Friendly reminder: Not being able prove something is not the same as disproving it, it only justifies skepticism or that it is currently intangible.
ITT: OP IS MIFFED
>>18974212
>>18974211
The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim; it would help if anything that anybody says on this board was falsifiable in the first place.
>Somebody provides valid criticism to conspiracy
>OP explains it using another conspiracy
>Someone else explains why that's bullshit
>'SHILLS GET OUT REEE'
>what i say is true but its up to you to prove me wrong
Fuck you
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
>>18976841
At least someone isn't an atheisim shill.
>"I have a million dollars in this box"
>opens box
>empty
>"This doesnt prove anything"
Sure thing OP. If youre making a claim, you need to also provide proof for that claim
>>18977407
Goes up to military base, asks to see nukes.
They say no.
Clearly the country has no nukes.
>>18977699
Yeah but if you say the base has nukes the burden of proof would be on you to prove it.
>>18977699
Being told you can't look in the box is not the same as looking into an empty box. Jesus goddamn christ you people are fucking stupid.