Scrutinize & discuss
>>19447605
>that you cant read
>there's shit deadlier than nukes in Antartica
>moving on
>>19447605
It reads like it's written by a 12 year old, and the story had so many inconsistencies and obvious plot holes it's ludicrous.
An interesting idea for fiction, but needs a better author.
I think it is in parts true, look at the illuminati card game explanation, they certainly seem to come true. It also explains why prominent people would visit Antarctica. Still not sure why the Bible would be tampered with..
Wait... Noah's ark is highly inspired from Utanapisti's ark from the Epic of Gilgamesh which has been written about 4000-5000 years ago... How come the bible be "right" if one (well in fact more but still) of it's story is inspired from the Epic of Gilgamesh ?
>>19449882
I don't think plagiarism existed as a concept back then.
>>19449893
Well... In the Epic, it's basically the same story, except Utanapisti is less "righteous" than Noah
>>19449893
Of course it did. Every time a story was passed by word of mouth it was taking place. Fucking hell, use your brain for once in your life.