What's your favourite Homo (apart from H. sapiens, of course)?

My favorite homo is OP

File: drawing_9.jpg (147KB, 1000x1007px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1000x1007px

Homo superior

>>2253875
Homobumbandit

Homo Bulbouspenor

>>2253875
Bugguy

>>2253949
Aww <3

>>2253915
kek

File: Homo_erectus_new.jpg (183KB, 544x680px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 544x680px

No one ever talks about Homo Erectus.

They should talk about Homo Erectus.

>>2256228
>we wuz kangz

File: 3d4fb3638ad1ce7cdf177ffe5b7c9f4c.jpg (43KB, 492x650px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 492x650px

Homo Ergaster,they were like Erectus, but less niggeredly

>>2256258
Seeing one of these walk down the street nowadays would be fucking terrifying. That perfect blend of human and simian features where your brain just doesn't know what to recognize it as.

File: bbaggins.jpg (24KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 300x250px

I kind of really like the idea of the little ones. Homo floresiensis.

Hobbits IRL.

>>2256287

If Hobbits were little nigglets, yes.

>>2256298
Eh. Doesn't matter what colour they were. The fact that little people existed is great.

>>2253878
This. Anything else is nigger-tier. There's evidence Neanderthals were more human in the spiritual sense than the humans that outcompeted them, and obviously all the successful populations today have Neanderthal admixture.

>>2256299
You don't need shitty useless shrunken species for that, just look and point at kids and dwarves instead

>>2256311
>Native Americans
>decimated
>had the most Neanderthal DNA of any haplogroup

File: Mol-Biol-Evol-2011-Yotova-1957-62.jpg (35KB, 932x359px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 932x359px

>>2256399
I dare ya, I double dare ya!

File: 201244125249002-2012-05margshipmanfd.jpg (111KB, 424x500px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 424x500px

>>2256417

File: human-evolution-a-notebook-6-638.jpg (124KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 638x479px

>>2256427

>>2253875
What killed our cousins anon? It had to be something big because if Abos can thrive in that wasteland called Australia then surely Neanderthal and Denisova can thrive in Asia for a very long time.

It would surely be a intriguing world where three intelligent species exist at the same time.

>>2256477
Genocide/interbreeding.

File: 20064976.gif (4MB, 1331x1590px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1331x1590px

>>2256427

File: Asian-Japanese-Spiked-Haircut.jpg (37KB, 474x639px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 474x639px

>>2253875
>Highest IQs
>Longest lives
>Best diets
>Overall healthiest
>have the most feminine women
>Less promiscuous
Pretty much the most advance homos are the East Asians; Chinese (whom will inevitably become the next world power), Koreans, and especially Japanese are at the top.

>>2256417
Blue or green eyes are actually disadvantageous, due to being less likely to tolerate sunrays and tend to be less powerful than darker color eyes.

>>2256399
Native Americans are actually derived from East Asians that crossed the ice-bridge between Asian and North America, about a few thousand years ago.

>>2257008
not if you're a neet basement dweller

>>2257003
>have the most feminine women and men
fixed it for you ;)

>>2257003
>Chinese (whom will inevitably become the next world power)
top kek m8

>no un-poisoned drinking water left in a few years
>somehow become world power
sure

File: Yakusho-Koji_photo-by-KAZUTO-SUETAKE_688.jpg (107KB, 688x350px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 688x350px

>>2257079
Lower sexual dimorphism tend to be a greater sign that a general population is more monogamous. This is because they find a mate and for the most part settle.


In most polygamous and/or violent species species, the masculine traits are a lot more pronounced.


In more esthetically diverse populations (many eye or hair colors) like cats, it is usually the female polyamory or essentially secretly cuckolding males; half of the kids in the farm were likely biological strangers to the daddy. This is because they let many more gens survive in comparison to male polygamy (gins of a single male in a few women).

>>2257034
>CITATION NEEDED
>Only for one East Asian country
>Not in all of China
>Likely optional for the higher leveled students
Besides, this would likely be the best way to ensure their population get smarter, by using much stricter education.

>>2257190
Asians don't have lower dimorphism than any other group.
"they all look the same to me" isn't actually a scientific argument.

>>2257199
Wanna bet?

>>2253875
None of them. 2EZ

>>2257199
That's simply not true; PC propaganda primarily to blur gender altogether.

Sorry, but it would appear that White and African populations are clearly more sexually dimorphic; usually due to some combination of historically being more violent, male polygamy, and/or female polyamory or secret cuckolding of the male.
Asian populations were generally more isolated and heavily influenced by cultures of honor and avoidance of shame; still do, but is dying due to Western influences.


Sure there are exceptions, but the general rule is not only true but blatantly obvious who is willing to honestly look at reality.

let me open up my porn folder and show you...

>>2257218
There is little doubt that white and black demographics are also a lot more sexual and promiscuous, which is more due to how they bred and survived.

>>2253875
You OP

File: 1452602833818.png (102KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 250x250px

>>2257218
So this is why it is usually white women who go on sex vacations, cuckold, and love medium pertaining to women manipulating men in secret relations or love triangles. With feminism, they are simply becoming more overt with their sexual nature that was evidently always there. Heck, they even take pride in being promiscuous among their female friend, and see almost nothing wrong with it.


Black women just want to fuck anyone with a cock, more often, and with little 'fucks' (ba dum tssk) about it. But at least they are more honest about it, in comparison.


Asian women are generally a lot more monogamous and less into cock-crasals. It's no wonder why white males are so obsessed with East Asian women.
But it is white cultures that will rot Asian counties, with European gens and perverted culture. The Asian women will eventually become as bad as the average white women.

File: 1477975518375.jpg (219KB, 500x638px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 500x638px

>>2253875
You

>>2256258
They're actually the same species, it's just that Ergaster was more primitive.

>>2256311
>Aborigines
>successful

Nice joke. Besides, Neanderthals had parts of their brain that were actually less developed than ours, and vice versa.

>>2256477
There's possibly up to 7: Us, Neanderthals, Denisovans, Hobbits, a species that mated with the Onge and Jarawa after they left Africa, a species that the Melanesians and Papua New Guineans mated with (might even been the same as the one who fucked the Onge/Jarawa), and another as of yet unknown species that mated with the ancestors of Pygmies and West Africans that apparently happened 338,000 years ago (before we even existed).

>>2257008
It's good to have in the dark though.

>>2257218
The Khoisan are about as "dimorphic" as Asians, and even look like a race of half African and half Asian (despite being older than both). Doesn't mean those hunter gatherers and pastoralists are superior.

>>2256399
>middle east
>zero blonde hair
Top kek

homo sexual

File: barbarian.jpg (43KB, 309x350px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 309x350px

>>2257888
>Depends on what do you mean by 'superior', as for all mating strategies do have benefits
Some can argue that male polygamy is better for the species, as for it is usually the most masculine/testosterone and/or physically strong or violent prone that survive. Thus less likely to be concurred, more likely to concur others with brute force, and better suited to fight off beasts. Thus more dimorphism, but less genetic diversity


Female polyamory or secret cuckolding of the male is also arguably beneficial. It allow for more gens and traits to survive, thus breeding participants are less likely to mate with someone genetically too close; inbreeding (or too close to it) can lead to very serious disorders

A combination of the previous strategies pretty much created white people. heck, chances are the main reason why they have so much Neanderthal genetics is because of the women's secrets... Which explain why white people are so esthetically diverse and European women love African and Muslim men so much, that they practically flood them in; they are clearly more masculine and full of testosterone. If anything, it is white humans going through the same issue yet again...


In the modern world, monogamy is the best functional strategy.Whites and blacks were not quite the same in regards to mating strategies, but monogamy (at least not true monogamy; wife's secret lovers) was clearly not their primary form of relations
____
By the way, with evolution, creatures are only as smart as they need to be. Areas with seasons tend to require more brain capacity, as for it was highly important to remember what grows when and how to survive the cold dark winters.
Asian countries were typically harsher, thus higher IQs were required for the general populations of East Asians

In most parts of Africa, there are no seasons and most game and food sources grow year round. Thus there was not as much push or need for higher IQs;though this is not to say there are no smart Africans

>>2256280

Dude, I saw that guy at the liquor store yesterday.

>>2258203
Love is one thing, and sex is another. While my wife and I love each other in a way that benefits both of us equally, why should she have sex with me if it's more pleasurable to her if a different man does it? If a relationship can benefit 3 people, isn't it better than a relationship that benefits only 2 people?

>>2258288
oh god, what the fuck

File: 36546754.jpg (101KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1280x720px

>>2253875
They may get messed with and teach people to workout, but they cuck hillbillies in North America like the Neanderthals did to white people. Eventually, hillbillies will take pride in their cuckery.

File: sticker,375x360.png (57KB, 375x360px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 375x360px

>>2253875
Beefsquatch is the best homo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHedCFU4Gw0

File: 609302-31614-56.jpg (70KB, 260x300px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 260x300px

>>2260010
Yeah, but then they will call other people cucks as self-projection or Displacement Psychology.


Neo Nazis or the alt right are perfect examples of this.

>>2253915
FUCKIGN BASED MILO
HELL YEAH BITSCHK

>>2253915
The crazy fag who believe Christians are oppressed?

>>2260031
Cuck means pushover, pussy, sucker who kisses nonwhite penis mindlessly, doormat and so on. It is not a reference to actual cuckolding.

>>2257003
>Overall healthiest

I'm a Chink and I feel suicidal everyday. Also, my stomach hurts like there is a baby xeno inside my intestines

File: IMG_2357.gif (674KB, 478x360px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 478x360px

>>2260108
>Cuck means pushover, pussy, sucker who kisses nonwhite penis mindlessly, doormat and so on. It is not a reference to actual cuckolding
Uh, no. No, not really. It just idiots wrongly using actual words because they think they sound 'cool'.


By the way
>sucker who kisses nonwhite penis mindlessly
So somehow cuck is racial and you are a faggot for white cocks only? You are really not helping your case

File: mushroom2.gif (666B, 17x17px) Image search: [Google]

666B, 17x17px

>>2260168
>idiots wrongly using actual words
>using actual words
>actual
...oh...oh wow....

File: Raven_Mind_Blown.gif (473KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 250x250px

>>2260175
>abbreviations... You clearly never heard of it.
Cuck was established as a shortened version for cuckolding or pertaining to it, long before morons were lobbing it to mean 'whatever insult I want it to mean'

File: 7a6a2370b3dd13dc9c3f19bf5b21ac47.jpg (26KB, 564x414px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 564x414px

>>2258084
So this is why so many white people online have an obsession with cuckolding and always lobbing it as if projection.

They are basically a race of cucks. Largely cucked by an inferior nonhuman species, and now by other human breeds like big dick Africans and Muslims.
By this, I do not necessarily mean interracial relations are cuckolded; white people show how it can greatly increase genetic diversity, which prevent inbreeding. Just that white women seem to have a blatant lean towards favoring cuckolding males in secret relations; otherwise they wouldn't look so esthetically different. Also, it is usually darker skinned males they complain finding alone with their wives or girlfriends, doing the dirty.
At least Africans and Muslims know how to keep their women more on check; even though they can be harsh. Whites/Caucasians even allowed feminism to not only exist but become the political mega power in their nations.
Even with the alt-right (the new logo for white-nationalists), it is clear that deep down they are very insecure that they will be mass cuckolded yet again. This is because their women are evidently the most scandalous cuckolders of them all, and even white men know it.

>>2260178
It's the new definition get with the times you fucking retard.
>gay means happy :)

>>2253875
God. That fag has done a good job of making you think he's real

File: img_9988edit.jpg__600x0_q85_upscale.jpg (135KB, 600x559px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 600x559px

If any of you went to >>>/int/ you'd know that there are no white people. The Neanderthals were the only white people and they're extinct.

>>2260286
Hey retard the only humans with no neanderthal DNA are Blacks, even black americans are part neanderthal because they are part white.

>>2253875
Dude... No homo!

Other than the homo sapien!

We're the number one homo of all the homos!

>>2256389
Source

File: 1453045434679.png (42KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 300x300px

>>2260225
No. Still no.

It is still just an annoying minority of idiots (typically on the internet) misusing words because they want to sound 'edgy' or think it sound 'cool'.
It just comes out as childish.


But considering how far off your definition is, why not just create a new word instead of trying misrepresent a term with specific existing meaning that that is actually not related to your intended label?
At least like this, the English language will be more consistent and words would actually have intended meaning

>>2253915
fpbp

Rudolphensis were the most based.