Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
NEW STUDY: STRANGE STRUCTURES & PASSAGEWAYS LEADING UNDERGROUND DISCOVERED ON FAR SIDE OF THE MOON 2017-04-24 03:26:48 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
NEW STUDY: STRANGE STRUCTURES & PASSAGEWAYS LEADING UNDERGROUND DISCOVERED ON FAR SIDE OF THE MOON 2017-04-24 03:26:48 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: download.png (83KB, 309x272px) Image search:
[Google]
83KB, 309x272px
NEW STUDY: STRANGE STRUCTURES & PASSAGEWAYS LEADING UNDERGROUND DISCOVERED ON FAR SIDE OF THE MOON
Anonymous
2017-04-24 03:26:48
Post No.
[Report]
Members of the Society For Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) have recently published a paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of the moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C. Titled “Image Analysis of Unusual Structures on the Far Side of the Moon in the Crater Paracelsus C,” it argues that these features might be artificial in origin, meaning someone other than a human being built them and put them there.
http://www.tsijournals.com/articles/image-analysis-of-unusual-structures-on-the-far-side-of-the-moon-in-the-crater-paracelsus-c.pdf
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/04/23/new-study-strange-structures-passageways-leading-underground-discovered-on-far-side-of-the-moon/
>>
>>18931228
We've been looking at the moon for years why are we just now seeing shit
>>
Nice click bait. Didn't even bother to ass your own description; just copy-pasted.
On a serious node, it is interesting that there doesn't seem to be any distinct impact craters around them, which leads me to believe they didn't come from a stray asteroid or something. Maybe this is why China has been pushing for moon rovers in the past few years
>>
>>18931311
Dark side. Harder to look at, and arguably not very worthwhile to do so
>>
>>18931311
Because just now the scientists have enough balls to open that shit to the impress.
>>
File: 1492048193737.jpg (47KB, 650x427px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 650x427px
>>18931311
why are you?
emphasis on the 'you'
>>
>>18931228
You ever ask yourself why aliens never create something that looks like it wasn't created by nature.
>>
>>18931311
these theories have been around for literally decades, not just for Luna but for Mars as well.
Specifically I'm referring to the work of Richard C. Hoagland, but he really went off the rails by focusing on conspiracy theories instead of sticking to hard science.
Check out his book Monuments of Mars, it's before he really lost his marbles and it's genuinely interesting.
>>18931450
you ever ask yourself why structures left abandoned for thousands of years don't look brand spanking fucking new?
>>
While I am an observer of UFOs those structures look to me like impact ejecta, spllntered crystalline igneous rock. In context of a granite body covered in impact craters, that probably makes more sense.
>>
>>18931228
I refuse to entertain the credibility of an organization who's acronym contains an acronym
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2