Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
Anonymous
Abandoned madhouse - Orbs and an angel captured? 2017-07-13 07:14:42 Post No. 19286628
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Abandoned madhouse - Orbs and an angel captured? 2017-07-13 07:14:42 Post No. 19286628
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 19944505_1582587881814770_2987668762162908340_o.jpg (162KB, 1244x829px) Image search:
[Google]
162KB, 1244x829px
Abandoned madhouse - Orbs and an angel captured?
Anonymous
2017-07-13 07:14:42
Post No. 19286628
[Report]
Hello this was posted on facebook by someone of my circle of friends. the image was taken by a canon camera at a Abandoned madhouse. i already checked the images for manipulation/possible photoshop hints but it looked clean.
he said the weird lights and stuff were only visible when he checked the images at home, they didnt saw them when they took the shots.
he also said the place had some evil presence and the camera didnt worked correctly like always
>>
>>
I've never heard of an orb that can't be explained away as dust, a bug, water drop(lets), or camera flaws.
The "angel" looks like it cold be a bug lit up by the flash. As does the little "fairy" to the bottom right.
Neat place though.
>>
File: a896c93f0d4a5786c796563fe079b0efbdc0c01d.175960.png (1MB, 1244x829px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1244x829px
>>19286670
>>19286628
photoforensics from pic 1
seems unedited
>>
>>19286628
>dey didnt saw dem
>da camera didnt worked correctleh bruh
you have to be at least 18 to come to 4chan but you have to be at least 11 to post on /x/
>>
>>19286718
please stop using that website when you don't actually understand what the technique is for or how it works. what you've produced there is meaningless.
>>
>>19286720
well i just repeat what i was told
the facebook post wasnt a viral thing had some likes thats it
>>
>>19286726
so go for it explain the correct use
>>
>>19286628
bump
>>
>>19286718
>seems unedited
I never said it was edited, I said it was bugs.
>>
Looks like a bug
>>
>>19286748
if two things are already dissimilar this technique doesn't do anything. a light thing on a black background doesnt work. the technique is for things like a face having been changed in a photo. the shading on the face is supposed to match the surrounding shading and you can tell if it doesn't.
I have seen people use the technique incorrectly 10 times more than correctly. Using a website is also not how you do it, there is special software that allows you to control parameters
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5