Friendly reminder that flatfags literally cannot explain why

Yes, anon. That's because they're fundamentally wrong. Good job, you win.

>>18637276
There's a 500 reply thread full of flatfags and yet not a single one will respond to this.

>>18637328
Were you expecting them to?

File: Azimuthal Equidistant Projection.jpg (584KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1600x1600px

Also

>>18637355
This is another good one.

>>18637344
I at least expected them to trot out some youtube videos about things completely unrelated to what I said.

>>18637355
>>18637201
The proportions in these maps are also ridiculous. They show Australia as larger than North America, and Africa as larger than Eurasia.

>>18637355
If the earth were flat, they'd all be looking in the same direction. Up.

>>18637427
Still doesn't make any sense, since all three can see the same stars, and those same stars are not visible in the northern hemisphere. The position of the stars was how the ancient Greeks figured out the world was round.

>>18637201
The map is slightly wrong, the way you draw the routes is not logical.

>>18637355
Idk about other fe fags but from my understanding the space is infinite round void and the earth is an infinite flat plane, in a density difference(/levels) law realm.

When applying the logic of it, north and south night skies work perfectly.

>>18637452
How would you draw the routes, and what would a correct map look like?

>When applying the logic of it, north and south night skies work perfectly.
explain.

>>18637459
The Americas needs to be shifted more clockwise, the first flight is more in a straight line over the ocean, compass works differently in south,
The 2nd flight slightly more rounded following the east/west compass angles coords/sonar/radar/gps chart.
If you try that you will find that the distance is almost the same that way.

>explain.

We are between density(1d, 2d, 3d) and space(4d).

Look at how perspective, and eye level horizon, the so called "gravity" works, then you will understand it better.

Theres no "Gravity" as a field/force by itself.

What makes things "fall" is electromagnetic interaction between matter under the laws of density and buoyancy(a quality of density), by that allowing higher density to move through lower density,
While pulling lower density towards lower density and higher density towards higher density by the shift/levels of dimensions(/the qualities of their configuration):
Singularity(1-D) > Density(1d>2d>3d), Form(3-D) > Expansion(3d>4d) > Space(4-D) > Deepening(4d>1d).
Lower density will expand, higher density will solidify.
Also, mind that one of the effect of that shift/levels of dimensions is,
The higher you go, the lower the density.
The lower you go, the higher the density.

>>18637492
>The Americas needs to be shifted more clockwise, the first flight is more in a straight line over the ocean, compass works differently in south,
>The 2nd flight slightly more rounded following the east/west compass angles coords/sonar/radar/gps chart.
>If you try that you will find that the distance is almost the same that way.
Isn't the position of the things on the map is based on longitude and latitude lines which have been thoroughly mapped? You can't just move them around. If not then it is already arbitrary.

>We are between density(1d, 2d, 3d) and space(4d).
>Look at how perspective, and eye level horizon, the so called "gravity" works, then you will understand it better.
>Theres no "Gravity" as a field/force by itself.
>What makes things "fall" is electromagnetic interaction between matter under the laws of density and buoyancy(a quality of density), by that allowing higher density to move through lower density,
>While pulling lower density towards lower density and higher density towards higher density by the shift/levels of dimensions(/the qualities of their configuration):
>Singularity(1-D) > Density(1d>2d>3d), Form(3-D) > Expansion(3d>4d) > Space(4-D) > Deepening(4d>1d).
>Lower density will expand, higher density will solidify.
>Also, mind that one of the effect of that shift/levels of dimensions is,
>The higher you go, the lower the density.
>The lower you go, the higher the density.
This is just meaningless babble about density and dimensions. This shit has nothing to do with the position of stars in the southern hemisphere..

File: 023.jpg (165KB, 1068x964px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1068x964px

We are living on a felt earth.

File: Flan_de_huevo_1.jpg (150KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1600x900px

>>18637523
We are living on a flan earth

File: SGU-From-pole-to-pole-1200x800-cp8.jpg (174KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1200x800px

>>18637510
The maps are wrong, look it up.

>This shit has nothing to do with the position of stars in the southern hemisphere

It has everything to do with it.
The sky is egg shaped for us(whole earth).

Pic related.
Star Trail from the Equator.

If you turn/chart it into AEP map it will make sense.

Just like weather makes sense on AEP
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/

>>18637395
mkay that's great guy

File: IMG_0105.jpg (22KB, 170x224px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 170x224px

***DAILY REMINDER THAT IF YOU SERIOUSLY BELIEVE THAT OUR EARTH IS FLAT YOU SHOULD OFF YOURSELF IMMEDIATLY***

They succeeded. You got triggered hard. They cant acknowledge anything that contradicts their bullshit

>>18637562
This. If you have the mental ability and manual dexterity necessary to fire up a computer, load up the 4chin, and post in a thread, yet you're still somehow retarded enough to genuinely believe in a flat earth... well, then you're clearly a dangerously unhinged kind of retarded.

>>18637540
Can you please pinpoint on those maps which areas these apparent centers of rotation are happening when people in the "southern" hemisphere look up?

Australia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZo-o4R6g0A

Chile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RYbqAmG3k8

South Africa:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM9uv1udY6o

>>18637612
https://youtube.com/watch?v=t30-YbayyXE
Somewhat close explanation to how it works.

>>18637605
>>18637562
Whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night, spherecucks.

>>18637638
I'm sorry but that video didn't help at all. I don't see what the movement of the sun has to do with the rotation of the stars. The sun moves over the Earth on a completely separate path, does it not? Please show me on the map where the rotation of the stars is happening, and how it creates the apparent rotations in those three locations.

>>18637646
Watch the whole video it answers it.

>>18637201
I'm not a flat fag but how do you explain the pic related? Distance is clearly different still it's the same duration. How does that work?

>>18637647
I'm watching but it's very confusing because they aren't using an accurate map of the earth. Pic related. Can you translate this image into how it works on the true map of the flat earth?

File: FE rotations.jpg (120KB, 980x626px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 980x626px

>>18637655
Oh I'm sorry, I forgot pic.

>>18637655
>>18637656
Keep watching the video carefully, you will understand.

>>18637660
The video really isn't helping. A map would be so much more helpful. Are you unable to make something real quick in MS Paint or something?

Really, it's just bringing up more questions. Like if it's just a trick of perspective, why don't we ever get both rotations in the horizon? We can get crepuscular rays no matter where we are on the earth because it's a matter of our perspective, not the specific location. But the star perspectives is such that it depends on where you stand on earth? I don't get it.

>>18637663
Its answered in the video close to the end of the video.

>>18637201
Wow You're Soooo BRAINWASHED. One Day You'll All See The TRUTH When The NWO Is BReaking Into CHRISTIAN HOUSES And Murdering Them. What Do You Think WiFi Signals Are For??? Fucking IDIOTS Are All Blind

>>18637665
I watched the whole video and he doesn't explain it at all. Watching more just added to my questions.

Can you please show me on a true map how this works?
Can you explain why we don't see the anti-rotation in the northern hemisphere, when we can see crepuscular and anti-crepuscular rays in the same horizon field?
Can you explain why the illusory rotating stars don't match the actual rotating ones?
Can you show me where in the sky the Magellanic Clouds are located, along with where they are projected to be?

>>18637673

North sky, flipped in south and converged, due to the laws behind why perspective happens.

Polaris(North/North Pole Star) is the fixed/axis point.

>>18637673
Use Logic.
Also rewatch the video.

>>18637667
I hope you are joking. Otherwise, look up schizophrenia.

>>18637673
so we're spinning at 1,040 mph, orbiting the sun at 30 kms and speeding through space at 514,000 mph.
If you believe the earth is a globe, this is what you believe.

then why are the stars the same every night?
how am i able to see those stars so still in the night sky.

i actually just can't get over this one thing and that the sun and the moon look the same size when ever i look at them day or night..

nothing adds up im sick of this.

I swear man, every flatearther needs to get back on theyr meds.

WHO THE FUCK CARES ABOUT ALL THIS SHIT
EXPLAIN JUST TWO THINGS
THE SUN, THE MOON

>>18637201
But can they explain why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

>>18637763
Ifyousungazethemoonandthesunlookthesamesize.truestory

>>18637201

The death knell of the shill.

>>18637763
>>18637768
no seriously i was talking to flat

>>18637739

You've never seen a super-moon? Sometimes that motherfucker is just HUGE

Guys I don't get it, can you explain this
>>18637652
To me

>>18637739
>then why are the stars the same every night?
>how am i able to see those stars so still in the night sky.
But the stars do move in a cyclical fashion over the course of a year.

>>18637739
You questions are stupid and nonsensical and you should feel ashamed

>>18637201
>why a flight from Buenos Aires to Auckland is shorter than one from New York to China
well, because the distance is just shorter. wow

>that latitude lines are curved concentric circles that get progressively larger the further south you go
those are just concepts. It's not like you see them when you sail across the sea. lol

OP is a faggot

>>18637910
>only things I see exist
Get better at trolling

>>18637910
>well, because the distance is just shorter. wow
Look at the map again.

>>18637912
"latitude lines" are a more or less arbitarily chosen human concept. They exist as much as micey mouse exists

>>18637922
Do you not understand physics? Explain to me how theyre arbitrary

>>18637918
oh, the strawman map. cool
Might as well say it shows how stupid the globe model is by claiming the very same map represents that model

>>18637927
They have nothing to do with physics, really. It is geometry. They just are arbitrary anon. The equator doesnt need to be 0 degrees for example.

>>18637492
That entire last paragraph is how people used to perceive the earth before people like Copernicus, Descartes, and Newton told them they were fucking idiots like, 500 years ago.

>>18637739
>then why are the stars the same every night
They're not
>how am I able to see those stars so still in the night sky
Next time you're in a car on the highway, look at a mountain on the horizon. See how it doesn't zoom by like the guard rail that's a few feet from your window?
>how do the sun and moon look the same size
They don't, the Earth has an elliptical orbit around the sun, making it vary slightly in size. This variation isn't noticeable to the naked eye because the variation is small and the sun impairs your vision if you try to stare at it. The moon also varies in size, but it changes noticeably and doesn't hurt to look at, which makes me wonder why you've never experienced this phenomena for yourself.

File: luigi pancakes.gif (1MB, 370x246px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 370x246px

>>18637201
>flatfags literally cannot explain why a flight from Buenos Aires to Auckland is shorter than one from New York to China.

Layover.

>>18637845
It's not supposed to make sense. OP is saying that those flight times would be vastly different if the Earth were situated the way it is in his map.

>>18637681
>North sky, flipped in south and converged

But we would see the same stars, or at least a distortion of that image. And this is not the case. I'm sorry this is very confusing to me. I'm trying to understand but it's very difficult for me.

>>18637683
>>18637732
I guess I'm not very good at this. But does this mean you aren't willing to help me understand? I don't see what's so hard about showing me this on the true map of the Earth.

>>18637739
OK. I get that the globe model doesn't make sense. So I'm trying to understand the FE model instead, but the stars are confusing. Can you help me with my questions?

>>18637739
>why do I see the same stars every night

Because the stars are really far away. This isn't hard to understand, you're just stupid.

>I'm driving down the highway at night
>I'm going 60 mph hour
>I can see the moon outside my window
>an hour later I can still see the moon
>how does it work?
>lol, I dunno!

>>18637938
No you can pick a range from negative 2000 to positive .4 you want, but that's just numbers. All the principles remain the same regardless of which number system you use.

>>18637201
They fly slower.

File: 1487217838805.png (259KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1280x720px

Fisheye lens cameras

File: 1487206673280.jpg (71KB, 918x960px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 918x960px

Earth pasted in literally EVERY nasa pic "from space"

File: 1487206142962.jpg (676KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 2048x2048px

Cartoon Earth

File: 5645643.jpg (579KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 2048x2048px

(1)Cartoon earth with multiple identical cloud patterns, impossible to occur naturally

File: Screen Shot 2015-04-29 at 1.11.30 AM_zpso5dhsynm.png (759KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

759KB, 800x500px

>>18638406
(2)

File: 2015-how-bigisthe-earth_nasa.png (235KB, 457x352px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 457x352px

>inb4 different cameras/lens
mmm, no, just cartoons

File: WHICHREAL.png (1MB, 1240x735px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1240x735px

>inb4 different cameras/lens
mmm, no, just photoshop

>>18638388
>>18638393
>>18638396
You seem to have some knowledge. Can you help me understand how stars work?

>>18637673
>Can you please show me on a true map how this works?
>Can you explain why we don't see the anti-rotation in the northern hemisphere, when we can see crepuscular and anti-crepuscular rays in the same horizon field?
>Can you explain why the illusory rotating stars don't match the actual rotating ones?
>Can you show me where in the sky the Magellanic Clouds are located, along with where they are projected to be?

File: 1487203786773.png (554KB, 743x745px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 743x745px

>inb4 what are orbits/orbital mechanics
no, they all end up in the ocean

File: density.jpg (82KB, 811x811px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 811x811px

No need for gravity

File: 4535365.jpg (55KB, 1024x449px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1024x449px

Flat

File: rounwrld.jpg (30KB, 288x451px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 288x451px

Globe?

>>18637638
>as you move, this dome moves with you
>everybody's got their own personal dome

lol

>>18638426
Gee I wonder why heavier things are at the bottom
>>18638428
>>18638432
Go to the horizon and jump off

>>18638426
No, that definitely needs gravity. If not for gravity it would all float out the top of the container.

>>18638441
You poor plebs, not even Pope Neil DeGrasse Tyson is able to explain what gravity is, and still you claim to totally understand it.

Hahaha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Efh4bu4rcbs

File: 1487204249324.webm (753KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 720x576px

Rockets don't work in a vacuum

>>18638448
That's a good enough explanation for me.

And you still can't understand even the basics.

>>18638455
No one thinks rockets can work in space.

>>18638455
That video does not accurately demonstrate how a rocket works or how a vacuum works.
The vacuum is all around the rocket first of all, not right behind it.

>>18638459
>That's a good enough explanation for me
Of course it is, simpletons don't require much evidence, just a well spoken messenger and CGI cartoons

>>18638455
Citation needed. Your experiment is invalid.

>>18638469
There isn't even a vacuum behind it. The vacuum is in the chamber in his vacuum cleaner.

All the hose does is make a current of air.

Meanwhile:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4CNvZj-gko

File: Set13_F126(rename before posting).jpg (233KB, 1263x632px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1263x632px

>>18638428
>>18638432
These are obvious fakes.
Here anon, i took this photo from a mountain at ~10500 feet, you can see the earth's curvature

>>18638493
Are you Eraz Marom, and you took that in 2009?

Because you left the signature on. Also you renamed it but left the note.

>>18638462
I like it how nobody ever has anything to say about this.
You all avoid it because vomit comet.

>>18638493
But what if your picture is fake?

>>18638501
>Are you Eraz Marom, and you took that in 2009?
yes

File: scobee.jpg (31KB, 500x428px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x428px

>>18638518

>>18638468
I do. You'd have to be pretty fucking dense not to understand Newtonian physics.

>>18638503
>vomit comet

The vomit comet lasts for about twenty seconds a stint. Videos of the ISS astronauts last for many minutes. So it's clearly not the vomit comet.

>but muh strings and harnesses

So at least it's settled that it's not the vomit comet. It's strings and harnesses. Except it's not that either, since there's none of the gear required.

>muh cgi and and photoshopping

Live? Live cgi? That must be a terrible strain on the artists hands.

Also, you can go outside and look up and see the ISS.

Friendly reminder that Hollow Earth is the true red pill.

>>18638503
You seem to be one who doesn't let even tough questions go unanswered. Well I seem to have a tough question, though I don't understand why it's tough.

There appear to be rotation points of the stars even when looking in a direction that doesn't rotate, noted here >>18637612.

This is apparently caused by "anti-rotation" rays, an illusion from perspective, as noted here >>18637638 . But this video made me have more questions. I'd really like some help understanding this. Can you help me with these questions?

>Can you please show me on a true map how this works?
>Can you explain why we don't see the anti-rotation in the northern hemisphere, when we can see crepuscular and anti-crepuscular rays in the same horizon field?
>Can you explain why the illusory rotating stars don't match the actual rotating ones?
>Can you show me where in the sky the Magellanic Clouds are located, along with where they are projected to be?

>>18638462
>>18638503
Yeah no. Her hair is obviously weightless. There's no hair harness. If her body was reacting to earth's gravity than so would her hair. She's just losing control of rotation. That probably happens a lot in micro gravity.

>>18638526
ALL footage from the ISS is a combination of vomit comet, strings and harnesses and CGI.

Here's an example: https://youtu.be/5Ok_yS6d1rQ?t=1m23s

>>18638524
look, a series of panoramic shots. this looks like the work of a decent photographer.

>>18638546
>vomit comet

We've already eliminated that possibility.

>harnesses and cgi

Also eliminated. There are clearly no harnesses, and go can't cgi stuff live.

Making retarded youtube videos with jump cuts and illuminati symbols doesn't validate your claims.

>>18638549
>the work of a decent photographer

Not that great a photoshopper though.

You can see in the top one where he's messed with the horizon.

>>18638527
I think the angle is what's confusing people. He wasn't actually 'that' high up. The space suit makes it look more impressive but he was only at the "edge of space" from what I remember.

>>18638545
Hairspray, it's so obvious.
>She's just losing control of rotation.
What rotation nigga? She was "standing" still, and all of a sudden she lost control of being still?

Hahahahaha

>>18638563
lol yeah. i don't really fault them, those shots are a hassle to edit and they're probably not part of any serious work anyway. nonetheless these threads are still stupid as fuck.

>>18637355
What? I'm confused. Is this a map of flat Earth or curved? And are you for or against FE? Because it seems like from what the pic says it's defending FE but people are replying saying things like "That's another good point Anon" refferencing- I assume OP since I didn't see any pro-FE replies

>>18637737
You Sound Like Everyone Else Who Has Told ME I'm Crazy. Have Fun Being An Energy Slave To NWO :)

>>18638569
Her foot's on the "floor." With nothing to hold you down, any force will set you in motion. She's using her hands to deliver the talk, so she has no real way to control herself.

If anything, this is evidence she's in zero gravity. If she were faking it, it'd be easier to control.

>>18638549
You can tell the true curvature of earth by a partial picture.

No matter from what angle it looks like it's taken.

The same way you can't determine the size of boobs if they use the classical selfie angle.

>>18638581
That thing it's falling from space into gravity it obviously produces visible atmospheric changes.

>>18638585
Beautiful.

>>18638591
You are crazy not because you believe in the flat earth, but because you don't stop trying to kill the cat.

>>18638595
Best building materials of 1969.

>>18638594
Exactly.

>>18638597
Ice ends, great evidence.

>>18638600
Checked and saved.

File: 435387957656.jpg (237KB, 946x710px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 946x710px

250 billion sattelites orbiting earth, still no real photo from space

>>18637737
I Keep My Drying Machines On 247 Good Luck Tryong To Find Me You FACIST NAZI FUCKING ASSHOLE BIYCH KKIKE CUNT FUCK YOU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeKdNSQgYk8

File: 13918444_1389465394415396_1313822696_o.jpg (88KB, 1024x698px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1024x698px

>>18638569
Her hair is constantly moving , that's not how hairspray works.

Have you seen how cats move in microgravity? Their balance gets fucked up so that every movement they make in their body causes them to rotate out of control. If you turn, you keep turning. It doesn't matter if she started off still.

Also, she would have to be strong as fuck to keep her body in that crooked , not up-and-down position that she is able to hold herself in using just one hand. And then she goes right back to being weightless. That isn't how the vomit vomit works.
And here's a crazy idea: maybe if the vomit vomit fucks up and your actor looks foolish, DONT RELEASE IT TO THE PUBLIC. You're the foolish one my friend. Occam' s razor.
Seriously though watch that cat shit.

>>18638606
>I have autism

>>18637737
BITCHASSHOLE FUCKING CUNT FAGGOT DICK ASSHOLE BITCH FUCKING FUCK KIKE NIGGER

>>18638607
That perspective it's kind of wrong, I believe the earth it's a little bigger than that.

>>18638611
Represent.

>>18638612
Design it's copy of a copy, there's not original ideas since 1895.

>>18638613
Cats are not humans they have more ways of determine their position.

>>18638615
Like no one in this thread does.

>>18638621
Your welcome.

>>18637492
>>18637492
2 things
1. What the fuck does any of this have to do with how Gravity isn't real and the Earth is flat?
2. Do you have any proof at all for this being how shit works at all? This isn't the paranormal side of /x/, you can't just spout off shit then say "There is no proof because if you want proof that means you're an ignorant bluepiller". This is the science mathy side of /x/, if you're gonna spout off a bunch of babble that doesn't relate to anything atleast source the bullshit you talk about

File: 1487159229465.jpg (15KB, 236x237px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 236x237px

>>18637513
Shit bait is shit

>>18638626
Dude, it's literally just meaningless babble. Timecube-tier.

File: nwo-exposed.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

>>18637737
I Will Make You Understad

>>18638613
>Her hair is constantly moving , that's not how hairspray works.
Her hair is rigid and is moving EXACTLY how hairspray would cause it to.

Why is long hair even allowed on the iss? It's a serious hazard, it could short-circuit equipment.

>>18638625
>That perspective it's kind of wrong, I believe the earth it's a little bigger than that.
I know, but flat earthers would argue that there are no satellites orbiting earth.
Everybody can witness satellites in the night sky

File: satan-george-bush.jpg (30KB, 370x432px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 370x432px

>>18637737
In that day the Lord with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea.

Isaiah 27:1

????? You Are Blind

ONLY YOU WILL KNOW

>>18637737
Did you just come out of a YouTube fucking comment section? That was the most obvious bait. Fuck I can't even call it bait, it's just a lil goof that was so clearly not serious. How the hell do you wonder more then half a second if that's real or not.
Jesus why does it seem everyone on the Internet as of late is absolute dog shit at detecting bait and sarcasm

>>18638643
Not everyone, you need a serious telelscope, at least for the ones that aren't black project spy satellites, cause you can't even see those.

>>18638625
Cats don't have to be just like humans, my point is that if you twist and turn even a little bit in micro gravity, you will start to rotate. The way she sat up could have been enough to make her spin slightly.

>>18638638
It's not rigid. When her head turns her hair moves in all directions. Put hairspray in and then move your head around. Not the same effect.
Are you serious about short circuiting a space station with your hair? I really don't think that's a concern.

>>18638655
You flat earthers are the most retarded humans alive.
Anybody can see satellites with naked eye, as long there is no light pollution from the city lights.

>>18638662
>Anybody can see satellites with naked eye, as long there is no light pollution from the city lights

I grow up in the deep desert, in the most clear skies in the world.

I can assure, that you don't see satellites, you barely see a point indistinguishable from the other stars, unless you know those stars from memory.

Flat earthers are literally worse than muslims.

>>18637739
Does your brain even work? Common sense and basically just existing gives you enough experience to answer all those questions without even needing to think on them too hard

TL:DR
>Why are the stars the same
They aren't. Go watch Thunderf00t's "Free your mind", and use google for half a second. Seriously I never do the crappy copout "Use google" approach but this is so obviously and easily explained people with more then half a fuck to give can explain it perfectly

>Why are the stars still

You know how when you look at a far away place, like a mountain and you can go a faaaaar distance and only then does it noticeably change?
Scale that up by millions of lightyears
Mars, Venus, etc. change positions far more quickly over the course of the years more drastically then the far away stars, but again. How does common sense and the basic experience of existing not answer those questions.
Go ahead fast travel millions of years into the future then you'll see the stars noticeably change. Until then this is what we fuckin got for all of our puny mortal existence

I had to use all my restraint to not just call you a retard and tell you to pick up a book that doesn't coddle your beliefs for once. I'm on the verge of an aneurysm from reading your headbangingly stupid arguments.

File: vomit_comet_hair.jpg (407KB, 1135x650px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1135x650px

>>18638661
>When her head turns her hair moves in all directions.
No, it doesn't. It stays rigid. You can lie to yourself all you want but that hair is not moving as it should in microgravity.

https://youtu.be/T9ACeKSk8LA?t=6m46s

File: satellite_flock1b.jpg (89KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1024x681px

>>18638607

There aren't 250 billion satellites orbiting earth.

The ones in your picture are scaled the size of cities.

It's honestly difficult to tell which of you are trolling retards and which of you have no idea how big the earth actually is retards.

>>18638662
Which kind of satellites? If you mean natural satellites yea, I live basically in Bumfuck nowhere Nevada and our stars are clear as hell, I see bigger sattelites all the time if I look for them, if you mean manmade satellites no, I'm on the side of Spherefags but no one can see that, satellites are big, but not see-them-from-space big, you can't even see the Great Wall of China from space (And before you say you can, no that's a proven myth) much less a human satellite which basically looks like a smaller head of a rocket disregarding fuel storage which might take up a bit of space

>>18638679
>Scale that up by millions of lightyears
Those millions of light years exist only on paper and in _theoretical_ astrophysicists' brains.

Don't even act like you could comprehend what 50 light years even means, you would embarrass yourself.

File: BBC.jpg (32KB, 534x401px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 534x401px

>>18638683
>>18638683
Interesting that your counter example uses the vomit comet as an example of what hair should look like in space. By interesting I of course mean fucking retarded.
GEE WIZ SOME PEOPLE HAVE STRAIGHT HAIR AND OTHER PEOPLE HAVE CURLY HAIR?!
Hairspray makes your hair stiff as a board. Watch the video, her hair moves all over, especially on top; it bobs left and right as her head turns. If her relative gravity really changed because she's riding the vomit comet, that there would also be a noticeable shift in the position of her hair but it just keeps floating.
I really used to give people on /x/ too much credit. Half of you are in highschool and the other half is more autistic than they want to admit to themselves.

>>18638690
So is this a real photo of a sattelite?
On google images literally all pics of sattelites are cartoons

File: iridium_flare.jpg (62KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x533px

>>18638698

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare

http://www.heavens-above.com/IridiumFlares.aspx

>>18638714

Obviously it's a real photo of a satellite being deployed. Do you think it's another fake done in NASA's swimming pool, monkey?

>>18638707
>Watch the video, her hair moves all over,
you mean Katie's hair?
No, it doesn't, you're obviously stupid and should change your contact lens. Try some fisheye ones, it helps to see the earth's curvature

>>18638721
That pic screams CGI you stupid american.
I don't expect you to differentiate between cartoons and real photos, I know it's too much to ask.

File: school_cost.jpg (421KB, 1198x864px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1198x864px

>>18638734

How does it scream CGI?

You subhuman scum really should be removed from society. I honestly don't much care how at this point.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLOMolslC9Y

File: 1481990443805.jpg (9KB, 184x168px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 184x168px

>>18638727
We're watching the same video right? And somehow you don't see the way her hair moves from side to side when she looks left and right?
Oh , you're one of those people who will say whatever you have to say and believe whatever you have to believe in order to fit a theory you don't want to admit you're wrong about.
Why would they set up all of their laptops and things on the WALL of the vomit comet anyway? That would make the fake video much much harder to film. Also NASA would have to be moronic to not film it again if they made such an obvious mistake. None of what you're suggesting makes any sense. This is all to support your flat earth joke. It's got more holes in it than Swiss cheese. Part of growing up is admitting when your wrong. You could take a big first step today.

>>18638741
So...

We waste money on education, or let them be ignorant about magnets?

>>18638539
>>18638539
>>18638539
Anyone??? I would really like some help here.

File: public_education.png (286KB, 1595x1469px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1595x1469px

>>18638746

If these threads are any indicator, we'd be better off locking them up in rubber rooms or burying them.

They're already ignorant. Nothing on earth is going to change that.

It's well past time to cut our losses.

>>18638766
Well obviously, but they aren't particulary dumber than previous generations, maybe there's still hope for some of them.

What about Astronomy Boot Camp?

Send them here and I'll make then camp in the desert until they under understand Pythagoras.

>>18638741
>Satellite Deployment: "Inertial Upper Stage"
loool, nice CGI m8
it seems all your globeheads' "evidence" for satellites is cartoons

>>18638779

Why bother?

Euthanize the retards and put the money toward people who can tie their own shoes.

These monkeys will be a drain on society forever. Coddling them helps no one. Not even them.

>>18638606
i merely pointed out panoramic shots, anon. never made claims one way or another.

>>18638597
that sure is a picture of an ice shelf.

File: Gall–Peters_projection_SW.jpg (723KB, 2058x1314px) Image search: [Google]

723KB, 2058x1314px

>>18637201
>>18637355

The problem here is not so much with our belief that the world is flat, but more that we're now not entirely sure exactly what it does in fact look like. This shouldn't be too hard to believe as it's no secret as it turns out that the Mercator projection that we all grew up with was horribly inaccurate, no matter what shape you think the Earth is.

There is plenty of evidence outside of flight routes that has convinced us entirely that the globe model we've been brought up to believe in is simply not true, couldn't possibly be true, and is just too ridiculous a notion to entertain anymore. Many of us feel the same way about hollow-earth and other such theories and all the evidence seems to point to us living on a flat plane as people have believed since time immemorial.

>>18637355

I have explained this one a number of times in my threads. The stars move in a 24 hour cycle which corresponds with the day/night cycle. It wouldn't make sense for Australia and South America to see the same stars at the same time on a flat earth or a globe. Think about it.

I'll have a new /fe/ General up in the next 12 hours if no one beats me to it first.

File: 1487217503580.png (868KB, 1169x6371px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 1169x6371px

>>18638788
Found the same shill from yesterday's thread.
You guys are soo easy to spot since you do your job by the book.

>>18638933

What are you talking about?

Flight routes are completely nonsensical on the flat earth model. They make perfect sense on a globe.

Australia and South America don't see the same stars at the same time. They see the same stars at different times since they're in completely different time zones.

>>18638766
>>18638779
>>18638788

Do you not understand how detrimental you are being to freedom and the health of our society? I see this shit constantly in these threads and it's just awful. Who decides what is right and what is so wrong that its believers should be rounded up and put to death? Would you like to take that mantle or are you happy just being a thug for some other dictator?

>>18638946

That's funny because they are one of the most common arguments for the flat earth. Look it up.

>Australia and South America don't see the same stars at the same time. They see the same stars at different times since they're in completely different time zones.

Yes. Exactly.

>>18638285
Due to perspective, north can see the middle circle of stars, the outer ring of stars is horizon line.
Due to perspective, south sees the outer ring of stars, converged, while middle circle of stars being the horizon line.


In reality theres no middle circle of stars nor outer ring of stars, they are not really "separated" in any way, it happens only due to the laws behind convergence and perspective.
This is just an example, in reality its slightly more complicated, but the same principle.

I hope that answers your question.

File: 1420337297433.jpg (27KB, 440x260px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 440x260px

>>18638949
Here's the thing, people who don't believe in science should be institutionalised.

>>18638938
DELET THIS NOW

>>18638949

There's a line and you monkeys are well beyond it.

Your retarded way of thinking is a far greater threat to society and freedom in the long run.

We let the progressive movement take hold and they butchered the 20th century. It's best to take care of these things early, before they get a chance to get out of hand.

The old saw about not agreeing with you but defending your right to say it is a suicide pact. We should learn from our mistakes.

>>18638952

And like every other argument for flat earth, they're completely retarded and easily dis-proven.

File: 1487264386809.jpg (59KB, 1024x449px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1024x449px

>>18638428
Even your image has a curve though, look how the line of the horizon compares to an actual straight line..

>>18638978
So do you honestly see a curve there?
The globe conditioning is strong with you

>>18638978
Looks too hazy to tell. Also that's a very limited field of view.

File: inbred-brothers5[1].png (132KB, 302x296px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 302x296px

>>18637739
10/10 bait

>>18638989
>>18638984
It's not a big curve due to the limited fov of the image but I think there's a fairly noticeable difference if you compare how the haze overlaps the straight line at the centre vs at either side, the right side especially obviously.

>>18638966
>Due to perspective, north can see the middle circle of stars, the outer ring of stars is horizon line.
But why don't we get the anti-rotation illusion? When we get the anti-crepuscular ray illusion, we see two focal points in the same horizon. I'm just not getting this, I'm very sorry.

>In reality theres no middle circle of stars nor outer ring of stars, they are not really "separated" in any way
Can you try to draw this? Or find an image? I don't understand why you say I see a ring and circle, then say they is no ring or circle.

>>18639000
>I think there's a fairly noticeable difference if you compare how the haze overlaps the straight line
Lol, no, you're just being delusional
This is what "science" does to people

What's the motivation behind flat earth theories? What makes people even think to look into that?

Like I get why people think the moon landing was fake, it would make sense for the government to want to fake that, and they made a big show of it, and their show was kind of off.

But flat earth? Why would two thousand year old scientists suddenly make up shit about the earth being round? Even if you find some sort of alternative scientific explanation for the Earth's shape and what-not, what's wrong with the standard one? It works, doesn't it? Is there some gaping flaw in the physics we've been using for like 400 years now

File: 1485907549816.jpg (164KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 800x800px

>>18637395
>The proportions in these maps are also ridiculous
I would tend to agree that the azimuthal projection is probably not accurate, mostly because of accounts from Australian truckers (and flat earthers) who claim reported distance do not match their own real life experience. We don't know have a definitive map as of yet, real map could be closer to pic related for what we know.

File: azw5fFV.png (34KB, 400x550px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 400x550px

So do people genuinely believe the earth is flat? I've heard of flat earth theorists but I thought it was just some inside-prank or people being ironic.

>>18639075
>What's the motivation behind flat earth theories?
The greatest of all, finding the Truth.

>>18639075
Well anon, once you learn that some conspiracies are true, you start believing almost anything you see on youtube.

>>18639088
My dad and sister are both flat earthers. They're both intelligent and successful people, just never cared to learn much about science.

>>18639089
I totally understand trying to find the truth and I have no bias against conspiracy theories or esoteric beliefs. But again, what's the impetus? What's the thing that made people question the science explaining the earth? Some flaw, some reason that the earth's shape might be a deception?

>>18639098
If you look up conspiracy videos on youtube, they suggest flat earth videos to you. There is one guy who basically drives it.

>>18638523

>As described by the third of Newton's laws of motion of classical mechanics, all forces occur in pairs such that if one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object exerts an equal and opposite reaction force on the first

except in the masonic space (a vacuum), there is no second object and therefore no reaction force.
A reactor do not work without a reaction force.

>>18639095

>you start believing almost anything you see on youtube.

Literal fucking retards.

>>18639106
Nah they really are both successful and intelligent, just not informed on science and distrusting of authority. The guy who makes those videos is a scam artist, but he's pretty convincing if you don't have the information to disprove him.

>>18639098
>What's the thing that made people question the science explaining the earth?
It looks fishy and indeed it is. Modern sciences are a web of lies, snake oil.

>>18639119
but that's not an answer.

>>18638972
what you call science is nothing short of a cult and disgrace tison acts as a kind of preacher inside that cult.
There is some irony in your comment because there is no people more institutionalized than you. I'm assuming here that you ain't a shill but most people criticizing are actually fakes earning a living from lies.

>>18639133
Well that guy is just a clown. I'm telling you dude, it's one guy on youtube who really is driving this entire movement. His videos are the answer to your question.

>>18639139
lel

>>18639133
Yes that's a pretty good answer, people sense they are being cheated by their government, their mainstream media, their own education system and they start seeking answers.
Nobody who has put some thinking into the moon landings believe them but knowing that they lied about the moon landings and how they managed to do it is not enough, the next question is why

>>18639119
Why does it look fishy? That's what I'm asking.

>>18639160
But wasn't the idea of earth being a sphere solidified long before the US gov?

>>18639160
>people on 4chan think they've discovered that the moon landing is a hoax
>none of America's rival states have ever claimed it to be bullshit

We landed on the moon fuckboys. It just takes a big rocket and intense math.

>>18639005
Because the stars rotate anti-clockwise around a fixed point you see the anti clockwise rotation of the sky in north.
Sun isnt a fixed point, its same as any other star other than pole stars. It doesnt rotate on the same scale, as far as I know thats why its rays are not moving the same way.
The sun appears to do a circle around the horizon for both north and south "poles" in north because it moves around it, in south because of convergence and perspective.

I dont understand what exactly you dont understand.. the north star trail is not an illusion of convergence and perspective at its center, South star trail is.

>I don't understand why you say I see a ring and circle, then say they is no ring or circle.

1.Draw a huge circle of stars
2.Draw a dot(Polaris) close to center point of the circle.
3.Draw an illusionary dividing circle(line) in the middle of the big circles radius.
4. Start rotating the circle anti-clockwise.

From north pole: Inner circle is the visible north stars trail, outer circle/ring.

5. Draw another circle, this time converge outer circle into where the inner circle is and expand inner circle into where the outer circle/ring is. (In other words flip it by the middle line)
Keep spinning it the same way.
During night time, anywhere south you will see the flipped new inner circle spinning clockwise. The new outer ring(former inner circle) is shrinked into horizon line.

The middle separating line is the Equator.

Pic related:
All of this is 1 big circle, north(the circle on the right) being the center of it, while the left(south) being the outer circle/ring of it.

>>18639169
The Earth being a sphere was solidified literally in ancient times.

>>18639177
>>18639005
Forgot the pic, this pic here: >>18637540

>>18637201

>tfw spherefags can't show the earth is round without refering to logical reasoning, manipulated photos/CG and "common sense"

You literally have nothing. Go outside and look, you'll see that the earth is flat. All your arguments are based on things that you can't see.

What else is it that you atheists usually deny because you can't see it?

>God isn't real, hell isn't real etc etc, show me proof

Weird how that logic works out for you

>>18639174
>It just takes a big rocket and intense math.

...and Stanley Kubrick

>>18639192
I can't tell if this is satire or not

>>18639192
Is this bait?

>>18639177
Thank you for replying, but I need to go to work now. If you have time, can you make this drawing for me? I would be VERY appreciative. I'm trying to understand but it just doesn't make sense to me.

>It doesnt rotate on the same scale, as far as I know thats why its rays are not moving the same way.
Wait, the sun rotates? I thought it orbits. Doesn't it go along a track center on the Pole Star? And I guess the rays are the part I don't get.

In that video I watched there is footage of the sun on one side of the horizon, and the illusion of a focal point on the other side. Now that horizon has to be less than 200 miles, don't you agree? So why does the anti-rotation illusion cover 12,000 miles and not the same distance if it's being produced by the same perspective?

>>18639190
OK, but that's only at the equator. Why don't we see this everywhere? I hope the thread is still up tonight so you can explain it.

>>18639201

It's just pointing out how in all other areas you wan't to be able to see that something is real and won't accept the arguments for religious truths
>because you can't prove them
but when it comes to the sphere earth theory you just accept it based on some reasoning or maths without asking for actual proof that you can see yourself.

Makes me think sphere earthers are pretty dumb.

So why do far away things in the ocean appear to sink below the horizon

File: fx-AS17-151-23201HR.jpg (1MB, 2363x2400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2363x2400px

>>18639174
No you didn't, nothing material can reach the sky.

.
>>18638396
>>18638581
>>18638602
>>18638595

nothing go past the first 70 miles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXNmj-JmrR8

>>18639215
>nothing material can reach the sky

what did he mean by this?

>>18639199
ice cream ice cream, mandrake, children's ice cream!

File: procyon.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18639235
that what you see in the sky are no giant balls of matter just waiting to be mined. You have been trained to believe this thanks to your education system and Hollywood.

>>18639227
>rocket runs out of fuel at a high altitude
>this somehow means space isn't real

Oh my fucking god

>>18639245
You know that you can look at planets with a basic telescope and tell that they're spheres by their appearance, right?

>>18638399
>>18638406
>>18638408
>what is fractal self similarity

>>18639253

They prefer out of focus cell phone videos.

>>18638741
so... your chart means to show inflation?

>>18639260
What was he trying to convey with his out of focus star webm?

>>18639253
>>18639260
When out of focus, you can make stars look like small dots of light.
Procyon as seen here >>18639245 is very detailed and the image is quite contrasted. This is inconsistent with an out-of-focus image.

>>18639265

It's sort of like virtue signalling, but for retards.

It's just a symptom of his mental illness.

>>18639098
First of all, there are no real photos of earth from space, all are composite or CG, and NASA admits it.
This is unacceptable if you believe there are a few thousands sattelites orbiting earth.

Second, there is no noticeable curvature, except for go pro fisheye lens footage, and of course, Nasa footage.

Third, the moon landings happened in a movie studio, the photos speak for themselves.

If NASA lied about the moon landings, what else they have been lying about?
Can we entrust them with anythingat all?

>>18639270
It is not very detailed, you can't see stars with any detail with a light telescope. Holy shit please educate yourself.

>>18639248
>rocket runs out of fuel
Rocket immediately stops spinning and altimeter shows it actually starts falling right away.
There is no deceleration phase as if the rocket had no initial speed.
Rocket emits a loud sound when it runs out of fuel (it was totally not the sound of the rocket hitting something)

balltards and logic

File: 1468538719817.gif (237KB, 276x268px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 276x268px

>>18639282
I like how you just state outright that the entire bank of astronomical scientific knowledge is false.

You know, just for a laugh, I would entertain an idea of a flat earth as a thought experiment if the evidence had even the smallest bit of scientific rigor.

Instead, every argument has to mention the fact that people who don't buy your logic have been indoctrinated.

I can't even RP well anymore. Fuck /x/, and fuck you.

>>18639213
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzeUhc8xQ3U

>>18639257
You can call it whatever you want, reasonable people would call those a poor photoshop job.

>>18639295
>Rocket immediately stops spinning

They were fast forwarding until that point are you serious? I thought that was immediately apparent even to flat earthers that the ascent is ffwd to skip the time it takes to get that high.

If the rocket hit something going at that speed it would be destroyed and would immediately stop ascending.

File: NASA-bmarbleW.jpg (797KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 2048x2048px

>>18638406

>>18639295
>my proof of spacecrafts not working is a spacecraft not only working but then de-spinning and killing rotational velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZqbjQ9ASc8
Brilliant work

>>18639324
So NASA photoshopped together pictures of the Earth taken from space?

>>18639319
>They were fast forwarding until that point are you serious?
I'm 100% serious.
They fast forward to a few seconds before it hits the wall then they start a count down and it happens exactly as I described.

>>18639333
In your mind a fucking rocket hit a solid object going at mach 3 and did not get destroyed. You are a moron. Literally nothing that happened in that video should not happen considering how physics and reality actually works. You need to get a job.

>>18639332
>So NASA photoshopped together pictures of the Earth taken from space?
No their lazy artist actually discovered the joy of photosoph copy/pasta feature that day

>spacecraft
there is no space in this video.

File: China_fake_landing.jpg (245KB, 1053x580px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1053x580px

>>18639257
>fractal self similarity
You're a perfect example of pure globe conditioning.
You refuse to see what your eyes clearly detect in those pics of earth.

>>18639349
>hit a solid object
who said it is a solid object? you
In my opinion it was an electro magnetic force field.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzMQza8xZCc

>>18639357
That's a beautiful CG, just not live, and not streamed from space.

It's amazing how people skilled with photo-video editing/rendering are unable to see that the so called live stream from the ISS is nothing but cartoon animation

>>18639263
Or just population growth.

File: ISS - live2.webm (785KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 720x576px

>>18639357
NASA can't beat that

>>18639368

Prove it, you mentally ill retard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU

File: straightjacket2.jpg (12KB, 236x316px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 236x316px

>>18639380

You're literally complaining that CGI looks better than reality.

>>18639382
this.

>>18639382
is this guy from pizza Comet?

>>18639382
Haha, stay mad globetard.

What is there to prove? Wipe the foam off your mouth, breathe in and use you eyes.

>>18639386
No I was just highlighting the fact that Universal Studio produces better CGIs than NASA does.

these are RP threads, right?

>>18639394

You made a claim. Prove it.

File: amstronglie.png (1MB, 1233x964px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1233x964px

>I can't recall seeing any star from the lunar surface or at any point during the mission

>>18639405
I made an observation, not a claim.
In order to realise that iss stream is just CG, you have to use your own eyes.

Or you can choose not to, I don't really care.

>>18639420

And this is why you people are pathetic losers.

Baseless claims. No evidence.

Nothing but mental illness.

>>18639424
Lol, I bet you believe the dinosaurs from Jurassic Park were also real

>>18639427
you realize that the bottom image is light refracting through a camera lens, right?

hence the term "lens flare."

nah, you probably think you've uncovered a massive conspiracy.

>>18639431

You're projecting, retard.

File: tumblr_mfoh5nuRvB1rcrlqpo3_250.png (56KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 160x160px

>>18637201

Flat Earth Theory is the most retarded thing people ever come up with... its bullshit which can be disproven by 8 year olds.

>>18639420
this is making a claim.

please tell me whether or not these are RP threads i need to know.

File: 1486690185900.jpg (15KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 236x236px

>>18639437
Light refracting through a camera lens that runs behind the church and trees

Another glorious example of
balltards and logic

>>18639446
Are you stupid or simply unable to tell CG from real footage?

I genuinely pity you anon.

>flatfags still deflecting from OP scenario
hehe

>>18639468

From the retard who thinks space videos are fake because movie studio CGI looks better.

How do you even remember to breathe?

>>18639476
You're puting words into my mouth.
Bad shill, sit down and watch tv, you need to relax your brain a little.

>>18639482
not him but he wasn't advertising anything thus he is not a shill. you parroting fuck.

>>18639482

If you exercised your brain a bit, you wouldn't be a flat earther.

It's okay. Go watch another six hour flat earth video on youtube. Maybe it will help you forget about what a pathetic failure you are in real life. On the internet, at least, you get to be a special snowflake who is smarter than everyone.

>>18639380
Right, but NASA isn't in show biz. Let me know when Universal Pictures lands a real man on the real moon.

>>18639472
All OP does is present some arguments and some reasoning, there is nothing solid in there. Maps are made by humans, they can be drawn any way, just as how you think can be made any way, what you're taught in school can be anything.

Reality is what you can go out and observe yourself. Not a single person has replied to my posts whenever I point out these obvious things. It's all
>prove things based on the reasoning I presented to trap you in my limited logic where I will always deny everything that strays from what I believe
>and no, I won't go outside and make observations, in fact I'll tell you
>don't go out and look, you're too stupid to do that, read a book and don't think yourself

That last part was literally said to me by a sphere earther. This is how stupid they are.
"Read a book, don't observe reality"

File: 1486689526352.jpg (93KB, 960x637px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 960x637px

>>18639472
>>flatfags still deflecting from OP scenario
I wish I could answer OP but he failed to provide a source.
How can I be sure that flight from New York to China doesn't actually contain one or more stops? I can't
Also OP drew red lines on his map as an apparent depiction of actual flight paths but they were obviously pulled out his ass.
Well to sum up this was one very low quality bait and you should be happy that we are here despite all this.

>>18639485
He is unable to tell that the ISS live stream is CG, how can I argue with that?

Btw, the monkeys from the movie Dawn of the planet of the apes are totally real, only the speech is pasted on top since the chimps couldn't learn how to talk.

Prove me wrong faggot

>>18639472
moreover flight paths have proved the flat Earth so many times before that it's kind of pointless.

Six Commercial Airplane Emergency Landings That Prove The Earth Is Flat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQHM2PAhSdQ

File: straightjacket3.jpg (21KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x300px

>>18639502

>literally incapable of understanding that movies are fictional
>claims everything else is fictional too

>>18639502
If you're able to tell it's CG, why can't you provide proof?

>>18639502
A) Have you seen how shitty that CGI is?
B) And there has been two different movies so how do you know which is accurate and which is the fake one?

>>18639494
>"Read a book, don't observe reality"

Same here, i've had globeheads tell me "Why don't you read some Carl Sagan and Michio Kaku instead of bothering looking for things you couldn't understand"

One thing I learned in my years is to be very cautious around people who tell other people what they should and should not read/research/listen to.

>>18639502
literally has nothing to do with me calling you a parroting fuck for misusing 'shill'.

File: 111111111111111111111111.gif (881KB, 612x381px) Image search: [Google]

881KB, 612x381px

>>18639519
>literally incapable of understanding that NASA videos are fictional
>claims everybody else is an idiot

shilling for the ball

>>18639494
>accusing others of """limited logic"""
>while actively ignoring the existence of things outside direct observation
lol

>>18639495
>I do not know that fixed perspective makes the parallel rays appear larger and I think you can determine relative location in a 3rd plane via a 2d single frame of reference picture that is subject to a number of inconsistencies
double lol, what do Anticrepuscular rays say about the Sun's location, then?

>>18639529
Irrelevant as long as one of two is real
A: They photoshopped together pictures from space to make a fake one! There is no space!
B: The original pictures were from space, so even if it's been 'lied about', where did they get it from?
A:

>>18639534
>This is why I never read books
>that's how they get you

>>18639547
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-cEeJKiqDA

>>18639542
>>I do not know that fixed perspective makes the parallel rays appear larger
it's not about their size but their angle. nice try at deflecting agent spaceball-x3321

>and I think you can determine relative location in a 3rd plane via a 2d single frame
Agreed not the exact distance, but you can discard preposterous claims such as the official 93 million miles sun-earth figure because in such case, rays would be parallel.

The double lol is on you, ballshiller

>>18637513
kek

File: railroadtracks.jpg (162KB, 792x599px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 792x599px

>>18639564
>the rays would be parallel

And they are.

>>18639544
How does it feel to tell your supevisor that you once again failed to derail a Flat earth thread using his instructions?
Does he get angry and punish you physically?

>>18639554
How do you know this is Antarctica and not somewhere in Greenland?
>inb4 the title of the video says it's Antarctica
This is how you gullible simpletons are deceived

>>18639554
>I totally trust that mason working at McMurdo Station, he wouldn't fake a video.

This was filmed December 7th-12th, 2016.
Notice how at no point in the past, say, at any point in the past 60 years, nobody thought that would be a great idea to film the 24 hours Sun light in Antarctica during christmas?
The thing is this video is a fake, it was made 2 month ago because the size of flat earth movement is probably starting to worry some big fishes.

>>18639539

You could go to a rocket launch. They're open to the public.

Oh wait, you'd have to leave the basement.

>>18639601
>You could go to a rocket launch.
LOL
>>18638422
we know how and where they all finish
most often in the ocean but not always
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgh2199qpck

>>18639589
the people down there work hard in some of the harshest conditions on the planet. some even stay through winter. what the fuck do you do?

>>18639615
we don't live on a planet, a planet is a wandering star and we, we live on a realm.
Why should I take anything you say seriously if you really believe that?

File: Jupiter.jpg (17KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 640x480px

>>18639620

Planets aren't stars, retard.

>>18639620
no. a star is a star. a massive nuclear body that burns very bright. our planet is not that as none of us are on fire.

hopefully.

File: Sirius-star.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18639630
That's because a star is an orb of light, not a giant sphere of burning gas,
Here is Sirius

>>18639638
your sciences are shit. sorry kiddo but you have been deceived.
see
>>18639642
and
>>18639245
for real life stars.

>>18639642
do you know how radiation works even in its most rudimentary sense? sweet fuck i have to believe this is a joke.

>>18639642

>check out my shitty cellphone video

Get a better telescope, retard.

>>18639646
no, kiddo. the sciences are perfectly alright. except maybe psychology outside of neuro science.

>>18638423
>What is gravity?
>How can gas have mass and be affected by gravity?

>>18639589
>the size of flat earth movement is probably starting to worry some big fishes.

True, in november 2016 google deleted over 3 million "flat earth" results from Youtube (not the videos, just the search results)

Also, Obama mentioned Flat earth a few times lately, and we all know every single word he says is part of a script.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB8Ic8ken40

>>18637540
That's just a wide fov lens

>>18639650
What do _you_ know about "outer space" radiation, faggot?
Oh, just what ND Tyson told you.
Opinion irrelevant to the subject

>>18639665
>what is a magic force that you can't explain, measure, or replicate in a lab?

oceans stick on the ball but small birds can fly with minimal effort?
well, uh.. it's because..actually

>>18639587
How do you know there's 24 hours of light in Greenland?

Maybe the center of the flat earth is in Antarctica, and the north pole is the edge of the world.

>>18639758
>birds can fly with minimal effort

If it's so easy, why can't you do it?

>>18639758
Force of gravity on the oceans = 1.5 quintillion tons.

Force of gravity on a typical bird = 0.1 lbs.

Hmm, I wonder.

>>18639742
you're the one that brought tyson up, famicom, not me. nor did i call you a faggot. tell you what, go grab a neon green defense light and shine it in your eyes. or, build a microwave emitter and point it at whatever device you're using to post from.

>>18639642
You forgot to focus.

>>18639105
Bullshit.
The fuel is being expelled with force in one direction. The ship therefor MUST experience equal and opposite force. Yes, even in a vacuum. The myth busters cracked this one. Honestly just think about it, it's not illogical.
If you stand on ice skates and throw a medicine ball, you move backwards. Physics are still physics in space

>>18639801
>I pulled those numbers out of my ass and they are true!
Sorry little man, the so called gravity should pull everything down with the same force regardless of mass, so a bird couldn't ever fly

>>18639781
>He never took mescaline

>>18639463
So glass is the only substance that can cause light to refract like that? That can't be done with gasses?

>>18638683
>This ugly guy

Yeah no.

>>18639874
Ok so you admit what is already very obvious, that in all ISS footage the whores are using hairspray.
Their hair is clearly too rigid, it doesn't float in all directions like we see with the blonde girl on the vomit comet.

>>18638399
This is just silly. They look identical at a glance, but look closer and identify specific features and you'll see that it's not.

>>18638388
>what are wide angle lenses
derp

>>18638418
lol, moron. Half of those dont even pretend to be real images. I am sure you even packed the universal logo in there. Your parents are ashamed of you, your friends hate you. kill yourself

What about these?
>>18638406
>>18638408
Would you mistrust your eyes and claim these cloud formations are not literally identical?
Do you agree it would have been highly improbable for them to naturally occur?

You don't need to answer, just be honest with yourself man.
Do your own research, don't let other people tell you what to believe, or what you should and should not look into.

Flat earth is the ultimate pandora's box.
You can choose not to open it, but if you do I promise you won't go back to the globe.

Peace!

>>18639845
>the so called gravity should pull everything down with the same force regardless of mass
well, kind of, yes
>so a bird couldn't ever fly
what? complete non sequitur

>>18639936
Please post some real photos of earth from space.
Protip: I checked the first 7 pages of google image results, and all are composites and/or photoshopped.