Megacorps

File: IMG_0253.png (19KB, 800x77px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 800x77px

>>19297160
Easy

File: 1497427559089.jpg (2MB, 3434x2959px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3434x2959px

>>19297160
>Monsanto

Monsanto has been bought by the Bayer Division wich holds around 307 Companys worldwide.

The global Network of Companys is constantly shifting, virtually impossible to entangle their connections by hand/mind and staying sane&functional at the same time.

Follow the money, they said, wich is also a fucking joke, Every currency on earth has been revalued multiple times by now, and most money is generated in automated trade deals.
if you really want to dive in that Rabbit hole, better prepare your Anus, Global Players, elitists and financial Structures require you to be redpilled on master tier...

>>19297188
>The global Network of Companys is constantly shifting,
So, there is no diagram out there that could at least give me a top 20 (or so) of the most powerful and influential conglomerates worldwide?
Are there no financial superstructures that tie everything together? Even non profit organizations and UN observers might play a role.
>if you really want to dive in that Rabbit hole
Where do I start? I want to know exactly who runs this shit.

>>19297199

You can look up Fortune's Global 500 list. Also, Citigroup seemed to pick a lot of Obama's cabinet per the Podesta email dump.

>>19297160
>"Companies"
>"Wall Street"

American education.

>>19297295
Wall Street is used as an inclusive term to refer to investment banks and hedge funds, you fucking moron.

>>19297160
I feel that its the evil himself ruling the world, hes the one who is letting the puppets dance...dunno where the good went..must be on vacation or sumthin...

>>19297188
why do people never provide sources, nor evidences, really nothing...for their crazy, world upside down turning claims?!?

Do you even have some? ;-)

File: mg21228354.500-3_600.jpg (152KB, 600x598px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 600x598px

>>19297199

There is, but not 20. There are 147 of them.

> a core of 1318 companies with interlocking ownerships. Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20. What’s more, although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1318 appeared to collectively own through their shares the majority of the world’s large blue chip and manufacturing firms – the “real” economy – representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues.


> When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a “super-entity” of 147 even more tightly knit companies – all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity – that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network. “In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network,” says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.

Read here (there is a top 50 list at the end of the article)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354-500-revealed-the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world/

and go to the scientific analysis of the original paper.

>>19297300

Same way as America is used to refer to the u.s. OF A.

>>19297160
Amazon is working it's way up there. But Halliburton and the Rand Corporation are the two I can think of, maybe DuPont?

>>19297160
https://www.blackrock.com/investing

5.4 Trillion in investments

>>19297199
>"If we figure out who's in charge, we can >find him and kill him"

>>19297160
De Beers

>>19297722
This it's serious nightmare fuel.

>>19297160
Procter and gamble. Unilever.
Consistently poisoned products with harmful effects to organs and normal brain function.

"B-but olfactory reception is just a myth anon-kun!"
Fuck off.

>>19299291
Same with lead poisoning, it's something they do, get caught on, then we just forget about it.

After that we redirect our frustration, to the dog/boyfriend/mother, but it's all caused by some form of corporate related issue, money, work, etc...

>No Disney-ABC mention
>No Comcast mention
>No Time-Warner mention

Glad to see the media conglomerates are successfully making your gaze slide right over them. I mean, it's not like Disney controls just about 90% of a child's entire media experience and implants the ethics they want into their fertile minds. (And no, I do not consider an outdated line on a pic to be a mention, especially when the only connection is to Mitchell who was a toothless chairman for three years.)

>>19299626
>ctrl-f Disney
>this is the only post mentioning it

how. You mention its targeting children, but even scarier is the number of adults absolutely obsessed with anything Disney, too.

>>19299640
those adults you speak of were most likely those who were watching Disney movies when they were young, and now as fully grown people they want to show their children the same "magic" they experienced as kids too.

Keep repeating this for a few more generations and god only knows what type of people will exist.

Nestle

>>19299291

>olfactory reception is just a myth

There are people out there trying to convince you that your sense of smell is a myth?

>>19297160
Rothschilds

>>19299640
even more scary is those "ELSA" videos, as Disney obviously has to do with it...usualy they law-suit anyone using their figures and trademarks...but not those guys that make sick gore, porn and stuff like this?!

Disney is evil...handle with it

Sony?

>>19299626
>they are entry level shit, its obvious and we barely need to discuss this basi /pol/ shit.
Its obvious, everbody knows that /pol/.

>>19301579
>>19301226
>>19299626


This as face companies, they apear to be powerfull, but only ins a small scale, behind them are the real heavy, banks, inteligence hardware and software structures.

I heard about some group related to root DNS domains and networks practically "owning" the internet and that Google and co were basically its subsidiaries. Anyone know what I'm talking about?

File: [Pyramid].jpg (124KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1024x819px

>>19297160

Corporations that "Own/Rule the World" or have the abilities/means to potentially do so fall under 2 Categories:

1) WS(World Stage) Corporations

2) BC(Behind Curtain) Corporations

Some corporations are Both, while others are either BC or WS only. Within that, some of those corporations have influence and/or projects/operations in the BC & WS.

[KB Archives: http://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge%20bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/%21%219O2tecpDHQ6/]

A variation of World/Global Government exists where it's Corporations rather then Power Structures controlling the Planet. A sub variant of that(The "Monopoly" World/Global Government) has a single Corporation controlling the Planet.

>>19302059
Could you list some of these corporations? I don't find any of your posts referencing them in the archive.

>>19297722
and it gets even messier if you start to delve down into the "power" families that run all the companies

>>19302074
You mean those http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/ ?

>>19297722
Is that the album cover art for Midlake's Antiphon?

>>19301582
You contributed nothing, so you obviously aren't even on entry level shit.

>>19301583
What makes you say another company has controlling stake in something like Disney-ABC? Do you have documentation, or are you just pulling shit from a tinfoil hat?

Bumping for interest. Underrated thread topic.