The universe will never not be on a steady path accelerating towards destruction, the world will never not cater to the lowest common denominator, life will never have an inherent meaning, and on an ontological level nothing truly matters.
Negativity is labeled as such because it is attached to pain, something undesirable according to our somatic focus.
I will hold myself in life by finding a way to make money legally, party, and form intrinsically valuable human relationships, but I am with VHEMT. There is no actual reason for the human race to exist and everything we see as progress is not necessarily so. I will thus never reproduce and silently wish no one else will, even though I know people will.
ive come a realization.
the fact that we dont have a devine goal enables us to experience our free will.
>>19606533
that life doesnt have a meaning i mean.
Im gonna have a kid in every state
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zcjw2ShUm4
>>19606524
>The universe will never not be on a steady path accelerating towards destruction
Since time is contained within the universe, that the universe has ever been in a state that is not "accelerating towards destruction" means it will be, since temporal flow is subjective. The universe exists in all states at once (time means nothing to it, since time is within it) so currently the universe is in a state of not "accelerating towards destruction" even as heat death constantly looms closer.
Also, you sound like a Nihilist. Consider a switch to Solipism.
>>19606578
How is Solipsism better than Nihilism again?
And I'm not.
I care about everything while I'm here.
I want to donate blood and help people in every way I can as much as I can.
I spread positivity as worldwide as I can.
But I'm just disseminating the truth here.
Free will of the I comes from love.
If all humanity does that humanity will become something much larger.
>>19606540
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPRviHmjh8Q
>>19606533
tidbit of info on free will at 14:26 and later in the video as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5OtCc_gXg0
>>19606524
if the world is ALWAYS on a steady path toward destruction, it's not actually on a path toward destruction.
holy fuck guys, come on.
>>19606524
>The universe will never not be on a steady path accelerating towards destruction
>posts an image that symbolizes a cyclical fluctuation between creation and destruction
>>19607011
Yeah this is a funny truth.
We would of been destroyed already, but we will face cataclysms.
But we have the option of not taking the destructive path.
>>19608244
It could of been an ironic joke.