Understanding that Brahmacharya does not facilitate giving into any sort of carnal desire or pleasure, how big of a difference in progress would there be between Brahmacharya and Tantric sex where someone doesn't cum?
My idea right now is to keep my mind completely pure and in Brahmacharya indefinitely, but if I end up with a woman (until I marry) I would try tantric sex. Hard and fast rule: If I cum, I don't touch a girl for at least a month. If I can hold it in and succesfully tantra, I fuck when it happens and don't actively avoid girls.
Is this viable at all? Am I vastly slowing myself down by allowing any sort of sex at all?
No "sex is not bad" or "not cumming causes prostate cancer" posts please, I'm not interested and won't read them
I'm including intra-jaculation in this as well btw. So orgasm without spilling seed - is that equivilant to holding it in normally and not exiting it at all?
Brahmacharya is for the most hardworking, legitimate practitioner. Tantra is like a watered down version of practice for normies that can't even give up their carnal desires (which is pretty much the first step on the ladder to moksha, which says a lot). "Using desire to extinguish desire" is a meme created by tantric hedonists as a sad attempt at trying to not get fully discredited as memelords, and it makes no sense. Do you extinguish a fire with fire?
>>18620880
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlSYSZP0NLw
watch this.
>>18620880
>>18623305
You can limit its path by burning a circle around it, thusly removing fuel from its path.