Why is pedophilia illegal? Just asking.

>>717441604
cause ur akmed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXG9cM5QxgU

>>717441604
Cause kids can't choose by themselves

>>717441684
there are things where adults can't choose, why is different with sex and kids?

Bc kids do not understand what is sex and stuff therefore they do not interested in sex which u forcibly make them.

P.s. FBI is informed and a seat team has been dispatched to ur location. Please do not resist and leave ur current place

>>717442071
i have the kids down the bed, they will never find them

>>717442071
Kek
But you're right

I need to know by Friday.

>>717441604
Most of the normies here don't even get it.

because its raping children

>>717441604
because bad people take advantage of children.

However sex should be legal about 14ish which is more in line with actual human development and has traditionally marked adulthood throughout time.

>>717442364
only if they don't want it

Because society has established a threshold of consent that includes all contracts and decisions that could have a lasting impact on those who are mentally undeveloped. Otherwise court would be a guessing game as to that person was able to consent to anything.

>>717442603
you bastard pedo go get some 14 chicks another place

>>717442611
they never want it

>>717442685
im not interested in girls that young im simply stating truth

>>717442737
> Because anon isn't intreasted in 14 year olds therefor no one is

YOU NEVER GO MENTAL RETARDATION!
Also, when I was 14, I wanted some of them older guys (I'm a guy, fuck off).

First of all pedophilia itself is not illegal. Sexually touching a child however is. Why is that you ask? Because chidren are not old enough to consent.

>>717443014
tits or gtfo

>>717443014
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

you want to fuck eminem and corey taylor

hahahahaha

>>717443027
>pedophilia itself is not illegal
what country do you live in? owning nude pictures of underage people is illegal

>>717443014
yeah i know thats why it should be like 14 as I said.

>>717443027
what is illegal then?

>>717443027
What's sexually touching? What if someone grabs them by the pussy in a totally unsexually touching way?

>>717441604
It makes it more exciting for the elites when they do it.

>>717443014
I mean you where(still are) mentally ill even if you got buttfucked by a older man it wouldn't screw you up

>>717443206
This only applies to future heads of state

>>717442737
Well most men wants young girls at 16-20. Not some used up whore.

File: 1483132715707.png (240KB, 432x429px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 432x429px

>>717441604
Because who the hell would pay 8 times more for an aging 1987 toyota corolla when you could have a new model for way less.

>>717441604
On child sexuality not being harmful
====================================

Research
--------
Susan Clancy:
http://www.salon.com/2010/01/19/trauma_myth_interview/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Clancy#The_Trauma_Myth
https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/trauma-myth

Rind, Tromovitch, Bauserman:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
http://www.mhamic.org/rind/
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100196502/guardian-paedophiles-are-ordinary-members-of-society-who-need-moral-support/

Other:
http://www.mhamic.org/sources/sandfort.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light
https://www.newgon.com/wiki/Research
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume16/j16_2.htm

Second-hand harm:
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume10/j10_1.htm

Food for thought
----------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Morality_and_the_Law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/07/don_t_pooh_pooh_the_left_s_push_to_normalize_pedophilia
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape

What about consent?
----------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_as_an_adult
http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/health/transgender-kids/
https://www.google.com/webhp?ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=circumcision+and+consent


Anecdotes
---------
https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/positive_memories.htm

>>717443294
what the fuck?

make sense holy faggots

>>717443162
He means "being a pedophile i think" it's not illegal to be a pedo but it is illegal to use/distribute pedo porn because the ACT is illegal and consumption of said material would create a bigger market for it.

>>717443162
1. paedophilia isn't illegal in every civilized country and probably in every other country too.
2. Do your parents ever took pictures of you as a toddler, playing naked on a beach or so? That'd be illegal if the bullshit you said is true.

>>717443382
On pedophilia not being a disorder
==================================

Research
--------
http://www.sexarchive.info/BIB/pedophilia.htm
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/03/paedophilia-bringing-dark-desires-light
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/local/la-me-pedophiles-20130115
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/07/don_t_pooh_pooh_the_left_s_push_to_normalize_pedophilia
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/01/dsm-pedophilia-mental-disorder-paraphilia_n_4184878.html

On legalizing child pornography
===============================

Research
--------
http://phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing-child-pornography-linked-sex.html
http://phys.org/news166769376.html
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/legal-child-pornography-reduces-child-sex-crimes-milton-diamond-hawaii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between_child_pornography_and_child_sexual_abuse

Food for thought
----------------

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zec7oZUrGg8

http://www.cracked.com/personal-experiences-1658-5-ways-were-making-pedophilia-worse.html

Falkvinge:
https://falkvinge.net/2012/05/23/cynicism-redefined-why-the-copyright-lobby-loves-child-porn/
https://falkvinge.net/2012/09/07/three-reasons-child-porn-must-be-re-legalized-in-the-coming-decade/
https://falkvinge.net/2012/09/11/child-porn-laws-arent-as-bad-as-you-think-theyre-much-much-worse/

human-stupidity.com:
http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/watching-child-pornography-victimizes-child-voodoo-science

Wikileaks:
http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn


Wikipedia is actually a very good starting point. You may not be able to cite it directly as a source, but it's a credible place to go.
http://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-britannica/

>>717441604
kids can't consent to sex

>>717441922
cause kids will be abused and prolly dont know whats happening?
and when they are old enough to understand they mostly will dislike

>>717443162
You dumbass learn some history! In some cultures when a man grows up (14 or some years old) they make him rub his dick against another mans dick and do it until ejection* this is considered "masculine". (I'm the 23 year old who wanted to get fucked when I was 14 faggot)

if it is ever legal for and adult to have sex with a child i am finding some small abandonded island and becoming a fucking hermit as i will no longer have any wish to live around society i will NOT support this sick shit EVER

>>717443282
>20
>Not some used up whore
Heh. Life would be so easy being as ignorant and or plain stupid as you are.

>>717443282
most men are idiots
>wanting some young annoying cunt instead of a laid back mature mommy

>>717442711
but they will get curious, like every other people

>>717441604
when I was 13 my sister's friend who was 11 came onto me, ever since then I have been attracted to girls who are young and small. Not kids but like 12 or 13 year olds. I'm 19 btw...

kids CAN consent to sex but even then their consent is worthless because they don't know the implications of sex which makes it a form of rape. Also a big man dick won't fit in some coin slot pussy.

>>717443555
I'll come to your island and have sex with it.

>>717443531
>cause kids will be abused and prolly dont know whats happening?
sex play is common among children, even though they don't know why or what it means, most hump teddy bears at some early part of life

>and when they are old enough to understand they mostly will dislike
That's an issue with our society, not pedophiles

>>717443638
Fucking pedos. How could anyone get off to the idea of removing a little girl's clothes and licking her tiny body all over, nibbling her neck and kissing her adorable little nipples? Only a heartless monster would think about her cute girlish mouth and tongue wrapped around a thick cock slick with her saliva, pumping in and out of her mouth until it erupts, the cum more than her little throat can swallow.

The idea of thick viscous semen overflowing, dribbling down her chin over her flat chest, her tiny hands scooping it all up and watching her suck it off her fingertips is just horrible. You're all a bunch of sick perverts, thinking of spreading her smooth slender thighs, cock poised at the entrance to her pure, tight, virginal pussy, and thrusting in deep as a whimper escapes her lips which are slippery with cum, while her small body shudders from having her cherry taken in one quick stroke.

I am disgusted at how you'd get even more excited as you lean over her, listening to her quickening breath, her girlish moans and gasps while you hasten your strokes, her sweet pants warm and moist on your face and her flat chest, shiny with a sheen of fresh sweat, rising and falling rapidly to meet yours.

>>717443638
you can fuck the island all you want i will just think you are odd

>>717443491
Can kids consent going to school? Or are they sometimes forced to? Why isn't this illegal?

>>717443427
The guardian and the huffington post?! Don't give me an excuse of "there still enformshit", give me the original study and you know, SOME FUCKING STUDIES THAT WERE PEER REVIEWED IN THE SCIENCE JOURNAL!

>>717443751
It is truly nasty how you'd run your hands all over her tiny body while you violate her, feeling her nipples hardening against your tongue as you lick her chest, her neck and her armpits, savoring the scent of her skin and sweat while she trembles from the stimulation and as she reaches her climax, hearing her cry out softly as she has her first orgasm while that cock is buried impossibly deep inside her, pulsing violently as an intense amount of hot cum spurts forth and floods through her freshly-deflowered pussy for the first time, filling her womb only to spill out of her with a sickening squelch. And as you lie atop her flushed body, she sighs breathlessly and her fingers dig into your back as she feels your cock hardening inside her again.

You're all sick in the head.

>>717443696
It doesn't matter if little kids hump teddy bears, it doesn't mean they're ready to be fucked by an adult, moron.

The issue with society is dumbasses like you. I can't tell if pedophiles are genuinely retarded or just willfully ignorant to the facts in order to justify their mental retardation.

>>717443751
wow, ur a faggot

>>717443751
Nette Paste.

>>717443789
Because it isn't a crime to send someone to school without their consent, it is a crime to have sex with someone without their consent. painfully stupid argument

>>717443861
Most grownups don't seem to have the ability to make decisions either. Is that really the game you want to play?
http://www.cracked.com/blog/4-reasons-we-suck-at-making-big-decisions/

>>717443696
so if i anal rape u and u didnt like it afterwards, its an issue of our society?
better move to saudi arabia

File: pedo rape gang.jpg (25KB, 464x261px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 464x261px

>>717441604
>Why is pedophilia illegal?
because of evil shitstains like you.

File: 1479962974260.jpg (54KB, 960x480px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 960x480px

>>717441604
to keep ahmeds out of our childrens assholes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXG9cM5QxgU

>>717443696
>most hump teddy bears at some early part of life

now thats just silly. theres a difference between a kid playfully humping on a teddy bear and humping on a teddy bear from being horny. thats one big assumption.

and this is coming from a pedofag

>>717443813
>implying raped kids have orgasms

leld hard brash, but it was a nice little faggy bait anyways

>>717444019
>it isn't a crime to do something that we don't consider a crime
>it's a crime to do something we consider a crime
Top argument/10, would argue again.

>>717443426
1. of course you can't make a sexual preference illegal as long as it's not acted upon
2. I thought that would be obvious that family can own their own childrens nude pictures...

>>717443544
we're talking about civilized countries not africa where they eat cow poop

>>717443565
Not everyone has an Oedipus Complex anon. Some us had decent childhoods.

>>717444052
pls send some more links to prove how much of a big retard you are

>>717443565
>implying men wants to be /ss/'d by a cougar

>>717444052
That article is totally irrelevant. When adults have sex, there is a level of understanding and control for both parties. When a child is molested by an adult, they don't understand the consequences, they don't understand the implications, and they don't have control over the situation.

>>717444328
you're the one retarded enough that i had to explain that to you. it's a crime for a fucking reason

>>717442603


implying that 14 year olds have any idea what they are doing with their lives

>>717444338
> 1. of course you can't make a sexual preference illegal as long as it's not acted upon
> 2. I thought that would be obvious that family can own their own childrens nude pictures...
Your original post was the dumbest thing I read on /b/ today, don't try to justify it.

>>717444364
mine was better than decent

>>717444486
yes

>>717444328
you rape a child, u benefit from it, the kid will just die inside
you send a kid to school, it will learn some shit it may use later in life

seeing a difference there?

>>717444552
>Still not a single argument
You explained nothing. What's the reason one thing is a crime and the other one isn't?

>>717444487
>trying to explain morality and law to pedos
LARF. All pedos understand is it feels good to stick their tiny dicks in preschoolers and adults laugh at their atrophied peckers.

>>717444750
>>717444615

>>717441604

because in 1958 a bunch of religious moral fags (the same fuckers the decoded eveyone should be crastreded by a sucessfull anti masterbation campin to get everyones cut of by james kellog yea the cerail guy) decided it was wrong and set an age for marriage and consent...

for the last 2000+ years it was normal
in common even in the american colonies
and early america

>>717444750
Do I really have to explain to you why rape is worse than going to school?

>>717444615
>you rape a child, u benefit from it, the kid will just die inside
[citation needed]

>>717444575
ok go rub your dick against some other dude in you straw hut and cow dung

>>717443789
you could argue that both going to school and having sex would cause metal damage to a child, but the amount of damage from going to school would be far less than that of sex. further more children need to learn the skills and knowledge they get from school to live in our society, they do not need the skills they would get from having sex.

>>717444933
What is they want to be a porn star?

>>717444823
>rape
Rape yes, what about caressing or giving a massage?

File: aca3e55287dad0f61838962ec7ab762b.jpg (166KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 675x900px

>>717441604
Want to knock up someone who would unlikely make a better mom than someone else who is roughly 19 years old?
I sure don't.

>>717445223
those are both sexual assault of the person does not consent

>>717441604
Name?

>>717445210
then they could learn those skill later in life (adult) when they wouldn't suffer from it mentally.

File: thisnigger.jpg (17KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x300px

>>717445223

>>717444615
then again, going around fucking females has no benefits either. sex is not a requirement for life.

>>717445440
>>>/r9k/

>>717444804
>i am an idiot and dont know about early puritans or womans rights movements banning child prostitution and rasing AoC
your an idiot bud

>>717445397
You're making the assumption that every kid will be traumatized from sex no matter what.
I'm sure there are some sick fuckers that will make sure their experience is loving and soft and the kid will come out okay.
Only other people that go "wow adults having sex with children is evil and rape and the kid will never be the same again" causes those people to feel like that I bet.

>>717445639
Who an idiot?
Also
>puritans
>raising AoC
Religion, worse than Hitler.

File: nigga u gay.jpg (977KB, 1391x1199px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 1391x1199px

>>717444804

>>717445751
>every kid will be traumatized from sex
[in regards to childhood sexual abuse]
"Psychological issues for this population often include anxiety, poor self-esteem, dysfunctional relationships, eating disorders, and PTSD."
"These long-term consequences include a higher incidence of depression, intrusive flashback memories, hypervigilance, maladaptive coping skills, dysfunctional social skills, and an overactive stress response."
https://www.americannursetoday.com/long-term-health-outcomes-of-childhood-sexual-abuse/

>>717445440
its fun, if ur not acting like a mongrel

>>717446011
>its fun

this is like the most important fact people seem to forget when it comes to sex.

>>717446006
And I'm saying some kids probably come out fine.

>>717446011
I can waste hours and money on worthless whores or I can just pull on my wiener and be done in 10 minutes

>>717446241
and you're an idiot

>>717446253
>I can just pull on my wiener and be done in 10 minutes
please get laid, for your own good.

>>717446393
:^)

>>717446253
whores are fun if you have a big cock.

>>717446006
>implying women don't get traumatized by sex

>>717446666
if it's rape

>>717446442
I have a gf I can get laid whenever I want I still prefer to fap

>>717447031
Then again:
>all sex with persons under $Magic_Number years of age equals rape

>>717441604

Pedophilia itself is technically legal

However CP, child rape, molestation, rape in general, and creeping on kids, now that's illegal

>>717447220
Yeah. you might not like it but sex with a child is rape.

Because people don't want a 45 year old man sleeping with their 5 year old daughter. It can cause years of mental problems and pain for years. Affecting how you are around people, and also can affect your personal relationship with people in the future.

>>717447416
What do you consider sex and where do you locate the magic number that turns kids into adults?

>>717444052
>Cracked

Holy fucking shit kill yourself you neckbearded child molester.

>>717447603
it's proven that sex with children is harmful to them, so that's why it's illegal. you're just being an autistic faggot right now, you know how simple it is, you over complicate it to blur the lines.

>>717442683
This.

when will these silly peados learn that they will NEVER have legal rights and that what they do will ALWAYS be seen as disgusting and vile

you will never be a protected class give up

>>717441604
kys

File: !!!1385920336186.jpg (39KB, 300x190px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 300x190px

>>717447797
>it's proven that sex with children is harmful to them

>>717447828
Pedo rights are human rights. End ageist bigotry now. Pedophobia has no place in a modern diverse and tolerant society, it's 2017 not 600AD.

>>717447963
>out of arguments

>>717443382
Okay, so. You and your nambla buddies really thought about this one haven't you. How about this. Instead of finding a 9 year old attractive, how about someone your own age.

>>717448026
A claim was made, I want to see the source, that's a fair request.

>>717447797
>proven that sex is harmful to minors
>yet minors in Beligum are able to decide whether to kill themselves or not

Clearly if you can decide whether to kill yourself you can decide whether you want to have sex or not.

>>717447963
you really don't realize how autistic "citation needed" is, do you? already posted this itt.

https://www.americannursetoday.com/long-term-health-outcomes-of-childhood-sexual-abuse/

there is barely any point in proving a source for you anyway though is there, because you'll try and justify it no matter what.

>>717448222
that's irrelevant, i never made the argument that minors should be able to decide to die or not.

>>717441604
because mohammad was a false prophet

>>717448224
>.americannursetoday.com
Really, that's bogus.
Got anything better?

>>717448224
But that's about sexual abuse not consensual sexual activities with a minor.

Has there been a proper study done conclusively demonstrating sexual activity with a minor will cause lasting damage? What proof do you have sexual activity with a minor causes lasting damage?

>>717448365
no minor has consentual sex with adults

>>717448278
No but if a minor can legally decide such important things as whether to live or not, there's no reason why a minor can't decide sexual activities that it wants to engage in.

>>717448334
>ask for source
>provide credible source
>that's "bogus"
fuck off.

>>717448365
>"consensual" sexual activities with a minor
that is sexual abuse idiot

>>717448466
they shouldn't be allowed to decide either.

>>717448365

What the fuck is wrong with you?

A minor is either a) not yet sexually mature (ie hasnt even hit puberty) and therefore is not biologically meant to be having sex yet, or b) a stupid dumb horny teenager that is not yet smart enough to realize when he/she is being manipulated by an adult.

>>717448437
>no minor can consent to sexual activity with adults
[citation needed]

Also that's a bigoted legal fiction that has been ingrained in society. It's time for such medieval hatred to be overthrown and pedos to be accepted in a modern and diverse society.

>>717448548
>>ask for source
>>provide credible source
>>that's "bogus"
>fuck off.
>>717443382
>>717443427

>>717448633
AND YET in Belgium kids can decide whether to kill themselves or not.

Clearly this is just age old bigotry disguised as protection of minors.

>>717441604
It's to do with property rights

You can't risk having your daughter's virginity taken thus lowering her value to future prosepctive husbands

Society has covered this up with lofty words regarding morality and ethics and so on, conveniently forgetting that kids have sexual urges and a sense of discovery themselves that a loving adult can help them to explore.

I suppose it also stops little boys and girls from being fucked in the ass before they are ready.

>>717448653
k so you can dismiss my sources with no reason and instead tell me to read your pro-pedophilia bullshit?

>>717448466
if ur talking about euthanasia ur just a retard

>>717448717

That is s straw man fallacy at its finest.

>>717448548
>automatically presumes minors having sex is sexual abuse

Clearly kids exploring their sexuality should automatically presumed to be sex offenders.

Absolutely disgusting bigotry.

>>717448437
how the fuck would you know ? Do you know every single minor in the world ?
Stop it with the stupid empty claims ffs, you're embarassing yourself

>>717448775
if these guys can do it why not?
>>717443801
>>717444430
>>717444487
>>717447620

>>717448125
>Instead of finding a 9 year old attractive, how about someone your own age.
I don't quite understand. What's more attractive than a 9 year old? [spoiler]Just trolling.[/spoiler][spoiler]10 year olds!

File: whatthefuck.jpg (34KB, 600x337px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x337px

>>717448903
>presumes
i'm not presuming, it's fact.

>>717448871
>>717448817
>straw man fallacy
>retard
>reducing to ad hominems

>in law has the capacity to decide whether to live or not
>but no capacity to decide whether to have sex or not

Something doesn't add up here.

Being sexually attracted to a teenage girl that has gone through puberty is biologically natural. You're supposed to be attracted to a "woman's shape" that indicates strong genetics and ability to carry a baby. Things like full breasts, wide hips, hour glass, etc.

A 16 year old that has gone through puberty is biologically ideal for what your genes and nature want, from a purely scientific/evolutionary stand point.

We're all attracted to a perfect body of a young woman that has gone through puberty, and thus, is able to have a child. That's evolution. We're the result of thousands of years of nature drilling that in to our genes.

We just don't acknowledge it or freely admit it because there is a stigma attached. Why the hell do you think a magazine that sexualizes a 17 year old celebrity would be burned at the metaphorical stake, when ONE DAY later, on that girl's 18th birthday every magazine cover jizzes all over themselves.

We have magazines called BARELY 18, as in, we are going to the limit of what the law says. If it were allowed, 16 years would be the age every porn company revolved around.

We're a country founded by religious extremists and that mentality continues today. Human kind has put rules on society, like this topic, monogamy, etc., that go against our very nature biologically/evolutionary-wise.


That all said, being attracted to a girl BEFORE puberty is not natural. It's not biologically normal, and yes, there is something wrong with you.

tl;dr: 16 year old = natural to be attracted, but we don't do it for moral reasons.

Pre-puberty (13 and under) = unnatural. There's something wrong with you mentally.

>>717443277
kek

>>717448996
>it's a fact
[citation needed]

>>717448977
why can't you read my source

>>717448996
>it's fact
[Citation needed]

File: Capture.png (5KB, 368x109px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 368x109px

>>717449102
>autism meds needed

>>717449133
Why can't they read mine?
>>717443382
>>717443427

>>717449257
>run out of arguments
>ask for a source
>ignore source
>read this massive list of my sources which aren't relevant to our specific argument
f u c k y o u

>>717449214
>in some jurisdictions
nice try faggot, but try again

>>717449000
1 kid has been euthanized in belgium
there is no law that every kid can decide to be killed or not
ur just trying to justify ur sickness with false
statments, but whatever, if it helps u sleep

btw he was 17 and incurable ill

>>717449214
Argument from authority.

Just because the law says its abuse doesn't mean its abuse. Just because the law blanket deems children unable to consent doesn't mean children can't consent.

The fact you cite the law as proof is proof once again of just how bigoted society is against young love and children's rights and is a flagrant violation of the human rights of a child to live a fulfilling life as a child.

File: 3a23a008fd4d8b7154bde23ff4ead226.651x439x1.jpg (38KB, 651x439px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 651x439px

>>717449257
>>717449378

Each link is a pool of information with its own sources to information, probably Gish galloping, but welcome to /b/

>>717449010
>>717445936

>>717443636
Tight?

>>717449431
No but it demonstrates that the law recognises the ability of a child to consent. As such there is no reason why such bigoted and brutish methods should be used in other aspects of the law.

>>717441604
Sauce

>>717449383
sex with a child is sexual abuse. get over it.

>>717449449
>pointing out fallacies
lol autism.
"Sexual abuse, also referred to as molestation, is usually undesired sexual behavior by one person upon another."
children can't consent, therefore sex with a child is sexual abuse.

>>717449450
your sources are irrelevant, you asked me for one, I proved that sexual molestation has lasting negative effects. I'm right, you're wrong.

>>717449605
write a letter to the government of belgium then

maybe they add a law, that incurable minors can decide to have sex with an adult or not

>>717448653
wikipedia is not a credible source

Remember the days when we had loli threads all the time and the fucking normies stayed at myspace?

>>717449777
>sex with a child is sexual abuse. get over it.
Fuck off faggot, just because there is a law doesn't mean it's justified. Just keep trying.

File: muleDeer300x300.jpg (76KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 300x300px

post your special steam girft card links here and /b/ros will help you get some gift cards - http://www.steamdigitalgift*com/BMlxAxN

>>717449777
>children can't consent
And yet in Belgium they can.

>>717449848
>dank 2015

File: 1350002840990.jpg (363KB, 804x787px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 804x787px

>>717449777
>sex with a child is sexual abuse. get over it.
If you've made up your mind, what the fuck are you doing here debating?

>>717449896
it's literally sexual abuse you sad nonce. enjoy your mental handicap

>>717448012
kys. It's a joke, but still.

>>717449777
>children can't consent
Keep chanting your tantrum if it does you any good. You'll never post proof or facts, it's hopless really.

underage are considered incapable of valid consent therefore there is no scenario for sexualizing them that isn't abusive

>>717449847
reading is not an activity of yours
>>717443427
>Wikipedia is actually a very good starting point. You may not be able to cite it directly as a source, but it's a credible place to go.
>http://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-britannica/

>>717442603

if you wouldn't trust a 14 year old with a car why would you trust them to be able to consent to something like sex? just seems like developmentally kids are not prepared for the kind of emotional and mental changes that come with sex. i understand if you WANT them to be able to have sex because you want to have sex with a 14 year old, but I don't think that's what's best for everyone

>>717449950
no they can't

>>717449956
why the fuck would i actually entertain the idea that pedophilia is okay? you're the fucking retard

>>717449981
>it's literally sexual abuse
167 replies in and people still are too stupid to figure out that we're not talking about rape. Keep digging faggot.

>>717449811
Well considering in California a child could prostitute themselves and not get into trouble suggests this is the direction we're heading in.

>>717450029
they can't consent. lol stupid pedophiles

>>717450088
sex with a child is sexual abuse

>>717450072
>why the fuck would i actually entertain the idea that pedophilia is okay? you're the fucking retard

that means you're out of logical arguments and I've won this debate

>>717449950
stop that fuckin shit with belgium already or a u a complete retard?

>>717450051
You can legally have sex with 14y/os in civilized countries. I know, this excludes the USA. Think Europe.

>>717450034
>underage are considered incapable of valid consent
>considered
we're getting to the real problem there. Finally.

Just a weird comment here...But I've been kinda sexually active since I was 6 or 7...I actually wound up giving a 16 year old head by the time I was 8...so I guess some kinds just have more maturity than others...

>>717450200
>that means you're out of arguments
no it doesn't
>and i've won this debate
no you haven't

>>717441604

yeah, instead of reading books you should come ask 4chan. you're clearly not looking for truth, you're looking for evidence to support what you already believe. your worldview is most likely built on lies

>>717450219
No but it is a facet of consent that Belgians were willing to entertain. Are you saying the Belgian electorate is retarded as well?

;^)

>>717450131
i'll just stop answering to you, if all you can do is repeat the same shit over and over without anything else to say.

>>717450288
see
>>717449450

>>717450245

just because you can doesn't mean you should. that's the argument

>>717450287
No! You were severly sexually abused! Don't think it was okay. Let the society tell you it was abuse.

>>717450287

lol "maturity"

>>717450407
>just because you can doesn't mean you should
That's legislating morality and I thin k we both know in the real world that is bullshit that doesn't change anything/work.

>>717450384
that's fine with me faggot
>>717450393
i'm not reading your sources, i provided a source for my argument, you never replied to that, so you're still wrong.

>>717450454
I forced him to pull his dick out after he broke my batman action figure..

>>717450407
Cool, the argument changes every time, just at your will. How convenient.

>>717450368
in 1 case so far, for an incurable minor thats right

as uve been told already, write a letter to their government
maybe they let u abuse a dying minor then, in case it consents ofc

;^)

>>717449605
Dude. He was 17. Not exactly a "child".

Actually raping people is bad obv. If people had the knowledge and experience for sex, go for it.

Having sex with a underage even if she has knowledge will count as statuary rape, but fuck it, thats still better than the "rape" most people here are talking about it.

>>717450493
I meant maturity as being aware of sexual practices and the feelings corresponding to them smart alek :P

>>717450615
Legally a minor. So, in the terms of law, has the same ability to consent as a "child" (which is none, btw)

>>717450530
>i'm not reading your sources
>LALALA I'M COVERING MY EARS I CAN'T HEAR YOU
What a fine example of argumentative behavior.

>>717450615
So to pick up my argument from earlier, when is a child a child?
And when is sex sex?

>>717450555
This is the stories you find in a random shota doujin on YaoiHavenReborn, dude.

>>717450530
>i'm not reading your sources, ..., so you're still wrong

So now you see where I'm coming from.