Does you ever bother to look at the epistemology of the topics

>>19395394
It goes further back than this.

Aztec was not the original religion, and even the incan claimed to have been based on a much older religion.


Even Greek religion had a long dark ages where they lost the ability to write.

>>19395721
Timelines are not your forte, eh?

>>19395394
Where is Discordianism on that list?

>>19395394
>Does you ever bother to look at the epistemology of the topics you discuss?
What, like studying their origins and whatnot? I "does" bother all the time.

>And why is it not analyzed and debated more often?
Too much shitposting I guess.

>on a side note, if you have, have you become less racist as a result?
I was never all that racist to begin with, so I'm not sure what you're asking here.

>>19395394
i don't see how beliefs would make me less racist. i dislike jews because they're evil and greedy, and i dislike niggers because they're dumb and primitive, not because of where they're from or what they believe in.