What did you think about it?

10/10 book and I highly recommend it. Now, the portion on reprogramming the mind is maybe too far out there, but the quality discussion on reality tunnels is exceptional.

>>19006016
It's an interesting read. It was not a total paradigm shift for me however, but rather new interesting perspectives.

It's a must read, but dated.

>>19006016
Fun reading if you're a bright, but otherwise intellectually-vacuous 20-something-stoner. Otherwise, crap.

>>19006016
First half of the book is 10/10, but I felt it got way too technical around the last 3 circuits and I found myself confused about what the author was talking about. Otherwise, it's a pretty solid read, highly recommended.

>>19007237

This. Absolutely this.

There are so many books I read when I was 22 and under that I thought were so mind bending, then 10 years later I realize how incredibly juvenile it all was.

File: principia_discordia.jpg (203KB, 742x1076px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 742x1076px

>>19007178
>>19007237
what would you recommend?

>>19008325

On what topic?

badly written, unfocused, dated, repetitive, overrated.

if I had read it as my introduction to /x/, it would have been ok. in 2017, for someone that browses /x/... meh. everyone here has heard it all.

>>19008341
kek

Nearly all of this board is stuck on the muh succubus stage y'know

>>19006016
Good read, good intro into /x/ish stuff.