Is the Temple of the Black Light/Current 218 worth looking into?

File: 1501986356001.png (312KB, 838x681px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 838x681px

>>19401029
No.
My full opinion would take pages. Suffice to say that they've lifted shtiloads of Chumbley material before it was released (likely via someone connected to Ye Olde Mike Ford). Chumbley is the origin point of Qayinite Gnosis in the last decades of the 20th C., period, end of story.

Moreover, some of the 'anti-cosmic' cats like Karlsson mangle and abuse Kabbalistic theory so deeply as to render their writings a longform joke (Klipot as things at all, to be evoked, rather than the accumulated habits that prevent Gnosis).

>>19401062
Hmm, in that case can you recommend any books/writings that explain proper Kabbalistic theory?

>>19401062
Is Ford good or are you implying he's also connected to stealing from this Chumbley guy (that to be frank I don't evenknow)?

>>19402551
>Chumbley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_D._Chumbley

No and yes Ford is directly lifting from Chumbley as well, potentially moreso than 218, but I'd have to sit and do a point by point on art/concepts.

>>19401062
>longform joke
Accurate.
>Klipot as things at all, to be evoked, rather than the accumulated habits that prevent gnosis
And the joke just keeps going.