Why don't we create a fake UFO crash landing to proove we can psyop just as effectively as the CIA?
All we would need would be some eyewithness accounts and strange metal pieces laying around in the desert.
>>18820272
Don't, we have enough confusion with what the CIA does.
The FBI guys hate this bs and I understand them.
Good idea, see cover up in action. Live stream it
Here's my plan, pls r8.
first, anons bring some burned metall pieces into a desert somewhere, near a spoopy airforce base.
Thenn, we get the eyewithness accounts. Anons film themselves talking about seeing something coming crashing down in the night, strange lights and sounds.
After that, we create a 'documentary", stating all kinds of nonsense, like raditation on the 'crash site'
>>18820272
The Turks did a some months ago. They used a couple of hashtags and two videos.
It was successful.
https://www.rt.com/viral/368731-turkey-ufo-attack-trending/
>>18820287
see? We could do the same thing, expect with more "proofs"
>>18820272
Hoaxes happen all the time, and detract from legitimate UFO research, and makes full public UFO disclosure even more unlikely. You should kill yourself instead.
>>18820272
I'm in. Let's do this
>>18820272
>why don't we do their job for them, without pay?
Allright, i live in an eastern European shithole, burgers report in
>implying you even need pieces of metal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nda_OSWeyn8
You just need to make it look like its common knowledge and everyone else saw it already. People will lie their ass off for their 15 minutes of fame. How do you think we have all these stories about skinwalkers? Do you think people really go in the woods at night that often?
>>18820272
/x/ is the mind /pol/ is executor. let's do some cybermagic