Israeli Astral Projection Recon

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-19 at 20.45.33.png (4MB, 1829x1250px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1829x1250px

>>18912428
Israeli Supreme Court on Rothschild Street. Not suspicious at all... Also there are lots of prominent buildings in the area; Bank of Israel, office of prime minister.

here you go OP, have you some Israeli Astral Projection

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-YnNmP7rtQ

File: 6_7.JPG.jpg (2MB, 2352x1568px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2352x1568px

חחחחחח

>>18912428
This from something I read earlier about someone who asked if Aping into area 51 was possible and this was the responseI'm just saying that the only way the government would know how to counter it is if they have a whole bunch of scientific evidence that it exists that most people don't know about.
There are only four reasonable possibilities:
-Remote viewing is not possible.
-Remote viewing is possible, but the government doesn't know enough about it to figure out how to prevent people from using it to see government secrets. Their only hope is that few people learn to do it. So even if they do have some kind of convincing evidence that it's real, they aren't going to share it, because they'd rather protect their own interests.
-The government has a bunch of data on remote viewing, enough to prove that it exists, but they don't know how to protect their secrets from it. Despite this, they decide it wouldn't be right to withhold such a significant discovery from the public, so they publish it anyway.
-The government knows quite a bit about remote viewing, enough that they can protect their secrets from it. As remote viewing would be a very useful ability for people to have, and they no longer have anything to lose from it, the government decides to publish all their data. The result is that the existence of remote viewing is not only accepted by science, but we also know a lot about how it works.
Now, not only don't we have any scientific understanding of remote viewing, but the general consensus among scientists is that it isn't even possible. So that eliminates #3 and #4. As #4 is the only one in which the government knows how to protect their secrets from remote viewers, the only reasonable conclusion is that either the government doesn't have a counter like you said they would, or remote viewing doesn't exist in the first place.

>>18912428
I'll astral project my dick up your ass faggot

>>18913925
>New Fag

File: phenomena-the-washington-post.jpg?fit=630%2C290.jpg (42KB, 630x290px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 630x290px

>>18913899
>I'm just saying that the only way the government would know how to counter it is if they have a whole bunch of scientific evidence that it exists
They do
>that most people don't know about.
Most people yes. But enough people know that a whole book is written on the government's occult research. It was a pullitzer prize finalist.

>>18913899
Also your logic is bad. Really bad. Like holy shit stop talking.

>>18912428
It's easy to kind of remote 'sense' someone if you imagine for example, their mood. Imagine something they normally say when they're in a good mood. If you get 'positive' feedback Then they probably are in a good mood. If you can't hear that in them, then they aren't in that mood. This can work to tell where someone is too. But you really have to know that person.

>>18913899
its Remote viewing is possible, but the government doesn't know enough about it

they used viewers in iraq or some shit

sometimes it's dead on and some times it's wrong