Since we're all supposedly returning eventually, how would one know if you're getting closer to the source, or further realizing your connection, and fragmenting your own consciousness, mistaking this for ascension
Try and live for the good of all beings, as, if you are assuming a "Source", we all must come from there.
>>19329499
Looks like a giant demonic vagina
>>19329534
Seen through a different lens,
Once samsara has been realised (ended), how would you know you've come into your own as A original consciousness, and not just awoken as The original consciousness,
>>19329552
It's just the blind idiot god Azathoth, ruler of tye oter gods in the Lovecraftian Mythos
>>19329499
To get closer to the source is to hone your consciousness--not fragment it.
If you're not destroying your ego such as figures like Jesus, the Buddha, Merlin, whatever, then you're probably not getting closer to the source. They did the things they did for a reason. Most of their "followers" nowadays NEVER consider mirroring those tenets... just what is regurgitated by others.
>>19329552
Stick you peepee give it funny milk
>>19330028
get reborn as monster spawn.
If you are self serving and only self serving that seems to be movong away from source. If you have empathy and understanding of others and treat them as yourself, you are moving closer to source.
That's not Azathoth that's Cyrax
>>19330049
What if you believe in advancing yourself through service to others? Does this lead to orbiting the source through simultaneous attraction and repulsion?
Question is not entirely serious, but
more serious than it sounds
You will know it's the Source because your return will be greeted with the most surreal dreamy music. It will also be, without and doubt in your mind, the most /real/ thing that has ever happened.
>>19332106
You mean like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwuSrosRYUw
>>19329499
The source is Krsna, the closer one gets to Krsna the more one becomes detached to material pleasures and more attached to Krsna.