How old is human civilisation /x/?
>>19374641
The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
Approximately 5,200 years.
>>19374641
Civilization came out of the Renaissance. History prior to then has been massively faked. Nothing is more than a few hundred years old also. Earth is probably wrecked by nature every millennia or so, and they don't want us to know there is no escape from the carnage.
>>19374709
proof?
>>19374709
This is what my research had led me too, but i thought it was more along the lines of each zodiacal age. We're nearing the age of Aquarius or already in it so it's just a matter of time before shit happens, but when.... fuck.
and if you aren't spiritually developed u will be fucked
Bruh, you dumb, its 2017 years old...
At LEAST 1 year. Thats just a guess though.
>>19374676
But before then the gods ruled here with mankind as his servant.
>>19375180
[citation missing]
>>19375186
here is one of many such corroborating links.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumerian_King_List
>>19374641
~150,000 years
>>19375237
That doesn't support anything you claimed, silly.
>>19375317
You just dont understand that kingship with mankind was established in Kish.
But the rulers before them were the gods.
They gave their children dominion.
>>19375320
Actually, you're demonstrating your ignorance of history, especially Mesopotamian history.
>>19375025
kekens
>>19375344
But what I said is right and anybody can fact check.
You haven't said a damn thing.
Look at how long the Antediluvian kings ruled for. They were not human.
>>19374709
Probably. You cannot write a theory on assumption. Give me the truth. Do not just assume "because conspiracy". If that was how it worked then Hitler is actually a secret ninja space demon made out of dark matter sent to earth to destroy humanity.
>>19375180
"ATHEISM ACTIVATE"
Der is noo gad.
A little over 13,000 years, probably.
Depends on how you define "Civilization", though. If you have cases of largely isolated tribes that speak proto-languages, does that count as civilization? Is communication through iconography necessary? Or could it be argued that the institution of agriculture is a step forward?
>>19375361
Nope, I am a Gnostic.
We say that the one you call the Lord is the Demiurge.
There is a God even higher then him.
The Demiurge is the Chief Archon.
But the Unknowable God is the Aeon of Aeons.
>>19375356
>Look at how long the Antediluvian kings ruled for. They were not human.
You can't even establish they were real. That could easily be chalked up to hyperbole to create pretense for divinity.
>>19375361
Like Daniken says.
My God has no need for a spaceship.
>>19375356
>But what I said is right and anybody can fact check.
Just because something is written doesn't make it a fact, silly.
>>19375375
Ohh, your in denial.
We all go through stages friend.
>>19375383
Not an argument.
>>19375383
>your
kek
>>19375375
>>19375383
Here, borrow my razor. Careful, it's sharp. If you don't know how to use it you might cut yourself a little. Don't worry, it's not fatal.
>>19375401
The gods bestowing kingship to mankind is the simplest solution.
Or your too daft to see the elegance.
>>19375401
>>19375416
Occam's razor only recognizes that simpler explanations are preferred on the grounds that they meet the criteria for falsifiability, and should never been regarded as a rigorous arbiter.
To this extent, claiming that antediluvian kings are not human is a much less falsifiable statement than the claim that the texts are hyperbole.
>>19374641
In the Solar System, Humanity was/has been around for Millions of years.
[Archives: http://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/boards/pol.x/subject/Knowledge%20Bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/%21%219O2tecpDHQ6/]
On Earth, Humanity has been around for Thousands of years.
>>19375416
>gods
>>19375416
>hyperbole
Good god!
While yet you both appear to disagree, it seems as if you both know how to wield my razor! Hats off to you, my good gentlemen.
I find myself unable to determine which of your hypotheses has fewer variables.
Anunnaki.
Those of the Bloodline Kingship of Anu who came to Ki.
>>19375452
He is claiming that the all stories of our ancestors are lies.
Do you not find that Legends are based in some Truth?
>>19375357
Sauce?
>>19374709
Often people have stated that it was a restoration.. So why is it there are no historic public records of such an event happening? Because it was not a restoration it was a creation…
“Have you ever watched how real archeological sites are handled with absolute care not to disturb anything?
Does this seem like one of those sites? We have been lied to about everything continuously from so called official sources.
“There is the official stories and there is the TRUTH and never shall the two meet”
All old photos and stories are faked.. The photos in this video slideshow shows the construction from beginning to end. The faked images of old photos show that what they constructed was falling apart so they had to repair their masonic illusion..multiple times..
No one renovates ancient monuments..duhhh..they only clean the debris so the monuments can be seen and studied..that is not what is going on in these photos..
This fake monument is built in the middle of a huge British secure military base property where the public has very limited and controlled access.
The photos are very real and the end result is that the stone are not artifacts of history..It is all a big fraud on humanity..
https://youtu.be/EhJ1NneWB6Q
>>19375625
An 1877 image showing leaning stones:
>>19375658
This pre-restoration photo shows that particular rock before the concrete was added to stabilize it. This is from around 1877
>>19375665
Compare that with the modern Stonehenge (Using Google Earth to match the viewpoint, so the shapes of the stones are not perfect)
12 years