10/10 thread 2 Continue from >>718346564

File: better.png (2MB, 1279x824px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1279x824px

>>718363603
i fixed this img from the other anon

her face is literal perfection

dont need tits

File: 136352410.jpg (80KB, 960x736px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 960x736px

My sister

are you cucks just posting your friends? None of these are real 10s right?

>>718363836
who the fuck is this

>>718363875
>>718364115
that chick isnt a 10/10??? The fuck is wrong with you?

>>718364285
Ngl that looks rendered jesus

>>718364330
whoooosh

10/10

saved

File: hnnnnnng.jpg (13KB, 378x301px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 378x301px

>>718363603
Saoirse Ronan pls

>>718364327
>>718364115

Yeah, she is pretty hot, can't lie... I feel like it's just a good shot tho, look at dem ears.. I would like to see another for better opinion.

>>718364556
>>718364220
little better

>>718364285
MORE

>>718364285
>>718364763
is that cg? I can't tell...

File: 1468745761768.jpg (96KB, 596x380px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 596x380px

>>718364763

File: tmp_9152-1483900859794-2103071975.jpg (124KB, 1381x1371px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1381x1371px

>>718363603

>>718364763
Literally 10/10 for once, thank you based anon

SAAAAUCEE

File: 1483979320462.jpg (220KB, 1280x1777px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1280x1777px

>>718364474

File: wat.jpg (31KB, 332x425px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 332x425px

>>718365117
why is she squinting like a steven seagal?

>>718365034
sauce

>>718365307
anna speckhart

>>718365307
>>718365034
She has a really annoying trashy voice

>>718365503
get this shit the fuck out of here

do you come from a brown country? fuck me....

>>718365555
put my stick in a pooper

File: 1476316083248.jpg (723KB, 1280x1912px) Image search: [Google]

723KB, 1280x1912px

>>718365117
close, would need to sell full body.

>>718365218
beautiful features but looks stupid. get your finger out of your mouth retard.

>>718365302
pretty hot but what a honker.

>I can't tell if this chick is 10 or not...

File: 1450183528844.jpg (106KB, 719x1280px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 719x1280px

>>718364870

File: oezBVlS.jpg (194KB, 901x1202px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 901x1202px

>>718364830

File: file.png (1MB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1080px

>>718364911

>>718365744
she's brown

>>718365798
One of the long lost Olsen robots that Disney lost was captured in France?

>>718365744
not attractive at all

>>718363603
7/10
>>718363720
5/10
>>718363757
6/10
>>718363794
4/10
>>718363811
3/10
>>718363836
4/10
>>718363846
4/10
>>718363875
7/10
>>718363882
4/10
>>718363885
2/10
>>718363916
Edgy/10
>>718363954
0/10
>>718363983
1/10
>>718363994
0/10 no face
>>718364003
1/10
>>718364035
7/10
>>718364076
1/10
>>718364078
1/10
>>718364126
3/10
>>718364161
3/10
>>718364171
8/10
>>718364220
6/10
>>718364262
7/10
>>718364264
4/10
>>718364285
0/10

>>718365744
now that I think about it, she's 10. big lips, cute nose, big eyes, great hair, fit and good skin. Looks like a fun fuck as well.

>>718365895
she wont age well

you can see it

File: 1482620975799.jpg (189KB, 998x999px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 998x999px

this is now an 11/10 thread

>>718365744
The only thing annoying me is her chin..... Otherwise very attractive

>>718365976

> opinions aren't subjective
> I am special

>>718366027
Nice meme >>>/r9k/

>>718366148
There is a universal beauty standard, beauty is objective.

File: 1446965916083.jpg (203KB, 698x1024px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 698x1024px

>>718365906
>>718365976
>>718366032
>also has great jaw line, perfect sized frame, good ears,nice eyebrows, and no hair on arms. Hold that 10 son.

>this girl is very close to real 10 too

>>718366592
hottie no doubt

>>718366671
no more memes.

>>718366801
cute but not 10 level

File: 1464224361705.jpg (66KB, 539x960px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 539x960px

>>718366490
But she's still brown. Here's a real 10, btw.

File: 1483982423512.jpg (2MB, 2736x3648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2736x3648px

>>718366976

>>718366027
Your opinion is shit

>>718367107
>>718367248
both these bitches look like they are related to jay leno.. the fuck outta here with that. Post some real hot whites, even >>718366934 is better example

>>718366101
God damn, those tits are perfect.

File: 1482721369267.jpg (23KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 499x499px

>>718367975
FUCK

WHO IS THIS GORGEOUS GODDESS OF SEX APPEAL?

>>718365864
yes, snorl4x is perfect

>>718366027
neckbeard/10

File: 1475549792275.jpg (79KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 500x667px

>>718368439
Other than the craziness I guess?

But yea, she is otherwise perfect

>>718366475
Yeah, but this 1-10 scale is shitty way to describe a woman. What's the difference between a 9 or a 10?

I'd say the majority of the women here are attractive. Whether they are a 10 or not, depends on the person.

>>718364363
shiet
give her some food u monsters

File: 13652412.jpg (71KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 720x720px

>>718363954
sis

>>718364470
Name?

File: 1476862113816.png (351KB, 700x439px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 700x439px

>>718369058
That's the point numb nuts, to show what YOU consider a 10 and compare to other anons... kinda makes it interesting.

>It's also fun to talk shit

>>718369243
hot but the earring is stupid so I assume she is.

>>718365034
who is she?

>>718369058
This. 8 and 9's can be universal. But a 10 is always subjective.

Like >>718365836 >>718364911 >>718365864
Are all 10's but for their own reasons.

But >>718363794 is a 9 for me, and probably almost universally an 8 or 9

Or >>718365744 is a high 8 for me, and probably for most. But I can see why both can easily be a 10 for others

>>718369734
MOOOOREEE

File: 13652424.jpg (85KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 960x720px

>>718363954

File: 1314.jpg (34KB, 390x470px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 390x470px

>>718369759
>Like >>718365836 >>718364911 >>718365864
>Are all 10's but for their own reasons.

File: anna.jpg (293KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 683x1024px

>>718364364
A-Ana sama?!

>>718363603
That's probably the least flattering (and most androgynous) pic you could have used for her though. She's fine when she doesn't look so boyish though.

>>718366020
Hnnnnnnnng

>>718369888
Like I said, 10's are subjective. And I find those 3 all to be near perfect in my eyes for their own reasons.

And I will probably find your 10 to be an 8 or 9 at best.

>>718369759
I find that pretty interesting.

>>718365744 I posted this one because of what I posted after about her.

>>718363794 could be my waiter and I wouldn't even check her out.

different strokes for different anons. Except for ones like >>718367248 ... no fucking way a 10 unless you are blind and she eats mints all day

File: 13652415.jpg (74KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 960x720px

>>718369846

>>718370124
Mask your shit taste however you like lad, kek

>>718370328
What exactly makes it shit taste?

>>718369058
There's also the issue of how people use the scale. For some people, 5 is literally average, i.e. people who aren't attractive or ugly, just plain. For other people though, anyone below a 6.5 or 7 is basically ugly, and you'd have to be a literal mutant or land whale to get ranked lower than 3 or 4.

>>718370425
>beauty is subjective, we should hold bach and britney spears in the same place
>beauty is subjective, we should hold my clear 4s and 3s as 10s because I say so

lol no

people are allowed to have shit taste but that doesn't make your ugly shit any less ugly

>>718370133
True.

Like with >>718365744 She is universally attractive with her body, but the chin kinda prevents a perfect 10. But some my chose to ignore it, or even like it.

And with >>718363794 She's nothing special, but is still remarkably cute in an 8/10 to 9/10 way if you start looking

And the final one. >>718367248 She is not an 8 by any standard, but with a normal facial expression could be a high 6 to mid 7

>>718370134
Beautiful photo

>>718370660
Still doesn't answer my question. What specifically makes them shit?

>>718370962
Ugly non-symmetrical faces with lots of imperfections, regular bodies, no sense of style or neatness, etc.

>>718367107
She's 7.5 as fuck, dude. I get that your post was mostly meant to be white nationalist edge though.

>>718371222
That's something. But I would say that those are really being nitpicky looking for the most minor details.

Sometimes the perfect 10 includes factors beyond physical that allows minor physical stuff to be over looked.

>>718371464
>minor
They are not even beautiful, regular at best. Only based on looks you have shit taste. Embrace your shit taste and don't explain it, we all have shit taste some times and it doesn't matter, but stop with the subjective bullshit because it is not true.

File: 11371198_963620503669785_152229232_n.jpg (94KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x640px

>>718371795

File: 14063399_1769394526676035_2123119619_n (1).jpg (290KB, 789x1077px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 789x1077px

>>718371849

File: IMG_7700.jpg (26KB, 740x414px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 740x414px

I'm gay so George is cool for me

File: 12142700_410213445844559_1137699389_n.jpg (66KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x640px

>>718371922

>>718371682
Eh, did it ever occur to you that tastes can be mostly subjective (Atleast in the way of 9's and 10's?) One persons 7 or even 6 can be anothers 9 or 10.

What is your "Perfect 10" I'm sure I can find something about yours that makes her a 6 or 7 in my eyes

And what are the 3 I posted outta 10?

File: 12479371_1523612814602846_739043468_n.jpg (82KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x640px

>>718371944
jump in front of a train my man

File: 6-fav.jpg (734KB, 2552x3298px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 2552x3298px

>>718370134
taken into the gallery, thank you

>>718367290
Fucking EFFY YES

File: 7-fav.jpg (161KB, 960x636px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 960x636px

>>718372295

File: 180px-CWC_mug_2014.jpg (7KB, 180x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 180x225px

>>718371464
we understand your point but it is incorrect. I may think pic related is a 10 because I really like sonic..
a 10 is the best, flawless. Not something you have to look over flaws for

File: 10-fav.jpg (262KB, 1100x684px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1100x684px

>>718372346

>>718372009
>tastes are subjective
Taste is, beauty is not. I am sure there must be some idiot with shit taste saying that the Seattle Needle is better architecture than Notre Dame, and he would have a shit taste, yes.

It doesn't matter how much you think your pics are better than, Saoirse Ronan for example, on any objective measure they are not. Period. You can still like them, and if you want you should, but still shit taste, stop it dude.

File: 15-fav.jpg (48KB, 656x794px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 656x794px

>>718372413

>>718372295
really incredible. def a 10
>>718372346
the fuck is this?

File: 19-fav.jpg (73KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 920x920px

>>718372478

File: 2 Saoirse Ronan (11).jpg (1MB, 1278x1696px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1278x1696px

>>718363603
>>718364474

File: 21-fav.jpg (123KB, 960x632px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 960x632px

>>718372518

File: 1 Saoirse Ronan (6).jpg (357KB, 561x758px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 561x758px

>>718372541

File: 24-fav.jpg (209KB, 688x900px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 688x900px

>>718372563

File: Saoirse Ronan (30).jpg (164KB, 841x1222px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 841x1222px

>>718372580

>>718372518
really great body and nose.. kinda has sausage fingers and cheap food court nails tho.. wish it wasn't black and white.

File: 30-fav.jpg (134KB, 946x1331px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 946x1331px

>>718372603

File: 157031-sarah-gadon-wallpaper-hd.jpg (290KB, 1920x1320px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1920x1320px

10/10

File: Saoirse Ronan (2).png (2MB, 827x1104px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 827x1104px

>>718372620

>>718366101
more

File: hqdefault.jpg (21KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x360px

>>718372541
>>718372580
>>718372620

File: Saoirse Ronan (28).jpg (623KB, 967x1452px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 967x1452px

>>718372675

File: 48-fav.png (503KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 960x640px

>>718372650

File: 52-fav.jpg (185KB, 1067x1600px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1067x1600px

>>718372730

>>718372357
Well, every person has flaws in some way. Like two of those I posted as my 10's have kinda wide noses, and the other has gauges which I don't like.

But the whole package for each is a 10.

>>718372444
Remember, this isn't an Objective Beauty thread. It's a 10/10. The most subjective of all ratings even. And honestly, I think the 3 I posted are better than Saoirse Ronan. I would think that she is universally kinda average. Maybe marginally higher?

File: 57-fav.jpg (312KB, 2056x1376px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 2056x1376px

>>718372802

File: Saoirse Ronan (22).jpg (269KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1440x1080px

>>718372723

File: 62-fav.jpg (105KB, 669x876px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 669x876px

>>718372879

File: Saoirse Ronan (19).jpg (804KB, 950x1288px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 950x1288px

>>718372897

File: 69-fav.jpg (575KB, 668x900px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 668x900px

>>718372951

>>718372875
>I think the 3 I posted are better than Saoirse Ronan
Wrong, and I am not even saying she is a 10/10, it was the first girl I thought given how the thread started, but it doesn't matter, because she doesn't have to be a 10/10 to be better than the girls you posted, which she is.

>>718363994
I want to nimble on her pussy lips.

File: 71-fav.jpg (2MB, 1280x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x1920px

>>718373051

File: 123.png (425KB, 579x557px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 579x557px

>>718372723
she does anal

File: 77-fav.jpg (155KB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 900x1350px

>>718373151
stop posting this non-sense about Saoirse Ronan

>>718373118
I don't think she is. She's also got a non-symmetrical face, and a large forehead.

Lets get some other Anon's to voice their opinions.

Rank these 4 from most attractive to least.

>>718372897
>>718365864
>>718364911
>>718365836

>>718372357
>we
No, the reason you think it's incorrect is because you don't understand it. Clearly, you're intellectually incapable of comprehending it.

If you were capable of understanding it, you would know that it is correct.

>>718373364
Why not use the OP pic?
>>718363603
>>718364171
>>718365864
>>718364911
Or this (I also not saying it is a 10/10, but it is objectively better than your pics).
>>718365836


Besides I already told you that taste =//= beauty..

>>718372640

cheap nails? you just discredited yourself

>>718373709
fug, messed up the order
>>718363603
>>718365864
>>718364911
>>718365836
>>718364171

>>718366174
flood girl?

Yikes. Didn't know people were so picky about details on a woman.

I only need to take a few seconds to look at a face to know whether she looks beautiful or not.

>>718373450
hahahahahahah

Nice intellectual comeback fuccboi. Define your stupid point or or fuck off and learn to love real aesthetic.

>Your fat GF isn't really perfect.

>>718366027

wow the edgelord has been honing his edge.

"look guise! I'm going to give 3's to chicks that are obviously 7's or better to show how sophistcated my tastes are! I'm a discriminating connoisseur of pussy, guise!!"

>>718373780
>>718372640
You're right. I just noticed it and it bugged me. Like putting Hershey's kisses on a beautiful chocolate cake.

>>718373825
I asked for other anon's opinions. Not yours again. I already know that you believe that beauty is always objective and anything that goes against your definition of such is invalid.

would rather have the cute face with a birthmark
>>718366671
then the hot face coated in bitch
>>718366801

>>718372357
I agree with the main idea of your post, but beauty is PURELY SUBJECTIVE.

The perception of whether someone is perfectly beautiful doesn't exist until the person makes that observation and then, no matter what his opinion is, his opinion is 100% correct - TO HIM.

This is not up for debate. It's the 100% facts of human beings.

Whether you AGREE or not *is* however.

OK, gonna try and do a poll on the most attractive out of the 4 here.

>>718365864
Snorl4x

>>718364911
Mixed

>>718365836
Kylie

>>718363603
Ronan

http://www.strawpoll.me/12072703/r

Saiorse is a 10, everyone kys

>>718366671
I couldn't give a shit about her birthmark.

She's pretty to me too.

>>718374187
I didn't give my opinion, nor is that the order I would put them. Stop your autism dude, I'm only picking random girls from the thread that are better and nobody else cares about your shit.

And yes, on any objective measure:
Both OP pic and the other I chose at random >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any of your pics

Bach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britney Spears

Notre Dame >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seattle Needle.

And I go back to my original post, mask your shit taste however you like.

>>718364503
thats a body built for breeding

>>718374603
that's what I'm talking about
>>718374410

>>718374432
>taste is PURELY SUBJECTIVE.*
Fixed that for you.

>>718374432
WRONG. There are universal standards for beauty. That is why great works of art and architecture are universally, in all cultures and periods are revered. A person saying the scenery of hackney is more beautiful than the Alhambra is not just a difference of opinion. it is wrong.