Archived threads in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect - 3762. page

They should be.
Any rational nation on this planet would join the EU.

>>136346881
who the fuck watches still tv in 2017?

show sender address, reply to, tits or gtfo you larping faggot.

or post pics of you getting v&
>also samefagging

oh the above one was page 2 of 4

>>136346877
Bumping for interest.

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-06 12:23:41 Post No.136349710
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-06 12:23:41 Post No.136349710 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/bant/1699453

soon we will be able to form our own political party

File: 1473297529876.png (114KB, 220x223px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 220x223px

>>137770297
/Pol/ Harbor 2: Electric Boogaloo!

Seriously, this board got so much shittier ever since Cville nazi rally

>>137770297
We have to remember that someplace far away moot is a faggot, and the truth deep in our hearts is the cornerstone if this place and it shall shine brightly bind us together for eternity.

Follow that light anon, and you will find your answers.

>>137770297

you could leave. that would be a start.

>>137769820
>Has there ever been a more childish human adult in history?
literally every single alt leftie on /pol/ right now

i mean how childish can you be to just go on 4chan of all places to carpet bag public opinion? like kill yourself, guy. what the fuck ARE you?

File: 1501556364984.jpg (253KB, 666x683px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 666x683px

>>137769973
>n-no YOU are!

The absolute state of Trumptards

3 years ago mainstream news wouldn't even dare to write something like this. Calling BLACKS racist??? Verboten.

We're swinging the pendulum

>>136346720
frontpagemag isnt mainstream news, it's a right-wing jewish neocon site

>>136346446
That hairtouching meme gets me going. Literally every white person who has ever met Africans who have never met white people before will tell you the same thing: They want to touch your hair. They've never seen white hair before, so they're curious. It's a perfectly human emotion, and physical contact like that helps break down social barriers.

But I guess that's exactly why militant blacks hate it so much. If those social barriers are broken down, they're left with scant little reason to hate people. Because this goes beyond saying "no" and being done with it. This is, firstly, demanding that people perform telepathic reasoning and take efforts to learn what they don't like, and then refrain from doing it, which is saddling others with one's personal preferences, which is shit. Secondly, there's not a white person alive who has never seen a black person (in contrast, there are plenty of blacks who have never seen whites, so who needs diversity here?), so the whole hair-touching thing has gone the way of the dodo. So the people complaining about it are, frankly, lying. Yeah, maybe it has happened once or twice in their lives. If they meet particularly sheltered people, it might happen a few times a year. But it's not an epidemic of maliciously racist behaviour, as they're making it out to be.

It's about touching your fucking hair, for fuck's sake. You know what white people would like for black people to stop doing to them? Rape and murder. Black fragility is the correct term.

>>136346396
>constantly dispute climate models
>we can perfectly predict africa's future population

The only reason they havnt all starved to death is MASSIVE aid from the rest of the world. At some point, the rest of the world will have nothing left to give. When that happens, there will be a a biblical extinction.
You think this "refugee crisis" is bad? You ain't seen shit yet

>>136346396

at what % of white global pop. will it reach before there is not enough taxpayers to fund all the billions of freeloaders????

Ever time I see a US flag ask "What did he/she mean by this?" I know that this question is asked honestly and I always feel some pity and can't concentrate on the question anymore

>>136346632
yea, it is sincere question since the context of the exchange is slightly confusing. acosta argues that the immigration policy will only allow white people in and then miller basically says "all you know is white people"?

why do people think the word cosmopolitan is a "white nationalist" code. it just describes a place or person familiar with a lot of cultures.

the same about knowing that poem was inscribed next to the statue many years later. isnt that just a knowledge about history someone who studies immigration should know?

So they can't afford it..
Should I be surprised?