We live in a simulation because _____>

>>19024219
If Pi is finite, we live in a simulation. But we don't think it is so...

File: ancientbuddistmap.jpg (70KB, 768x735px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 768x735px

>>19024219

Admiral Robert Byrd knew there was more beyond the south pole. We're being lied to.

File: projections.png (127KB, 400x278px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 400x278px

>>19024219
>americans in charge of knowing anything about anything
c'mon, you learn about map projections in primary school

>>19024219
You realise that flattening that second globe makes Australia and everything in the southern hemisphere double the size of everything in the north, right? What a great age we live in where gross incompotence reigns supreme and "facts" like "planets" "being" "spherical" are trown out the window.

The fact we cannot escape our own subjectivity, cannot prove the consciousness of others, cannot escape the planet, cannot see or understand, let alone escape the universe as well as the holographic nature of our existence and the overriding fact we cannot understand nor explain the essence of why or how we even exist as we do at all gives the simulation theory credence.

Good luck "proving" anything "objectively" though under the current reductive dominant model of scientific empirical thought. Not an accident really that we're made to think this way. We literally cant prove it.

File: 1470629631989.jpg (82KB, 738x462px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 738x462px

>>19024460
What map projection have to do with circle navigation?

>>19024986
Are we alone or are we here with others?

>>19024445
Scientists calculated that there is over 50% chance that we live in a simulated universe.

>>19027435
Source?

>>19025000
That graphic is retarded. First, flight safety over 7000 miles of ocean is a real issue. Second, neither of those map projections take manifold mathematics into account. Long distance flight is based on arcs on a sphere.