Do girls care if you have little to no social life?

File: 1471464789872.gif (2MB, 423x264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 423x264px

>>18133989

>Do girls care if you have little to no social life?

Absolutely. Yes.

Firstly, nothing is more tiresome than being someone's one and only source of human interaction. Its sad. Its like hanging out with a fart.

Secondly, its basic animal dynamics. Have you ever been at the buffet and noticed that like a tray of gross looking deviled eggs is untouched and no one is eating it? What are the chances you're going to go over there and dig in, pretty low huh? I need to know that you, as a human being, are acceptable to other human beings. Its important. I'm not about to take the chance that you're so socially inept that you start doing magic tricks and trying to speak to people in elvish the first time I take you to meet my friends.

Thirdly, its a red flag very early in relationships. The fact that you have no friends could either mean you're terribly socially awkward or you've murdered them all and you have all of their thigh meat curing on hooks in your bathroom. Either option doesn't really get vaginas moist if you catch my drift.

>What should I do?

Get some friends, weirdo.

No generalisation can be made for ''girls''. Some girls will mind, some won't.

>>18133989
I'm personally highly intimidated by people with lots of friends, but I only represent one of 3.5 billion women

>>18133989

the things guys worry about.

>>18133989

how many girls have you dated? like official bf gf thing and how long did those relationships last?

>>18134008
But I really like deviled eggs. Why wouldn't I eat any? And it's a buffet. Maybe they just switched them out

>>18134038
Guys have to worry about every little thing that could have the gate closed on them, girls just have to keep the gate looking pretty.

>>18134048

you must be at least 18 years of age to post here.

if you're going to change your entire life and pretend to socialize just to not scare off a woman than you're doing life wrong.

>>18134050
Neither me or OP said anything about doing that.

>>18134055

>no social life
>afraid girl will run if i have no social life
>what do

if your implying that the answer is 'nothing' then you're retarded.

File: 1489541129164.gif (817KB, 200x233px) Image search: [Google]

817KB, 200x233px

>>18134048

>looking pretty is the only thing girls have to worry about

>>18134063

forgive him, he has never met a woman.

>>18133989
>tfw only socialize with an old lady with cancer who feeds cats

>tfw recently got a job and only one or two other coworkers to talk to

meh

I'm an only child and grew up mostly alone, being alone is natural for me. Lonely as hell sometimes, but God doesn't give you anything you can't handle.

>>18134063
When it comes to dating yes.

File: 1403372548110.gif (3MB, 286x258px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 286x258px

>>18134072

I have this overwhelming feeling that you have absolutely no experience with women.

>>18134039
My only real gf I had was when I was 18 (22 now), we lasted 9 months. I had a larger friend group back then and that's where I met her.

>>18134038
Why don't you think it's worth worrying about?

>>18134091
>ohhh boo hoo i have to put on the make ups and get the periods sob sob woe is me
Being female is living life on easy mode.

>>18134097

because it doesn't matter. as long as you're a cohesive person they're not going to care (assuming they are also a cohesive person).

most social lives are radically changed to accommodate a new girlfriend anyways.

ye lol had this girl, things were going okay, shes social as fuck, the moment she knew i have no social life she peaced, she still tries to tease me from time to time but i realized she isn't the right person for me anyways so i don't give her attention anymore.

>>18133989

pensive loners are a type... find a girl who digs you for you

>>18134008
you are a living cancer who communicates and lives by memes and I want you to be purged from this earth like the malignancy you are inside

File: 2017-03-05 01.43.26.jpg (243KB, 1600x1371px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1600x1371px

>>18134098
good mood revived. Thanks anon

File: 1430876077011.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>>18134098

Back to your containment board, shithead

>>>/r9k/

>>18134072
If she has no standards and and doesn't care about a long term relationship then what you say is true.

Good news for you.

>>18134593
there is only one gender, male because women are just objects

>>18134008
>Firstly, nothing is more tiresome than being someone's one and only source of human interaction. Its sad. Its like hanging out with a fart.

This is why I gave up dating. Society took out the significant from "significant other".

Now, everyone's just concerned about building a safety bubble out of social networking and "being free".

It's "sad" to have someone be your ray of hope/strength/motivation and "ludicrous" to expect others to think of you this way.

But then all these failed marriages warn about how stupid this low-key approach to relationships is.
Then again, I can't really blame people. In a world where alcohol and distortion of truth to give a good first impression is mandatory on a first date, it's no surprise people want to have as little to do with one another as possible.

>>18134658
this is only getting better

>>18134626
Oh excuse me. Yes, of course. Women have to worry about finding the guy with the fat enough wallet, strong enough social network, etc.

Women only have to worry about looking for the man who creates security in their lives. Actual romance I'd secondary at BEST.

Well guess what, guys have to worry about way more shit, AND when we have worked and toiled hard - and I mean *hard* to be wanted by women, we still have the night impossible task of finding a needle in a haystack - a woman who isn't essentially a gold digger, doesn't just want a baby, etc. but is actually looking for a soul mate like we are.

And guess what. For those few girls? Dating is fucking easy. There's a thousand mature men looking for each one mature woman who rises above the comfort given to her by society.

>>18134677
>we still have the night impossible task of finding a needle in a haystack
>a woman doesn't just want a baby, etc. but is actually looking for a soul mate like we are.
You realize that women generally want to have babies with their lovers because of the instinctive desire to perpetuate the human race with someone they find good enough for the task, not because of the potential alimony checks, right ?
I know it's hard to meet people outside of school and work in our modern cities sterilized by late-stage capitalism, but please, try to meet more women in places where people share your hobbies.

>>18134704
Pfhah! I'll believe it when I see it.
Women are slaves to their biological need to procreate. Romance is not a part of that need. Very few women bother to rise above that animal behavior and actually keep their dignity. The average female will only ever love her children and their father will always just be an object, even if they don't admit it to themselves.

The few women who aren't like that, are frankly not worth the effort of having to compete with other men. Especially not when it's such a high number of other men.

This is because that when youve achieved what society expects men to be, this Adonis of body and mind, it comes with a dose of self respect and dignity - a superiority - that eliminates the need for companionship in one way or another.

>>18134722
>Women are slaves to their biological need to procreate.
Like everyone else.
I mean, take a honest look at yourself. Why do you think you are whining all day on Cambodian cartoon enthusiast forums about women and why they don't want a good and caring man like you ? Why do you jerk to porn three times a day and feel sad about it before you go to sleep ?
Because you are a slave to your biological need to procreate, like most other people. And if we weren't slave to those biological needs, the human species wouldn't exist today.

>Romance is not a part of that need
You could make the argument that romance is like dogs sniffing their asses before they fuck, but in a human, more sophisticated way.
This would be very edgy and cynical, but I think there is a part of truth in that (but like everyone else, I think romance is beautiful).

>[insert stereotypical /r9k/ memes about women]
You are so bitter dude, I don't know what to say.
I can't blame you because I'm kinda bitter myself, and I don't think it's solely your fault, our sick societies create bitter people everyday IMHO, with their jobs empty of meaning, their bullies, their omnipotent competitiveness, etc.
And the modern dating scene is so terrible. We have to act like walking clichés out of romantic comedies, and play by boring unwritten rules, instead of being genuine and meeting potential partners in authentic situations.
That said, the attitude you have right now won't do you any favors. There are some good people out there. Try to meet them in places where you can share your hobbies with others, seriously.

>This is because that when youve achieved what society expects men to be, this Adonis of body and mind, it comes with a dose of self respect and dignity - a superiority - that eliminates the need for companionship in one way or another.
Shut up, you are a loser whining on an imageboard, like me.
Reading a few Nietzsche aphorisms doesn't make you an aristocratic patrician.

>>18134754
>first paragraph
Yeah, this is only the 800th tine I've heard this unoriginal argument, full of presumption that I masturbate every day and assuming that I'm just a "nice guy" never getting any cooch. We're not animals anymore. Parenthood is a deep responsibility, not an urge to haphazardly fulfill because of a centuries old beastial instinct.

And masturbation is wholly different from a woman's biological clock nagging at her subconciously to get knocked up. It's a WHOLLY separate process from her urge to rub one out or have sex. It just so happens the two go hand in hand conveniently.

>Third paragraph.
It's not worth it for me to look for a needle in a haystack. The road to being "well adjusted" was long, hard and very lonely. I no longer have the need for companionship because the hardest moments of my life I've had to go through alone. So yes, I'm bitter. And spiteful. I'm a believer of karma and if nobody helps me then I will definitely not help anyone either. I would have made any sacrifice when I was a loser. I used to spend money to rent out rooms to homeless people during winter at a hotel I worked at. But that very same attitude allowed people to walk all over me. I've had to change everything in my life. Everything. And now I've got better things to do than deign to compete with little monkey "Alphas", while trying to find a woman who isn't as shallow as the rest of society.

>final paragraph
Assume what you want, I'm here to give out non-dating advice, but these threads sometimes catch my eye. Nobody's perfect, I guess.

>>18134722
>Women are slaves to their biological need to procreate. Romance is not a part of that need.

I would never understand this /r9k/ idea that men are the romantic sex that wants commitment. What other men do you know about? The vast mayority of men are more superficial, more corncerned with sex and a lot less "romantic" about their relationships than women. Myself included. And THAT is actual evolutionary psicology, since men evolved with the evolutionary strategy of fucking as many women as they can, and not the ridiculous "Nature of women" that you people never shut about.
So I ask this again, from where do you pull out this idea of how "men" act?

>>18134677
I don't even understand how people as bitter and/or retarded as yourself happen
I can't even pick out a single point to argue with, it's all just so wrong

>>18134779
>The vast mayority of men are more superficial, more corncerned with sex and a lot less "romantic" about their relationships than women.

The vast majority of alpha males, yes. They're too stupid to do anything but think with their dicks. Life hands them everything and never expand their mind past such base behavior.

But in the vast majority of the remaining men, there's a much greater drive for selfless romance than in most women.

Most women look only for some sort of security or insurance. Many simply want a stable man she can raise a kid with. Romance is tertiary for them most of the time. (Exception being teenage years, of course, as their sex hormones overpower the biological clock.)

>>18134785
Yeah it's always easy to just not counter argue and declare you're right.

File: 1489570163636.png (76KB, 203x203px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 203x203px

>>18133989
I've been with a girl 4 years. She's seen me times where I've had 10-20 friends, and times where I only had 1-2 friends. If you're dating someone, they should only care if you're verging on antisocial.

Human interaction should be important, as you don't want to come off as someone that's socially inept, but it shouldn't be important in a romantic relationship.

>>18133989
Absolutely. If there is one thing that attracts girls/women it's status, and social status is one thing.

I'd actually wager that a hugely popular bum would be a lot more popular with the ladies than a guy with a huge bank account and no friends

>>18134817
Too bold a claim. Money will still win out over social status, because it inherently carries the promise of tall social status.

>>18134776
>This is only the 800th tine I've heard this unoriginal argument, full of presumption that I masturbate every day and assuming that I'm just a "nice guy"
You are an anonymous poster on an imageboard infamous for being populated by that kind of person. I don't know who you are.
Moreover, you are posting /r9k/ memes, so, yeah of course I'm gonna assume you are part of this demographic.

>We're not animals anymore
I disagree. We are just way, way more intelligent than all of them, on this planet at least.

>masturbation is wholly different from a woman's biological clock nagging at her subconciously to get knocked up
I don't think it's that different, but maybe you are right. That said, even though my ex wanted to have a child with me, she knew I wasn't ready at all for it, so we were both careful and she never did something shitty behind my back.

>It's not worth it for me to look for a needle in a haystack.
Like I said, try to meet people with similar interests IRL.
I feel kinda bad saying this because I know it's hard nowadays. Affordable video arcades, cinemas, music venues, places where you can play board games, etc, are every day being replaced by more and more soulless Burger King and Zara stores where everyone stay in their bubble. I believe in the Debordian theory that capitalism is destroying authentic life in cities, and I think that is why so many isolated people spend so much in front of their computers nowadays instead of going outside.

Anyway, I don't want get too political, but, the thing is that I have met a substantial amount of girls who attend or even organize screenings of patrician movies, and concerts, once I got out of the boring city I grew up in. Of course, most girls are normies because most people are normies in general. But interesting girls aren't as rare as you think. If you can find opportunities to share your hobbies with people IRL, you will be surprised I guess.

>>18134827

>Implying instinc is so rational.

>>18134776
>>18134875 (cont.)
>The road to being "well adjusted" was long, hard and very lonely
I will sound like a hippie but I think powerful people want you to be "well-adjusted" for their own interests. We should strive for being more well adjusted according to ourselves, not to the expectations of society, unless that's what is making you happy (and I know being an outcast isn't a nice feeling)

>I used to spend money to rent out rooms to homeless people during winter at a hotel I worked at. But that very same attitude allowed people to walk all over me.
Reading this make me seriously shed tears. I don't know what to say. It's naive but I wish people wouldn't be so shitty.

>And now I've got better things to do than deign to compete with little monkey "Alphas", while trying to find a woman who isn't as shallow as the rest of society.
I think I can understand.
But what strike me is your lack of empathy for women. I guess what I wanted to convey by all this text is that they are humans like all of us. Some of them are even like /r9k/bots toward us, but in a different, inverted way (i.e. isolationist feminists).
And I think the answer is to interact with more women instead of being consumed by bitterness.
This board is pretty cool for that because femanons aren't afraid of exposing their identity here. But friendships and relationships are even better for that.
I know you will say "yeah, this guy is just a privileged normie who have great social skills", but I'm an alcoholic NEET who always stress over my interactions with people and spend most of my time on imageboards. However, I've met people who shared my peculiar music tastes at concerts, among them there were women and my ex-gf, and I've learn not to be resentful toward them despites my bad experiences in the past.

>>18134792
>The vast majority of alpha males, yes.

Are you implying that myself and everyday other male I met is an alpha male? Also, nice way of avoiding nuance there. I said men tend to be more superficial (physically at least) than women, that is not the same that just thinking with your dick.

Also, and the more important thing, YOU DIDN'T EVEN ANSWER MY QUESTION, that was the whole point of my post, how do you know all this stuff about the behavior of men and women? I also explained to you why men act this way with real biology and you avoided that too. You just keep making claims about "how things are" but can't even explain how do you know this.