YOU DIDN'T LISTEN
Why, I said this 10 years ago already, nobody believed me...
Hitler loved muslims unironically, so...
>>128351439
Wouldn'd have happened if you didn't treat the germans like cattle in Versailles
>6 years as home secretary
>1 year as prime minister
>Brought in numerous infringements and laws on normal peoples rights
>Thinks more laws and limiting the internet is a solution
>Failed to tackle threats to our country
>Hailed ‘benefits’ of Sharia law
>Failed to keep this country safe ON HER WATCH
>Two terror attacks and multiple dead including children within weeks
huurr derrr well Corbyn will be far worse....
This country deserves to fucking die.
She's one of the worst this country has even seen. Should be ashamed of herself.
the answer to this is more restrictions on the internet
>>128350969
>Hailed ‘benefits’ of Sharia law
What?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It's over Drumpfkins.
>>128678324
can you just impeach someone because you dont like them? or do they have to commit a crime
Yet not even an accusation of a crime.
You're a dildo.
could have sworn i saw this same headline last month
>"FUCKING MUSLIM CUNTS!"
>"Don't shout that you fucking idiot, it's not Muslims"
What did he mean by this?
https://twitter.com/ConsentNo/status/871133685361364993
>>128350863
>I'm being a literal retard
Or something to that effect.
>>128350863
>"Well then Richard, what should I be shouting?"
>"You shouldn't be saying anything Nigel. As a matter of fact, this is only encouraging them."
>"Are you bloody fucking daft?!"
>"See this is exactly what I'm talking about! You right wing morons are so close minded."
>"Hey you guys done? Figured I'd at least let you finish before I set this off, but you're kind of running into overtime here."
what's stopping me from becoming a wanderer of the earth /pol/?
>>128676827
you have to eat
>>128676827
Beg for change? sleep in garbage? eat what I throw away? They got a name for that, it's called a bum
>>128677025
You're a coward
Do it OhPee
Arrest for hate speech when?
https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/871127587329896454
My blood is boiling. Literaly just contacted the police in London to report her. Line is busy
I'm new to twitter trolling and just got a 12 hour ban. Anyone know if I've been redflagged so prob no one will ever actually see my tweets from here on out? (they'll be pushed to the bottom)
And, which one of these do you think got me cut? If all I have to do is refrain from saying "go kill yourself" i might just make a new account.
>>128350761
When will these fellas get arrested?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqauSd2oMYI
Do you guys not understand that if you don't stop talking like tin foil hatters obsessed with jews this symbol will never make a comeback?
>40% of the white population is full blown cucked
>Without them we are fucked
>Even with the entire 40% of cucks we are like 30% of the planet
>There are probably more niggers that support us now than the 40% of cucks
Y'all need to stop getting extreme meth head explainations and propaganda out of your faces and evolve. Accept Dindus that are with us, convert the cucks, and stop being so god damn exclusive. We'll never exceed if this tin foil shit continues. I mean we are literally at the point mother fuckers are saying slavs, Italians and greeks aren't white.
Wake up or enjoy the many trucks of peace to come
>>128676784
read siege fag
>>128676982
I ain't reading tom Clancy's rainbow six siege
>"""""""""""""""""Us"""""""""""""""""""""
Who?
All these attacks... It's as if there's one connecting thread...
hmm... what could it be? Wait a second... IT COULDN'T BE
>>128350745
It is... TOXIC MASCULINITY. This is whu we need feminism.
>>128350745
Fucking white males
>>128350745
FUCKING MUSLIM CUNTS
IT'S HAPPENING! AUSTRALIA! IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ISIS
You're going to have to translate that gutterspeak
>>128676764
Its not in the falklands is it?
i dont read no mexican.
Just remember who the REAL TERRORISTS are....
>>128350632
FUCKING
>>128350632
FUCKING
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2017/06/04/beyond-blowback-islam-and-terror/
>The latest attack in London – the third to hit Britain within seventy-five days – is once again provoking a debate about the relationship between Islam and terrorism. On one side we have those who say Islam is inherently violent, and is incompatible with the basic canons of Western civilization. On the other side, we have liberals who say that this is a libel on an entire religion, and that advocates of religious violence are a distinct minority within the Muslim faith.
>These two views have distinct policy implications: the former would impose what amounts to a Muslim ban on travel to Western countries, and would furthermore mandate State surveillance of mosques and other religious institutions of that faith. The latter stance would oppose these measures, and proceed as if Muslims posed the same danger to us as, say, Presbyterians, i.e. none at all.
>Both views are simplistic nonsense. Furthermore, neither offers an effective policy to deal with the problem as defined.
>The origins of Islamic terrorism are not in dispute: the idea that “they hate us because we’re free,” i.e. because of our secular values and Western lifestyle, was not even worth considering, at least initially. After all, Japan, for example, which is not exactly an exemplar of Islamic values, has never been attacked by Islamic extremists. South America has proved similarly immune. The focus of the Islamists’ wrath has been on the United States and Western Europe – not coincidentally, those countries which have a long history of intervention in the Muslim world.
--->
>>128676541
--->
>Which brings us to the theory of “blowback,” the idea that the root cause of radical Islamic terrorism is simple retaliation. Here the writings of Chalmers Johnson, whose book, entitled Blowback; The Costs and Consequences of American Empire, was published before 9/11, and also of Robert Pape, who has done yeomen’s work on this issue, are very useful. Johnson put the concept in its historical context, and Pape shows, with extensive detailed evidence, that occupied peoples routinely adopt such tactics as suicide bombings to fight the overwhelming presence of occupiers. And this is not limited to Islamists, by any means: the Tamil Tigers, fighting for the “liberation” of Sri Lanka, for example, employed these same tactics.
>And so the “blowback” concept, in its pure form, avers that this isn’t about religion, but about resistance: the resistance of a militarily weak insurgency against an occupying power that exerts overwhelming force. Adherents of this theory point to the statements of the terrorists themselves, principally al-Qaeda, which declared that the presence of US troops on the “sacred” soil of Saudi Arabia motivated – and justified – the 9/11 attacks. Aside from that, they point to other examples of Western imperialism – the invasion and occupation of Iraq, US support to Muslim despots, and the ongoing “war on terrorism” that, from their perspective, is a war on Islam.
>So it’s all very cut and dried, simple really – but is it?
--->
>>128676578
--->
>It’s been sixteen years since the 9/11 attacks, long enough for a strand of Islam to emerge that views terrorism against Western targets as a religious duty. Furthermore, the radical Islamist critique of Western values and lifestyle as morally corrupt has been integrated into the purely consequentialist idea of “blowback” as retaliation for specific actions. Because it can surely be argued – especially by religious ideologues – that a society capable of killing hundreds of thousands in, say, Iraq, is inherently depraved. Given the theory of “blowback,” this merging of a typically anti-colonialist narrative with a moral critique was inevitable. And to give it a religious angle wasn’t difficult. After all, in the years since September 11, 2001, have the US and its allies attacked any non-Muslim countries?
>And it’s not as if there aren’t elements within orthodox Islam that need only elaboration to legitimize this mutant variation. The very concept of jihad, and the storied history of Islamic conquerors who “converted” new adherents by force, feed into this frenzied fundamentalism, which seeks to return to a “purer” form of Mohammed’s creed. Of course, one could point to similarly aggressive tendencies in Christianity, as well as other faiths, and yet the missing element here is a history of military occupation and conflict.
>Religious belief, like all human concepts, isn’t static: it undergoes changes in response to events. It adapts, it mutates, it evolves. Christianity changed in response to the advance of science: Galileo is no longer considered a heretic. Judaism was transformed by the Holocaust: Zionism, yesterday embraced by a tiny minority of Jews, is dominant today. Islam is not immune to the tides of history.
--->
>>128676657
--->
>Western liberals downplay this uncomfortable truth because they generally disdain religion and fail to appreciate its power. They cannot understand how a person could drive a truck into a crowd of pedestrians, and go on a stabbing spree, while shouting “This is for Allah!” Allah, for them, is a delusion: religion is a primitive throwback, a reactionary atavism that is on its way out. Yet this is hardly true in most areas of the world outside of the Global Metropolis.
>The failure of Western liberal elites to acknowledge this reality – the reality of a newly militant strand of Islam that upholds terror as a sacred duty – is linked to their appeasement of the Saudis. For years the Kingdom has exported its austere version of Islam, Wahabism, which serves as the theological foundations of the very terrorist movement we are supposedly pledged to fight.
--->
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-mexico/articles/2017-05-31/gary-johnson-plans-to-ride-bike-to-mexico-border-from-canada
I smoke weed and climb mountains bro Joe Rogan for President 2020
>>128350470
america is a country of subrural retards who voted in fatso when they could have gone for the patrician choice
>>128351026
You're a Muslim faggot. Gas yourself Achmed. Go suck off Sadiq Khan.
GET FUCKED MEMESTREAM METEOR
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
lying press btfo
Will he fight Al? and Who will win?
>>127153657
There was an investigation and a sheriff that donated to his campaign determined that there was probable cause for assault
Checkmate, Islamophobes.
>>128350215
My god....they just dont quit.
SO AFRAID TO CONFRONT ISLAM.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT GOD DAMMIT!
>>128350215
Racism is worst than murder so she's right
>All this fucking bait.
Just read the second fucking post and go into another thread.
Also we should just call these people like her what they are -- evil enablers.
BRIT FUCKERS
GET OUT AND VOTE CONSERVATIVE
I swear to christ if Labor wins CNN is gonna act smug for a whole week and I will backtrace your IPs and eat two scoops of all your ice cream
Tories support mass immigration, and are pro-isreal and pro-saudi, you dumb pard
>>128351490
Fuck off Corbynista. May is anti-immigration.
Listen, hugbox redditors. Not everyone who disagrees with you is deep into psyops or a shill. Some people just disagree. For instance, me.
Rural white voter here. Voting for Trump was possibly the biggest mistake of my life. Probably the worst president we've had in the last 500 years. We must impeach him now and lock up his most fervent supporters. The travel ban is racist and the white house is literally full of islamophobic texts and art. Hate can only be defeated by destroying it from the top down.
On top of his blatant racism, now he is literally destroying the planet earth and ruining young and promising female entertainers' lives. What about our children? Do the right thing, fellow rural white voters. Call your senator or congressman and set things right.
Fine British posters, don't let your country be overrun by hatred as ours has.