Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
Anonymous
/aq/ aquarium general 2017-06-16 11:27:14 Post No. 2409131
[Report] Image search: [Google]
/aq/ aquarium general 2017-06-16 11:27:14 Post No. 2409131
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_20161223_220027.jpg (1MB, 3024x4032px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3024x4032px
Discuss anything aquarium related here, including inhabitants, decor and issues.
Google is your friend.
Feel free to ask questions but know that there are a lot of resources out there that could answer your question a lot faster and accurately than /an/.
Make sure to include these things in your post before asking because we can't help you if we don't have the full picture:
-tank size (include dimensions, not just volume)
-parameters (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, pH, GH, KH)
-any and all inhabitants + how long you've had them
Links:
Tank Cycling:
https://www.petcha.com/freshwater-aquarium-cycling/
https://www.petcha.com/fishless-aquarium-cycling-method/
Care Guides:
>http://seriouslyfish.com/
Plants and Animals for sale:
>http://www.petsolutions.com/
>http://www.aquabid.com/
>http://www.liveaquaria.com/
Database for aquatic plants and their parameters
>http://www.flowgrow.de/db/aquaticplants
>>
Someone mentioned a discord in the last thread, can I get a link to that?
Also last thread >>2403915
>>
File: Jan_Matejko,_Stańczyk.jpg (1MB, 2412x1816px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2412x1816px
>>2409131
What fish are vertical tanks for? My tank has a huge algae bloom problem (the water itself is mountain dew green), is this bad for the fish?
Please no bully - I want to be a better fish owner
>>
>>2409136
Vertical tanks aren't for many fish. Fancy goldfish and angelfish are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head, and even with them normal tanks will probably be better.
>>
>>2409136
>vertical tanks
apple snails
>>
>>2409147
No. Just no anon. They need to reach the surface to breathe
>>
Use the search function we already have a general >>2409034
>>
>>2409163
This was made before that one, use the time function
>>
>>2409176
No it wasn't lol the other one was made 2 hours before this one.
>>
>>2409176
no it wasn't
2409034 comes before 2409131
>>
>>2409180
There's the time the other thread was made. 17:35 this thread was made 19:27 just admit you're wrong.
>>
>>2409184
you're retarded.
let me know when you spot your mistake.
>>
>>2409200
So you're telling the thread made at 17:35 was made after this thread that was made at 19:27? What kind of weird fantasy world is this?
>>
>>2409204
nope, wrong error.
try again.
>>
>>2409241
that's what I said.
I'll assume you've spotted your mistake.
Thread posts: 16
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4