216 Phi Sequence

File: 216 phi sequence patterns.png (31KB, 335x684px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 335x684px

This is just an example of some of the patterns that emerge. They also emerge in criss-cross formats. Can anyone help me further identify some information of patterns that exist within this series of numbers?

>>19286488
>There is a sequence of numbers that, arguably, is paranormal in that it is so perfectly aligned in the patterns that emerge from it that it was intelligently considered before it's creation.

are you capable of understanding that pi contains an infinite number of such sequences?

File: 216 Phi Sequence in Geometry.gif (2MB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x540px

>>19286510
I am aware of this but this specific sequence just intrigues me greatly, it is composed of the basic single digit numerics available to us and in this it produces patterns.

Is that not coincidental enough to make you wonder how or why this is??

>>19286533
>Is that not coincidental enough to make you wonder how or why this is??

No, because I understand mathematics. You're making the mistake that conutless people who come here make: you're trying to explain away reality with supernatural.

being intrigued by something doesn't mean god created the universe.

>>19286566
Well, then I gladly, and I point this out, openmindedly, ask you what you think on the subject of that matter that this numerological pattern produces repeating patterns.

Is that...Just coincidence to you??

>>19286585
Not that anon, but when you create a set of patterns whose seeds terms are...

1+1=...
2+1=...
3+1=...
4+1=...

And so on, then you should expect to get some interesting patterns out of it because...

>1
>2
>3
>4

...because you seeded it with a highly ordered mathematical structure.

File: rainbow spiral vortex.gif (812KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 800x600px

>>19286615
I understand.

Sigh, my point is more along the lines of, is it not intriguing that such occurrences produce patterns? Is that not interesting?? Why would this occur at all?

File: 22 The Spiritual Fool.png (78KB, 300x578px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 300x578px

>>19286615
Although I will point out. Seeds terms ar ACTUALLY:

1+1
2+2
3+3
4+4

I don't understand how you didn't catch that, did you even look at the picture? :/

File: thirdsinbase10.jpg (3KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 184x184px

i dunno, base 10 numerology is kind of non-paranormal to me ... I'd like to see more 12 and 60 stuff

>>19286656
Binary is rather a curiosity. Interesting in how far it can be taken. Almost doesn't seem human like technologically.

>>19286637
Because I didn't want to be depressed tonight, so I used a slightly more complex metaseries.

For n+n, the pattern is even more trivial: Each terms in the 2+2 series will be double its index in the 1+1 series. Literally the same as multiplying the original sequence by n.

>>19286666
That's lovely.

So why not observe the OP's picture and use that mathematically potent mind to discern why it produces the patterns it does?

>>19286631
>Sigh, my point is more along the lines of, is it not intriguing that such occurrences produce patterns? Is that not interesting?? Why would this occur at all?

see, you said you were capable of understanding, but you are not capable of understanding the concept of infinity.

most normal people, no offense, aren't capable of understanding geological time scales, astrological distances, concepts like infinity or irrational numbers. it's probably just not in your programming.

>>19286671
because OP is not academically capable of understanding the proof. it has no value to him.

>>19286671
>Because I didn't want to be depressed tonight.
When your seed structure is ordered and mathematical, and you use math to create derivative structures, you should expect those structures to be ordered and mathematical. It's both how and _why_ math works. >>19286615

Creating randomness, non-patterned sequences, now that's hard. Order means we already have a way to understand it. I'm also not in a teaching mood right now, so the basics of entropy are all you're getting out of me tonight. The other anon might have the patience to explain in mathematical detail.

>>19286706
i'm not the mathematician you are, I just grasp the concepts.

I hope OP is at least picking up on the concept that learning is better than "believing"

File: Orbs 4 Four of Orbs.png (65KB, 300x578px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 300x578px

>>19286679
It sounds ironic to me, someone who comprehends infinity, but isn't arrogant enough to say I understand it. I'm sorry you feel these ways, maybe one day you'll realize the opportunity you missed in showcasing your 'knowledge'.

>>19286687
Why not explain it anyways for anyone who does? Why are you resisting providing an explanation?

>>19286706
The arrogance tonight is just, particularly indicative of /x/philes.

I don't think it's worthwhile trying to discuss the metaphysical nature of coincidence as to why this sequence produces patterns.

I honestly thought there'd be a curiosity, instead only the people full of themselves respond.

It's honestly quite sad. What are you all trying to hide? There was a basic question and the responses are all indicative of apathy and self-absorbed feelings of self belief without any consideration for others who you all probably consider 'lesser'.

Damn, talk about depressing. I can't tell if you're trolls, shills, or just ass holes.

I don't know why I expect anything from /x/ when people like the above ruin potentially decent threads in seemingly an endless crusade of trying to prove yourselves.

All you proved is you don't give a fuck, and you don't care. Even if you tried to explain it, I'd consider it, but instead you do what you do.

Extremely, depressing. One day, I hope you get what you deserve, for all your...'Intelligence', you all are awfully fucking cruel.

So anyone else who is interested in answering the OP with speculation is welcome to answer. Until these fucks attempt to be worthwhile in explaining why they're such self absorbed ass holes, everyone else is welcome to provide their consideration.

I'm just trying to figure out why the mathematics are designed in such a way, seemingly inherently, to produce such patterns.

Is that really too autistic for some of you 'advanced intellectuals'?

Like Jesus Christ, I hope you get a knee broken to understand how you make others feel with your arrogance.

>>19286761
>What are you all trying to hide?
I like math. I don't like to see shit all over math.

>>19286761
>I'm just trying to figure out why the mathematics are designed in such a way, seemingly inherently, to produce such patterns.
I re-read your OP and first reply and tried, tried to figure out how intuition is supposed to apply to a fundamentally logical structure. The only answer I can come up with is that numbers don't have meaning unless we assign them meaning.

Yes, there is an inherent order to the structures you're looking at. It is exactly as it seems: Such patterns emerge from patterned sources. When you use math to make more math, math emerges.

It's math.

>>19286761
>Why are you resisting providing an explanation?

because of this, little kid. fuck you. did you forget where you are? this isn't the website where we spoonfeed stupid people.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=why+does+pi+have+repeating+number+sequences

File: THE DIGITS.jpg (30KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x480px

>>19286774
That makes no fucking sense, it's a basic fucking question.

Why does this sequence of numbers, produce fucking patterns.

Is that really shitting all over math?

What the, flying fuck, is wrong with you?

Forgive me for bothering, maybe other fucking sites will provide more insightful answers than these fucking excuses you pathetic fucks make up for yourselves.

Hey mods, feel free to delete this. It's not worth the, extravagant display of megalomania you sad people fucking show.

How pathetic, it was a simple fucking question and all you can produce in response is your arrogance. Take a good fucking hard look in the mirror next time you catch your reflection, you can live with being so fucking full of yourself?

It's just so sad. Everyone deserves better than people like the above.

>>19286789
dude what you don't understand is that there are people who attribute supernatural explanations to things without researching the real-world explanations for them first

and people who understand math and science consider themselves above the first type of people, because frankly, they are.

File: mfw all this.jpg (16KB, 225x325px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 225x325px

>>19286788
Especially, when they deserve to be murdered like this piece of shit excuse for a fucking human being.

>Where do you think you are

A place where I can ask fucking questions, where the fuck do you think you are? The fucking dark web?

This is a prime example, of pathetic magicians, people, pathetic excuses for human beings.

Good job keeping the quality of this board shit.

Pat yourself on the back, and pray to your fucking god that your knees don't get shattered one day in response to your sad pathetic excuse for fucking consciousness.

God save your fucking soul.

>>19286793
Einstein. That's all I need to say.

I now no better than to attempt to discover deeper meanings to life through skeptical observation of coincidental occurrences on a place as self-absorbed and pathetic as this place.

Kek, kekekekekek, or whatever the fuck.

Please, do the WORLD, a favor, perhaps the COSMOS, lobotomize yourselves, maybe then you'll understand a semblance of humility.

Pray to your fucking gods. You have what you deserve coming to you all. Just wait, I don't need to do shit, it'll hit you like a fucking perfect solution to a complex equation.

And all that'll be left for you to ponder, is what the fuck you did wrong in your life to get what you deserved.

There's no peace for you people, you're so fucking sad and pathetic and upset with your lives.

There's nothing left to be said, let the thread die.

>>19286806
>I'm stupid so I lash out with angry reddit spacing

Notice that the two guys who understand math, including me, have moved on as of this post. Didn't read, btw.

File: 6-tetragrammaton-cycle.jpg (547KB, 2197x888px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 2197x888px

>>19286656
>having a base instead of forming numbers like words
stupid babylonians

>>19286566
Dude god is the universe, you're trying to explain him away with his math

>>19286488
>>19286496
You make ancient alchemy look bad with your stupidity.
You took the pattern and multiplied it by (1 to 9)mod9, thats why you get vedic square patterns.

If you want to actually analyze Phi then Here:
Base-2: 0,1
Base-3: 0,1,2 OR -1(2), 0, +1(1)
Base-4: 0, 1, 2, 3 OR -1(2) 3or0 +1(1) OR binary 0=0, 1=3{1,2} OR charge: -, ( * ), +
...
Base-10: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 OR -4(5), -3(6), -2(7), -1(8) 9or0 +1(1) +2(2) +3(3) +4(4) OR binary 0=0, 1=9{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} OR charge: -, ( + ), +, -, ( * ), +, -, ( - ), +

The Fibonacci Sequence:
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765, 10946, 17711, 28657, 46368, ...

Fibonacci Sequence Mod9:
{ 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 4, 3, 7, 1, 8, 9, 8, 8, 7, 6, 4, 1, 5, 6, 2, 8, 1, 9 }co.
->
{ (1 1 2) [3] (5 8 4) [3] (7 1 8) [9] (8 8 7) [6] (4 1 5) [6] (2 8 1) [9] }co.
->
{ (4) [3] (8) [3] (7) [9] (5) [6] (1) [6] (2) [9] }co.
->
{ (1) [6] (2) [9] (4) [3] (8) [3] (7) [9] (5) [6] (1) }co.
OR
{ (8) [3] (7) [9] (5) [6] (1) [6] (2) [9] (4) [3] (8) }co.
->
{ (1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, 1) [6, 9, 3, 3, 9, 6] }
OR
{ (8, 7, 5, 1, 2, 4, 8) [3, 9, 6, 6, 9, 3] }
___
(1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, 1) <- 8 into -, - and 1 into +, +
([6, 9, 3, 3, 9, 6]) <- 9 into +- and 9 into -+
->
{ + , - + , - , - , + - , + }
OR
(8, 7, 5, 1, 2, 4, 8)
([3, 9, 6, 6, 9, 3])
->
{ - , + - , + , + , - + , - }
___
Base-10 Multiplication Table mod9 (/vedic square):

{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8} 9
{2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 3, 5, 7} 9
{3, 6, 9, 3, 6, 9, 3, 6} 9
{4, 8, 3, 7, 2, 6, 1, 5} 9
{5, 1, 6, 2, 7, 3, 8, 4} 9
{6, 3, 9, 6, 3, 9, 6, 3} 9
{7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2} 9
{8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1} 9
{9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9} 9
->
{ + , - , - , + , - , + , + , - } *
{ - , + , + , - , + , - , - , + } *
{ - , + , * , - , + , * , - , + } *
{ + , - , - , + , - , + , + , - } *
{ - , + , + , - , + , - , - , + } *
{ + , - , * , + , - , * , + , - } *
{ + , - , - , + , - , + , + , - } *
{ - , + , + , - , + , - , - , + } *
{ * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * } *

>>19287064
Also I suggest you look at these posts:
>>19277386
>>19277389
>>19280468
>>19280611
>>19280662

Good luck.

>>19286488
Maybe stupid here, but is that the right pattern? Phi is the Fibonacci sequence, right? Your first line is 1,1,2,3,5,8,4,3,7,1,8,9,8,8,7,6,4,1,5,6,2,8,1,9... - shouldn't it be 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,134... (I know it's not the same number of terms, but I got lazy)?

I mean, I've actually done this in some weird fit of mathematical curiosity, as I was looking for the differences between the numbers in the sequence as some way of determining primes somehow (I don't really know if it's anywhere near a reasonable idea, but I recall by taking a continual difference between any two numbers and the difference of the one next to it, you wind up arriving at a prime... I may have been wrong, though).

But yeah, it's hard to tell how significant the coincidences of this pattern are, because I can't see how you get from 8 to 4 in line one, from 6 to 1 (I thought you might just be cutting off the tens digit in some form of base change, but I can't tell) in line two, or from the 9 to the 6 in the third line, and so on and so forth. It's like every line starts with Phi but varies all of a sudden. What am I not getting here?

>>19286666

Nice quads

>>19287064
>(1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, 1) <- 8 into -, - and 1 into +, +
>([6, 9, 3, 3, 9, 6]) <- 9 into +- and 9 into -+
->
>{ + , - + , - , - , + - , + }

([6, 9, 3, 3, 9, 6]) <- 9 into -+ and 9 into +-

Sorry for the typo, it is "9 into +- and 9 into -+" is for
(8, 7, 5, 1, 2, 4, 8)
([3, 9, 6, 6, 9, 3])
>'9' of 3 9 6, into 7(+), 5(-) and '9' of 6 9 3 into 2(-), 4(+)

>>19286761
Wow... angry much? Did you have highly intelligent people insult and traumatize you in your past ? You need to understand that sometimes explaining things to a person who doesn't have the mental capacity even understand the explanation is not only uncomfortable and awkward for everyone, it's also a waste of energy. Would you explain calculus to a four year old. No. Its easier to just say "Yeah that's way out" in-between tokes. . . And pass it so they stop asking questions and forget
about it. Or get naked. One of the two usually works for me. Because I've come to find the average person, gets either get weirded out by your sudden nerdiness or mad because... Idk I have no clue why.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snka4Zu2-94

>>19287086
13>1+3 = 4
21>2+1 = 3
34>3+4 = 7
55>5+5 = 10>1+0 = 1
89>8+9 = 17>1+7 = 8

This is what he was doing.

>>19286510
Not pi, but based on the Fibonacci series. He wrote PHI, the ratio between two consecutive numbers that the Fibonacci series approactes

File: Chris-Rock-HUH-WTF.gif (590KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 500x275px

>>19287173
>Would you explain calculus to a four year old. No. Its easier to just say "Yeah that's way out" in-between tokes. . . And pass it so they stop asking questions and forget about it. Or get naked.

>>19286488
we only have 9 digits. if the system is meant to reduce larger numbers into single ones, and follows a sequence for the order of calculations. it's inevitable that a pattern would emerge

>>19287789
Ooooooh... thank you; it wasn't clear from the post (maybe my reading comprehension wasn't up to snuff, there).

The whole "casting out 9s" from numerological sums is definitely weird, and the fact that summing Fibonacci results in consistent results until you get to the 12th and 24th digit, wherein you get a 9 is pretty weird. The symmetry is beautiful, too.