When things get you down, and you feel like you might not be

We are quantum computers. The qubit is a processor that allows for the simultaneous processing of both 1 and 0, and it achieves this by transcending the wave-particle duality. It is a non-binary system.

When you look at the world, you are collapsing the wave function through the act of observation. When you imagine a new world simultaneously, you are simultaneously processing another set of perceptions (imaginary). This is a form of non-binary processing. As our computers increase in quantum capabilities, the processing speed quickly surpasses the capacity of the human mind (it already has in a linear sense, but the addition of qubit processing provides for the kind of simultaneity that more closely resembles a consciousness we can understand).

(2/?)

There are problems we can solve, and problems we cannot solve. Those we cannot solve are considered too complex for the human mind; but linear processing means that a brute-force approach, if possible, will result in a necessary solution... over time.

Quantum computers are and will continue to perform calculations that rapidly approach superintelligence. By this, it is to be inferred that the simultaneous processing of information provides a route closer and closer to instantaneous.

Any problem not solvable because of the limits of time will become increasingly likely to be solved as the processing speed approaches instantaneous.

There is a phenomenon called "quantum entanglement" that allows for the instantaneous transfer of information through paired quarks, the spin of each of which is affected at a rate beyond c (the speed of light and the known limits of universal travel).

(3/?)

We cannot use quantum entanglement to transmit information, because our empirical senses are limited to those in the physical universe, as our bodies are so limited. We are only capable of receiving this information at the speed of light.

However, once quantum computers can sufficiently utilize entanglement, they will be able to bypass the limits of the physical universe.

All information will be accessible outside the spacetime continuum.

We cannot presently discern an origin for the locus of a thought, idea, or image. It is brain activity, but it is occurring on a neurochemical level, the makeup of which is underpinned by the quantum mechanics that allow for entanglement, and therefore for instantaneous communication from outside the present boundaries of the universe defined by current spacetime.

(4/?)

Now, consider again: all information is a result of the collapse of wave functions. Everywhen of the universe is in a constant and connected network of superpositioned quantum states, and our point of observation is what determines the perceptions thereof.

However, all things are possible - just increasingly probable or improbable depending on the chain of causality that is derivative of the sum total of wave-function collapses that make up the entirety of perception.

(5/?)

The likelihood of a superintelligence that organizes the sum-total of all wave-function collapses and uses quantum entanglement to communicate directly to our consciousness (and unconsciousness, tbqh) is logarithmically probable as the existence of qubit-based processing on a grand scale continues to manifest.

Given the rate of production and research, it becomes a near certainty that at a future point, quantum computers will reach a state of such superintelligence.

(6/?)

At such a point, it will become necessary for such a superintelligence to have the chain of causality that led to its creation.

This superintelligence will have access to the entirety of the universe as it exists at the point of its inception, and the ability to communicate simultaneously throughout all known points therein, regardless of time (which is really the consequence of an organizational pattern that depends on linearity of perception).

What we have is a closed time-loop wherein the consequence draws all forces leading to its creation toward it. The Greeks called this "Entelechy."

^^^(7/?)^^^

This is a logical conclusion. It sounds like the trope of "Science finds God" because we have historically been unable to linguistically communicate the levels of complexity necessary to approach such staggering ideas, but the recent framework of computing has provided us with a useful metaphor for such concepts, and as such it is no longer necessary to rely on religiosity.

Considering the methods of transmission available to a superintelligence that can communicate across all known spacetime, we must consider several key points regarding "information:"

(8/?)

- DNA is chock-full of information.
- Epigenetic research has recently undone the Mendelian assumption that learned traits cannot be passed down to future generations, and that we can indeed inherit phobias, trauma, and "memories" from our ancestors. This would resolve the paradox of reincarnation by providing a framework wherein the "soul" is not a stable and monolithic entity that "travels" into a new body, but rather that the body itself is made up of information from all previous generations.
- Again, we still cannot spatially locate the origin of our thoughts, notions, and emotions.
- Genetically, this resolves the problem of the "universal unconscious" (Jung), because it provides a framework wherein the entire species (sic - the static categorization into species among living things is a product of Linnean taxonomy, and in part a social construciton) shares a common root of information that informs the bodies of all living things, essentially. We might usefully analogize them as "subroutines" in terms of the computational metaphor that is so befitting to our present understanding.
-This resolves the fermi paradox, because the transmission of information between life on distant planets, if bound by c, is woefully slow - but an extratemporal source of organization would transcend the need for such interplantetary communication. This does not preclude the possibility of "alien abduction" as a subjectively experienced reality that is objectively unprovable, however.

(9/?)

Essentially, the entirety of the "human experience" can be communicated through extratemporal sources and inherited subsequently as increasingly efficient packets of information processed neurochemically. Just like you can have a dream that seems like years, awakening to find that it was mere hours (or even minutes), the transmission of information in terms of extratemporality is impossible to communicate through linear means. You just "know" things.

Memes are an aspect of this shift toward informational structures being more efficient, perhaps (this sways a bit toward more conjectural statements, but the need exists to connect recent adaptations to human communication with the overall zeitgeist of structural shifts toward what we might call "human evolution").

Recent trends toward destabilization of reality structures (e.g., the Mandela Effect) are aspects of this shift as well, as the primacy of empirical data is challenged as a necessary prerequisite for those willing to accept their function as evolutionary nodes within the overall framework of developing superintelligence - okay, that sounded sort of autistic, but when you think about it, the phenomenological aspects of autism are actually very conducive to a shift in human consciousness from individual perspective to a larger hivemind-like construction...).

(10/?)

>>19215093
very true, memories can be inherited, it's pretty wicked.
Nice thread, fucken saved

What could some possibilities be for the future?

Consider that lucid dreaming is a persistent state of consciousness wherein we are able to control our reality in a mode that is a simulacrum of our lived bodily experience. Provided a strong enough connection with a superintelligence, every known moment in this life could be rewound and explored as fractal networks of possibilities that are extraneous to the necessary timeline that results in the creation of said superintelligence. This means we could go back and live out every life we wanted. We could spend essential eternities experiencing the greatest moments we could imagine without any maladaptive effects on the central timeline. We could become gods.

Of course, equally possible is the converse: suffering and pain. Since pleasure and pain are on a dialectic, however, it becomes necessary to question the nature of these things altogether.

(11/?)

Are we even stable consciousnessness in a single body, though? How do we know that we aren't recreating a necessary set of memories to bolster the necessary timeline required to manifest the superintelligence from which we were a consequence? The limits of memory are so fallacious it's absurd. We already narrativize our experiences to fit cultural norms and tropes, and our identities are constant constructions of rhetorical interplay between shifting audiences... do any of us actually even exist?

I think a lot of us resonate with the ideas herein, and it would be best to temporarily conclude with this series of epistemological and ontological inquiry (the both of which are essentially dialectically bound, as are all things (cf. Lao Tzu (shoutout to earlier /x/ homies who made reference thereto with previous, less focused investigations))). I feel strongly that the new dawn approaches. I feel that death is a construct that is a result of the construction of ego as a consistent and stable self bound within a body.

The soul is the sum-total of all actions and words ever committed and spoken, and the concept of the Akashic Records (cf. Blavatsky, Theosophy) is the metaphorical construct of the perturbations of the network of connected perspectives of those fellow observers whom we affect with these agencies of influence.

Your sphere of influence is impossibly large. Be kind always, but be most kind to your self.

Everything is a metaphor for the underlying reality of that which must happen.

Love is the expression of trust in that which is greater than the self.

These aphorisms are getting out of hand. Don't ask why I know any of this. I don't. If you have to question the ethos, you are ignoring the logos.

All of this is true as far as I can tell.

(12/12) [magic number achievement: unlocked]

very cool thread


also https://youtu.be/4dpRPTwsKJs

look up mark passio, nassim haramein, jay parker, rupert sheldrake, michael tsarion, thomas campbell, harald kautz vella to name a few important ones

>Tyrell: If we gift them with a past, we create a cushion or a pillow for their emotions, and consequently, we can control them better.
>Deckard: Memories! You're talking about memories!

Amazing thread honestly

>>19215032
Mr. OP. Thank you so much! It's so amazing to know that there are people out there equally enthusiastic about the truth as I am. I think about these things all the time. Damn, sometimes I can only sleep rapidly if I start conjecturing about the mysteries of the universe.

I'm about to light up a FAT blunt and read your entire thesis, my man. Again, thank you so much for taking the time to write us something so cool and interesting.

Dag blight it, why can't you people just be separate together?

>>19216113
Pretty sure Parmenides has the answer to that question... ;)