Moon General v.2

inb4 argument watch this please
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs

Hologram tho? Why.

>>18636387
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/607938/WATCH-Lunar-wave-which-cameraman-claims-proves-Moon-is-actually-a-HOLOGRAM

Why is the earth 'flat'? There's never a reason why

>>18636397
Nobody chose to make it spherical or flat. Why would the moon be a hologram?

File: moon_and_earth_lroearthrise_frame_0.jpg (373KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1920x1080px

This is Earthrise, nasa's iconic photo taken from the surface of the moon.

>>18636397
>even the tabloids mock you and call you crazy

That's got to sting.

File: earthmoon.png (365KB, 650x460px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 650x460px

>>18636412
This is a size comparison between the two bodies.

>>18636416
Yes. That's the actual relative size comparison.

In

>>18636412

the moon only looks bigger because it's much, much closer to the camera. This is called "perspective."

File: 7147487483_d1d224bd37.jpg (41KB, 500x364px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x364px

>>18636412 #
>>18636416 (You) #
However, THIS is a photo of the moon from the surface of the earth.

They appear to be the same size. But we are told that the earth is many, many times larger than the moon.

So how can they both be the same apparent size?

>>18636406
Why would the government want to keep us from knowing the true shape of the earth? Nobody knows.....

>>18636412
>>18636416
Basic explanation guys
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloEarth/ApolloEarth.HTM

>>18636425
>they appear to be the same size

How can you tell? Those are two different photos.

File: 173222545.jpg (37KB, 515x333px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 515x333px

>>18636421
This is another photo of the moon.

>>18636420
Forced perspective. Check it out, they can do some neat shit. Some people pretend to be holding up the Eiffel tower with a single hand

>>18636427
Go outside and look at the moon.

It's no bigger than the one of the supposed earth from the moon.

Nasa goofed so bad with this Earthrise nonsense

>>18636428
Yes. So what?

Unless they're in the same photo, you can't tell which one looks bigger or which one looks smaller.

File: 5367751791_26635c1b18_z.jpg (60KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 640x426px

>>18636428
yeah and so is this

>>18636431
>two objects of different size
>appear the same size from the same distance

No

>>18636432
>go look at the moon it's not bigger than the earth

Indeed, the moon from the earth is a lot smaller than the earth from the moon.

>>18636437
Do you know how photography works?

>>18636436
We all know the moon waxes and wanes

That's not the point at all.

The point is the Earth should be much, much larger when seen from the surface of the earth.

File: WrongChairs.jpg (42KB, 614x461px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 614x461px

>>18636426
>http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloEarth/ApolloEarth.HTM

That actually makes sense
>same size chair

>>18636440
You're not seeing what is right in front if your face

File: TooSmallEarth.jpg (73KB, 543x545px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 543x545px

>>18636443
Why would it be? The astronauts obviously saw it much bigger than the camera captured it in say this photo- but thats about perspective and the camera lens not about the relative distance

>>18636446
You're talking about different distances and same sizes.

My point is the opposite

File: MOONS.png (168KB, 1071x659px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1071x659px

>this thread and the last

>>18636454
If the chair was larger in the back, but farther away it would look smaller. Basic physics

>>18636452
You really can't accept the fact that we never went and got shown a movie instead.

It's okay, this is big stuff

>>18636460
>A wild tangent appears

>>18636459
The moon and the earth are the same distance

And yet look the same size in photos.

>>18636458
Basically

>>18636460
I would if anyone gave me any even remotely accurate examples of how we could have filmed it, but they can't, because its not true. I understand 'fighting the power' is something you still want to do- but just take the loss and move on.

>>18636462
If they had to fake the Earthrise photo, and they did fake it, then we never went to the moon.

That lied to us

>>18636463
>>18636463
Not all cameras are created equal, and not all perspectives are equal.

>>18636463
>And yet look the same size in photos.
This is the dumbest fucking statement I have ever seen on /x/.

Their sizes change in every photo depending on the camera.

Believing the moon is real in 2017. ISHYG.....

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

>>18636464
There are actually tons of videos explaining how nasa made a movie.

We even have moonsets and full scale models that were commissioned by nasa....

>>18636465
Why do you neglect basic facts?

If you guys have questions see if they have already been asked http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm

>>18636468
The Earth is huge compared to the moon. Massive.

It would be very prominent in the moon sky.

Insult me all you like that doesn't change the truth of what I say.

>>18636471
>have moonsets and full scale models that were commissioned by nasa....

But do you have any proof, and on top of that do you know how hard it would be to slow down the footage, watch the video in OP and check this link >>18636476

>>18636479
You're right, his insults will never change how retarded your statement is

>still not understanding photography

>>18636471
The height of the cold war, nobody called bullshit but some guys decades later on a Cambodian basket weaving board and YouTubers.

>>18636483
>two objects the same distance apart
>and of very different sizes
>must appear the same size
>YOU FUCKING RETARD!!!!!!!

O I am laffin!

>>18636484 this
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs this

and

http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/ApolloEarth/ApolloEarth.HTM this

should explain everything, if you guys are still skeptical, seek help. Now I'm not saying we went to the moon and had 2 men walk on it and capture photos, but I am saying it was impossible to fake it.

>>18636489
It's right in front of your eyes.

I guess what they say is true. You can lead a horse to water....

>>18636490
>distance apart
>>and of very different sizes
>>must appear the same size
>>YOU FUCKING RETARD!!!!!!!

Thats not what anyone is saying, you fucking retard.

>>18636491
Youtube vids and fake news dont count as sources. NEXT!

>>18636491
>impossible to fake it

And yet they did.

>>18636491
>>18636497
HAHAHA 'FAKE NEWS'- you obviously have some mental disability. Don't you have to be at least 13 to use 4chan

>>18636496
And he they appear the same size according to nasa's Earthrise photo....

It's so obvious

>>18636498
Do you understand what impossible means?

This Thread

>Here are facts done by independent researchers and scientists that not only back up the facts given by NASA but present even more arguments that it was impossible to fake the moon landing with the technology available at the time

the other side

>BUT LOOK THE EARTH IS SMALL IN THIS PHOTO YOU FUCKING RETARD GET FUCKED UPEN YOUR EYES NIGGGA

yeah I'm done with this

>>18636493
But can't force him to drink the koolaid

>>18636499
Oh so sketchy websites are ok when globies use them?

File: FullMoon2010.jpg (2MB, 2580x2452px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2580x2452px

>>18636509
this, not everyone is always out to get you guys come on. Wake up and realize other shit is more important. Im out

>>18636514
>>18636509
These two cannot possibly comprehend a government that would lie to it's people.

Even with photo evidence they can't believe a government would lie.

>>18636509
Also, what was IMPOSSIBLE was sending humans through the Van Allen belt.

Not once but twice.

>>18636525
>These two cannot possibly comprehend a government that would lie to it's people.

They're literally saying the government lies to you about important shit why waste time on this and you respond with

>Even with photo evidence they can't believe a government would lie.

When there is no photo evidence of the moon landing being faked just you trying to debate physics. Look at the links here >>18636491
and educate yourself

File: 10000namesDiana.jpg (36KB, 736x854px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 736x854px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbWhBlQDJ4

"Hey guys, let's dis the Moon. Don't be superstitious; what's the worst that can happen? "

>>18636412
>taken from the surface of the moon
Mmm no, nobody ever set oot on the moon

>>18636525
How could half a million nasa employees all lie?

>>18636532
>two objects of wildly different sizes appear the same size in photographs

Literally your argument. The Earth dwarfs the moon.

All I am saying is that this size difference is NOT represented in nasa photos.

You think it is though. You look at Earthrise and you say it looks kosher.

File: hanks_apollo_symbol.gif (41KB, 450x221px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 450x221px

>>18636536

"Houston, we have a problem," said actor Tom Hanks in the docudrama hit movie, Apollo 13. Indeed, they did. The Apollo 13 spacecraft was launched at exactly 13:13 military time, a bewitching moment. The official Apollo 13 emblem depicted the chariot and horses"

>>18636538
What is compartmentilazation?

They weren't all in on it.

>the bigger the lie the more likely you are to beleive it

>>18636540
But how do you know how earth is supposed to look like from space? Youve never been to space and everyone who has says thats>>18636412
how it looks

>>18636546
So they thought they were actually going to the moon?

>>18636548
Okay fine.

You actually believe that two objects if very different sizes look the same from the same distance.

Fine. I don't believe that. I actually believe that a larger object looks lager.

File: OWaUVX6.gif (2MB, 580x433px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 580x433px

>>18636446
>angelfire

>>18636551
So you admit to being wrong?

>>18636557
I am admitting that you think that if you went to the Sun and took a picture of the Earth that it would look just like the sun does from Earth.

>>18636551
Its not the exact same distance.

>>18636563
But the earth looks bigger than the moon in the all the pictures you provided.

File: Quot+sjw+s+have+a+valid+point+quot+_720109d5e17c0cb54271132507ad0300.jpg (7KB, 229x220px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 229x220px

>>18636564
>the distance to the earth from the moon
>is different than the distance from the moon to the earth

>>18636570

You really think that. Amazing

>>18636412
>>18636425

>>18636576
>the surface of the moon and earth are smooth and orbits dont exist

>>18636577
I told you in the last thread that moonpic was taken with a telephoto lens while the earthpic wasnt. Why is photography such a difficult concept for you?

>>18636583
Oh right, your opinion is that nasa chose to distort the size of the earth to be much smaller in their seminal Earthrise photo.

That's what you actually think

>>18636584
>chose
They didnt. You have to follow the laws of physics whether you understand them or not.

>>18636591
Oh right, you think that all cameras in the world show the earth to be moonsized so nasa had no choice.

File: veiledIsIs.jpg (375KB, 1215x717px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1215x717px

>>18636591

Anon; how can you tell if the "Laws" of Physics are being violated if you can't monitor them below a macroscopic level; if a few molecules go this way, instead of that way, as a result of.... "chaos" how would you never be able to prove it?

Also how can you tell what the "Laws" of physics are, and are not, if you're not omniscient.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-mpifTiPV4

Why do we always see the same side of the moon at night

>>18636452
Muh stars.