Any explinations

>>18754926
Fake news

>>18754926
Bad CGI. I can do a full photo analysis if you want.

>>18754982
Would be awesome

>>18754982
>>18754993
just do a reverse image search. it is old. here is an overlay of that picture with an overlay of another picture of a deer taken 9 days later. there is no change to the surroundings so I say fake.

File: PICT0134 copy.jpg (122KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1600x1200px

>>18755033
sorry forgot to attach image

>>18754926
its Hillary on her way back from Metro Pizza, she was a little cranky they did not have any of her favorite topping, deep fried Asian child.

>>18755033
Today I learned a reverse image search is equivalent to "full photo analysis."

>>18755051
Well if you searched for the image and an identical one comes up no need for further analysis

>>18754982
Nah it's okay, I completely believe you and require no evidence to cement my faith in your claim that the photo in question is both fake, and incredibly gay.

>>18754926
enemy from a videogame called "outlast".

Not trying to be a grammar nazi OP, but you've misspelled explaination wrong.

>>18755168
this picture is older than outlast, genius.

It was supposedly made for a viral marketing campaign for a brand of jeans or some shit.

Thought I saw one in real life.

>>18754926
I remember being spooped by this back in 2010 when a friend sent it to me

I don't know how people can't tell it's fake just by looking at it. It's sort of an uncanny valley thing, minus the getting scared part.

>>18755351
Explaination? Really? You call someone on their spelling and then spell the same word wrong in a poorly constructed sentence?

>>18754926
Proven fake - ain't no Rake.

File: 9un6j34abjhy.png (130KB, 697x447px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 697x447px

>>18754926

It's rake pasta