Hey /x/ what's this. No really

>>19335920
looks like a boat

trying to view a 3D object in a 1D plane. Could be a boat, could literally be anything.

>>19335920
It's not a boat.

>>19335920

>come to /x/
>see this thread
>leave

That's a boat

>>19336957
>plane
>1D
Are you serious?

>>19336961
But I mean...It looks like a boat

>>19335920
Yeah that's a boat

>>19335920
it's definitely the loch ness monster

>>19337031
>oh no
>he missed a key and pressed the one right net to it
>better ask him if he's serious to make him look stupid

(((((((((((he clearly meant 2D))))))))))

>>19337031
Yes, do you not know how satellite images work?

>>19337065
>Getting this defensive over being an idiot
Either 1D was meant or the post wasn't proof-read.

>>19337065
>>19337031

yes 2D, obvious mistake is obvious.

>>19337078
A flat photo is 1D? You're this stupid? No wonder you think it's the Loch Ness Monster.

>>19337089
it's called a typo you moron. Also, Who the fuck said anything about lock ness? Do i look like the fucking op?

>>19337099
>lock
LOL!
Are you really the person who defended calling it a 1D image? a one-dimensional image is not possible. The height of the single pixel is still measured in a second dimension.

>Who the fuck said anything about lock ness?
The filename. That's a hint for you.

Again, "lock." I'm dying here.

And you're calling me stupid?

>>19337117
Considering how strung up on types you are, Yes, I'm calling you stupid. Good luck with that =)

>>19335920
Were all yelling at each other about 1D and 2D while we now have irrefutable proof that the lochness monster is real

>>19337123
Typos.

Damn, I really do make too many of those. Let me tell you something about the Grammarly addon for chrome, it's worthless sometimes.

>>19337131
>Relying on software so you don't have to learn
Low-capacity Millennials. I fucking swear.

>>19337144
>using technology fucking millennials
fucking boomers.

>>19337149
You're a few decades off. Nice try, though.

Or was that just a typo?

>>19335920
So other than that guy who thinks typos are serious business, what do you guys think it is?

>>19337123
>Strung up on typos
(See? It's that easy not to fuck up)

Let's see ...

>>19336957
This may have been a typo. But the person who wrote it is somehow not capable of proofreading such a short post.

See, when the likelihood was mentioned that it is a typo, my one reply is this:
>>19337084

Otherwise I took the words of these two posts in mind:
>>19337086
>>19337065


>>19337031
>>19337078
This fuckwit is defending it as a one-dimensional image. This cannot possibly be a typo.

Then this genius post was made:
>>19337099
Again bringing up the typo issue, which had been solved. The post to which I had replied had nothing to do with typos. It was some mudskull who believes that since the photo was taken by a satellite, it is in one dimension.
The poster cannot even use capitalization, nor spell the names of locations properly.
This inability is explained and defended, blaming it on software:
>>19337131

I am not hung on on a typo. I am hung up on people who cannot take responsibility for their own lack of simple spelling and capitalization; people who truly cannot distinguish between two and one dimensions, and who have such poor reading comprehension that they don't even know what they're replying to.

>>19337182
A boat.

And the only people who are hung up on typos are the people who are to goddamned stupid to realize that the one guy is not railing about typos.

>>19337211
>to
fucking idiot

>>19337203
This is what being hung up on something looks like.

File: Gomamon_b.jpg (53KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 320x320px

It's this you faggots. The second digimon you get if you let the larvae one lay in its shit for too long