What's behind the box, /x/?

Usually a few coins or a Mushroom, OP.

>>18691801
Assimilate me daddy!

>>18691775
Your mother, OP

File: 20020513_1919_eit304_1024.jpg (137KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1024x1024px

These boxes happen, when some of data is lost.

The image is encoded in boxes of this size, and if there is transmission error, one box is lost, but not whole image... If transmission is lucky enough, there are no losses...
There is so much images processed that there is no-one controlling them each separatelly, either to censor it or to make quality checks...

Then in case of this drop-out, there is either black box (which is better), or they leave there pixels from previous image (which is harder to detect)...
(On my image, there are two rectangular areas, that are kept from previous image few-hours old, rather than keeping the boxes black)

>>18691860

t. Nasa

File: SWAP20120718_radiallyfiltered_yellow.png (1MB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x1024px

>>18691966
What's wrong with NASA?

------
This image is from ESA mission Proba2. It can be compared with NASA images and it matches...

Just the Proba2 resolution is low (1024x1024) compared with SDO (4096x4096)...

Some time ago, Japan mission (I do not remember name) could be compared to NASA SOHO...

And that, what can be seen from ground, also matches these space pictures, but Extreme Ultra-Violet does not pass through atmosphere and one needs a space mission to observe it in detail...

File: 20120806_070008_1024_0304.jpg (258KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1024x1024px

This one is from same day, from SDO, also low-resolution and different sensor (here 304 A, while Proba2 image above is 174 A), but it can be seen, that the places of "hot" regions match...

File: AIA20120806_2102_0171.jpg (338KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1024x1024px

>>18691966
>>18692127
>>18692142
And this is from a comparable sensor (171 A) on a same day, from NASA SDO mission, as downloaded from Stanford university (also lower resolution, but much sharper than Proba2 image)...

File: 20120405_1319_eit304_512.jpg (93KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 512x512px

>>18691775
In extreme case, the black boxes can look like this...

(This is from old SOHO mission, that is 1M km away from Earth toward Sun in L1 Lagrange point, at the place, where gravity of Earth and Sun is in balance... Since it is quite far and almost exactly in front of Sun, the transmission has defects sometimes...)

>>18691775
Muslims

>>18692207
i appreciate your explanations. i wish everyone on this board would accept answers that aren't "secret alien tomb of mozart the government doesn't want you to know about"

File: 20120806_191500_2048_HMIIF.jpg (1MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x2048px

>>18692290
Thank you...

>>18692168 >>18692142 >>18692127
Same day in visible-light spectrum...
Note Sunspots.
Note, that they are very bright in Extreme Ultra-violet light, they just do not shine in visible 6000K spectrum...

File: 20120806_191500_2048_HMIBC.jpg (2MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x2048px

>>18692442
>>18692168 >>18692142 >>18692127

This is magnetogram from a same day...

Note, that Sunspots are very magnetic, that there are + and - pairs, and that leading pair is negative on one hemisphere and positive on another hemisphere...

Then after 11 years, the poles on Sun swap, and north and south magnetic poles change their place...


Many people make various claims about Earth pole swaps.
They are nothing unusual and time by time it happens.
It has got absolutelly nothing with rotation axis change, which is almost impossible, because the energy, stored in Earth gyroscope, is enormous...

Magnetic poles are caused by eddies in molten iron core of Earth, which are plasma (atoms missing electrons) and move, so it is kind of electric current. Such eddies are much stronger magnets than Earth's magnetic field, but they all almost cancel each other, some moving this direction and some moving opposite direction.
Just they do not cancel completely, one direction prevails, and it is then the net magnetic field of Earth... (and it is even not aligned with North-South axis, the south magnetic pole is way out of Antarctic below Australia and North magnetic pole is at Islands near Canada).

So one day sooner or later the molten-iron eddies in core will little prevail the opposite direction from the current one and magnetic pole shift (switch) will occur...
It will happen slowly (first cancel to zero and then slowly emerge opposite) over many years and you would not feel it, there need not be even small earthquakes associated with it...

File: sn10961.gif (23KB, 189x189px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 189x189px

>>18692496
And since someone does not believe in NASA missions, why not cross-check them:

This is Earth-based magnetogram from ground-based Wilcox Solar Observatory .
http://wso.stanford.edu/magnetograms.html

The resolution is much smaller, but their data run from year 1976 until today, which is much longer time-span for studying longer processes, than space-based missions only from cca 1996...

File: WSO_Synoptic_FlowMap__.jpg (310KB, 3138x180px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 3138x180px

>>18692592
Here is that Solar pole-shift (pole-switch) from magnetograms from (ground-based) Wilcox Solar Observatory, from middle 1976 to end of 2015.

Green vs. Yellow, I'm not sure which is magnetic north and which is south now...

File: WsoMag_synoptic_NorthSouth_ver150620a.png (89KB, 960x330px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 960x330px

>>18692779
And here is a chart for that...
North pole ("upper") is red, South pole ("lower") is blue, +- is magnetic polarity...

It shows, that for short period of time during the switch, it is even possible, that both poles are same... (here both negative)

>>18692496
Errata:

North magnetic pole is near Antarctica and Australia, and South magnetic pole is above Canada...

(Because north magnetic pole of compass is attracted to south magnetic pole of Earth, which happens to be on north hemisphere...)

>>18692127
>this is a "flat surface" for a flatearther
>and of course is orbiting us

>>18691775
For one thing, a box is not a star. Your picture is of the sun, which is a star, not a box.

File: tmp_26374-twilight-princess-hd-screencap_960.0.0531579458.jpg (105KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1600x900px

>>18692207
Who could be behind this...

>>18691860
Its fake anyway, because the sun is flat too

>>18691860
shill detected

>>18691775
>What's behind the box, /x/?

Screw that, what is IN the box?

File: __20120606_022857_4096_0304_Small2048.jpg (1MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x2048px

>>18695713
> Sun is flat too ...
Beside it is clearly visible, how it turns, from multiple images in multiple days...

On the West, first one to see, how the Sun turns, was Galileo Galilei, who invented a telescope arround 1609... (beware, that it is really dangerous to watch Sun with telescope or binoculars, it's a fraction of a second to completely burn the eye and it even does not hurt enough to warn you!)
(Chinese already knew this long time ago)

--------
This picture here is more interesting, because that round thing is not a defect...

It's Venus planet, when it has been passing in front of the Sun.

Well, it's not that much large compared to Sun, it was 5x more near to us than Sun at this moment, that's why it appears just this large. Not larger, not smalller. (Venus is almost same size as Earth, almost...)

It's apparently quite larger than normally, when it is visible as morning or evening "star", which is usually when it is on opposite side behind the Sun, when it best reflects it's light...

This Venus transit could have been seen from Earth, I've seen it on my own eyes (through double floppy-disk filter), I've photographed this on my own camera... A very real event.

And their relative sizes perfectly match.

For those who would like to amuse with a trigonometry, at time of this image:

Distance Earth-Venus: 43.189 million km
Distance Earth-Sun: 151.804 million km
Distance Venus-Sun: 108.615 million km

Apparent radius of Sun in this image is 945.653 arcsec, diameter 1891.306 arcsec, which is 0.525 degree (diameter) ... (from technical metadata of an image less than hour from this one)

Sun is typically half-degree in diameter, as seen from Earth (which pulses, at january it's more near and at july more far, since Earth orbits on an ellipse)

Venus is cca 49 pixels over Sun of 1600 pixels on that image...

sin( rad(49/1600*0.52536) ) * 43.189e6 / 2 = 6064 km radius calculated,
actual is 6051.8 km ...

File: Tse2010t_640mm_1.jpg (2MB, 2808x1952px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2808x1952px

>>18696540 (cont)
You flat-earthers would have hard time explaining this Venus transit or Solar eclipse variability - sometimes the Moon is more near and sometimes more far, also Sun distance is variable, and they perfectly match during eclipse with calculations...

File: Se2001u_comp09-17_lasco-c2.png (1MB, 1068x1072px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1068x1072px

Here is a composite - photography of Solar eclipse by prof. Druckmuller, who I know, with a NASA photography from space, LASCO camera (large angle solar corona observer) on SOHO (solar orbiter heliospheric observatory) satelite...

During eclipse, much sharper photography can be made and much more near to Solar surface.
But space-based mission has advantage, that it observes all the time, multiple frames per day, every day...
(The satelite has something like a "spoon" in front of Sun to obscure it and to see it's corona)

And this way during eclipse, it can be perfectly verified, that their space-based images match it, that the images from before and from after the eclipse match it and there is no sharp "jump" or trick to make it matching just at the time of the eclipse...

>>18692207
Thnaks.

File: Tse_2015_Svalbard_200mm_c2.jpg (480KB, 2129x1114px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 2129x1114px

Here another eclipse, compared earth-based photography from Greenland with SOHO/LASCO space-based image (joint NASA/ESA satelite)...

It's visible, that during Solar eclipse, much sharper and much more near to Solar surface is possible, but only once or twice per year for just few minutes, but space-based Lasco images are available every day of a year...

And when there is such a chance to compare them, they match...

And place of Solar eclipse on Earth surface, relative size of Sun and Moon, duration etc - all can be calculated with a great precision...

>>18696694
In the whole universe eclipses will be rare af. I reckon we could make space tourist bucks.

Also I wonder if alien sightings and abductions increase around eclipse sites...

Just think about how weird it is that our moon and sun are just the right size and distance apart and so on to do this.

>>18691790
Kek. You deserve it.

File: 41314-Brad-Pitt-Seven-whats-in-the-b-AYBg.png (142KB, 481x290px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 481x290px

Be careful what box you open.
>Public Safety PSA.

File: bfly_EarthLine.png (30KB, 1986x648px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 1986x648px

>>18696783
There's even bigger mystery about Sun and Moon:

The Sun turns arround it's axis and one such turn takes one Moon... One Month. (there are languages, where Moon and Month is a same word)

Not exactly - since Sun turns very strangely, it turns fast at equator (cca 25 days), and very slow at poles (cca 35 days). All surface features get squeezed over time...

There is a latitude (arround 40°-50° north and south), that turns just those 27-29 days, synchronized with the Earth pulse.

Because Earth does not orbit on elipse, but on a tilde trajectory, wavering inward and outward by the Moon counterbalance by some +- 4000km. At time of full-moon, Earth is more near to Sun and at time of new moon, Earth is more far from Sun, and so it pulses, synchronized with Sun spin.

By this, the Earth's magnetosphere is probably recharched. (There is a mystery, WHY didn't the Earth's magnetosphere fade away as on Mars). Magnetosphere protects our atmosphere, so that solar wind does not blow it out.

It's just too perfect (the Sun-Moon synchronization) to be random... Most other stars spin faster.

Sun is quite magnetic, and Earth also. At the distances, the Jupiter should be 100x stronger magnet as felt by Sun, but since the IMF (interplanetary magnetic field) is conductor, the Sun's magnetic field is 100x stronger measured on Earth, than it should be, and so the Earth at Sun is felt almost same strong magnet as Jupiter...

The Sunspot cycle starts always from that belt, which is synchronized with Earth pulse, and travels 11 years toward Solar equator - synchronized with Earth-Venus-Jupiter trio, synchronized with changes in Earth's orbital energy, and synchronized with Venus-Jupiter-Earth oppositions and conjunctions, because the Sun feels its planets...

(On this NASA picture I've marked by blue lines the Solar latitude, that is synchronized with Earth pulse...)

File: VAngMoment_Emb_406_1750-2050_a_cmp_SunSpots_ver100120.png (116KB, 960x329px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 960x329px

>>18699185
(But this planetary origin of Sunspots does not befit NASA much, because it is much more useful to perpetually investigate that as a mystery, than to really know it...)

holy shit you found the allspark. someone call the fuckin autobots

File: image.jpg (56KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1000x563px

>>18691775
First, it isn't a cube. It appears to be a square.
Second:
>>18691860/this

>pic related

>>18692496
My only criticism with you is that you use ellipsis way too often.

>>18691775
That's the Phantom Zone.