>liking cowtits For what purpose?

File: 1478558575093.png (38KB, 499x338px)

38KB, 499x338px

>>149819477

I agree, penis is much better.

>>149819477
I just like breasts. And butts. And legs.

Women in general, desu senpai.

File: 7abd591ae6443390d94f62b21351fd4155e6897d882a242299ef832e53eb6eaf_1-1.jpg (268KB, 720x771px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 720x771px

>>149819477
>not liking cow tits
Textbook faggotry

>>149819477
>>>/y/
>>>/lgbt/
>>>/tumblr/

File: misuzu hates perverts.png (91KB, 734x314px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 734x314px

>>149819493

File: IMG_2686.jpg (262KB, 1108x1479px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1108x1479px

>>149819477
My dick loves them. It can't be helped.

I like milk. Cowtits look like they can produce more milk than itty bitty raisins.

File: 1429083050380.png (498KB, 978x690px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 978x690px

>>149819477
But I don't.

>>149820260
Are you a liberal? Just curious.

I like cocks.

Love them.

File: 1436215434337.jpg (650KB, 1200x802px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 1200x802px

>>149820386
I wouldn't know. I never cared about things like that.

>>149820386
What does that have to do with anything?

File: 45367586758.png (60KB, 413x189px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 413x189px

>flatties

File: misuzu cowtits2.png (64KB, 446x386px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 446x386px

>>149820548
>not liking flatties

>>149819477
>>149820673
>posting shitty transparencies
You are worse than any cowtit lover.

File: flatties GTFO.png (260KB, 673x712px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 673x712px

>>149819477

>>149820834
Teach me how

File: 1213422523533.jpg (43KB, 623x537px)

43KB, 623x537px

I like them all.

File: 1453344649451.png (45KB, 404x193px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 404x193px

>>149821200
The "how" depends on the source.
Pic related was relatively easy to fix because it's black&white. Do a manual selection on the black outline (in places where there is no continuous black line, go for the closest to black pixels) and then do a color to alpha.
No need to bother with black hair or black writing at all. It'll sort itself out perfectly.

>>149820673 is not perfectly black and requires a more careful and more destructive approach.

>>149821486
[cont]
When the outline isn't perfectly black you can still use color to alpha, but that can easily lead to the picture looking strange. In order for it to look good, you would need to make sure to select on the very edge of the line, to affect as few pixels of the outline as possible. Experimenting and practice required.
If the background isn't white you are usually have to actually delete it (hide it behind a mask or whatever, the effect is the same). In that case, you better add a background layer and experiment with a few different background colors to see if your creation looks good.

File: 1470821190444.png (24KB, 404x193px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 404x193px

>>149821486
Damnit, I forgot to transform it back to grayscale. Useless bloat.

File: 1470742134541.webm (3MB, 912x512px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 912x512px

>>149819477
Flat is the one true path.

File: misuzu cowtits2.png (73KB, 438x386px)

73KB, 438x386px

>>149821486

File: 1470400362063.png (36KB, 394x386px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 394x386px

>>149822987

>>149821736
>>149823339
Saved.

>>149823339
what's the difference between that and this >>149822987 ?

>>149824530
He cleaned it up. It looks nicer.

>>149824611
Okay, how about this >>149821736
and my OP picture?

I don't get what was cleaned. Tell me anon so I know how to "clean" things.

>>149824671
Since white pixels were turned transparent, you need a dark background to be able to tell the difference.

>>149824744
Oh, you're totally right.