/x/, can someone please outline each of the 11 dimensions of M theory?

Can you elaborate what you mean? What is M and M theory?

File: 1488526731262.jpg (15KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 256x256px

>>18874503
Nobody is willing to do your homework for you. Try /sci/

>>18874503
In layman's terms:
3 "familiar" spatial dimensions
6 "compactified" spatial dimensions
1 time dimension
1 energy dimension

"Compactified" means the dimension is too small to be seen from our macro POV. Consider the analogy of a laser beam. From our macroscopic view, that laser beam is 1 dimensional. But if you were to look REALLY REALLY close - like quantum levels of scale - you would see that the 1-D laser line actual DOES have width and depth. It's some number of photons thick, or perhaps even 1 photon thick. But it STILL has more than just 1 dimension. The 6 compactified spatial dimensions work the same way, but even smaller.

That's about as far as my understanding goes. No idea how the "energy dimension" is supposed to work. But I DO know that 11th dimension came about specifically for M-Theory, which basically said "all these separate, competing String Theories are correct, but only if you look at them from an 11th dimension."

>>18874503
Speaking of M theory, whatever happened to M? (The poster)

>>18875039
Time and energy dimension are the same. 6 compact spatial dimensions are a single, fluxing dimension. In reality, this creates four dimensions. The dimension of energy is the sum of the flux within itself.

Dot
line
depth
space
light

M had a hit tune in the early 1980s called Pop Music.

>>18875039
A laser obviously has more than one dimension.

>>18874503
what if the folded dimensions are like double folded and we are the actual folded dimensions and theres and vast unfolded dimension above us

>>18875168
>whatever happened to M? (The poster)
Oh shit, I remember that guy, I think I still have some of the threads saved up somewhere

>>18874503
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3ivpV5OSUs
From the man himself.

>>18876834
>analogy

>>18876883
Damn, this guy sounds EXACTLY like the main character from Silicon Valley.

>>18875393
How is the research and early stages of the book that yourself and the other "Mystery" anons are putting together going? Still looking at a release this year?
I recall one of you guys saying you weren't going to live more than a week from the time of posting, I really hope that wasn't true and everyone is okay. Are you able to say whether or not they managed to get the help they needed in time?