Saw a thread about the general IQ of /x/ in the catalog, but it 404ed before I got a chance to check it out. So what is your IQ, and what do you personally think the IQ of a person means? Does a higher IQ help or prevent a spiritual understanding/perception of the paranormal?
Here's one test you could try:
http://www.ravensprogressivematricestest.com/
>>19421179
easy as fuck, answer is 1
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/19420839/
tldr that test is whack and all of us got 140+
or maybe all of us are actually just genius
>>19421183
Shit. Got any others? I think MENSA has one on their website, at least Norwegian MENSA does, but it's very limited.
>>19421189
honestly every IQ test I look at seem to be shitty
I saw some on reddit that they said were accurate, however at the end of them there is shit you can buy, so I feel like every online IQ test gives you inflated numbers to make you likely to buy stuff
>>19421181
Its 3 faggot. Kys
>>19421181
Haha, what a dumbass
>>19421288
You need an IQ of 12 to open a door, an IQ of 25 to understand what happens when you open a door, and an IQ of 3 to post on 4chan
>>19421183
>>19420910
>Is this test accurate?
If the average score for all the takers of this piss-easy test is only 98.4, then yes, compared to the majority of mankind, I'm a goddamn genius.
3?
The last 10 questions we're actually challenging but rest are easy.
>>19421179
I got 2
Am I retarded or is phoneposting a bad idea?
Oh. Alright then.
I usually get around 135 on online tests. I am almost certain I am not actually that smart. I did an official one when I was a child and scored in the 90s, though I did rush the end of it because I was bored and I wanted to go out and play.
>>19421330
>'The last 10 questions we're...'
>we're
no way you got that high of an IQ on that test, my dude
I got 87!
mah AQ iz faiv.
>>19421179
i got fucking 123. didnt expect but ok.
Wtf I got 160. Is this the top score one can get with this test? Well I seem to be quite good at recognizing patterns, such intelligence!
>>19421563
I got 150. Let's save the world.
>>19421181
Hope that's bait bro or your a fuckin retard
>>19421566
Nah I don't deal with brainlets like yourself.
Except if you're a girl ._.
It's 3 niggie
Ive taken multiple IQ tests online and the results were always different ( one time i had 150 and the next time 105) so i decided to take an official one at a psychiatrist and my IQ is 125 which is slightly above average however an IQ test does NOT evaluate your emotional intelligence (also referred to as EQ, it includes your ability to relate to other people and also your own moral code etc) yet both types of intelligence are equally as important
I got a 104 guys am I tarded?
>>19421693
yeah mate
>>19421706
No u
>>19421179
Not paranormal. IQ tests are for losers and insecure beta teenagers.
>>19421770
>sub 100 IQ detected
>>19421803
Actually i am
>>19421766
Check mate, dickhead.
>>19421807
Tough luck, I am
>>19421563
how does it feel to be retarded?
>>19421818
Thats not your real IQ, the 0 is obviously photoshopped, bucko.
>>19421818
>Takes a photo of his computer screen
>genius
Ok buddy.
>>19421824
Oh, don't be mad that you lost at the evolutionary game. You can still make a career at McDonald's.
>>19421834
>muh smug anime girl
>>19421179
sweet, what do I win? I got 143
>>19421842
Even a macdonalds worker knows how to take a screeshot without photographing the computer screen. Your score is obviously a fluke. At least now you can join the hordes of failures who brag to be smart but "don't apply themselves", lol.
Is it bad that I only started thinking the test was bullshit when it said I was a genius?
Low self esteem or confirmation for fake test?
>>19421179
IQ 113, said I had "superior intelligence"
I believe IQ tests assigned by online methods are likely bullshit, and that IQ is a flawed method regarding how smart someone is.
Regarding spiritual matters, it might make you feel all high and mighty about whatever you believe, but everyone is really stabbing blindly in the dark
.>>19421842
I assign you the status of idiot for not understanding how control shift prnt screen works, which ties into my point of IQ tests not being all encompassing.
>>19421856
Probably bullshit, considering how everyone who aren't complete retards got above 140
>>19421856
IQ doesn't mean exactly that you are a genius, but you might have decent problem solving skills. congratz.
>>19421863
>>19421864
good points, still fun/interesting I guess
>>19421851
>>19421863
Well guys, what now? Give me my well deserved respect
>>19421856
Same, the test basically only tests your ability to recognice and predeict patterns, which is a natural ability of humans. It is by no means a full representation of your IQ, just a fraction of it. Still cool to brag about it.
I'm going to guess that 160 is the max.
Not sure if I got one wrong or if it's just because I'm an oldfag. Then maybe I'm just being arrogant and the max is 200 or some such.
IQ tests only really test a very limited form of intelligence, and it's very easy to game them. i.e. If you know what you're doing and what you're looking for you can improve your score.
In either case so much for the "/x/ is the lowest IQ board" meme.
If there are so many geniuses here, how comes flat earth threads are so common?
>Mfw Iq is 149
>>19421896
oh shit
>>19421896
Because maybe they realise something you've missed?
Or on a serious note, perhaps it's because these kind of IQ tests are primarily targeted at pattern recognition. Which is important because conspiracy theorists are very very good at spotting patterns in huge datasets that most people arn't capable of.
The problem is of course attributing a meaning and consequence to those patterns where there may not be any, but it's still pattern recognition in overdrive none the less.
That test is beyond simple. Everyone hear, and everyone I know always scores ridiculously high. Hell, I took it and got 146
I got 152. This one and the last one stumped me.
>>19421955
It's number 4.
Add the parts that differ and subtract the parts which repeat.
>>19421964
ahhh fuck I see how you solve it now. I treated a lot of these as if they were more complex than they actually were.
>>19421693
That's actually above average. Everyone on imageboards likes to pretend they have 120+ though.
>>19421975
That was always my problem too. I always treated them more holistically and that I was supposed to intuitively figure out which one fit best.
Then I realised they are simply a case of, add this, subtract that, rotate this etc. Not to mention the fact that they often repeat the same method a few times in a row. Presumably to mediate for lucky guesses? So you can usually do a bunch the same way and save some time.
>>19421179
Everyone here is going to over-exaggerate their IQ to genius levels.
Here's some of my qualifications.
>placed #1 in my program for my university's economics undergrad program
>placed #1 in my program for my university's economics masters program (4.0 on this one)
>co-authored a published research paper in economics
HOWEVER, based on my GRE scores and the average IQ of someone with a graduate degree, I would probably put myself somewhere between 125-130 but definitely less than 132 (what is needed to get into Mensa). I've also read The Bell Curve by Murray which I think corroborates what I think my IQ is. I've done good with business and my career, my finances, and in general life. But I attribute a lot of it to being just a no-life, autistic hard worker. An ounce of effort for someone with a high IQ is worth a pound of effort from someone with a low IQ. I dated a girl with a 4.0 as well, but holy fuck she had her nose in books reading all day. Studying for exams, reviewing homework, etc. I just showed up to class and did the homework. Even in my master's I just showed up. The hardest thing I've ever done was co-authoring that research paper though. But that was probably just do to the content of the paper and large panel set of data.
Anyways, tl;dr:
>I'm prob 125ish.
>everyone here will claim they are 140+ which is ELITE in terms of IQ, like the 99th percentile (which is bullshit)
>IQ is most heavily correlated with use of language, vocabulary, etc. less so with pattern recognition, though still correlated.
Hi from /biz/ and /fit/
>>19421183
This.
Try this one instead http://iqtest.dk/main.swf
It's the least bs test you can find online according to many iqfags
>>19421194
Exactly what I always figured with these tests
I've done that one before and I'm pretty sure I got 160 also
They made the test easy so everyone can have fuzzy feelings about themselves
I wonder if thinking you're a genius makes you want to buy the full test tho?
All it did was make me question the validity
>>19421179
I took a test once and it said that my IQ is 125 but I guess it was highly inaccurate since its just an online test anyone can take
>>19421179
>yes goym go do an IQ test
it's the only proof that you are intelligent because apparently there is nothing else in your life that can prove that you are smart
>>19421834
Did you expect image quality on /x/?
>Your age adjusted IQ score
Every one in this thread is 12 years old except me that's why your guys is so much higher than my 104 and I'm 30. Bye now leaving this thread never to return with a sense of self satisfaction.
150, kneel brainlets
>>19421179
The only iq that matters is mathematical and logical reasoning. You can shove yer silly "rotating shape" iq's up yer arses mates. I am logically flawless mates and yer shapes are pissin me off mate
Yep, pretty sure this is less accurate than the shit on /x/
>>19421916
This
t. mestizo brazilian with IQ 147
>>19421179
Don't care what memeQ people are getting in this thread, /x/ is by far the least intelligent board on 4chan and possibly the dumbest place on Earth.
I think I figured out how the IQ is calculated. It seems 160 is as high as it can go. There are 60 questions and avarage IQ is 100.
It probably starts at 100 and adds 1 point for every right answer. For every miss you either get no points or loose a certain number od points, either based on how close your answer was or based on the age you gave at the end.
I'm pretty sure that's not how IQ test are supposed to work.
132
>>19423337
Schizophrenic people due have high IQ m8. Doesn't mean that they contribute to society.
I would say
lets change the world BITCHES
wubba lubba dub dub
>>19421179
Answer is 3.
High IQ impedes spirituality, because it helps you understand why what others call spiritual experiences are not so.
>147
My IQ was tested as 145 as a kid. My standardized test scores have always been at the 99.7% range. I also take more Adderal now and practice law all day, so it makes sense that I'd be sharper today.
I can see a slight skew upwards here, because it is probably re-normalized across a bell curve, and a lot of people probably don't take it properly.
That said, it's accurate for me, and I don't find it surprising that people on /x/ who are both willing to take this test and post their results would do very well.
The paranormal is all about the human brain noticing patterns, which is specifically what this measures.
>did a test earlier with math in it
>scored an IQ of 92
What art life?
>>19421402
It's auto correct. Get a life:)
I scored a 2.... wow... and here I thought they were making sense. guess it's flipping burgers for me
>>19421348
i got a 2 also...
>>19423351
Guess again bitch!
>>19423578
>Your performance on the test was just just below the population average which means that you have the ability to achieve success in life.
>3
>>19423907
>I refreshed the page and got one more point
..ok
>>19422000
>http://iqtest.dk/main.swf
did this one and scored a 118
>>19422000
I took both and it clearly shows how bullshit OP's IQ test really is.
>>19421183
>>19421183
>>19421183
How i do? Actually tried and got this. I am actually worried.
>>19424377
Why is the bottom half colored in black, that's racist
>>19424404
kek
This is no longer about spirituality bs anymore.
Just a bunch if men exchanging scores on a bs test.
Anyone have pic about IQ comparison of all board in 4chan? I remember the lowest is /x/. I miss that pic..
>>19425213
This one?
>>19421179
How accurate is this "raven" test, OP?
whoops!
>>19421323
It's 3 because if you look, you can see a pattern with them. The bottom horizontal row starts with one black corner, then continues with two black squares, so you know the next one i supposed to have 3 black squares. Answer 3 is 3 black squares. You can also look at the vertical row to the far left. It starts with 5 black squares and loses 1 in the next box, so you can assume that in the box after that, it loses another, resulting in 3.
>>19425261
>"The gold standard in intelligence tests" - Cnn
Not only is it not an intelligence test, but an IQ test,
but it was said by CNN?
Either CNN is getting worse, and this test is horseshit,
Or that quote is made up horseshit, and the test is horseshit
either way you're left with shit
>>19422000
>http://iqtest.dk/main.swf
>118
>tfw brainlet
I've done this before and got a better score when I ran out of time and just guessed the last 10.
>>19425243
Yeah that one. thank you so much anon
>>19422000
160 on OP's test, 133 on that one.
Same principle, but the second has a higher level of difficulty. Going to try this again when i'm not sleep-deprived.
i don't think this test is legitimate beccause i got 108 on mensa :/
>>19421179
I did the test all boring 60 and got iq 136..it's fuckin bullshit I'm a 180 all day!!
>>19425243
WTF? BTFO
OP's is shit so I didn't bother.
>>19421179
It's funny how I read some article suggesting that the elder child is more gifted than the younger one, both in intelligence and physical abilities. Not only my big bro looks skinny but this made my day. He got 143 near Genius
>>19422000
>126
eh, seems about right on every iq thing I've ever done.
I hab bren tubor
Wow i thought i was retarded. And i probably was right because after the test i entered a valid email
>>19427474
Fuckin kek, man.
That's pretty funny. I just put butts for everything.
>>19421179
It's 3, starting from the top left if you progress to the right you add a square to the top row, if you progress down you subtract a square from the left side. The bottom corner would be a full top row nothing else
>>19421179
First ~45 are really just recognizing simple patterns
50 and up were hard though
Test may be rating a bit higher than it should though, Im probably not this high
>>19421179
Take that all my college classes where I averaged 70-80!
150 brainlet reporting in
>>19421834
>this poster understands humor
i bet the op hacked it and boosted the numbers to make us feel better
or
solving all th
Easier than it looks
>>19421181
I would say you're witty and clever, but you're fucking not!
Black guy here, I got 110 on dk. I fucking hate these test.
reeee
>145
>near genius
nigger whut
that does bring up an intruiging question though: how much do other factors affect adaptibility and comprehension. things like-
>memory (mine is shit)
>context (some people have prejudice for certain things)
>culture (people will notice pattern of thought in others and apply, like expecting a dubious reply on 4chins to be of malice more than benevolence.)
>self-esteem/self-fufilling prophecy
and the like
>>19428093
>(some people have prejudice for certain things)
More like everyone. Even scientists fall prey to biases.
86 I got bored halfway through and didnt think I completed it in 15 minutes so I doubt this is accurate.
>>19421179
Psych fag on his way to bed here.
As many of you suspected, these online tests are bullshit.
A real test takes thousands of participants to calibrate and another couple thousand to make the sample populations they compare you against.
This shit costs a shit ton of money and they protect it better than the government protects what actually went down 07/11/1996 in a small town in the Pacific North West.
Professionals who use these tests have to sign a bunch of shit, so the companies can sue the living hell out of them, should they leak anything.
And the tests on the internet compare you to other people who take the test (at best, some literally just give you random numbers above 100), which are all dumber than the average person.
The more you know.
>>19428190
And what about people who scored low?
>>19428194
Random numbers generally?
Doesn't really matter. These tests aren't real. And the one posted certainly isn't.
If you want a cheap way to get an idea of your IQ, apply to MENSA. Or check out your local uni with a psych department. They usually have seminars, where they have to test people.
lmao this is retarded.
I took the one OP is from and got 131.something. I took this one while making macaroni and got 164.
>>19429659
>>19422000
lol fucking fine I guess I'm a macaroni genius or some shit.