Flat Earth

I think it's the most amusing subject on /x/.

>>19030990
The theory that makes everyone believe we're retards. [spoiler]we are[spoiler]

It's flat, you win. Can we change subject now?

File: 7ac7f41980d7623035fdbf9b76fa5ad9.jpg (113KB, 950x783px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 950x783px

But what about Eric Dubay?

>>19031007
Clearly, it's true for you. Why not sage, next.

>>19030995
It's really, an IQ benchmark.

What about Fat Earth?

To tell you the truth I was looking for an actual good rebuttal... whatever

>>19030990
no one actually beliebes it

just larping 4 luls

A successful demonstration of how willful ignorance can be used to deflect any logical argument--so successful was the Flat Earth example, that people began perpetuating it in earnest, not realizing that the progenitor of the example did so with satire.

The amount of assumptions necessary to sustain a Flat Earth model is on par with Simulation Theory. It boils down to "everything is so fake, that it's apparently real." Which I guess is whatever.

Sure.

>>19030990
flat as a pancake
has no cause to be believed otherwise

>>19030990
People have a hard time believeing that the earth is flat which it is because they don't dont to say goodbye to everything the think they know about the cosmos and the dream that they will one day become astronauts

Imagination fodder

>>19030990
Well if earth was flat wouldn't the middle be sinking in causing everything to pour that way over time

How can a globe be true? The evidence of the globe can't stand up to the flat Earth evidence

>STOP CIA STOP
flat earth my balls piece of shit, stop this crap

flat earth is a meme, ya dingus. PRANKED

File: cone-moon.png (288KB, 668x748px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 668x748px

>>19031531
The next big meme is conical moon. Get ready for it and plan accordingly. The moon is actually in the shape of a cone. The face of it that we see is the base of the cone. Conical moon is gonna be huge, just watch.

It's this bullshit lack of evidence and ridicule that feeds the fire of is conspiracy

>>19031037

The Earth is big

>>19031654
What's your point

Nikola Tesla told us the world is flat. If you want a legitimate intelligent discussion about the subject you won't find it here. If Nikola can't convince you the world is flat no discussion on this Chan will. If you legitimately want to know more on the subject download the onion router and search the forbidden libraries there.

>>19031654
For you

>>19031037
The bottom image of the ocean there actually shows a very minor, barely noticeable curve though.

>>19030990
It is a pretty serious example of the effects of the failure of the American education system. Flat Earthers lack critical thinking skills and basic math and science backgrounds. This is what happens when these bumbling idiots reach adulthood and start having opinions.

>>19031815
How can you say Flat Earthers dont critical think when you lord and savior is a jewish mathematic theoriest that never put his theories to real world test? How could Einstein get rid of the existence of aether with no proof of it. You claim Flat Earthers dont critical think yet you only ridicule and regurgitate information without thinking.

>>19031759
Good point, thanks for the lead.

>>19031007
Trying to speak for /x/

Doesnt know you cant spoiler here

Back to your containment board.

>>19031037
>Edges of the photos are cropped

You actually have to point out things like this to these people.

>>19031759
Stop dragging tesla into your stupid snowflake cult.

Heres the quote in question.

>NIKOLA TESLA: "Earth is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore, it has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment. Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electo-magnetic levitation. Electromag levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity. The stars are attached to the FIRMAMENT."

Other quotes on his theory (Which specifically believes in a globe earth.)

>This metal, it would seem, has an origin entirely different from that of the rest of the globe.

>It is a well-known fact that the interior portions of the globe are very hot, the temperature rising, as observations show, with the approach to the center at the rate of approximately 1 degree C. for every hundred feet of depth. The difficulties of sinking shafts and placing boilers at depths of, say, twelve thousand feet, corresponding to an increase in temperature of about 120 degrees C., are not insuperable, and we could certainly avail ourselves in this way of the internal heat of the globe.

>By realizing such a plan, we should be enabled to get at any point of the globe a continuous supply of energy, day and night

Hes not talking about a flat earth hes talking about an electrical universe, this is

>>19032032
>The observation of this wonderful phenomenon impressed me strongly that communication at any distance could be easily effected by its means, provided that apparatus could be perfected capable of producing an electric or magnetic change of state, however small, in the terrestrial globe or environing medium.

Source:

"The Problem of Increasing Human Energy with Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun's Energy" in Century Illustrated Magazine (June 1900)

Keep your flat earth bullshit out of Teslas mouth.

I think people who think the earth is flat should be beaten to death in the streets.

>>19032133
No. They should be educated that United States is their crew. They should be educated to disregard their race as a gang to belong to. They then ride Los Angeles public buses claiming United States is their allegiance rather than a racial gang.

There will be instant killing.

>>19032152
The fuck that even means ?

File: bdjJfL2.png (198KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 960x540px

>>19032032
"Though free to think and act, we are helt together like the stars in the FIRNAMENT (dome), with dies inseperable (stars never move) These ties cannot me seen, but we feel them. You are LYING when you're saying that tesla didnt think that the earth was flat. The cognitive dissonance is strong in you my friend

>>19032194
Yah i covered that and added in large parts from the rest of the article youre quoting as well as sourced it.

READ WHAT YOURE REPLYING TO SNOWFLAKE.

>>19032194

>Mentions FIRMMENT once to explain the interaction between an electric universe and celestial bodies. (Not as a glass dome above earth or any of that shit,)

Must be flat earth

>Mention GLOBE multiple times in the same article and others.

Must? be? flat? earth? k.

Hes referring to the sky as a whole, have you ever actually looked up the definition of firmament? Of course you havent youve got youtube videos and disinfo agencies to give you your world view.


Heres the definition moron.

fir·ma·ment
ˈfərməmənt/Submit
noun literary

the heavens or the sky, especially when regarded as a tangible thing.

>>19031968
The aether doesn't exist. It was disproven way before Einstein

>>19031968
>Einstein is our lord and savior

Whoever claimed that? Certainly not scientists.

>never put his theories to real world tests

There have been multiple different independent tests of Einstein's theories, from special relativity to general relativity to the photoelectric effect.

What sort of dumbass thinks it's never been tested? Even the confirmation of gravitational waves was a test. That was all over the news just a year or so ago.

>disproved aether

Well he didn't have too, as multiple experiments had already ruled it out.

>>19032032
He never actually said those things you know.

File: 1486402562584.jpg (29KB, 600x733px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x733px

>>19031037
Oh What a joke you are
>>19032255
>>19032323
Can you link these experiments that Disproved Aether?
>>19032323
And can you link info of these independent test?

>>19030990
What if everyone is just trolling and no one can tell that others are trolling? Thus no one actualyl believes in flat earth but they think others do.

Mofofucking chess homies.

The icewall part is real at the very least, so earth if round is 2/3rds frozen
Honestly its probably a disk if not flat

>>19030990
What makes the earth flat? Why is it flat opposed to other celestial bodies? Why wouldnt it collapse?

File: flatpoints.jpg (402KB, 800x3784px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 800x3784px

>>19031037
>avocados are flat

>>19031156
>>19031477
>>19031755
piss poor bait

>>19032194
>FIRNAMENT (dome)
lmao. nice try you fucking BRAINLET (retard)

>>19033618
>educate me about special relativity?
You did go to school, r-right?

>>19033693
Don't be mad just because your arguments can't compare to the flat earth ones

File: howamisupposedtocrashthisplane.png (10KB, 961x530px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 961x530px

>>19033703
How could they? We all know how well thought out and sophisticated the flat earther arguments are! fucking solid!

File: e7accf4a634d77baaa166c418e376a24.jpg (24KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x480px

>>19033702
Yeah, what a mistake that was

File: dogcam.jpg (60KB, 883x653px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 883x653px

>>19031037
You can't tell with DogCam. It's using a fisheye lens, so the horizon fluctuates and curves both ways.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwimocU0IIc
See 2:10 in video
I wish someone would launch a balloon with a straight, non-fisheye lens with no barrel distortion so everybody could shut up once and for all.

>(not that they would, of course)

>>19033728
>I wish someone would launch a balloon with a straight, non-fisheye lens
everytime flat-tards are presented with exactly this they claim it is fake or still a wide angle-lense.

File: 7602503_G.jpg (11KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 600x400px

>>19033790
How come when globetards are presented with evidence of seeing places at impossible distance they claim it is an illusion?

>>19033800
Thats completely dodging the point and no, it isnt an "impossible distance" and I dont know who claimed this was an illusion. You just dont understand the model you are trying to criticise. fail

>>19033800
>look at this photo showing the horizon and how the bottom of this building is beneath the horizon
thanks for helping to disprove the flattards. lmao kys

so flat earth believers are saying that time zones are justified by the fact that the sun emits light on a specific spot, hence day and night. if that's the case, then we should be, at a certain region, to see the sun and not receive any light while some other part of the earth is experiencing day. but it's not the case

>>19030990
Retarded but necessary.

File: IMG_1707.jpg (52KB, 540x346px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 540x346px

if the earth is flat, then the center of gravity of the planet is in the middle. that means that people who move away from the center and drop an object should see the object fall diagonally in a way that it is directed at the center of gravity. but i remember that even aussies drop their objects vertically downward. oh and don't try to tell me gravity doesn't exist. if that's the case, your body wouldn't evolve to resist the pull of earth by developing bones and muscles, the same bones and muscles that degenerate in outer space because gravity doesn't exist.

>>19033806
They call this a mirage, look up the image. This image should be a mile behind the curve
>>19033813
so our perception can wrap around the globe apparently
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql_TTguKxnE

>>19033826
Flat Earthers don't believe in Gravity, they believe density adequately explains why objects falls.

>>19033826
They also don't really believe in space either.

>>19033830
>They call this a mirage
who?
>This image should be a mile behind the curve
why? Where is that picture taken? Froma what altitude? How far away is that city? present your math, because "this just doesnt seem right to me" is not convincing and makes me think I was right with my assumption that you just fail to understand the globe model and basic trigonometry

File: balloonfishlens.jpg (192KB, 960x1052px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 960x1052px

>>19030990

Flat earth might be hard to believe if everyone wasn't so full of shit with fisheye lens.

What sells this is how people try to fake the curve

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bns4R5ZsVUw

>>19033830
>sees horizon
>things dissappear with bottom first behind it
>believes this would happen on a flat disc
top kek

>>19033859
>wide angle lenses exist
>therefor the earth is flat
top kek

>>19033859
>it's

>>19033854
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLlNKy5j_O8
it's from the other side of lake Michigan 59 miles away

Should be 2.738199 behind the curvature
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=59&h0=5&unit=imperial

File: Sunbehindclouds.jpg (38KB, 530x521px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 530x521px

>>19033860
>>19033863

Keep trying

>>19033876
>uses shitty internet calculator
>assumes photo was taken 5ft above sea level
>assumes the top of the buildings are also at sea level
>Should be 2.738199 behind the curvature
wow, so basically I was right with

>you just fail to understand the globe model and basic trigonometry

>inb4 sheepsihly post another shitty yt video and parrots another "point" that is easily debunked by anyone with half a brain
think for yourself. do your own math. dont use youtube as your sole source of education. reflect on where you could be wrong. dont reply.

>>19033913
>thinks cloud is behind sun
>keeps posting this bs, even though it gets explained to him everytime
top kek, is it autism?

>>19033728
>you can't tell because it's a fisheye lens

I hate to introduce facts into a flat earth thread, but you can tell a great deal about curvature from fish eye lenses.

If you have a perfectly horizontal line, and it's directly in the middle of the image, it will remain a horizontal line.

If that same horizontal line is below the midpoint, it will bend upwards (into a u-shape), and if it's above the midpoint it will do the opposite. The same thing goes for straight vertical lines in the center, left, or right sides.

In fact, the way fish eye lenses distort the image is so predictable, there is easy to use consumer software where you can just plug in the image, and it corrects everything to a normal field of view.

>>19033944
this
I never really understood the fisheye argument either. In some pics the distortion actually counters the curvature of the horizon. But hey, I guess then it was just cgi =)

>>19033944
>It will bend upwards (into a u-shap)
So like it did in the red bull jump at 4:33 minutes in right?

>>19033944
>>19034055
Sorry forgot the Sauce
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYw4meRWGd4
4:33 minutes in it bends upwards

File: u9fg0.jpg (49KB, 539x299px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 539x299px

>>19033932
Okay so doing the math on paper is going to give me different result... okay. I live in Michigan, I can recreate this dumbass

>>19034555
that wasnt my only point (and it was the least important, nice dodging) and yes, I assume you arent even able to do this on paper since you keep showing how you dont understand how this works.

>>19033800
All you see is photos from relatively small distances. Also don't rely worked with communication satellites and such.
At least half of the so called proofs are easy to debunk when you lived and know about the world from experience. They are just nonsense.
When someone makes claims and tell people they do reach, and still they come with nonsense, you just know it's complete crap.

>>19036585
*really

>>19030990
Mouthbreathing idiots that use polar projections of the fucking globe as anti-gobe illustrations. For them the distorted view of Antarctica is some kind of ice wall, And the fact that thousands of people go there every year and that you can buy a tourist tour doesn't matter.
>http://map-projections.net/single-view/azimutal-equidistant-gpolar

>>19036612
You're not allowed to independently explore Antarctica, only guided tours are allowed, several flat earthers have tried to go to antarctica but instead have been brought back home by the authorities. Why aren't people allowed you must ask

>>19033690
Underrated post, 100% true too lol

File: 1494301092305.webm (437KB, 308x312px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 308x312px

Pure fucking autism

if the earth is flat and the sun simply moves away into the distance, how come the underside of clouds become illuminated just before the sun dips below the horizon? that would require a relative change of altitude no?

It is only flat when considering the mentality of some of earth's occupants

>>19036783
I guess you don't know how the sun works on the flat earth model, why don't try to learn something about the flath earth instead of only knowing how the globe model works

>>19036662
Yeah, and whats up with Montana?! same shit. What are they hiding?

>>19036813
he is trying. but in vain, since you didnt even try to answer the question. So, please answer without the use of a youtube link

>>19030990

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kAjQdeyiHc

>>19036662
>several flat earthers have tried to go to antarctica but instead have been brought back home by the authorities.
Who are they?

Why does water drain in the opposite direction on the southern hemisphere?

>>19036967
it doesnt

>>19036885
>>19036813
Thank you anon. Would seem the obvious thing to do - answer the question rather than assume my intentions baka. The fucking state of humanity these days... Freud wasn't kidding when he said that he was bringing the plague to America

>>19036998
>>“We Are Bringing Them The Plague”
I had no idea he said that

>>19030990

Flat earth is undoubtedly the truth. Jews push the spherical earth lie as hard as they can, they spend billions upon billions on trickey to promote this lie.

Why do people think it has to be either flat or a sphere? Why cant it be both?

File: nasaearth.png (223KB, 457x352px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 457x352px

>>19033690
>>19036718

At least you can measure a curve on an avocado and take a non altered photo to prove it

File: sunheight.jpg (36KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x426px

>>19033939

Good argument

>>19037168
>converging light rays
That's perspective. All parallel lines appear to converge on a point.

File: looking-up-skyscraper-perspective-high-39856020.jpg (146KB, 1300x953px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1300x953px

>>19037168
>thinks sun rays "converge"
>keeps posting this bs, even though it gets explained to him everytime
it is almosts getting sad, but still: top kek

File: 1480535960272.jpg (31KB, 255x239px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 255x239px

>>19037165
>completely missing the point
>making the same dumb arguments that the avocado pic is mocking

>>19031037
flat earthers who use this as an example just show their idiocy,the earth is fuckin huuuuuuuge!!!!! you would have to leave the atmosphere and then some, before you noticed any curvature..check out the avocado pic doin the rounds for an example.

Its amazing how flatbrains only have 3 or 4 "conclusive proof" pictures to show, always getting the optical effects at sunset or just the right ammount of clouds.
I imagine if any of you retards walked outside and looked up, you would see how the sky actually works and would change at least one of your 3 pictures.
One can hope.

File: 800x533.jpg (310KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 800x533px

>>19037196
Beat me to it
I'll post mine anyway

>>19030990
There must be some truth to it considering how many shills appear when it is brought up, compared to many other paranormal theories that pass more or less without interest. I doubt the e-brigades would bother unless someone told them to.

Did someone screecap that anon's long ass posts debunking 200 flat earther "arguments" a while back?
A link is fine too

File: d5c.jpg (36KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 625x626px

>>19033800

File: sunspot1.png (187KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 600x375px

>>19037186
>>19037196
>>19037204

Can you explain away this sunspot? Why is it so small if the sun is so big? Shouldn't it be bigger?

>>19037243
>Shouldn't it be bigger?
why? Can it be that you misinterpret the glare in that picture for the actual size of the sun? Can it be that like so many of your fellow flatties you got some misconceptions about photography going on? And how does any of this prove the earth being flat?

>>19037243
>sunspot
I don't know what you mean. That just looks like a photo with a lot of glare

"Sunspot" generally refers to a dark spot on the surface of the sun, which wouldn't be visible in this photo.

Are you referring to the reflection on the surface?

File: sunspot2.png (264KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 600x375px

>>19037243
>>19037250
>>19037257

Check it out yourself

https://youtu.be/pnzUgKZ8m2k?t=184

File: 1437350762828.jpg (142KB, 1328x664px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1328x664px

Hello again, flarfriends.
I come to you with the same question, again. This time for sure one of you enlightened brainiac truthseekers will find give me a straight answer.

Consider the stars.
In a flat earth model, all the earth sees the same stars, at the same time, since they are fixed on a dome revolving above the surface.
However, the constelations change from one hemisphere to another. Sailors have (had, rather) to use different star charts when they wanted to travel down to africa.
They also change gradually, and the variation in the night sky corresponds with the curvature of the earth.
If you cant explain this, at least try to answer this question: How can the Cape of Good Hope, the Cape of Storms and Australia all see the Southern Cross if the are supposed to be spread out in opposite parts of the flat model?

>>19037207
>shills
Confirmation bias.
You're like the SJWs, "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi".
Or the /pol/ tards "anyone who disagrees is a Jew".

File: 1484698661154.png (168KB, 500x726px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 500x726px

>>19037207
>implying someone would be willing to pay people to argue against a superceded theory that holds no weight in society or the scientific community and has less than 20 pictures as only proofs
>on 4chan
>on fucking /x/, the only board the rest of this site never mentions because they are too embarrased
Hows that delusion working out for you?

>When I say that my turtle is the divine spawn of an multi-universal egregore composed of all the emotions of hatred and spite, people say that I'm a retard and a lunatic. I must be onto something!
Yes.

For all you retards that actually believe the Earth is flat, WHY would they lie to keep it a secret? What's the point?

>>19032005
There's a fucking fat earth thread onthe catalog daily. An outside observer could make the sane statement, it's not speaking for x

File: Flat-Earth-Memes-285-8.jpg (62KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 960x720px

>>19037283
because of the law of perspective. Your eye sight can only travel so far and convergences at the end point of your sight. Your probably with your argument is that you think you can see infinity far. When you are at the on hemisphere you see a different set of stars. I will give you the Southerner cross for now because I don't know. I am going to have to research to find that one out. Now I raise you another question. Why don't we see different constelations and stars every night if we are a spinning ball shooting through space? Shouldn't we see a different set of stars every night?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afjcaJpMWyc

File: flat-earth-memes-74-1.jpg (58KB, 800x565px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 800x565px

>>19037328
This is probably the stupids question of them all
>why would powerful people hid resources and more land from us. Why wouldn't powerful people want us to leave and continue to work for them

>>19036888
LMAO

File: e5415b9481e1fb4edb285559b9aed8fd.jpg (74KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 960x960px

>>19036585
Satellites are just made to steal your tax money, land base towers using triangulation do the exact same thing as communication satellites just as effective. How come the only place where signal is empty is where there are little to none towers?

>>19037622
>because of the law of perspective.
Incorrect. Flat earthers have a very poor concept of perspective.

>Your eye sight can only travel so far
You can see things light years away.

>convergences at the end point of your sight.
You're confusing concepts

>Your probably with your argument is that you think you can see infinity far.
Straw man. Nobody says that.

>I will give you the Southerner cross for now because I don't know.
It's because teh Southern cross and many other constellations are mainly visible in the southern hemisphere, just as the North Star is not visible from most of the Southern hemisphere.

>>19037652
>You can see light years away
>Straw man. Nobody says that
Pick one.

>>19037622
>Why don't we see different constelations and stars every night if we are a spinning ball shooting through space?
Imagine you're walking back and forth on a a square about 10 feet to a side, while looking at a grove of trees 20 miles away. The trees aren't going to change much from your perspective.

Our motion is very small compared to the scale of the background stars.

>>19037664
>>Pick one.
Light years != infinity.
A light year is about 6 trillion miles.

>>19037243
>can you explain this sunspot?

Sure, it's called a "reflection," not a sunspot.

You'll notice there's a small break in the clouds and that's the north sea underneath.

>>19034063
It's bending to the right, because it's moving to the left side of the frame. You'll notice it becomes more pronounced the further left it moves.

If you don't want to correct fish eye lens using software, you can do it manually by waiting until the horizon is right in the middle of the frame. In any high altitude shot of the earth, the horizon will be curved as it should be.

File: 1463447791296.jpg (59KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x667px

>>19037633
>why would elites hide land and resources?
Yes, why?
Throughout history, expansion has been pretty much all that mattered in the big scheme of things.
Its not like Spain and England invested their whole countries colonizing a whole continent to the point where "colonizing" comes from the dude who started it.
Its not like Europe conquered most of Africa for no actual good reason other than land expansion and bragging rights, creating so much tension it sparked two consecutive world wars.
Its not like the US invented the concept of Manifest Destiny to invade the rest of the continent.
Its not like almost all wars have land expansion as one of the main motivations.

Do you really think any country on Earth would not start settlying immediately if any new square meter of terrain was discovered? There are conflicts for Antarctica, actual rocks in the middle of the Pacific, the fucking Moon and soon, Mars.

Please tell me why would any government hide land, and what exactly is stopping you from saving up, getting a plane and go discover it.

>>19037622
>Why don't we see different constelations and stars every night if we are a spinning ball shooting through space?

After 24 hours, the earth is pointing at essentially the same direction it was the night before.

But yes, after six months, the earth will be pointing in the opposite direction, sidereally, at night.

And you do indeed see different constellations.

ok faggots. Give me your best flat earth docu you have! Without any coIntelPro shit.

>>19031037
>you can actually see the curvature on the first and second pics
You can't make this shit up

>>19037744
Flat earthers conpletely and undisputably BTFO

>>19037744
I think they would try to all get up and start settling there if we were allowed. the only thing stopping me is the military presents.
Why on Earth is public access to Antarctic or the Arctic not allowed? Why are 54 countries stopping me from going there? They don't stop me from going in to the desert, Why would they stop me from going to an Ice desert if there is nothing there?

90% of these guys barely made it through high school if that.

File: 1448179451753.jpg (88KB, 960x955px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 960x955px

>>19037939
No one is actually stopping you from going to antarctica on your own. Its just ridiculously hard.
Free market dictates what routes are availiable, no one is going to make a ferry to go to Antarctica out of charity. And since no one actually wants to go there, since its a literal desert of ice with lethal temperatures and absolutely nothing to see, then there are no routes.

You, yourself, can buy (or rent) a boat and go wherever the hell you want, as long as you have the proper visa. Antarctica doesnt require a visa since its technically not a country. You would need a lot of preparation, money and free time, but you can do it., and lots of people have.
Recently, a relative (grandson?) of Shackleton teamed up with Hyundai to cross the whole thing. In case you didnt knew, Shackleton fucked up his expedition and most of his crew died. Thats why no one goes to Antarctica.

Have some links:
https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/country/antarctica.html for an official US government page saying that you actually can travel there.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/features/across-antarctica-ernest-shackletons-tyre-tracks/ for the absolute madman that took /o/ too far.

>>19037995

3 of 28 isn't most you fucking chimp.

You're as bad as the flat earth retard.

>>19030990
If that pic is your working model for your theory, i can disprove it right now. See how everything in the Northern Hemisphere is suddenly dwarfed by everything in the Southern Hemisphere? That's what happens when you try to flatten a globe. To correct this, you would have to expand everything in the north while retaining the souths size, or shrink the south to match the norths scale. You could do that, but only if you cut lines into the ocean to segment your map, which foils your theory anyway since Antarcticas coastline would have to be interrupted. This is just one reason your theory and map are wrong, but being a flat Earther I don't expect facts to make much sense to you.

/thread
/theory
#slap_a_milennial

File: 1478664155512.jpg (6KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 300x168px

>>19038003
Sorry, Ernest, I have bad memory. You can go back now.

>you exagerating how many people died in the nimrod is as bad as denying centuries of science and dismissing solid proofs as tricks of a shadow global empire to control the population.
I understand.

>>19037649
How about at the ocean? Ever been there? I worked there. And used satellites. So I don't believe those who say they don't exist. Why should I?

>>19038079
The Ocean? are you talking about the body of water or is it some kind of scientific research place that works with satellites?

File: image.jpg (137KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1000x1000px

>>19031597

We live inside of a sphere, on the inner surface. The planets are spheres, and we see their outer surface.

None of the planets have stable orbits. Gravity is real, but EM is stronger and controls the orbits. Many of the planets are rocky, but the largest are mostly balls of gas.

File: image.jpg (275KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 640x640px

>>19038141

The true shape of the universe is a torus. Purusha is the Hindu cosmic man - the blackhole at the center of our galaxy.

>>19038032
You owe me a punch.

I'm just skimming frontpage here. Fuck you. Switching to catalog.

>>19033800
Explain why the bottom of the city is not visible please.

File: image.jpg (92KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 450x450px

>>19038156

The spine of Purusha is the Bridge of Heaven - the Milky Way. The Sun, Surya, orbits around it in a corkscrew pattern. The Bridge blocks the light of the Sun, giving us night.

Surya's father, Kashyapa, lives on the Bridge of Heaven. At each end, a door leads to the next world. This is the World Tree spoken of by shaman.

>>19033723

Yup

File: tumblr_nya73vU3bC1uvq3s5o1_400.png (132KB, 360x340px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 360x340px

>>19033690
holy shit, I think ball vegetables and fruits are lies by the government to destroy Americas lord and savoir Jesus Christ

File: image.jpg (539KB, 1188x791px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1188x791px

>>19038184

The Mapparium is inaccurate in that the Bridge doesn't feed into the poles.

The poles have the highest average elevation of all continents;

>https://antarctic-logistics.com/about-antarctica/antarctic-environment/
>Antarctica is the highest continent on Earth: average elevation is 8,200ft (2500m

98% of Antarctica is under 1,900m of ice;

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica
>About 98% of Antarctica is covered by ice that averages 1.9 km (1.2 mi; 6,200 ft) in thickness

2500 - 1900 = 600m.

File: image.jpg (101KB, 776x600px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 776x600px

>>19038318

Post-glacial rebound would allow this 600m to rise over time. Both poles are rising at a rate of 13mm/yr, or 1m/77yrs. It would take just 30,000 years for the poles to be the highest points on Earth if you took away the ice. So regardless, the poles have the highest average elevations - because they're the bases of the Bridge.

The Sumerian King list records history going back to about 250,000 years ago, and 26,000YBP humans were making ceramic Venus figurines in Europe. So humans have exhibited behavioral modernity for the time span it would take for the poles to rise 400m.

File: d26d32515f611c44e9f155a364e95e20.jpg (826KB, 1200x1134px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 1200x1134px

>>19037939
>the military presents.
I hope i get a drone.

File: 5ded7f178df04a349eb179c6ab6ed2a2_laughing-coffee-blank-meme-laughing-meme_991-902.jpg (54KB, 991x902px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 991x902px

>>19038814
My bad, I will proof read more.

>>19030990
Flat earth is false.

Hollow Earth on the other hand...

File: dcb8fac9dd1e4b6a1ae3ae43da0d3bfff53d3cdcc83395cb8fb4df770e302287.jpg (79KB, 625x468px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 625x468px

>>19039005
I said the same thing too. Don't worry, you join us when your ready.

>>19038156
>The true shape of the universe is a torus
a lot of cosmologists would actually agree with this

File: Mapparium_2017-Header_Image_1100x550px.jpg (275KB, 1100x550px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 1100x550px

>>19038184
>>19038318
>Mapparium
Imagine if someone fell over the rail and broke through the glass.

>>19038103
The Atlantic Ocean and the Indian Ocean, but also other seas, like the Norwegian and Arabic. Besides that I learned how a particular communication satellite works, in order to fix our own communication system in case our own system disfunfunctioned. And how to track it. And frequencies how to contact them in the first place.
So my conclusion is some group is gainig from dening or they don't know what they talk about.

And then I simply ask the question :
" Why fake evidence and spread something as dumb as Flat Earth Theory?"

>>19033826
https://www.varchive.org/ce/cosmos.htm

the earth isnt flat

>>19030990

The earth is not flat

why?

Three words: «Star Trails»

You're welcome.

>>19039920
Two words: «Not An Argument»

>>19039904
this
I have to walk up that damn hill every fucking day on my way to work. Believe me, the earth isnt flat

>>19032194
>The cognitive dissonance is strong in you my friend
Projecting this hard

>>19033690
This is great, I'm going to use it on one of my nigger jew co-workers.

>Nignog believes he's "Judah"
>Talking like some broke-ass yid
>Says the Earth is flat
>Says Earth is only 6000 years old
>Says satellites don't exist
>We work for Comcast in the Network Ops Center, specifically in the goddamned satellite to head end control section

>>19040391
I got one of those in my office. Why is it always Judah, and never one of the shitty tribes like Zebulon?

>>19036982
>"Objects not attached to the surface of the earth (water in a sink going down a drain) will create a vortex going the opposite direction. So in the Northern hemisphere, it moves clockwise. In the Southern hemisphere, it moves counter clockwise. On the equator, water goes straight down."

>>19030990
why don't flat earth folks just keep attempt to sail completely around the world to prove their theory?

>>19040556
thats a common misconception. at least if we are talking about regular sinks/drains

File: dynamite.png (191KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 400x400px

>>19031037
>tfw I live on the great plains
>tfw I can see the curvature of the earth from the top of a parking ramp
>mfw people on the internet try to tell me the earth is flat

If the earth was flat cats would have knocked everything off already

File: fakechild.png (1MB, 892x868px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 892x868px

>>19040717

PLEASE SHARE!

File: truemapoftheworld.png (11KB, 244x207px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 244x207px

>>19037266

checked

can someone explain these hotspots?

>>19041593
reflection

>>19033813
That is because of the law of perspective

File: Screenshot_2017-05-15-16-03-16.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

CGI

>>19042198
and it is clearly some false color image. But the tghings, I bet they never ever claimed that this was an untouched photograph or anything

>>19042208
A quick Google search and apparently it's a single photo (non-composite), so basically the closest you can get to an unprocessed iamge of Earth. Flatbrains won't understand, unfortunately.

File: infinite.jpg (34KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x360px

>>19042227

>>19042188
Nope. The laws of perspective wouldn't put things "below" the horizon like that.

File: TrueColor_FY4A_1315UTC_2017_02_20.jpg (465KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1200x1200px

>>19042233
1

>>19041588
>this photo was faked therefore the earth is flat

>>19037649
>land base towers using triangulation do the exact same thing as communication satellites just as effective.

No, as someone who works with planning & deployment of cellular networks, that's flat-out wrong.
Network-based localization is very iffy due to radio propagation of cellular signals and insufficiently accurate timing.
Even with GPS-synchronization for timing the accuracy is in the 50-100 meter range in high-density areas (even worse in the countryside, where hundreds of meters error is common). Which is far worse than the 3-5 meter accuracy of GPS.

You can use GPS & GLONASS anywhere on earth (as long as you have a clear view of the sky).
The theory behind them is identical as celestial navigation (which only works on a round earth), but they use artificial satellites rather than fixed stars and/or planets.


>Satellites are just made to steal your tax money

Except for all those commercial satellites like BGAN, which I've used in literal buttfuck nowhere in Namibia to send reports to my superiors.
Or the utilization of GPS to map out future site locations in areas with no cellular infrastructure.

>>19039218
>" Why fake evidence and spread something as dumb as Flat Earth Theory?"

So that when you point out a real conspiracy (vote manipulation, banking elites eroding nations for a one-world government, government corruption etc), people will laugh at you and say "lol what a conspiracy nut, I bet you believe the earth is flat too huh?"

>>19043066
That's quite a huge leap. It's just a few wackos who think that the Earth is flat and I don't see how anyone could connect this belief with government corruption. At least where I come from, people aren't naive and think all's fine and dandy when it comes to politics.

>>19043093
>it's just a few wackos

Right, like any other conspiracy theory.

I only say I believe in it to piss people off

File: stupid.jpg (44KB, 780x648px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 780x648px

If its flat, traveling around the perceived Antarctica coast would take much longer than traveling around the perceived equator. Should be easy to prove for anyone with a ship or a plane.

>>19042233
Option 1. Mainly because there's actual evidence and math to support it.

>>19043669
>I'm only pretending to be retarded

I guess the joke's on them.

>>19043728
There have been voyages showing it was over 50,000 miles long twice the length of the Earth.

>>19043957

Which ones?

>>19043957
pretty sure anon meant a voyage roughly along the same latitude (like directly heading strictly west or east all the time)

File: 1454242772931.png (112KB, 294x256px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 294x256px

>>19043957
>length of the Earth

File: 1480535864688.png (216KB, 351x329px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 351x329px

>>19043957
Did they use GPS to track the distance of their voyage? If not, what else did they use to make an accurate measurement of the distance travelled?

File: fe-satellite-no.jpg (120KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 960x960px

>>19039218
Do you deny the possibility that it could've been a plane or drone you were tracking and getting signal from. If so why?

What i wanna know is why the moon dosen't spin and we see the same side of it everytime its visible. Does anyone have any explanation for this?

>>19043994
not him, but planes cant fly that high or that fast.
>b-but how do you know how they fly
it boils down to basic trigonometry

>>19044028
same poster. i mean, stars spin, planets spin our sun spins every other moon in this solar system spins.. we spin. So wtf is up with that?

>>19044028
It spins, but it is tidally locked. That means that its rotation period got "synchronized" with its orbital period. Every trip around the earth it does one rotation, which results in showing us only the same side all the time.

File: hqdefault (1).jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x360px

>>19044028
because they say it rotates at the same speed as us so the same side is always facing us, what a coincidence. also, I wanna know why we can see stars through the moon?

>>19043994
>you were tracking

The fact that somebody is tracking it means they know it's 200 miles up and moving at 17,0000 mph.

Do you really think that's going to be a drone? How about an object 25,000 miles up and moving at 7,000 mph.

>>19044028

Yeah, it's called tidal locking, and it's very common. The gravity of the planet pulls on the part of the moon closer to the planet then the part of the moon further away from the planet. This creates a torque that works against's the moon's rotation. The rotation (relative to the planet) slowly drops, until one side faces the planet during its entire revolution.

At one point in the past the moon rotated and both sides would have been in view, if anybody had been around to see it. Over billions of years it slowly spun to a "halt"

>>19044045
> what a coincidence.

It's not a coincidence, it's a consequence of gravity. Most moons in the solar system are tidally locked to their planets.

>why we can see stars through the moon

We cannot. Maybe go outside sometime at night and look for yourself.

Yes, I'm aware there are youtubers that claim they can. They are lying. The photos they present are due to dead pixels or some other camera artifact.

>>19044045

It's not a coincidence. It's physics.

>>19044045
>what a coincidence
it isnt. It is an completely explained phenomena and there are many many examples of tidal locking and similar orbital "ressonances".
>why we can see stars through the moon?
how do you know that this is a star? I would tell you about aberration, but I am sure your pic is from some shady youtuber who disingenuously claimed that he was 100% sure that this little spot was a star anyway

Okay guys, I get it. Don't question authority, Don't question anything and any other source is blasphemy. Anything else I am missing?

>>19044133

Your thorazine drip.

>>19044133
you are forgetting to question pseudo-science

File: Einstein_tongue.jpg (16KB, 230x286px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 230x286px

>>19044142
Just place it here on my tongue

>>19044133
There's a difference between questioning authority and assuming everything from any sort of authority is completely fabricated regardless of evidence to the contrary. Learn it, dipshit.

>>19044039
The moon is spinning. It is just rotating at the same rate that it orbits the earth, about 27 days. As mentioned several times, it's tidal locking caused by gravity.

>>19044133
Were you the guy that asked about how the moon worked?

Why did you ask a question if you didn't want the answer? Did you think that just because you personally didn't know the answer to a simple question, then therefore nobody would?

>>19043994
Do you think I am talking about an one time event on a special place?
I talk about daily routine at any give location.
In my line of work, if they were airplane , we would have called them airplanes, because of the 'exclusive ' behavior of those planes. You need to know what you are dealing with in order to efficiently make use of it's properties.
If they were drones, we would call them drones, for the same reasons. And we worked with both also. And when we work with satellites, we call them satellites.
There are a lot of different satellites. Maybe the word itself confuses you.
It simply means in orbit of an other body.
Some built only to take pictures. Most of them are not. And whilst you might think pictures can only be made a camera, this is not correct. In the hospital they can make a picture with soundwaves to see an unborn baby still in the belly. It not fake, it's no conspiracy but an image of this kind looks very different then a photo taken by an optical camera. Still you can see what you aimed to see.
Just because you don't understand how research is done, does not mean there research that they say they do does not real.
Did you ever visited New Sealand, Iceland or Hawaii? Are those fake too? Confidence me they do real.
You see?
If you don't understand satellites, fine. But stop screaming they do not real like a little bitch.

>>19043066
Maybe your kind of people. The problem might be the ability to communicate.
If a fire breaks out and all I can should is "Help" , chances are nobody will come to the rescue with something to fight the fire with.

Just saying conspiracy is pretty lame. First find hard evidence. That's it actually.
There still is no evidence for flat earth and the only things they do come up with proves their level of stupidity and lack of competence for doing research. They mostly think youtube vloggers are a good source for academic research.

If you can truly show who does what in court, your claim will be taken serious. If not , don't take that road and move on.
Flat earthers should not have taken that road. They should have spend that time in actually learning physics and "the art of doing research" . They suck at both big time.

It's entirely impossible for this idea to have any merit. 1st, centripetal force when applied to the flat Earth would literally crush or dislodge anything a near the edge, or Central plains of said flat surface. 2nd the flat Earth would have massive gravitational anomalies caused by the existence of the sun and as such would literally crumble at the proposed distance from the fault earth to the sun. 3rd flat earthers want to revert to a geocentric model on some cases and it's gaining, essentially undoing what we know today as established fact, seriously go outside get a telescope and the proper lighter filters and look at the sun, measure the distance from earth with say the moon based on relative distances , after that simply observe the planetary bodies and watch as they endlessly March around the sun in ellipses seriously this idea that earth is flat is getting to be both repugnant and quite a repulsive topic . Please educate yourselves before you spread this massive failure of a hypothetical.

>>19044421
This.

Earth is shaped as an upside-down plate of spaghetti and if you disagree youre a shill

File: 15036400_1491424160885274_7245063454838437222_n.jpg (28KB, 480x458px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x458px

>>19046031
I wasn't screaming like a bitch, what a pathetic defamatory remark. I only made a suggestion why couldn't it be something else. So why don't you give me the information on how to so I can do it myself if you know how to? Show me some evidence and sources instead deflecting.

File: iss ralf.jpg (38KB, 730x521px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 730x521px

You can easily see the ISS if you track its location and camp out when its crossing overhead.

You can see it with the naked eye or bionculars. Get a cheap telescope if you are honestly unconvinced.

>>19033826
thats not how gravity would be distributed if the planet were flat. even if it were you could even it out by increasing the density of the disk as you go toward the edge of the disk.

also there are weirder theories when the planet is really just one dome in a series of domes on a larger surface which would also take care of this gravity argument

>>19047194
That's actually a swamp gas ballon

File: Pyramidz.jpg (159KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1000x667px

>>19030990

Did a thread on it abit ago:

http://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge%20bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/%21%219O2tecpDHQ6/

File: Screenshot_2017-05-17-19-59-13.png (702KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

702KB, 1920x1080px

Tesla knew the earth was flat!
Also, he was a real scientist. A scientist that actually would've made the world a better place. Unfortunately he got shut down by J.P.Morgan. Such a shame. We would have free electricity by now

>>19031189
what even can to be is poor do?

>>19047446
>he was a real scientist

lol

>>19047242
No, the center of gravity would still be at the center of mass, in the middle of the disk.

This is why all large objects gravitationally collapse into spheres, unless they're spinning very fast.

>>19047274
I thought it was a Chinese weather lantern.