Ufo on Mars?? Picture taken by the mars rover

>>18839513
Weather balloon

>>18839517
>Weather balloon
>On mars

If that's not denial then I don't know what is

>>18839529
>the joke
>your head

>>18839513
KEK look at that curvature :D is mars little as fuck or that rover big as my mommas ass? :D

>>18839586
It's the type of lense

OP here. There are plenty of pictures of it, if it really is a UFO then i honestly don't know what to think anymore..

https://marsmobile.jpl.nasa.gov/msl//multimedia/raw/?rawid=FRB_543972418EDR_F0620108FHAZ00401M_&s=1650

It looks like a little scratch on the lens.

>>18839604
You are fucking joking aren't you?

>>18839513
it's too sharp compared to the surrounding objects so its something on the lense. next

>>18839782
Wierd you can't see the "scratch" on the later pictures, or did the martians replace the lens Mr NASA man?

File: FLB_543985741EDR_F0620108FHAZ00206M_-br2.jpg (171KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1024x1024px

>>18839782
Sorry for got go add the pic

>>18839513
lens flare

>>18839608
Fuck off, spy

File: download.jpg (6KB, 318x158px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 318x158px

It's probably Phobos or Deimos, there both irregularly shaped and the stretch from the fish eye lens could make them look like that

>>18839602
>only shows up on the right camera
>doesn't show up on the left camera

Dirt on the lens

>>18839513
It looks like someone photoshopped a car on there

>>18839517
It's a swamp gas

>>18839873
Best so far, the fish lens is stretching a round entity and also pulling it downwards like an unhappy face.

>>18839933
It looks like an SUV

File: shill-warning.jpg (77KB, 402x402px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 402x402px

Damn this thread is getting derailed awfully fast!

>>18839880
Prove that the pictures is taken by 2 different cameras

>>18839880
This

>>18840062
>literally labeled left camera and right camera
>complete with time stamps
>and showing the same landscapes from slightly different sides of the lander

>>18839602
You fucking idiot, dod you know that UFO stands for unidentified flying object which is for an alien spacecrafts, anything that you are looking at the sky and dont know what it is its an UFO

>>18839513
>UFO on Mars
>It's in the sky

Might as well say Mars is flat too.

>>18840049
anti-disinfo agent, pls go

File: 2014-04-28 044822-045806 UTC.gif (478KB, 259x345px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 259x345px

you are aware there's been a giant cylinder orbiting mars since at least the 70s right?

>>18841964
https://marsmobile.jpl.nasa.gov/msl//multimedia/raw/?s=#/?slide=613

>taken from sol day 613
>Right Navigation Cameras (Navcams)

just scroll down, the gif i made is about 10 minutes of motion.

>>18839513
I think it's a Mazda 3. Now what that's doing in the skies of Mars I don't know, but to be fair you only asked what it was not how it got there.

>>18839513

Benis :-DDDDDD

>>18839513
>Fish-eye lens

now they're trying say mars is a globe

Obviously swamp gas

File: 343.jpg (10KB, 200x211px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x211px

>>18842284
Kek

File: proof.jpg (57KB, 506x500px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 506x500px

>>18841966
>moonlet
kek

>>18842797
So this confirms that mars rover is actually on earth?

File: output_JpRofx.gif (1MB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 512x512px

>>18842797
Both the Soviet Space program and the US space program publish photos (25 years apart) of a large cigar shaped UFO orbiting the planet Mars.

let's say the rover is on earth, doesn't explain the anomaly photographed at least twice in 2014. It's not Phobos or Deimos. It could be one of the human orbiting crafts, but NASA did not identify which one it would be. As it stands it's a real UFO.
so you decide to post this useless shit which takes 5 minutes to explain. wonder what you're trying to achieve?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LB9AwHpBwGY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U2M3_VAJ-A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eBHdFpmpHs

>>18839513
It's an Xbox controller being thrown. They have obviously played APB on mars.

>>18839513
the mcc doing their daily area surveys

>>18841964
>>18841986
I was always interested in this, odd how it seems like we've never got clearer footage of it over the years.

>>18839513
Wow you guys are sad
It's clearly a scratch on the lens.
If there is anything there it's underground. Just like here on earth.

>>18841964
Found yo mammas dildo

>>18841964
No i actually haven't..

File: 1485656093642.jpg (86KB, 651x429px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 651x429px

>>18839529

You sure are fuckin stupid

>>18843712
just like the weird structures in antarctica or the moon or mars, they don't go about advertising it, but they don't really bother hiding them too hard either.

it's soft disclosure, tv and movies is another type of soft disclosure, you keep hinting at it through conspiracy theories and fiction and entertainment until everyone around the world suspects whats going on. then you stage some kind of event which makes the government seem like the good guys and gives them enough plausible deniability or reasonable doubt as to why they weren't open with the information from day 1.

File: 1443292010281.png (55KB, 219x400px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 219x400px

>>18839529
>being this fucking retarded
Don't even try to say you're just pretending.

File: 1491035189812s.jpg (2KB, 93x125px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 93x125px

>>18841964
Has the cylinder UFO on Mars being debunked yet btw?

We're not on Mars. Can't escape LEO, right President Obama? Plus the whole firmament thing and propulsion doesn't work in a vacuum. Sucks that you guys are so dumb.

>>18839513
A speck on the lens. It's semi transparent

>>18845459
If you give them the benefit of the doubt, you can say that they saw what we are seeing, didn't knew what to make of it and let it be, until they find a more compelling evidence or an explanation.

It's a good way to not embarrass yourself.

>>18842868
I hope you're not serious

File: ayy.jpg (124KB, 782x346px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 782x346px

>>18846889
they know exactly what it is, an alien object.

if you've ever worked in a bureaucracy, which NASA is, you will understand how it works. Everyone KNOWS, and nobody owns it, because it's an uncomfortable truth. There are more unknowns than knowns since contact is impossible and communication attempts failed over and over.

Embarrassing myself how? I'm not staking my public identity, reputation or livelihood on any of this information. There is a giant fucking cylinder orbiting Mars. As a tax payer I want a public statement of acknowledgement and an open discussion over the fact there are weird anomalous objects which were clearly manufactured either lying dormant, deactivated or destroyed, or acting on their own all over our solar system, including penetrating our national airspace.

>>18846848
A skeptical person would say flippantly it is one of these:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Artificial_satellites_orbiting_Mars
And the reason it appears like a cylinder is an artefact of the exposure rate of the camera and the steady motion of the objects orbit.

A closer inspection of the gif I posted and the youtube videos that guy did in 2014 and mostly got ignored, shows other objects travelling at comparable rates of speed which are clearly point sources. So why is the camera not smudging the point sources but smudging the satellite? Because it's shaped like a cylinder, and that previous explanation is bs.

Finding the 14 known orbital paths of the man-made Martian satellites and recalculating for the 2 occurrences of the navcam imaging this object is a non-trivial task.

At some point the weight of evidence has to shift your position from, I can explain this to, okay wtf is this and why aren't we talking about it openly at the official level. The answer is probably horrific, they know and they simply cannot tell people, including their own employees.

>>18847352
Okay Thanks for explaining! But i wonder, how do you know all this and when NASA are lying or not?

File: GEO1280.jpg (125KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1280x1024px

>>18847363
Because NASA employees are human beings with their own personal prejudices and opinions, obviously some people working there feel like this should be discussed.

I've been looking for real UFO footage for 15 years and the official NASA footage is better (from the shuttle missions, the ISS, the Mars missions, Apollo missions) than a lot of what humans can take on the ground. Earth's atmosphere gets in the way of photographing or filming the sky, especially fast moving objects. In space it's much easier to get clear pictures of things that move against the dark background.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqN-KLOCS5k

Let's say I'm a super skeptic and I take Jeff Challender's videos as interesting clips of natural phenomena, debris, satellites. Okay, Earth orbit is filled with junk that just orbits us from all of the past missions. Mars doesn't have that problem, so a weird object orbiting Mars is very interesting to me, if I want to make the alien UFO case.

>>18847444
>Mars doesn't have that problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_Mars
>There is a number of derelict orbiters around Mars whose location is not known precisely;there is a proposal to search for small moons, dust rings, and old orbiters with the Optical Navigation Camera on Mars Recon. Orbiter.[16] There should be 8 derelict Mars orbiters barring unforeseen events if they have not decayed as of 2016.[17] One example is Mariner 9, which entered Mars orbit in 1971 and is expected to remain in orbit until approximately 2022, when the spacecraft is projected to enter the Martian atmosphere and either burn up or crash into the planet's surface.[18] The Viking 1 orbiter is predicted not to decay until at least 2019.[19] One orbiter that is confirmed to have undergone Mars atmospheric entry is Mars Climate Orbiter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mars_orbiters

>>18841964
To go back to your gif, two things I noticed:
1) The stars in the background are increasing in number with each frame. This means the gif is a sequence of pictures from a timelapse. The lens shutter was left open, which means anything moving will have streaks behind it and motion blur.
2) The "cylinder" moves the exact length of itself with each frame. It is also oriented perfectly with it's path of motion. This is exactly what we would expect if it is not in fact a cylinder, but a smaller object leaving a motion trail from the timelapse.

>>18847572
NASA shill confirmed

>>18847444
Why would NASA keep these things secret, what is the reason??

>>18839586
it's called fisheye you cunt

>>18839513
its just another rover that was doing tricks

>>18839513
Looks like a jeep bro

File: NRB_451931834EDR_F0311330NCAM00554M_.jpg (387KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1024x1024px

>>18847572
i already explained this here >>18847352

Why isn't the entire image smeared and just the cylinder? There are multiple other objects moving across the 6 images, the best example is the one I circled in red, but there are objects moving with the cylinder also, following it's leading edge and rotating around it. Why does the object look so similar to the one filmed entering the crater in Mexico in 2012 here: >>18843009 Why did NASA offer such small resolution pictures to the public when that camera has this resolution capability (picture related).

The Apollo 11 cameras had high contrast low frame rate anti-blur technology in the form of Westinghouse slow-scan Lunar Camera, SEC tube:
>http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/403684.pdf
This classified technology was allowed to be used by the DoD, most people working on the Apollo program would not have had a need to know, it was a compartmentalized mission with every sub-contractor doing their part. So the cameras on the 2011 NASA curiosity are more primitive than those of the 1969 Apollo 11 lunar lander?


>>18847743
Is this a serious question? Space has applications for weapon delivery systems.

NASA has a near monopoly on space outside low earth orbit, no other country is even close in terms of space exploration or human firsts. Anything it discovers is filtered through military channels before it trickles down to the public, because all information can be used to gain an advantage over other nations on Earth. To think otherwise is counterfactual. The DoD, Pentagon, CIA, US Military are spending nearly a trillion dollars on defence, but they are ignoring space? You really believe that? The first country to have an orbital strike bomber can cripple an ICBM nuclear first strike since all long range missiles are designed to be atmosphere breakers, launching up vertically in a long parabolic path to avoid land and air based interceptors.

>>18839951
>round

File: shine bright.jpg (49KB, 401x317px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 401x317px

>>18847572
>stars in the background are increasing
>moves the exact length of itself
>shaped like a circular object repeating/blurred

well that settles it.

>>18839513
This picture. So Mars is confirmed flat right. #FlatMarsTheory

you can see the curvature and it's grey

this is the moon, dumbies

>>18848974
Ok let me just ask a straight question, does the government hide information, that intelligent alien species exist?

>>18839513
The lighting and shadows in the image is all wrong.

>>18849489
how the fuck would i know? im not some larper pretending to work for nasa.

>>18849531
You know they do but you don't want to tell us..

>>18849511
So this raw pic is Photoshoped? And what would be the reason to do that??

>mars

>>18840202
Worth noting that the left cam fired 19 seconds before the right. I don't believe this is a UFO, but this evidence isn't enough to prove that it isn't.

>>18849548
ayyyy don't make me abduct you and wipe your memories now.

>>18839513
You guys are arguing about the "ufo" and missing the big picture. THERE ARE TIRE TRACKS ON MARS RIGHT IN THE PICTURE. PROOF OF AYYY LMAO RIGHT THERE!

>>18839513
Looks like dirt on the lens or the photo

>>18839513
We spent 3 billion dollars on that piece of shit and it can't even take decent color photos.