how do you explain time cube? no matter how hard i try i can't

>>19179620
For one, it has no proof to it. At least not real proof beyond a crazy person rambling. But being unable to debunk things does not make those things true, and you know that.

I'm god, prove me wrong. You couldn't. I would have made a baseless claim that I can constantly redefine or shrug off. Same as if I said any other claim. Claims have to be proven, not disproven. Otherwise any half assed claim would be true unless someone can show it is wrong and that is backwards thinking.

But if you cared about the truth? You'd see we have already been to space and seen that the earth is not a cube. And the current models for the way we use these satellites for things like GPS and whatnot only work if we take into account a round earth. If that isn't enough evidence for you, then you should be honest and admit that your inquiry isn't about explaining it, but rather pushing an agenda. Or you're trolling. But lately it's hard to tell with the kinds of dregs /x/ gets.

>>19179645
>You'd see we have already been to space and seen that the earth is not a cube.
time cube doesn't posit that the earth is a cube. if you can't/or haven't bothered to grasp a concept, don't argue against it.

that being said I do agree with you

File: maxresdefault.jpg (38KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1280x720px

>>19179620

Sounds like a job for TimeCop

>>19179666
Given how retarded it is I didn't bother to read up on how a cube time would even work on a round earth.

Then general physics does wonders to debunk him. General relativity or even light/gravity and their influences on time sure show that there isn't a cube time because time at our level and scale is all relative. The only way it'd work is if time was objective, but in this universe at least, it's relative.

>>19179691
>>19179645
>falling for the obvious troll
Good job, namefag.

>>19179620
>no matter how hard i try i can't debunk it, it's impenetrable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

>>19180072
they're a tripfag not a namefag
I guess you'd be called a newfag then

the more you knoooow

>>19180158
All tripfags are namefags, not all namefags are tripfags.

>>19180813
>All tripfags are namefags
This is false.

>>19181819
my penis is false

>>19179645
just the entire kabballah and every symbol with the x and the cross and the 4 leaf clover

>>19183659
>The entire kabbalah
Citation, please/ Or at least reference to a text?

>>19183442
underrated response