shit like forced minority characters helps fill any wallets.
Tweet x Craig was legitimately moving. For whatever reason, the idea of Wendy watching yaoi is cute.
>Haven't watched in years
>Not sure if Maryo's husband was a character previously introduced
>Think he'll show up in the background of the show
>"These aren't tears, i-it's j-just r-raining..."
Also the Canadian episode's usage of Safety Dance felt like it was going to lead up to a full on boss battle. Although slightly disappointed that Buddy-Trump didn't get more screentime, I think Matt and Trey are waiting for IRL Trump to do something spectacular and to resolve the current PC arc.
Honestly, as story and plot, this season is pretty hype.
SJWs are pro censorship, once you make censorship acceptable you can begin to expand it.
All you have to do to make something untouchable is put on some SJW window dressing and suddenly all the critics apparently hate women and minorities, allowing them to be safely ignored.
Thats a pretty vague and non-sensical answer.
The only thing I see is media trying to forcibly push progressiveness in their stuff with the support of sjws so more consumers will flock to it but that also pushes others away so I dont see how they end up making a shit ton of dosh. Nor have I seen any major pandering to tumblrinas as of yet.
You know she got laughed out because what they proposed was done with no facts and a lot of misrepresentation and she set feminism back with that on a pretty hilarious scale. I guess sometimes the best action is inaction letting stupid dumb fucks shoot themselves in the foot.
Basicly they pander to these groups because they are steadily gaining traction and they fear being called bigoted for not catering to their whims. They don't want the majority's first impression of them to be a negative one. Saddly only a few creative people have decided to stand their ground and tell them to fuck off.
It's not about increasing revenue as much as it's about stopping it from dwindling.
The really scary thing is how powerful they are getting, The fact that the head of a campus can get canned for people running in front of his moving car is kinda fucked up. (Though granted, let's face it, it would not have gained nearly as much traction with the school administration the football team did not decide to strike.)
They rely on screaming the most and acting retarded to gather sympathy, they are literally parasites in their dynamics.
Although an impressive amount of self delusionment helps too, see the following.
are you kidding me
remember when when gay marriage was legalized and all of a sudden everything from oreos to google had a rainbow flag on their logos and packaging
every time there an earthquake in japan or its 9/11s anniversary company love tweet out our prayer go out to such and such a cause
they try to use moral highground in their marketing.
you think campbells gives about gays? they just do this because it will create alot of buzz by being pc and provocative
being talked about on a talkshow is the kinda stuff their aiming for, its free nation wide publicity
I often view SJW's as facists, because if it's exactly not their brand of morals and way of living, then you are unintelligent swine that must be destroyed.
I see lot's of advocating for intolerance, peir preasure, vandalism and even violence promoted by supposed peaceful Liberals.
Kenny's family kind of hit close to home for me, because I grew upin the shitty mexican parts of Santa Monica and it was a shitty place, but then all of a sudden, rich white hipsters started moving in and those of us that didn't get priced out and moved are now the servant caste of poor that live shoulder to shoulder with rich and better off people , working as their food services and house keeping staff.
That bit where kenny saved up his pay to buy his little sister a doll...I was not ready for thise feels
Also, in Santa Monica, we have 10 dollar cupcakes and Milk Shakes...
>CIA operatives reverse engineering Minecraft.jpg
But the fact that these people was able to get this powerful is the problem. We can make all the excuses all we want but everyone who made all the hate threads and contributed to it are part of the problem.
>Not seeing how retarded shit like forced minority characters helps fill any wallets.
You dont see it because you are probably one of those faggots.
If there wasnt any money to make you would think no one would lose their time trying to force cultural marxism
Too be fair they are fist sized cupcakes, and they say they are organic, gluten free and have no nuts, but it still should not cost that much, znd really it tastes the same as your local super market bakery cupcakes with the thick ass sugary frosting.
so im not the only poor kid that relates to kenny episodes
that dss episode reminded me of a friend that got put in a foster home. unless your young you almost have no chance of being adopted and the homes are really no worse than their real homes.
>All you have to do to make something untouchable is put on some SJW window dressing and suddenly all the critics apparently hate women and minorities, allowing them to be safely ignored.
This shit right here. I fucking hate this more than the people who actually believe it, the people who hide behind it and use it to deflect all reasonable criticism, even criticism completely unrelated to politics like the fact someone's art and writing are fucking shit.
>So I'd argue that season 19 is less about SJWs and more about the facade and hypocrisy people build up to seem like better people.
... so you're arguing that it's about sjws, then?
>hypocrisy people build up to seem like better people
It's about people who don't necessarily agree with the PC mentality about everything, but don't want to do anything about it because the real SJWs have such a black and white view of morality; either you're perfect (agreeing with them all the way on everything) or you're a scumbag, misogynist, etc. (anyone who dares disagree with them). Watch the bar scene from the first episode, most of them don't believe what they're saying but they're afraid to admit it.
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Misogynist fighting articles highlighted off the shoulder of Jezebel. I watched trigger warnings glitter in the feed on the Huffington Post. All those news stories will be lost in time, like ads... on a YouTube steam.
Time to die.
Yeah, I like it too. Fuck Jenner. He was a terrible person as man, and a killer that was never punished. Just because she says she's a woman now doesn't mean that goes away - she's still a terrible person just now with a vagina.
Also I am not convinced this is all not some horrible ruse to get the charges dropped. That's how much a shitty person Jenner is.
The right and left alternate every ten years.
In ten years time we'll be bitching about the Moral Majority/Religious Right/whatever it is they are called when the right take over and overreach culturally again
Yeah this Emperor's New clothes kind of situation worked for them with modern art and now it's working for them in games and toons
>fill an art gallery with buttholes
>someone says buttholes can't be art
>"no you stupid troglodyte you don't understand, this pushes the boundaries of art"
>someone buys it for $10,000 because they don't want to be called a troglodyte who doesn't understand art and wants to fit in
>as a result more and more modern art becomes similar stuff to low effort pictures of buttholes
I'm not making the butthole thing up by the way, that actually happened and sold
In spite of feminists easily being the biggest driving force of the PC movement, the most bold faced of the liars and hypocrites, and the strictest of the thought police, even south park is too afraid to speak anything against them.
Instead they have to just aim all their insults and jokes at "PC people" as a general, nameless group to, rather ironically, keep their show PC by avoiding offending women.
yeah it's crazy how 4chan gloat about south park treatment of SJW when the exact thing could be said about gamergates (execpt that nobody outside here cared at all).
>what you think video game make people violent and sexist, that crazy!
>let me explain why by sending you death threat, beating up simulation and insults.
>There are people who know, but they have to stay very hidden.
Is she talking about anonymous?
I believe you. I'm a security guard at a gallery, and OMG, you won't believe the levels of pretentious shit that is in there and one painting is indeed just poo smeared on a canvas.
>Buttholes and literal shit are praised as quality art
>Cartoons are still just for kids
Someone needs to fracture those buttholes
Found it for you, fellas.
>mine visage when modern art galleries are now filled with assholes not only metaphorically, but also factually
How did you feel when PC Principle got BTFO by Jimmy?
No, they don't make fun of feminsts because these PC cunts have appropriated the word. Actual feminists are not online bitching about vidya, they're out in Africa or Asia providing maternal care or manning the damn abortion boat.
PC cunts is exactly the right term. Besides, they have a whole world of neckbeard m'ladies to back them up.
>stupid ugly necckbeards all support feminism
>no it's stupid ugly neckbeards that are against feminism!
I really wish people would stop using buzzwords after they've come to lose all meaning.
Or better yet, if the world became collectively smart enough to just never use them in the first place, since they hardly had much "meaning" to begin with.
Besides, the PC brigade also turns on any feminist who DARES to speak against what they spout.
Are you a feminist who doesn't buy any of Anita's nonsense/speaks against trannies who game the system/etc,? Congrats! The PC brigade deems you a hereti..er I mean MRA in diguise!
It's hilarious when the people who use that term to insult anyone who speaks against feminism/SJW nonsense turn out to be EXACTLY what they are.
ie. Basement dwelling neckbeards calling people who disagree with them basement dwelling neckbeards.
So then it's just American feminists that are poisoning the movement or is that too much of a blanket statement? The only other place I can think of that has a problem similar to this is Sweden.
I'm gonna put like this:
Guys Want Pussy
They will try everything to get their dick wet and lose all self-worth and pride just for a chance to get laid
Nerds are desperate mother fuckers. They don't care about the winning side, they just wanna be on the side of easier chance for Sex
Oh god Matt & Tray, please do what I think you're doing
Please BTFO everyone on either side of this retarded imaginary conflict of agendas by pointing out that they're just fucking sheeple who can't do any better than throw around buzzwords they heard from whoever pushed their respective agenda on them
I'm so fucking tired of muh safe space of not being harassed by meanies vs muh safe space of saying whatever the fuck I want without having to consider the consequences
It's like watching monkeys fling shit at each other, thinking their shit is any different just because it's flying in the other direction
There are stupid people everywhere. Trying to declare "everyone from THIS country is a moron that's ruining everything but if you're from THIS country you're smart and awesome" is retarded /pol/ and /int/ levels of shitposting
Just remember. Nothing lasts forever.
Look at Peter Popoff. He's the Anita Sarkeesian of Christianity. He was a pretty popular faith healer. Had wide TV coverage and everything. But one day, his web of lies was discovered and tangled by one James Randi.
Or what about Mother Teresa? Yes, it took until AFTER she died for people to discover that she was not the saint that the media build her up to be, but like I said. Nothing lasts forever.
Not comparable in the slightest. Anitas lies are already plainly visible for anyone to view at their leisure. It just doesn't matter because anyone who mentions them get's labeled a misogynist and has all of their points completely ignored. Christians have no such level of protection. Nobody has the level of social protection women have.
To think, the only reason why only now people are more daring to condemn SJW shenanigans on campus schools everywhere is because of the Paris Massacre. They cried that they're not getting the attention that they deserve. (See the Mizzou incident)
Nerds with no fucking self respect disgust me.
God damn have some worth in yourself, and don't bend over backwards for the slim change of getting your dick wet.
Especially when those chicks you are trying to win over don't see you as anything more than useful fools to be exploited.
There is no shame in simply just disregarding women, focusing on your passions, and dealing with sexual urges via good old fashioned fapping.
Some feminists may not be bad people, but their choice to align themselves with an inherently female-centric movement (it has the suffix for "female" right in the name) instead of any of the many movements that seek actual equality for people of both genders betrays their true biased nature.
But even then, it doesn't change that +90% of feminists are still happily a part of the PC movement.
Not necessarily wanting pussy. Some have deep seated self loathing in that they'll defend a woman and self flagellate themselves to "atone for their sins". See also: Tatsuya Ishida of Sinfest.
>Matt and Trey arent afraid of offending Muslims with depictions of Muhammad.
>But they are afraid of offending Anita and feminists.
Personally I don't think it's a national thing.
I think it's a race thing. Which is why whenever a feminist talks about how they still need feminism their only worthwhile examples of problems are from brown countries.
Although I guess with Europe in general and the UK in particular it probably helps you guys that you had queens and Margret Thatcher to kind of show that hey! Women can be shit leaders too.
>So I'd argue that season 19 is less about SJWs and more about the facade and hypocrisy people build up to seem like better people.
I would argue its about making fun of everyone, but SJW's present the loudest, most obnoxious subjects and they make easy punching bags.
A bit like it was a cop out. They had something similar way earlier on with Big Gay Al telling people not to support forcing to let gays be in scouts. It's another "I cant believe someone i support would be against my ideals".
Having someone they view as an oppressed minority tell them they dont share their beliefs was too easy to go for i thought. I was hoping for a more creative spin on something that would make him crack.
Wasn't Jenner pretty outspoken against gay marriage in the past? It's weird that people are acting as if she's some sort of saint now, so I have to admit I find the ridiculous portrayal in SP kinda funny. It's not like SP hasn't done this before.
Also will the season end with reddit realizing its an ad?
It doesn't matter. They've been caught harassing themselves with fake accounts (or having their supporters do it for them) and nobody cares. If you try to bring it up they just pull the "You're a misogynist!" card and it's over, nobody will pay you any more attention or look at any proof of their lies, and instead just continue listening to them ramble on about victimization and harassment and blah blah blah.
>Having a serious debate about politics on a cartoon image board
This is ridiculous.
Why are SJWs so gay and hate themselves?
At least /pol/ is fun and has good memes, but fuck anyone who takes this shit seriously.
This new internet thing where people think every internet flame war is a dramatic political issue is embarassing as fuck. What is wrong with our generation how will we ever be able to cope with real problems?
Keep makin good shit, Matt & Trey.
>All you have to do to make something untouchable is put on some SJW window dressing and suddenly all the critics apparently hate women and minorities, allowing them to be safely ignored.
This. Look at how the defense of the upcoming Ghostbusters movie is set up. Fan4stic tried to do it too for a second but couldn't mount a defense because it was just that bad.
Look, SJWs are beyond retarded and I hate dealing with them in /aco/.
But /pol/ has the shittiest memes and isn't terribly funny. Really its only fun when something crazy is happening, like the Jamar Clark threads earlier.
Didn't they have tons of articles with OH YOU NERDS WILL SEE IT ANYWAYS?
And now there's an all women Ocean's 11 in the works. It's just lame pandering as a way to dress up reboots and sequels.
This is an ANIME WEBSITE. We do not cater to thin-skinned libtards from /co/ and /aco/. You are guests, behave as such.
>Thats a pretty vague and non-sensical answer.
Not that anon but I can give a concrete example of the idea of shit stirring making money. It's called Dragon's Crown.
It's a side scrolling beatemup similar to DnD, with a character that's a sorceress with gigantic tits. It was on a platform I didn't own and wasn't paying attention to.
Except like a butterfly flapping its huge fleshy chest wings, that sorceress caused enough of a storm on the internet that for a while I was hearing about the game every freaking day. So eventually I had to seek out a copy and see what the big deal is. Between the game and the console to play it on, that was a couple hundred dollars I spent.
Shit was stirred, and it made money. On the other side of the equation there were people going "This game is offensive donate to my kickstarter and I'll make a video detailing why!". Which made even more money.
This is basically all just war profiteering on a much smaller and pettier scale.
If Brianna Wu (another one of those Anita-likes but with a tranny) and Shanely Kane (a more aggressive Anita of the tech industry) are any indication, then the only ones who'll cause their downfall are themselves.
Hell, Anita herself lost some credibility during E32015 regarding what she said about the new DOOM and Fallout 4.
So basically, you're gonna meet some assholes in your life and the best thing to do is not give them the time of day to spew their bullshit then. Cause they don't seem like the kind of folks that actually want to talk so much as the kind that just want to yell, about pretty much anything for any reason.
Post yfw Caitlin Jenner is now literally a hero out to save the world from the ads.
Holy shit you should check out some of the threads some time. People are tossing around allegations of racism and sexism like you wouldn't believe. It's definitely gotten better, but it was obnoxious as fuck for quite some time.
>vs muh safe space of saying whatever the fuck I want without having to consider the consequences
Reminder that you are literally only able to make this statement on 4chan and not many other places on the Internet without facing consequences yourself
You're a hypocrite anon, you're a monkey flinging shit at BOTH sides and thinking your shit doesn't stink at all
Harass herself on twitter until she gets an audience with the president himself (or god forbid, herself) to write a bunch of new laws about how all men must have their internet usage monitored at all times by a feminist approved anti-harassment officer who can have them arrested for rape at any time for any current or possible future instances of misogyny.
Her complaint was on Linkle's looks and her "cutesy name". Someone wake me up when someone's daughter gets named Aborted Fetus Sandpaper Genitals, which is the least cute arrangement of words I could come up with.
>I'm not making the butthole thing up by the way, that actually happened and sold
What kills me is that Hyrule Warriors is a game with a huge fucking cast, most of which are awesome women. You think she'd talk about how great it is to play as fan favorite characters like Impa or Ruto.
But no, she's saying that Linkle is somehow a bad character. Knows nothing about her personality or mannerisms, but she's just worthless.
Sometimes I think these people won't be happy until women are not featured in video games.
>PC Principle is a human from the future sent back to the present prevent the Rise of the Ads
>He is Butters and his Canadian girlfriend's future son
>Traveling to the past distorted his memories and allowed him to be used by the ads.
>Seeing him with Leslie awakened his memories and reminded him of his mission
>He and Catlin Jenner are integral to prevent the horrible future that awaits not just South Park but the whole world.
I think the reason they chose Caitlin Jenner is because of the PC crowd,
she's the only one who'll turn around and go "hey that was pretty funny".
Didn't Diaz throw a hissyfit saying Nintendo owed him money for the idea of Linkle?
I like that they're portraying him as being someone who genuinely seems to want to do good for the world while being woefully ignorant about everything as well.
What kills me is faggots who argue over whether a game is sexist. Its just a fucking game if you dont like it dont play it but dont ruin other peoples fun acting like a crybaby ass bitchmade faggot ass bitch
Nah, he critiqued Nintendo's design on Linkle saying "what do I know, it's not like I've ever designed Zelda characters", which he technically didn't. he just drew boobs on Link.
Technically he didn't even do that. He drew fanart of a game where you played as Zelda, and Link was a prince.
He shut up about it after some whining, since everyone was calling him out.
>Entire season is going to end up being an ad for Fractured But Whole
You know am I think person who wishes nintendo had played it a little less safe and just used a different cast in a different section of the universe. It would have been nice to see different areas of the world. I feel like genderbent link just lets them reuse assets rather than creating something new.
Also she's pretty much just the Elf from dragon's crown.
The fact that she's pretty much the elf from dragon's crown kinda goes against the idea that she's just genderbent link, no? I mean, that's literally what the feminist uproar is about. They hate that their female Link isn't literally Link wearing a sports bra.
This, she's just waifu/fap bait for their musou spin off game. She wasnt designed to appeal to some PC agenda or champion a new age for the series. That game is filled with dumb shit like that which will likely never see the light of day in a mainline Zelda game.
Oh then I guess that doesn't matter much but it still feels lazy.
Not really. The elf is kind of generic elf chick which linkle is as well. I mean there are some differences but the look is almost the same.
I just said that the elf is generic. The only thing notable is that she's the most recent character with the look in a long time.
Which is the problem with linkle for me. Is just that she's generic.
I'm just using the terminology he used as a means to point out that Linkle being "literally x character" goes against the notion of her being "female Link" which is what has the feminazi's panties all wadded up.
Being generic is fine with me, after all that's basically what her entire inception and reason for being came from.
They're always riled up. They're also pushing the "female Link" shit even though it's been stated that she's her own separate character.
They share the same features because it's a generic look. DC was about archtypes. Which is weird that every character has something striking about themselves except the elf.
I feel like Link look would be as generic as linkle's if other copycats tried to drive the look into the ground but for some reason that never became the look of a generic elf.
He couldn't even use nice ones.
Yeah, there's not even that many things similar, just the use of a hood, braided hair, and absolute territory.
Elf is supposed to be small, lithe and graceful. You're supposed to recognize characters instantly by their silhouettes and stances, just like in Team Fortress 2.
Granted she can get lost in the action easier, but its a smart design overall.
A) She got to speak at the UN for Women, or whatever its called.
B) the report they presented was dismissed and essentially laughed out for being woefully out of date and using incorrect statistics.
I really don't think it will happen, but I'd love an Anita joke in SP. Although that would also validate her, I suppose.
>tfw there was a heavily promoted "Who's Afraid of Feminism?" seminar at my college with heavy use of this human joke's "research"
I guess I'm afraid of it now, if this guff is what they think it means.
The NAMBLA episode includes a line about how gays have equal rights and now it's time for pedophiles to get the same.
Gays didn't even have equal rights at the time but this is exactly what happened once they got it...
Americans do have this way of taking ideas and ratcheting them up to stupid extremes so they polarize everyone. Atheism and feminism are both prime examples - both have been mainstream moderate positions in Europe for decades, but once America got their hands on them the terms became poisoned by association with insane extremists.
While there are no "real" conseuquences here outside of the occasional warnings and bans, calling or even implying 4chan a safe space is hilariously naive.
By definition, no one is going to call you a raging autist that needs to get the fuck out in a safe space. We do that shit on average once every thirty seconds. Here, you WILL be exposed to ideas that you disagree with, and be told to kindly gobble a dozen dicks if you have a problem with it.
So yeah, we're a shithole too, but that's still slightly better.
the relation is 2:1 or 3:1 or something to that effect, but it doesn't really matter since the characters are all fun to play (except zant)
>You can't use the subweapon radial in multiplayer
Calling out Fractured But Whole will play out.
>Play the game as a White Douchebag
>your main quest is infiltrate the PC frat house
>level is hard mode.
>play as a PoC Douchebag
>all the frat bros just leave you alone.
and your dick is just a vagina morphed in the womb
>A lot of Japanese games are being heavily censored in the West now because women in revealing clothing "sends the wrong message".
No, no, no. Youre lying. You must be lying. Japanese vidya is all we have left. Based developers like kojimbo or kamiya wouldnt do as in like that no matter how much american tumblrinas complain. People over there dont care. Stop saying such things man, you had me worried.
What if PC Principle isn't an ad?
What if he's an
Ad blocker? Why else does he tell leslie to shut up?
By "a lot of japanese games" he means "the two /v/ has been shitposting about non-stop"
By "heavily censored" he means they removed a boob slider in one game and some costumes in another.
The "sends the wrong message" thing is a total fabrication that happens to fit his internal narrative.
This is a South Park thread. Be anti-bullshit like South Park. Don't be Cartman and don't be PC principal.
Thats just one game right? It wont spread. Yeah, it wont.
Were doomed, arent we?
>neither should be acceptable
In what context? By whom? To what end? What action should be taken and by whom?
"X shouldn't be acceptable" isn't a meaningful statement.
Either man up and suggest what you want done or sit back down.
Is it really that hard to understand?
The games should be released with all of the same content and features that existed in the original japanese release, just in english. Removing features for the sake of pushing an agenda should not happen
Well, pray tell me why should removing costumes and getting rid of the boob sliders be acceptable? They don't add anything, but they don't detract from the game either. They're options, and having lots of options are great.
They also got rid of the religious and philosophical themes that were in the previous game, for what reason?
This is especially strange given how Bayonetta 2 is uncensored and untouched.
I have to admit if this season which has been full of calling out politically correct bullshit ends with some message about how ads are dumb it'll be a little bit of an anticlimax
I hope they relate the ad stuff back to social justice
>Is it really that hard to understand
It is when you simply make blanket statements and refuse to back them up.
>The games should be released with all of the same content and features that existed in the original japanese release, just in english.
Why? Why is that so necessary and important? How far should we go to ensure this? Should we protest? Make a law? Or are you just blustering to make yourself feel good?
>Removing features for the sake of pushing an agenda should not happen
You haven't established that that's the reason behind the removals (and honestly, that's retarded, it's adapting the product to the west's market), and even if you had "it shouldn't happen" isn't a meaningful statement.
>why should it be acceptable
Because it hurts no one, most likely helps the product, and it's their product to do with as they wish. The argument that they shouldn't be allowed to change things in localization is much more difficult, and completely unsupported by anything you people say.
Yes, having lots of options is nice, but also totally irrelevant to this conversation.
>They also got rid of the religious and philosophical themes that were in the previous game, for what reason?
Why does the reason even matter?
>This is especially strange given how Bayonetta 2 is uncensored and untouched.
This does not follow.
Remember when everyone flipped the finger to ebaumsworld by stealing content from independent artists? Now thats literally facebook or any social media because people stopped giving a shit. History repeats itself, if you stop caring about censorship it progresses until the next generation call for our shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BijChf8ROJU it has been not even 10 years holy hell
Fractured But Whole isn't coming out before S20 starts though
It's a bit premature to be advertising it when there isn't anything more than the initial teaser trailer that has been released. Compare that to how much promotion SOT had by the time the black friday trilogy happened
You never gave a good reason why the changes are acceptable except "because it is, now shut up".
Hell, even saying "because the west isn't ready for it" would have been acceptable. (even though there are boob sliders in western games these days too.)
>You never gave a good reason why the changes are acceptable
That they own the product and it's theirs to do with as they wish isn't a good enough reason?
Are you advocating for a law preventing self-censorship or are you just retarded?
The purpose of translating a game is to TRANSLATE it, not APPROPRIATE it. There is a very important difference. Customers want to be able to play the same game that the japanese play, not something which has been butchered and adjusted to what market research said white people would like better. Why do you think people make fun of Phoenix Wright being set in Los Angeles despite all of the traditional japanese looking locations? This isn't exclusive to sexual and religious stuff nor is it a new issue, it's changes in general to the original material which the audience for these games have long been vocal about not wanting
You haven't made an actual argument, you're just saying 'you're wrong' without supporting that claim
Why are you blindly supporting them though? Do you believe that them changing things in the game whether it's removing features or rewriting dialogue to omit its original meaning is a GOOD thing?
>The purpose of translating a game is to TRANSLATE it, not APPROPRIATE it.
It's called localization, not translation. A whole lot more than simple translation goes into the process.
The localizers/publishers making these changes clearly disagree. Their beliefs on the market, true or otherwise, are guiding their decisions and absolutely nothing about that is "unacceptable."
You're saying you're arguing that these things aren't right or acceptable, but all you're actually saying is that you don't like it. That's fine, but it's not the same as saying it shouldn't be allowed.
Just because something CAN be done, doesn't mean it SHOULD be done
Do you not understand this? It's not about censorship, it's about creating a better end product
Unacceptable doesn't mean 'shouldn't be allowed', it means 'shouldn't be done'
I'm totally ambivalent. It's their product and if they feel they need to alter it for other markets I genuinely could not care less. The idea that I should be angry that I miss out on a boob slider and a costume is ridiculous.
Unacceptable means it cannot be accepted. The reason it by itself is meaningless is because you're not saying by whom.
>it's not about censorship
Could've fooled me with the 10 shit threads a day that start with CENSORSHIP IN GAMES
>I genuinely could not care less
So why the fuck are you responding at all? You are autistically caught up on the semantics of the word 'unacceptable' as if uttering it triggered your beliefs in freedom of speech or some shit, and to prove your 'point' you're blindly supporting something which you claim to not care any less about
Just stop posting
I wonder how you felt when Midway removed the blood from the SNES version of MK because of what Nintendo wanted?
Let's just say when MK2 came out, they changed their mind and let Midway have the blood.
>So why the fuck are you responding at all?
To try to gain insight on why you people are shitting all over /v/ every day. To try to maybe evolve your argument a bit so it has some substance instead of being you angrily crying.
>I wonder how you felt when Midway removed the blood from the SNES version of MK because of what Nintendo wanted?
It seemed silly to me but I sure wasn't angry about it.
In fact, the concept of being angry about something like that is so foreign to me I genuinely cannot understand what kind of person would. It's just not something to get angry about.
I mean, you're seriously saying I should've been angry over a red sprite being changed to a grey sprite.
This may be news to you but I have never spoken about this on /v/ before and have nothing to do with the people you apparently have an agenda against
I believe companies can be misguided in what they believe their customers want. I am not saying they should be revoked of their right as the owner of the game to remove or modify content when releasing it in the west, I'm just saying they're fucking idiots who are out of touch with their audience
There you go, champ, you did it! You coherently made your opinion clear and reasonable without resorting to stupid statements like "it shouldn't be allowed"!
Now was that so hard?
>The reason it by itself is meaningless is because you're not saying by whom.
Is english not your first language?
The person using the word 'unacceptable' is the one who it's unacceptable to, you retard
How the fuck were you so caught up on such basic comprehension?
This thread is giving me the giggles. Seems this season hit a little bit too close to home for OP and a few other people in this thread, and they're now trying to internalize and twist that criticism so it isn't about them.
Sorry lads, safe spaces, politically correct, trannies... it's all about shitting on SJWs.
That's simply not true, anon. "This is unacceptable" can mean anything ranging from "I don't like it" to "This needs to be illegal yesterday." In the former context the "whom" is indeed just the speaker but in the latter the speaker is implying it is unacceptable to society, who he claims to speak for.
But we're getting off topic. Just be mindful of your diction in the future, buddy.
It's funny to see the different responses. From those who are militant it's "South Park was never relevant and it's just going too far, it used to punch up!" and then there's "The theme of south park is very vague this season, I don't know what they're trying to say" like the people who thought "The first episode is about Tom Brady!" Then there's the Livid Liquids.
>and then there's "The theme of south park is very vague this season, I don't know what they're trying to say"
No fucking way. Has to be satire or something.
>PC Principal saves everything, talks about how he was being misguided by corporations
>Kyle steps in a tries to finish his speech
What's going to happen to PC principal?
Will be be killed off?
Will be become a good guy and make a heroic sacrifice?
Will he stay around as a toned down version of himself, just without the principal title?
Or what if, if he really is an ad, his real name IS PC Principal since he was engineered to fit that role and cannot do anything else?
I'd give you some credibility if you weren't so obviously defending yourself because I attacked your agenda of choice rather than even entertaining the thought that you're just being manipulated and fulfilling someone's narrative.
Shit like gamergate is the exact same bullshit as what SJW's are doing - people's good intentions serving a "greater good" of pushing someone's political agenda, with all kinds of bells and whistles like vague promises of "freedom of speech" or "ethics" to keep the little agenda warriors going.
I'm more than sure that people like TB or Milo Yiannopolis have good intentions and really believe it's about ethics, don't get me wrong. The problem is that collectively, a great majority of gamergate is exactly what they hate to be called - a reactionary movement. A "movement" of young adults and teenagers who have never actually read up on "freedom of speech" and mostly don't even realize that there are very specific agreed upon exceptions to "freedom of speech", but are willing to fight anyone who tries to tell them what they can and cannot do if anyone at all presents it to them as an existing, viable option - that is, of course, without them realizing that they're defending "freedom of speech" the agenda-serving buzzword, not "freedom of speech" the actual ideological construct.
>a reactionary movement
I never understood why people see this as pejorative, especially those who use it against right-wing stuff.
Wasn't progress meant to be good by their standards? Wasn't it a great thing to go against the status quo? A bit intellectually dishonest.
> A reactionary is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which possessed characteristics (discipline, respect for authority, etc.) that he or she thinks are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore the status quo ante.
> Political reactionaries are at the right-wing of a political spectrum; yet, reactionary ideologies can be radical, in the sense of political extremism, in service to re-establishing the status quo ante. In political discourse, being considered a reactionary is generally regarded as negative; yet the descriptor political reactionary has been adopted by the likes of the Austrian monarchist Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, the Scottish journalist Gerald Warner of Craigenmaddie, the Colombian political theologist Nicolás Gómez Dávila, and the Hungarian historian John Lukacs.
In other words,
Because when the left wing gets the power, suddenly "reactionary movement" is a pejorative, because it's going against THEIR status quo.
They're all about going against the status quo, unless when THEY represent the status quo.
Similarly, I am sure there are things you care a lot about, which other people will not understand.
I am absolutely sure there have been moments in your life where, as it seemed to another person, you were irrationally angry over something that has no actual importance.
Why would you sperg out over a subject matter you don't care about? It makes you look, and argue, like an absolute retard.
Just like how "you're killing me" could me that your argument is draining the life out of me and I will die soon or your argument is so bad that I am laughing too hard. I get your point but trying to argue that we should accept connotation over denotation is a bit of stretch. I don't disagree with you 100% but by your logic his use of the word unacceptable could mean anything so who even cares what word means.
No need to delve too deep into that, actually using the words "left-wing" and "right-wing" as part of a point is harmful to begin with, as the only purpose those words serve anymore is to oversimplify matters in order to - you guessed it - push an agenda. That's all they're good for anymore.
>"The theme of south park is very vague this season, I don't know what they're trying to say"
Literally every IGN review of this season, desu. Even when the point is blindingly obvious, the reviewer goes "I'm just not sure what this is in reference to".
I only mentioned it in the context of the other posts. Both sides sum it up as "It's fine when I have the power, but it's bad when THEY have the power." Sometimes it's justifiable (like you don't want ISIS for example to get any power), but most often it's a power grab.
>Jimmy has a similar stance, so he rejects PCP’s efforts to shut him up, as well as the policy that the principal gets to check every issue of the paper for potentially offensive material before it goes to print. Jimmy decides to go on his own renegade paper route (atop an oversized Thomas the Tank Engine, no less) that soon garners considerable readership around South Park due to Super School News’ unflinching eye and lack of advertising. Specifically, it doesn’t assault the reader with ads dressed up as articles, as Stephen Stotch observes in a brilliant Vertigo-like sequence that captures how maddening yet addictive sponsored content (and the internet in general) can be. For the record, every site I write for runs ads or publishes sponsored content (usually both), so I understand it’s just the name of the game these days. And as readers, we’re all just as responsible for its existence as the media outlets who publish it.
Well, the AV Club reviews always deliver
I just didn't like to see retards get coverage for their shitty games because they blew some guys behind a dumpster at a convention
I didn't want my harmless comments on forums removed because said retard was also friends with mods, who also promoted their content.
Where the fuck does freedom of speech play into this? Just because I choose to question the powers that be?
The only argument that I see is: " if you don't like it, leave! There is no freedom of speech here!"
Despite those communities literally thriving and parading around that idea mere weeks ago.
No, here's what's happening: I'm saying shit you don't like to see. Instead of debating or tolerating my views, you try to stifle and remove them because they make you uncomfortable. You use vague phrases like 'creepy' or 'bigoted' to quickly label things and categorize complex ideas, so you don't have to dwell too hard on things that might shatter your shallow worldview.
But please, let's skirt around the issue by arguing about the definition of freedom of speech some more. These distractions can only work so well.
Yeah yeah cool you can tell me why I'm wrong, but once again, you're being stunningly hypocritical
>I'd give you some credibility if you weren't so obviously defending yourself because I attacked your agenda of choice
Right now you're calling 4chan a safe space where you don't have to consider consequences and directly benefiting from it, which makes you a hypocrite, and when called out on that, you switch to saying that I'm stonewalling... in order to stonewall because you don't want to hear what I'm saying
It's not about credibility, that's plain facts which can be directly taken from looking at your posts
Exactly. Now the conservatives are the ones fighting for free speech while the liberals are telling them what they're allowed to wear.
It's becoming clear that both parties only champion free speech when THEY'RE not the ones in power. When they have the power, they'll happily cast it aside.
Buckle up, buckaroos!
well it sure as hell isn't news.
It's a fear-mongering story I guess? The study they talk about could only end in oral health remaining the same or getting worse as people age over the ten years. Since the results are rigged the article will always be negative , the fear mongering might make people more susceptible to products that tout themselves as cavity protecting even though their no different from competitors.
Its a study on dental health. Im not seeing any product from any business entity being pushed around. Id get it if it was a study showing how a certain product did better for dental health than others but like this? Nah.
Im just gonna guess its typical southpark stupidity and not take it seriously.
I don't understand why people get mad over media content. It's media. It's something that exists. Nobody is forcing you to buy videogames, watch tv, read books or
open certain threads. It shouldn't matter if it exists or not, and it definitely shouldn't matter if it appeals to you or not. You have the right to vote with your dollar and that's all that should matter.
But what if its factually true? Then isnt it news on some level? How do you know it isnt true? And doesnt that qualify almost all news as ads?
I read about murders in my neighborhood. Its negative. It gets me scared. So I decide I should buy a gun or purchase an alarm system. Well doesnt that make the first article jimmy read about a murdered doctor an ad too?
Maybe I dont get it, but thats what it looks like to me.
OH boy, a 13 year old white kid is going to educate us all on history. I'm sure this will be enlightening.
Go back to reddit and /r/theredpill. That's where conservatives belong. 4chan is for freethinkers who frequent /d/ and /lbgtqibbq/ and look for traps on /soc/. Reddit is more in line with your regressive concepts.
It is factually true, logically over a ten year time period your teeth will either remain the same or get worse. The article is painting common sense as new information and placing it in a negative light to make it interesting.
For your example, reading about a new murder or a specific case would qualify as news. But a pointless statistic like "murders on the rise", when you live in a rapidly growing city, would not count as news, since it's common sense. The pointless statistic could qualify as an ad if a promise about "reducing increased crime" becomes a way to enforce stricter laws or get a politician more favor from the public
Explain then genius. Theres no business entity or product being presented and theres the possibility thats an actual study. The only possible 'ad' I see is people trying to buy more dental products out of fear or awareness. Thats just the article inadvertently giving people the idea to buy things. Not sure if its fair to equate that to an ad. And this can apply to almost everything when you think that way.
>But what if its factually true? Then isnt it news on some level? How do you know it isnt true? And doesnt that qualify almost all news as ads?
Depends on if the report was sponsored by some dental association. Just like how you get scientists that are paid by fast food companies to put out reports/research to say fast food isn't as bad as it is claimed to be etc.
You can only really trust independent research and even then it still may be inconsistent.
A rise in murders can qualify as news when the factors arent exactly obvious. Its still a new development. Theyd also be more informative than just making guesses based on what you hear personally. Even so it still doesnt qualify as an ad.
And does reading about the new victim of a serial killer in my county qualify as an ad if it gets my freaked out enough to buy weapons and pay for security services? Its news according to your criteria but it got me to buy something.
I'll agree with your first point. A article about a rise in murders for detroit would be pointless compared to a rise in murders for a small midwestern city.
For your second point reading about new victims of a serial killer indirectly becomes an advertisement for security companies. It's still technically news but then you have to question the value knowing that information adds to your life if the article is pure sensationalism.
this anon has it right, that dental article was clickbait. I think clickbait should count as an ad
Then that just makes everything vague. I dont think something so indirect and inadvertent should qualify as an ad.
Also why are ads worse than hitler now? You still have the choice on whether to buy their shit or not. And ads keep businesses afloat. Its annoying when theyre everywhere but cmon.
And Im totally not a self aware ad trying to advertise ads, guys.
Advertise a product, spread it to almost every form of media, reap the profits...then profilerate the use of adblock, set the conditions for adaptation and improvement,... And continue advertisement stronger and more effective than ever. Its a perfectly logical system. In this world of ours, business and profit never ends, and neither does our purpose, our raison d'etre.
>What we propose to do is not to control content, but to create context.
>The digital society furthers human flaws and selectively rewards development of convenient half-truths. Just look at the strange juxtapositions of morality around you.
>You exercise your right to "freedom" and this is the result. All rhetoric to avoid conflict and protect each other from hurt. The untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems.
>Everyone withdraws into their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum. They stay inside their little ponds, leaking whatever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large.
>The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh. No one is invalidated, but nobody is right.
>Not even natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "truth."
>And this is the way the world ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper.
>So I'd argue that season 19 is less about SJWs and more about the facade and hypocrisy people build up to seem like better people.
But you just described SJW. They only pretend to care about social justice to inflate their own ego, pretend they are good, get a bunch of brainless fans (who may or may not have good intentions) and cry harassment when someone disagrees with them.
>PCP has very PC opinions but is willing to violent and disturbing things to protect them.
Yes, that's all SJWs. They have no problem seeing someone be fined or tossed in jail over "problematic" art or speech. Outsourcing your violence to the police doesn't make you peaceful.
>Leslie wears a shirt resembling Reddit
is an ad
>therefore Matt and Trey think Reddit are
ads and shills
I'm fairly new to South Park I very rarely watch the show outside a few episodes Ive watched over the years.
I've never seen this character before this episode but is her shirt representing a faux Reddit? Again I rarely watch the show; plz no bully.
What made you think I'm defending conservatives in that post? What, just because I pointed out that SJWs have become the new "Moral Majority"? Is it because SJWs are left leanin, and anyone who bashes them are "conservatives?"
I like how Tweek and Craig have been together since their episode.
Yeah, me too. I was kinda hoping for them to hold hand at some point but I guess it'd be a bit distracting. I'm still holding onto the hope they'll hold hands in the background at some point.
I wonder what they were talking about.
>either way the implications make my dick launch into orbit.
Principal PC is not just an ad but Paid Content.
That's why he's always telling Lesly to shut up. Because she's the old wave of ads and he's the new wave, trying to not look like an ad by telling the old ads to shut up so people will pay attention to what he's paid to say
The running theme of the season is less about SJWs and more about progressivism less as an ideology and more as a trend.
Every time South Park becomes more "PC" Randy thinks about how cool it is. He spews the talking points, as does the rest of the town, in an effort to be more modern and viewed in a positive light rather than adhering to what they actually believe in.
It's against people who lord their PC status over others and the ones that follow them to be considered intellectual and "with it."
The problem with that is that to call people out on just following a trend ignores that anti-PC fervor is also a trend. Claiming that someone is doing something just to be cool assumes too much.
South Park has always wanted to look good in front of people, or at least the Mayor has. And to an extent the people of the town are generally nice and well meaning. The PC movement is just making them take it to lengths they previously never thought possible. But all in all it's hard to see any real harm done by it, the town is happier and at a higher quality then ever before.
The funny thing is that if there was actually a correct way to live, a smart way to live, then you would be dumb to not live that way. It's a matter of opinion and freedom is good, sure, but it's perfectly within one's right to laugh out anyone who advocates poor life choices like faith healing. No one has the right to tell you what religion to be, but everyone has the right to express themselves.
Liberal-arts-collegefag here, yes it is that bad, it is McCarthyism at Its most potent and stifling at Its most benine, saying anything outside of the current doctrine at my school is social suicide.
A girl I know just accused this wimpy hipster kid of violently raping her on fucking fb this morning. Naming this kid as the rapist and "looking to get acknowledged as a survivor" trying to get the whole school on her side and standing in solidarity because this kid had to nerve to show up at a local show that she also attended.
I live with these people, they are the lowest form of scum, ive lived in the inner city and have more empathy for ghetto rats than sjw after attending an American liberal arts college.
Actually, people do have the right to tell you what religion to be, they just can't force you to be a religion, even though parents implanting memes into their children's mind is standard.
Dumb bitches crying rape for attention is nothing new. And of course even when it's made completely clear or they admit they were lying it never makes the news, they just want to say it happened and news outlets never go back on it or highlight it.
Honestly makes me want South Park to tackle this blatent bullshit on women and feminists part, instead they just focus on the blanket PC movement, women arent even involved in anyway with it according to them.
I guess you don't watch the news because Rolling Stones article where they gave the spotlight to someone who lied about being raped was all over it. Even on MSNBC.
It's great that you assume everyone is lying for attention though.
Yeah that one time, and like i said it's never highlighted for a significant amount of time. Compared to the numerous cases where they're all too eager to report it.
Go back to thinking that 99% of women face sexual assault some time in their life like they love to claim though, totally believable.
I'm not even saying that they're all telling the truth or even implying I believe in your made up stat. You did move the goal posts though because now you need a story highlighted for what you see as a significant amount of time. A news cycle shaming Rolling Stones and a follow up on how they aim to repair their image in the face of a university threatening to press charges won't be enough.
That's kind of what it means to highlight it. A singular instance that goes on for some indeterminable length of time doesnt really qualify.
Even if i was wrong about literally one story it doesnt make up for the countless others that get recklessly broadcast.
Not that guy, but there was one around here that ended just a few weeks ago where a hockey player was accused of rape. After a bunch of absolutely retarded bullshit that would be perfectly suited to an episode of Law and Order SVU, the prosecutor finally dropped the case against him.
He still lost a bunch of endorsement deals and his reputation's been dragged through the fucking mud.
That's the case Rolling Stones got in deep shit over. The one we've been talking about. The rape itself was just a story in RS, the fact that it was a false rape claim was on every major news network.
Considering that Breitbart has had more influence as has been exposed as being more dishonest than those, even to the point of Fox News having a big apology session for believing their Shirley Sharrod story like everyone else.
It's exactly what's happening with SJWs. On a grander scale, it's what has been happening with american college education for the last 8 years at least. Instead of being places where people go to learn about different things and find ways to help the world, a lot of universities are promoting this "progressive" propaganda in other to look good in front of everyone else. In other words, the system is downplaying education in favor of keeping a certain appearance. Same thing that's happening in Europe for example
The thing with ads is interesting, because it's exactly the thing that Gawker and lots of media conglomerates do nowadays. When it comes down to it it's really just corporations pushing a certain agenda to make profit. It just so happens that the newest agenda to appeal to is extreme leftism with huge totalitarian tendencies.
It's actually pretty straightforward. They literally show you what media companies do in the episode. You go on any website nowadays and what do you see? Some article on a "controversial" topic. It's how sites like Kotaku and overall how Gawker media gets all their clicks. It's called clickbait for a reason
The equivalent on 4chan are the infamous bait shitposts. You know it's bait, yet everyone responds to it. Likewise, in a typical website a person will see something like "why modern videogames are sexist" and suddenly the article will get millions of hits. At the end of the day what does that mean? Millions of people who see ads for that particular website as well, and all of it comes down to revenue. Controversy sells, it always has
People are just too fucking retarded to realize it
I went to college in democrat territory and got earfulls of conservative ag industry propaganda and anti-catholic religious propaganda from different universities. It's not as systematic as you think and I read that the Koch bros bought a university in Florida.
I don't see how gawker is extremist. They're too useless and "safe" to be extremist. It's typical liberal bias with headlines that are more obnoxious than usual.
Not that I've heard. And it doesn't even seem like the news stations over here care about that at all.
Even when they reported on the charges being dropped, the news lady was quick to make it a point to add BUT HE MIGHT STILL BE A RAPIST THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT HE'S INNOCENT.
Shit's fucked up.