Flat Earth

>>19025155
>abstract consideration

What do you mean?

>>19025155

Die in a fire.

>>19025155
I seriously don't understand this question...

>>19025155
not unless FTL travel is possible, as it would require constant acceleration upwards

>>19028294
Why would it need constant acceleration upwards? Stop spreading flat earth disinformation. You don't need gravity when you have density.

File: Flat.png (219KB, 666x385px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 666x385px

>>19028294
Tesla knew that the earth was rather a plane instead of a planet a long time ago, the freemasons of nasa has lied to you for a long time. Gravity and relativity were theories paid to be brought forth to disprove the flat earth by the freemasons. look it up

The Earth is a treadmill.

File: 1231449189370.jpg (88KB, 452x640px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 452x640px

>>19028526
>Stop spreading flat earth disinformation

>You don't need gravity when you have density

File: calc.jpg (9KB, 191x263px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 191x263px

>>19028539
There is nothing that proves that gravity exist, you think no one ever wondered why things fall before that stupid story you get told in school with isaac and the apple

>>19028526
>You don't need gravity when you have density.
That makes no sense.

>>19028526

OK, I'll be more polite. How does "density" work in the place of gravity? I don't understand this theory.

File: density.jpg (75KB, 1456x915px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1456x915px

>>19028552
Why would you need a layer of gravity next to density? Its okay to have been lied to you know

>>19028556
What keeps the atmosphere on earth?

>>19028565
Density

File: plane.jpg (128KB, 720x467px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 720x467px

>>19028533

>>19028567
You might just as well say MAGIC
Why are things denser the closer you get to earth?

>>19028572
They don't get denser. It's just organizing itself in order of density.

>>19028565
How can vacum exist next to non vacum, and how can gyroscopes work on a round earth. It can't

>>19028556
What determines the direction that dense objects flow? How would "density" determine which direction is down?

>>19028578
exactly

File: Tesla_gravity.png (1022KB, 1422x800px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 1422x800px

>>19028565

>>19028578
>>19028579
>it just is
Thanks for explaining

>>19028567
You're a fucking retard. Gravity is directly affected by density. The more dense an object is, the more mass it has in less space, making gravity stronger because gravitational force is directly proportional to mass and inversely proportional to distance from center of mass -- and the more dense an object is (the less volume it has), the closer to center mass other objects can be.

Just because density and gravity are related doesn't mean gravity doesn't exist. What the fuck kind of stupid logic is that?

>t. highschool physics dropout

File: bullshit.jpg (15KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x250px

>>19028585

>>19028588
You don't undertand density but you understand a theory that's 100% speculation?

>>19028581
You are made to think that there is no up and down in the universe, that's its all relative. Science created to ignore your common senses

>>19028607
Explain density to me then, prof.

>>19028545
>calculus is fake math

Confirmed college dropout

>>19028585
>every copy of theory destroyed
>shitposting animefag larper divined it in a dream?

>>19028579
>>19028613
>>19028556
>>19028545
>>19028533
I have no fucking words. Mostly because reading your posts dropped my IQ from 155 to 90. Thanks for making me dumber, asshole.

>>19028617
Calculus is filled with numerous mathematical fallacies

File: globeearthretardsinthisthread.jpg (34KB, 300x240px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 300x240px

>>19028625
You owe me a fucking big one the day when it becomes known that the earth is flat.

>>19028592
The aether proved that the earth was flat, whatever proves the earth is flat they dismiss

>>19028526
you are dense

>>19028294
this is a complete non-sequitor

>>19028625
Your IQ has always stayed at 90 my dode

>>19028627
>mathematical fallacies
Such as?

>>19028627
Give me an example you false speculation shitfuck

>>19028526
>You don't need gravity when you have density.
this is how you spot a fake flat earther

>>19028568
That graphic isn't confusing enough. Could you decrease the resolution a little and put more stuff on it?

>>19028613
But basically you're saying there's a form of universal gravitation, that some kind of one-directional force is everywhere that attracts denser objects downwards.

>>19029314
Our universe is a tube.

>>19028533
>666x385
Ni try satan.

>>19028625
>155
Are you stupid?

>>19029325
huh.

>>19028579
>How can vacum exist next to non vacum
This is a misconception. Vacuums don't pull by themselves It's the air pushing in.

Gravity holds the atmosphere down and creates atmospheric pressure.

>>19028579
>gyroscopes
lol, never heard of that one. Any flattard want to humor me with this epic argument?

>>19028579
>how can gyroscopes work on a round earth
>>19033039
Actually it's a legitimate question - how does a gyroscope orient itself as a vehicle travels around the curved earth? Hypothetically, if you have a gyroscope spinning vertically, and you travel a quarter of the way around the world, wouldn't it rotate 90 degrees? Or for that matter, shouldn't it rotate as the earth turns beneath it?

However, aircraft gyroscopic controls are mounted in such a way as to always maintain their orientation towards the ground.

File: 1494228381578.jpg (216KB, 758x997px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 758x997px

>>19033198
>Hypothetically, if you have a gyroscope spinning vertically, and you travel a quarter of the way around the world, wouldn't it rotate 90 degrees?
no. why would it?
I feel like this is another one of those arguments where the flat earther sees something wrong with physics, but there isnt something wrong, he just has wrong expectations because he doesnt understand the subject. It is just like "why cant I see stars in that picture" or my very favorite "planes would just fly off into space on a round earth"

>>19033226
>no, why wouldnt it?

what an amazing answer to a question that you couldn't answer because it would prove the earth flat

File: tmp_22354-maxresdefault(9)-687178229.jpg (79KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1280x720px

>>19033198
Yes, however designing a gyroscope to maintain its spin over the duration it takes to travel a quarter rotation of the Earth is difficult due to friction. Adding energy to the gyroscope over time corrupts the results, since the energy added this way is from the orientation of the moment it was added. To really measure the rotation of the Earth, potential energy must be added once, and then left to its own devices over a 24 hour period

Thus the Focault pendulum was designed:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WZ3bi5IVToE

You can visit these in person, and stay the whole day if you like.

>>19033226
Anon's question was a valid one, and the person who does understand gyroscopic precession in this exchange is your self. You are welcome for this correction of your nescience, because I understand that as a scientific individual, you value truth more than ego. You may still thank me if you wish to.

File: vacuum driven attitude indicator.png (173KB, 1069x484px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1069x484px

>>19033226
>he just has wrong expectations because he doesnt understand the subject

This exactly. The gyroscopes in airplanes are continually corrected. They are not built like the classic image of a disc suspended in gimbles. Here are some lovely stack exchanges with more info for those who actually want to learn.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/286880/gyroscope-in-an-airplane-following-the-curve-of-the-earth
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/14657/if-i-fly-a-balanced-turn-long-enough-will-the-ai-show-im-level/14659#14659

File: posts.jpg (748KB, 2272x1704px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 2272x1704px

>>19034268
>>19034303
These are great posts, thanks for the links.

This is turning out better than most /sci/ threads.

>>19033948
I answered the question and just added the "why?" because I dont understand where anons misconception lies

>>19034268
>Anon's question was a valid one
I guess every question is a "valid one". but still

>>19034303
this.

People should at least have a basic understanding of something before calling bs.

There is nothing wrong about gyroscopes working on the "globe model"

>>19025172

this..

What difference does it make if the earth is flat or round ?

>>19036250
wow anon, really makes you think. I guess it makes a lot of differences on the practical site alone

>>19036250
Mariners have navigated for hundreds of years based on a round earth.

If the earth were flat, physics and science would be very different from the way it is known today.

>>19025155
The Earth is flat. It stuffs its bra.

File: hmmm.png (323KB, 380x512px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 380x512px

>>19037265
I don't mind if they are padded

>>19037061
Marines nagivates as it were they were sailing on a flat earth, i dont know how you got it wrong, most of the physics would be the same but gravity and relativity should be dismissed as they are completly bogus, you need just as much faith or even more to think that those to even exist compared to some sort of god

Love all the retarded globers who are fighting a losing battle. Don't think for yourself

>>19037421
Same. Better read up those blogspots because too many people believe in something and just doesnt seem right than to take some papers and a pencil and do the math myself.
I dropped out of highschool because my teacher was a globehead and the scientists are all atheist mason reptilian liars, but thanks to flatearhtsocietytruth blogspot, I dont need to think about big things anymore, since the earth is flat and none of those difficult forces exist actually.
I read the Tesla wikipedia page once.