Is Julian Assange dead?

>>18604896
CIA probably silenced him and Now they have created a new Assange in the life simulation to keep their secrets out of the general public's knowledge. Of course, they leave a little mistake like that to engage those who are more enlightened than most, so that they can know on whom to keep a greater watch

>>18604896
da fuck is this image

>>18604896
What the fuggg
CGI?

no you fucking niggers whoever did the editing for this was lazy as fuck and merged different takes or cut out pauses or extra footage

RT purchased the interview footage and inserted a couple morph cuts. Assange is being systematically handed to the US.

Daily reminder Assange has been compromised ages ago when he stopped pgp-signing his messages.

>>18604966
Mid-speech?

>>18604994
That's the illusion it's meant to give, yeah. They use it to remove odd pauses and ums and shut.

>>18605056
If this were the case, more of the image would have done this you idiot CIA shill

>>18605056
Can you show me another example of this technology? I don't doubt you, I'm curious.

video link?

File: omg not this shit again rdj.jpg (128KB, 454x418px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 454x418px

>>18604896

Remember when they cut his Internet off. The wikileaks staff was whining about that all the time.Imagne if he is to dessapear somewhere they will whine three times more.Moreover if he has a family and stuff, they will be concerned and go to the media...so he is definitely alive

File: url.jpg (11KB, 229x221px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 229x221px

>>18604896
>Adobe after effects
>Warp tool
Are the CIA even trying?

Who the fuck cares he didn't do anything but make a bunch of kids mad at their big bad brother government. And he thought nigger Obama wouldn't have the balls to let that transgender monstrosity free... dumbass hung himself with his own tongue.

If they replaced his face this might be what they did.,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk

>>18605064
Yeah, great product for Adobe, one where instead of a barely noticeable little ripple on a collar it should instead cause everything to ripple about.

And of course to top it off you're claiming it's really because he's a CGI model or they've put someone else's face on his head or something else that makes way less sense.

>>18605090
This is the earliest use of such technology that I know of
https://youtu.be/vkxrVpzPK4U

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_(1974_film)

So it was developed as a way to fill in frames in animations. It was then used as a way to compress video streams and files. Adobe have developed it so that you can make a cut without it being obvious with a heavy weight on not messing up the face (it only does it if it can detect a face otherwose it throws an error).

>>18605200
>dumbass hung himself with his own tongue.
Did he? That's got to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, and at least the other one's getting released now.

It just makes the US government look so weak when they're going "b-but you PROMISED us Assange".

>>18605090
if you do a camera pan on someones face
you can create a 3D rendering of it with 2 programs .
you could then texture the skin etc. if you get enough well lit shots of someone talking you can map how they speak.

look at the characters in rogue one. they looked real.

anything is plausible now but to prove it's digital you'd need the original video.

>>18605495
>>18605406
>>18605154
>>18605094
>>18605090
Its likely THIS guys
}
>>18605394

>>18605495
>look at the characters in rogue one. they looked real.
Confirmed for not having seen Rogue One.

After the moira IoT DDoS attacks, people were trying to track him, as they thought he got taken from the embassy.

It ended with people pointing to a flight ID linking a GSK owned plane flying from London to North Carolina where an alleged CIA black site is located. However, no one was able to verify the source of the plane ID, so it was likely misinformation. So at this point, who knows where Assange is.

I do know that there is tech that can spoof a person both in visual and audio presentation. I mean full on body, motion, voice looking like a normal recording. I remember seeing a normiebook video about it way back when. Some university grad students came up with it and made Obama say whatever they wanted. I haven't been able to find reference to that tech again sadly. It was likely scrubbed from the net. But it absolutely exists. So who knows man, who fucking knows at this point. I want to get off Mr. Assange's Wild Ride.

>>18605056
The transition is too smooth, i also thought about that when i first saw it, but no, it's not that.

>>18605684
>It ended with people pointing to a flight ID linking a GSK owned plane flying from London to North Carolina where an alleged CIA black site is located. However, no one was able to verify the source of the plane ID, so it was likely misinformation. So at this point, who knows where Assange is.
They happen so regularly that no real significance could be attached to one anyway, so even if it could be proven it wouldn't make any difference.

What I suspect happened was strong arm tactics began tipping the balance against Assange, so stage 1 of the switch was released. This had shit on Ecuador so they are now forced to look after him lest the next stages reveal this information to more parties. Remember that Assange's big breakthroughs were on things like rubberhose protection where you avoid nasty things like torture and death through subterfuge. This sort of levelled system is exactly his sort of thing.

Since that didn't work they've now tried to just plain discredit him. So we get all this misinfo shit so many people are on some level doubting that he isn't compromised.

The sad thing is wikileaks was compromised but just through seizing of material, so they lost a bunch of leaked videos and such. The thing I would look for in the case of Assange being successfully neutralized is the levels of armed presence outside the embassy. If it decreases fairly suddenly and doesn't cone back up again without obvious reasons then he's being fucked.

>>18605725
There's also the issue of status verification. You used to be able to call the embassy and they would confirm his status as safe and alive. After the moira incident, they would no longer answer questions. I don't know if that's changed but the fact that they suddenly stopped answering questions like that is a red flag. Occam's razor, etc.

>>18605738
The relationship between themselves and Assange changed. Before Assange was a publicity "look at how we are moral crusaders against the much bigger imperialists" type deal. They wanted him there. Then the powers that be swayed them towards handing him in, probably starting with disconnecting his internet. This then led to the dead man's switch being activated that threatened Equador so they are under duress rather than wanting him there.

I imagine misinformation shills are tending to stay fairly close to a truth, I expect details such as they were going to fly him out to the US were true for example. But the amount of resources they expect us to believe they're throwing at a total non-threat is ridiculous. Why would they even bother to fake a bunch of interviews using highly sophisticated technology (which also apparently fails for a fraction of a second with suddenly no way to clean it up), again still having guards outside, compromising the rest of wikileaks on several levels (the site itself, the social media, the people) and all sorts of crazy shit. Fact is most people wouldn't bat an eyelid if he did disappear overnight, they just don't care all that much.

Check this guy out for example
>>18605495
we are apparently to believe that they are using techniques better than multi-billion dollar company Pixar use on a multi million budget film (Rogue One was 200M and if you missed seeing the movie the CGI actors were noticeable as fuck and p bad). And just so what? A handful of people out some governments for doing something bad? It just doesn't make sense.

>>18605873
If you have a guy that looks fairly similar, and CGI over him, it's a lot easier than making it from scratch.

Regardless I don't think the interviews are faked, my main issue it's how wikilieaks has been portrayed.

How the current democrats narrative (not the left, the left it's another thing completely) have pushed this idea of wikileaks being compromised and under the CIA, FBI or KGB control, to rest credit to their leaks, that, without a doubt costed them the election, so it's reasonable that they throw everything in their power to stop them.

My personal problem with the situation, it's how we aren't pushing to make Trump pardon him.

He handed the election to him in silver wear.

We are the ones that should be pushing for that and instead we waste our time in petty arguments, while the guy doesn't even have internet and has to rely on his saved porn.

It's a disgrace, shame on you all.

>>18605889
>My personal problem with the situation, it's how we aren't pushing to make Trump pardon him.
>He handed the election to him in silver wear.
>We are the ones that should be pushing for that and instead we waste our time in petty arguments, while the guy doesn't even have internet and has to rely on his saved porn.
>It's a disgrace, shame on you all.
Agreed. The guy's a hero, and he's definitely not in a good situation right now. And wikileaks is the true 5th Estate atm, most of the rest of the media cannot and have not held any government to account in the west.

>>18605914
Now we are two.

What do we do?

>>18604896
The thing is none of you actually watch what has been edited before jumping to conclusions. It's obvious that Assange's statement has been clipped to make it more damning than when he originally said it as a political move and the morphing glitches are a byproduct of that.

Anyone who thinks this is CGI has absolutely no knowledge of how CGI works, as the creators would have total control over the models and such 2D mistakes would not occur. This is definitely caused by wanting to merge two statements in to one to create a singular message.

>>18605935
this makes a hell of a lot more sense

>>18605921
I feel there's only a couple of things I can do and mostly that's just keeping an eye out for odd bits of news and postings that make no sense.

>>18604896
Where is the original video

Ju lion a star angle

>>18604896
as far as r/WhereIsAssange/ he is not.

>>18606418
Have you seen the anonscan tweets? Are you ready for a nice game of chess?

>>18604896
Dead thread

>>18608818
Dead as Assange

>>18608880
So he is alive then? Kek

>>18608884
Probably in a medically induced coma until the CIA is positive they have deactivated his deadmans switch

>>18608884
no obama had assanfe killed thinking hillary need the help. hillary didnt want him killed just locked up or detained so he couldnt say anything . she didnt want his insurance policy getting out

when his insurance files started to pour out of the server in the philipines through the routing server in ecuador they threatened ecuador and they cut the feed then replaced the files with fake ones after the election

OP's gif is proof they used digital editing to more spliced clips of assange together to make a fake live appearance because it would be lethal to the liberals agenda if they get caught assassinating any one

>>18605935
>>18608903
What was that movie where they edited an audio clip together to make a fake news thing of the President (who was I seem to remember meant to be like Bill Clinton)? It was a 90s thing, I think mid-90s because I have a vague memory of it being called prescient at one point with the Monica Lewinski thing.

>>18609223
I seem to remember something like that bing described in the snowden leaks as well. that magazine that "sold" hacking tools and "implants" and the spook services. something like they only needed on average like 3 sentences and they could make you say anything. fuck, especially if it was cell phone quality and not HD video/audio

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk

>>18609223
Primary Colors, starring John Travolta.

>>18604896
that actually looks like 3d bug, so yes probably hes been dead for long time

>>18609782
Thanks! And holy shit it actually was about Bill Clinton's first Presidential campaign.

>>18609496
I was thinking that it wouldn't be the first time misinformation had been inspired by the movies (Chilcot and The Rock) but it's a bit weird when seen in light of recent events and the above.

Definitely rewatching it anyway.

File: wikileaks-did-911.jpg (49KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 800x600px

>>18604896
This is glitches are product of so called "morph cut" or "warp cut" in editing software.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLgsFifh54Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV4vBRbXD9g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6wPUtKg-Ac

WikiLeaks staff is so wide spread at this point that it is impossible to compromise entire organization without few members being able to report it to the public.

Here https://pad.riseup.net/p/ProofOfLife you have many of Julians interviews done on video or via phone and many known people claiming they have seen him in person. There is no way he has been taken away and replaced with actors.

>>18610563
>WikiLeaks staff is so wide spread at this point that it is impossible to compromise entire organization without few members being able to report it to the public.
Not only that, most of them are further embedded in other communities that have a vested interest in wikileaks not being compromised. See Applebaum.

File: C4JaF49XUAMiYhu.jpg (18KB, 593x394px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 593x394px

So what's this about?

File: blackrazor.jpg (177KB, 469x670px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 469x670px

>>18611001
Whiteman airforce base.

File: how-about-a-nice-games-of-chess-300x220.jpg (16KB, 300x220px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x220px

>>18611028
>Whiteman airforce base
>Why is Vault 7
>Why-teman
?
Anyway, so Vault 7 is something to do with that NICE GAME OF CHESS?

File: RENDITION 023_1327358881.jpg (292KB, 1484x989px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1484x989px

>>18611028
http://livingresistance.com/2016/10/25/breaking-help-tweeted-wikileaks-regarding-assange/

Smithfield’s dirty secret.

>>18604966
Video editor here. So for exactly what purpose would someone mask out and blend pieces of his shirt together? This is not just a video edit, this is an algorithm that has merged two pieces of video and has artifacted. Even if we're saying the editor used such a method to cut out a piece of dialogue that was unwanted, it's still pretty surprising to go to such lengths instead of just cutting it.

>>18611273
They cut back and forth to the interviewer a lot, and you'll hear he does umm and ahhh a lot in interviews (not massively surprising considering his situation). So they probably had to do some morph cuts to stop the assange-interviewer-assange edits from being jarring.

Also I would have said the radio interview he did that did have the ahhs still in sounded like it had been chopped together at points.

>>18611214
>Oct 18th: London Airport evacuated due to “chemical attack”, potentially used as cover to fly Assange out of country.
There would be no need to do this whatsoever. Not a personal message, but for everyone: you cannot sleepwalk through shit like this, there's way too much lazy information to lead you down the wrong path.

File: CyWLf5cUcAA8m1H.jpg large.jpg (120KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1024x575px

>>18611339
I posted that shit ironically. Iirc chemical attack on airport didnt even happen the same day that "witnesses saw black bagged person taken out of embassy".
There was some other shit where pople were following some vans on cctvs across london. Pic related.

But yeah its all LARPing of few faggots who made up that shit and then spam it on reddit and 4chan.

File: Screenshot_47.jpg (146KB, 533x872px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 533x872px

>>18611498

more nonsense:

https://web.archive.org/web/20170107091001/https://nationonenews.com/2016/10/17/breaking-julian-assange-in-the-custody-of-uk-officials-black-sack-over-his-head-as-taken-out-of-ecuadorian-embassy-d-notices-given-no-photos/

My point is that you need to recheck every article and source you find anywhere, today there is so many semi legit looking sites that post shitposting from reddit as news, and even most real news sites post made up shit that caters their readers preference
You need to fact check sources of information that seems fake according to your beliefs AND information that fits your agenda too. There are so many sites that publish tinfoil hat tier conspiracy theories as truth that has been covered up by conspirators. And then on top of that you have LARPEers who just troll with more or less convincing funfiction disguised as first person reports.

>>18605725
>GSK
Glaxo Smith Kline?

>>18609517
within the next 5 years you can bet some confession will be made using face2face and speech generated using neural nets.

decade or so ago this would have required a supercomputer. Now you could build a rig that does this well enough for about 10K

People think what we have now is fake news? hah just wait.

File: puppetpolitician.jpg (175KB, 463x665px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 463x665px

>>18611552
Trust only yourself.

File: C3-N_BxWEAAoS8u.jpg (44KB, 637x394px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 637x394px

>>18611565
I guess so? Dunno desu.

File: C4OoqRZWQAEA5EK.jpg large.jpg (164KB, 910x607px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 910x607px

>>18613251
May as well post the most recent pic
>When mailboxes were being observed by Stasi agents, every person posting a letter was photographed. Some films found in the Stasi archives also show persons dressed in civilian clothing emptying the mailbox after the conclusion of the surveillance action.

If anonscan know what's going on it could be a reference to google indexing literally everything. So because tech companies have tried to monitor everything, but have screwed up security, they have access to some part of the missing emails.