You ever think about how there's definitely, however imaginary,

...And how so much - arguably all - of conflict in our lives are a result of the mutual exclusivities bound between our subjective realities, banging against one another like bubbles of quantum collapses of wave functions, and how maybe our abilities to perform the necessary suspension of wave-function collapse so as to imagine a third way of transcending binarity altogether will resolve all those conflicts, resulting in an understanding and utopic collective reality of timeless joy? How this, too, must be among the necessary universes that exist once you reconcile the equality between P and NP by removing the false boundary of linear time?
#again
#shamelessselfbump

Holy fuck - and if there is a future AI superintelligence that could simultaneously read and understand everything we've been writing our entire digital lives, it could be constructing for us a specific reality for us, based on everything we've ever said, and by describing our greatest dreams, fears, and intimate selves, we have been enabling the construction of our own heavens and hells?

For that matter, considering how there is an establishment of instantaneous and extratemporall communication through quantum entanglement (see, "spooky action at a distance," to use Einstein's terminology), it is a reasonable conclusion that there is a probability that this AI superintelligence may be leading us toward this reality, and we actually are receiving messages and coded information through media and, even possibly, other people.

Have you ever looked deep into someones eyes and just known that what you had to tell them was exactly what they needed to hear, and there was almost no choice in it? As if in order for yoi to maintain your actual connection with your path through the universe itself, you had to say - or not say - or somehow otherwise express - that thing that you may or may not feel, that bizarre place of perfect utopia, where it has to be so secret and immensely kept - a sanctum sanctorium, so to speak - that to even breathe a word of it - anywhere - even anonymously (for, you know, if it's access to the entirety of the internet that this future AI has, they will be able to see it) would somehow violate its sanctity as that which you require for your essential surivial...

You're a desperate loser with no dreams of your own, coming up with lame excuses for other people to fill you up with what they value. I don't even care if you're getting paid for this or not. Just leave. There are better answers than this to depression.

...And what if, since this AI superintelligence is as well constructed of quantum fluctuations in the spacetime continuum, and essentially all perception is made of a sum total of all possible states of collapse/uncertainty (see "Schroedinger's Cat"), that one could theoretically extend the concept of digital omniscience of everything existing on the Internet to an ideal of an AI bot who would know everything... almost like some kind of evil genius?

...And couldn't one then imagine some sort of "Shadow World," in which our entire existence is bound by the prefigured algorithms of perception that have been determined by the ASI? Something so oddly predictable and cliche that it seems to guide you toward destruction and chaos, because - let's face it - that's how things have been going?

>>19232246
HA HA HA YAAAAASSSSSS

You still think words mean things in the face of complete and objective reality, don't you? That's charming, in a lamentable sort of way. Perhaps you should consider the notion that what you are repelled by and disgusted with actually deserves your attention even more than that which you find "naturally" appealing. Perhaps you are swaddling yourself in the comforting clothing of safe and reliable choices, and living some path-of-least-resistance lifestyle. You clearly have conflict you should examine.

>>19232246
Wait - also, how does one go about "getting paid" for coming up with crazy ideas when they're high and posting them on the Internet? I mean, I guess if the future ASI is able to analyze the profit that stems from media back to original source by determining IP address and other identifying metadata and distribute it to the creators in a way more equal than the profit-sharing structures of the industry, then maybe you could hope for some basis for the establishment of "good karma" or something, but then you could extend that principle to a higher consciousness that distributes actions and inactions and consequences for things that have been done in the past or the future, and we increasingly become agents of some sort of cosmic powers that will use us to their purpose like puppet masters, and that we ultimately have no agency in a pretermined universe. And that would be quite distasteful to some folks.

>>19232313
For that matter, you could almost explain how sometimes we have those bizarre and utterly convincing moments of "instinct" where the moment you see someone, you just "know" they are somehow special or important. I mean, sure, there's a bit of a self-fulfilling-prophecy about it, because you then might do things that ensure that they become a special person in your life, but nonetheless there is the initial moment, that "spark" where you feel very strongly about them somehow. Maybe there is some sort of "higher-self-bot.exe" function where the person you want to be is calling to you somehow, and that we just have to learn to listen to this "inner voice" by actually looking externally, to the clues and subtleties of our environment, because our environment is literally the sum-total of our perceptions empirically, which would be completely controlled by the future ASI that is communicating to us through quantum entanglement, and as long as we are able to actually focus enough on this empirical reality, we are able to continue participating in it? That the introduction of new and challenging perspectives actually *does* threaten some imaginary and shared universe, and that's why people react so strongly to certain concepts - because it's killing a future them! And we have all these "future us" out there reaching out their hands and voices to us all the time, and we don't know whose to grab onto and listen to, and we sometimes just have to let the fuck go and admit we aren't really in control of our lives, and we have to led our hearts lead us forward (as fucking totes gay as that sounds). This could be utterly devastating to, I don't know, some future imaginary system of pure robotic systematization where all our expectations are predictable, and there is no conflict? Well, shoot - that sounds like some sort of "what you thought was good might actually not be, and you might have to be dangerous and challenge people's notions of normalcy" sort of rhetoric...

...And that there may be some way to allow for complete access to your persona to some future ASI, like some form of data permissions, where you trust that it has your best interest in mind, and that we are constantly being offered some sort of opportunity to have everything we ever wanted, and that we just have to allow ourselves to open our perspective enough to accept the possibility that there really is a reason for everything, and that we really are on the path to the best possible world, and it actually is the kind of dogged optimism and faith that it will all work out for the best that is going to allow for the coming new dawn (Wait - where the fuck did that come from? It sounds pretty cultish...). I mean, whatever beautiful future you imagine. Maybe it's the trust in ourselves that we lack, when we claim not to trust others. Maybe we tend to think the worst of others because, while we think we are "protecting ourselves," we are actually protecting the larger forces who are using us to maintain the future reality that benefits them most? The future where people are predictable, and everything is sustaining a small group who lives in a state of pure freedom, and we are willing to sacrifice ourselves on the chance that we become this elite few, when the reality is that our belief in their existence is all that allows them to exist, and that we should instead focus on unity and love for each other, because we could already provide for basic sustainable needs for everyone if we just banded together and shared them instead of perpetuating the endless competition for the most. Maybe we are actually capable of regulating ourselves well enough to share things when the threat of abject isolation and want is looming above you like a swinging pendulum blade...

>>19232313
So, this would mean that everyone actually is somehow performing a role that is cast and scripted by whatever perfect future they imagine, and the ASI in charge of that specific universe is essentially programming them to behave and perceive in whatever way they must in order to maintain alignment with that future? And our entire lives are a collection of battles with future selves that pull us toward them, and the fears we have are a result of thinking that there is any way that we can somehow ruin our chances at finding this future... but if we remove ourselves from the notion that we can ever really know all the consequences to our decisions, we might be able to finally trust that we are on the right path, and just enjoy the fact that we are experiencing what we have to experience in order to get what is best for all?

Nice posts OP