What will it take for the textbooks to be corrected, and for

>>19424335
It's not going to happen within this generation of phds. Social sciences reflect social outlooks, which is why they are not hard sciences and can almost be considered occult.
>literal tomb raiders

>>19424343
Burial is such a scam. If they won't even respect King Tut's tomb, wtf makes you think they won't be playing golf over my grandpa's grave in a century?

>>19424348
who cares about your grandpas grave nerd

i'd build a highrise over it in a heartbeat

>>19424373
And I don't blame you, it's a fucking scam

File: fortaleza-de-kuelap.jpg (89KB, 774x518px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 774x518px

>>19424343
I completely agree with this, I think ancient history became rapidly more of a mean than an study on itself, just look at how much the masons banked in egyptian theology.

WE WUZ ALIENS

>>19424531
That explains your weird look.

There is little to no evidence that agricultural societies existed prior to 10,000 BC. It was almost all hunting and gathering.

>>19424600
Watch some videos by Bright Insight, he talks a lot about it.

File: 1494735793853.png (2MB, 1024x719px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x719px

>>19424600
So they can make huge structures but collecting some seeds was above them?

The city was buried so probably most clear evidence of agriculture got lost.

>>19424610
It's not just "planting seeds". It also requires domestication and irrigation.

>>19424600
Because it was 12000 years ago? It's hard for much to survive that long, especially if huge floods happened. There's evidence sea levels raised over 100 feet around 10,000 years ago. Look what the titanic looks like after being under water 100 years, nevermind 10,000