Post futa giving men the D.
If you use the word "gay" to descibe homosexual male, then, this isn't gay since these men are engaging in intercours with women, who are not from the same sex, hence not homosexual.
I wish there were more non-trap male on futa.
>finds men unattractive
>masturbates to pictures which have a heavy focus on men getting fucked
Everyone of you arguing about whether or not this is gay or not are dumb.
Stop worrying about labels and bullshit, stop worrying about what gets other people hard, and just roll with whatever your own dick decides to take a stand for.
You'll be much happier, and your inane bickering won't clog up the board for those of us trying to masturbate like civilized perverts.
Because people into futanari generally aren't into men. I know those who don't like it would balk at the concept, but it's really not hard to see why given this fetish revolves around dicks on women. Gay men being into that makes as much sense as straight men digging dudes with pussies.
Strap-ons are also cumbersome. They DO give pleasure to the women wielding them unlike >>122586 says, but it's generally in a narrow way.
Futanari is appealing because it's not just a toy at that point, it's a part of the woman in question. It's relatable. It's warm flesh instead of cold plastic. You know how she feels based on the simple fact there's a hardon and you know for a fact she came based on the physical result. It's also much more open to spontaneous passion than an unwieldy toy that takes time to put on and ends up not being used correctly most of the time.
If women could actually wield real dicks if they wanted to I assure you nobody would bother with strap-ons anymore. This fetish is simply that same inclination taken into the realm of unrealistic fantasy.
Except a glance at /d/ proves otherwise.
>huge cock/ball futa
>futa on male
>futa bigger than male
and 70% of the time, they're solo; it's not partly about the dick, it's ALL about the dick. Hell, your own picture screams that you just want to suck cocks and not feel gay.
Well you asked a question and got a few different answers, none of which align with your assumption. It's kind of childish to just literally ignore them and make up your mind anyway.
If it were just illustrated shemale smut then no one would bother with the futanari term to begin with. It's a loanword used to describe the unrealistic fantasy of women with dicks that have nothing to do with being transsexual since there were already terms to describe and identify the latter but not the former. Loanwords aren't adopted to fill in niches that are already filled or represent ideas that are already prevalent/popular.
You don't have to like it anon. I happen to think the other futafags around here who shove it in people's faces are incredibly annoying (partly because they do that with other fetishes of their own as well), but... what do you gain by pretending to ask a question and then rejecting the prospect of even reading an answer?
If it were ALL about the dick then they'd be pictures of nothing but disembodied dicks. The women they're attached to is an important part of the equation I think people looking to hate on the fetish often ignore.
I don't feel gay because I don't have any interest in men. Nothing about the male aesthetic is appealing to me. I like curves and gentle features, short torsos, long legs, supple breasts, flared hips, etc. I just happen to think an aesthetically pleasing cock occasionally looks good on that too.
I get that sounds ridiculous, but to someone like me it's not an indication of sex or gender, it's just a part as being tied completely to the realm of unrealistic fantasy means that part can be disconnected from where it originates in real life without taking along any of the baggage.
It's like putting bat wings on a woman and calling her a succubus or slicing off her bottom half for a scaly fishtail for a mermaid. Neither of those things can happen in real life and my interest in succubi and mermaids doesn't indicate an attraction for bats or fish, but for those fantasy forms. Similarly I don't really have any desire to suck dick in real life either.
I get it if you can't make that disconnect in the realm of fantasy. There are things in fantasy fetishes I don't get or particularly like either, but telling someone what their fetish REALLY means when you have a negative bias while ignoring their arguments just seems silly.
I never asked a question. I was just passing by and thought I'd sum up that paragraph. To anyone outside our little circle, that explanation won't fly. Just because you want to label to something else doesn't mean a thing. A moonbounce and a bouncycastle are the same thing.
Every damn futa thread is 1 dude shitpost "LMAO GAY" and 40 of you fall for it
Stop replying to bait and post related to the thread
I've actually had that explanation fly for many people curious (positively and negatively) about the fetish. It doesn't fly with people who've already made up their minds about what it is based on their own subjective views. And like I said, some people aren't able to make the disconnect between fantasy and reality for some things and there's nothing wrong with that as long as you're not using that discrepancy in views to attack someone else for their harmless unrealistic fetish and taste in smut.
And yes, your views are important because they determine what you do and don't like. But they end at the point of you trying and to tell someone else what they like and why they like it when you obviously don't. At that point you're just playing fetish police.
I see that "disembodied dick" argument a lot. You guys really can't come up with a better comeback, huh?
>nothing about the male aesthetic is appealing to me
>the quintessence of masculinity
Just because you pretend they're gender neutral, doesn't make it so. I get it if you can't make that connection in the realm of your head. I have fetishes that are embarassing too, but pretending you REALLY aren't gay is just silly.
A tranny tag existing on Xnxx is irrelevant.
I know the term has a tie-in for transsexualism in Japan, but that also has little to do with how the word has been adopted outside of Japan. Outside audiences saw the appeal of the genre's more fantastical nature and adopted the term for the corresponding idea. There's some overlap, but by and large the term has changed as its moved across borders. It happens with every loanword at some point.
A couple paragraphs doesn't really make a thesis. I don't know why it's bad that I'm taking time to explain myself instead of being rude or shitposting. I get angry at enough things to let the stuff I fap to become a part of that.
You're pulling some Olympic level linguistics to explain the validity of your fetish. I like robots, that's simply it. Gears and armor plating excites me. Bam, no 3 paragraphs. You sir like trannies in a variety if flavors. Particularly the illustrated kind. Bam, no more creeping people out explaining your fetish in length
It's not silly if I have no attraction to men. I honestly don't anon. You can't force yourself to be attracted to something you're not.
Ask yourself, would someone who thinks vaginas aesthetically pleasing but dislikes everything else about female physiology and has no inclination to take that fancy into the realm of reality be considered straight in your opinion?
In the realm of made up fantasy it doesn't matter where the part comes from. That's why you can have centaurs, mermaids, succubi, naga, minotaurs, etc. A picture of a drawn futanari has nothing to do with men for me, because that unrealistic form is its own package every bit as similar as an angel's wings belong to her and not some hypothetical bird out there in the aether missing its pair.
I don't see the cock as the quintessence of masculinity. If anything a dick and balls is the antithesis of masculinity since it's natural state is always soft, erections are wildly susceptible to stress both physical and mental and any trauma inflicted to them is utterly debilitating. That flies in the face of what traditional masculinity is meant to be. Humans are a lot more sexually dimorphic than just the plumbing between the legs.
So what part do you have a problem with; my verbosity or the fact I don't see drawn futanari and MtF transsexuals as the same thing?
I'm sure there are people who do see them as the same thing, but they have their own reasons for liking or interpreting the fetish. You're essentially telling me that your view of this fetish supersedes mine for some arbitrary reason based on what I assume is a dislike of it.
I'm quite sure a few people who enjoy robots/mecha/cyborgs/etc have their own reasons for liking that fetish, are you going to make sure those reasons line up with yours or that their interest isn't for a reason you deem invalid?
The sexual organs are how we tell sexes apart. It's very black and white. Unless its a vagina at the end of a penis. At that point its either fantasy, movie magic, or a freak of nature
I don't get how explaining why I like something or why I don't see it a certain way makes me a tryhard.
I don't know how to make it any clearer that I'm not sexually attracted to men. I can't help but notice that when I ask if it's believable for someone to have an interest in drawn vaginas but not the real thing or anything else about the female body to be straight I get no answers.
My mindset isn't any different than the suspension of disbelief that allows mythological beings to exist in fantasy to begin with.
Take a step back and look at all the smut on the popular porn boards. Even with vanilla content all the bodies are idealized, all the women hairless except where it's wanted, no physical defects or deformities, etc. You're already engaging your suspension of disbelief for 90% of the content here to begin with.
Why is it so hard to understand that some people can go a bit further and they're not raving lunatics for doing so or bothering to explain themselves?
Yes, the amount of words you deem necessary to try and disassociate a facet of one thing is alarming. It's like saying you like hot sauce but only this hot sauce that honestly tastes like the other hot sauce because of the label.
We make all sorts of classifications based on parts that exist in fantasy that wouldn't mesh with reality. Nobody labels angels as avians based on the structure of their wings. Nobody disputes the reptilian associations to naga even though describing them as ectothermic never sees relevance.
You've already given the answer to this conundrum. It's fantasy. You can take any part you want and it put it anywhere you want without it having any meaning beyond what you want it to. Nobody else is obligated to see it that way and that's precisely how people can see futanari as just "tranny porn," but it's no different than the suspension of disbelief that enables things like fantasy and science-fiction to exist in the first place.
The vagina in this case would be attached to a man.
Explaining things makes me gay?
You think the hot sauces taste the same so deem the separate labels unnecessary.
They don't taste the same to me so I do see a difference.
Even then some people might think they taste the same but prefer one labeling or the other for superficial reasons anyway.
I never pretended to try and color what you view them as and any attempt at doing so would be silly. I can't change what you see things as, all I ask is that you reciprocate instead of trying to tell me what I'm into and why I'm into it.
Well again, I don't think slapping a vagina on a drawn Schwarzenegger makes a woman and in order for it to be an analogous mirror to popular forms of futanari it'd have to just either be dick, balls and vagina or simply vagina on the guy's body.
If you choose to see them as trannies that's your prerogative.
I personally don't because of their general tendency to have developed, chimeric forms and lack of transitioning from one sex to the other.
1.Because it's perverted
2. You can still suck her dick
3. Give her reach around
I guess it comes to wether you're top or bottom[spoiler]a.k.a. a faggot[/spoiler]
It was just a general statement on how male on futa gets less content than any other futa-themed coupling.
>believing in things like homosexuality, heterosexuality.
>not believing these things are mere social constructs
>have to give people labels or I cannot sleep at night.
Hey man, if I am a homo in your eyes that is fine. I will consider you a paedophile.
Seeing as this is a board for drawn images and they synonymous to cartoons and cartoons are for children that would only mean that you are massive pedo that wants to have sex with children.
It's all just a perversion or natural reproductive functions in the brain, what's the point of attaching specific labels to it?
Wanting to jizz on a girl's feet achieves absolutely nothing, in fact, if we always wanted to jizz on girl's feet all the time, we wouldn't reproduce and we would die out.
Whatever a guy has on his hard drive is none of my business as long as it's not CP and it doesn't cross into the real world.
That being said I totally want to get assfucked by a tall muscly futagirl, like all the time, always.
Yeah but it's about the mental attachment to the dick, not the dick itself most of the time.
It's about gender reversals, you know how /pol/acks are also into interracial a lot of the time? I'm just saying that the idea of a woman with a natural dick is very sexually different than just a dude.
It's very Freudian but I don't really give a fuck there's a lot of good art and somehow I developed the fetish. You're kind of a fag for caring so much though.
Well, the picture you quoted is about half and half, given the guy is giving oral too. There's not really enough male on futa content to make a new thread for it on /aco/ without bitching swamping it while a lot of the content overlaps with this anyway. Since both you and the people who like it both admit to it having little content you don't have to worry about this thread getting swamped, you just need to be able to not get triggered by things you don't personally like.
Unless that's hard for you. You used 'like' as a useless filler word at the beginning of a sentence and that's something you often find on Tumblr so I'm not sure either way.
And ehh, there may not be as much, but in my experience there's usually at least an equal amount of either topping.
As I said though, my biggest complaint wasn't my personal dislike of the content, but rather that it's being posted in a thread about tangentially related content at best (If not the exact opposite content.)
It makes text more conversational. I did it on purpose honestly. I can easily refrain from it, but it makes the messages droll in my opinion,
dicks are a sexual organ. Thus they are arousing. Many men find men romantically and sexually unattractive (body hair, rough skin, muscle, bone structure, voice, smell, elbows, etc.) but like cock, balls, tits, pussy, and ass. So for men who have no romantic interest in other men, and find ~99% of the male body unattractive, there is the fictional futa.
Kind of, it's not the penis it's method of reproduction. A male is an individual who inserts eggs and a female is one who carries and incubates one. So what determines the sexes isn't the penis/clitoris (which are functionally the same thing) it's the ovaries/testes.
Example: A woman with a 3inch clitoris could potential use it for insertion but since she doesn't shoot sperm through it she's still a woman.
This guy/gal knows what they're talking about but as usual everyone just goes back to the usual "I don't understand so you're gay" statement. Good job Anon for explaining it to the ones who have an open mind and wish to understand it.