Flat Earthers BTFO

>>18602135
CGI fags BTFO ;)

That video it's so cool.

Almost cried.

Looks pretty flat to me at 2:22

File: goprolol.png (329KB, 1368x770px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1368x770px

Sorry bout that.

File: goprolol2.png (919KB, 1368x770px) Image search: [Google]

919KB, 1368x770px

Just how big is New Mexico supposed to be?

>1:00 mark
>rocket stops when it hits the firmament of the sky

Nice proof of flat earth

>>18602778
It has an internal mechanism to stop it spinning after a while.

t. Flat Earther.

>>18602135
why? the amateur rocket hitting the dome at 1:00 that proves the flat Earth or the shitty CGI running at ~1:40 or is it that fish eye lens effect at 1:30?
tell me more about that GTFO please.

>>18603015
This post really is the mindset of the average flattard in a nutshell.
When he thinks that something proves his view somehow (although it doesnt), it is proof. Yet, when the VERY SAME video disproves him, it is obviously CGI. Throw in some buzzword that doesnt change anything about the video (le fish lens!) and we have all the marks of extreme confirmation bias to the point of denying reality. I am glad this is only a troll thread, but those people really exist. fuck this gay earth

>>18603046
okay it was that shitty CGI then.
thanks for answering, balltard.

about that rocket hitting the dome, the real documentary can be watched here. There was no CGI and no fish eye lens in the real thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXNmj-JmrR8

>>18603046
Please explain
>>18602611
and
>>18602616
for me.

>>18603046
>This post really is the mindset of the average flattard in a nutshell.
The flatfags think that they have exclusive knowledge, that somehow they are part of some sort of selected group. Just like gnosticism and masons, all of them fools.

>>18603094
Sure buddy, just keep ad homineming entire groups of people you've never met.

>>18602801
No it doesn't have such mechanism
For one thing the project team never made any mention of it just shills and the rocket stop spinning and start falling immediately instead of decelerating.
You can even hear the sound of the impact.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXNmj-JmrR8

>>18603089
explain what exactly?

>>18603163
Jesus goddamn Christ. Why is space now a sphere? Why does New Mexico cover half of the Earth?

Fucking shills man. I swear to god you people are the worst.

>>18603071
See? Every video that is evidence against your case is magic cgi of course. every video you desperately try to present as evidence for your case is of course the real deal. No, if you can play the ignorant game, everyone can. If you deem fotographic evidence as irrelevant, dont present it yourself.
You dont actually care about real evidence. It becomes real as long as you can construct it as confirmation for the view you already hold. bad habit

>>18603173
>Why is space now a sphere?
What? I guess you are referring to the distortion caused by the wide angle lense. Do I really need to explain simple optics?

>Why does New Mexico cover half of the Earth?
But it doesnt. What are you on about? You cant even see half of the earth in that picture. That would be a whole hemisphere. You would have to be in a much higher orbit to see it that way.

Wow, seems like the questions you had were based on misconceptions and false expectations as always. Just like every other time a flatearther spotted a supposed "oddity". Please keep the buzzwords (you also dont know the meaning of) coming tho.

>people actually believe in the flat earth
>I share my round world with these people

God damn either /x/ is one big larp or people need to start dying.

>>18603191
I just proved your video is a forgery, a rip of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXNmj-JmrR8
with added sequences (fish eye lens/CGI) and notes to fit your narrative
Everyone can compare both videos in a matter of a few seconds and realize your bullshit, what's up with you it's like you aren't trying anymore?

File: Master_of_Orion_2_06-pc-games.jpg (101KB, 662x496px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 662x496px

Earth is flat you idiots. The Cherokee have spoken to the An'u'naaki: alien hyperlords dat still control earth through telekinetic abilities.

The An'u'naaki are from another dimension and earth is flat.

File: newmexico.png (50KB, 524x360px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 524x360px

>>18603216
>What? I guess you are referring to the distortion caused by the wide angle lense. Do I really need to explain simple optics?
from >>18603046
>Throw in some buzzword that doesnt change anything about the video (le fish lens!)

>>18603216
>You cant even see half of the earth in that picture.

You are so fucking retarded.

>>18603235
At this point I am just amazed by the mindset of you people. I have given up talking sense into you people a long time ago, dont bother. Partly because of reasons I stated above. It is also always the same. It already is again with you. Already having 2 different standards. Already referring to yt videos. Already accusing people of shilling.
It amazes me. really

>>18603260
wow. what a great counter argument. showing me the picture (I already saw) that completely underlines my statement and shows that it is correct. It also really seems like you are actually interested in having an intellectually honest discussion. What a good post my man

>>18603281
Stfu. You have no idea what it means to be a flat girl... Do you?!?

>>18603260
So what is it?
>fisheye lense/ cgi
>video accurately depicts proportions/curvature of the earth
Because you realize that it is only of these, right? It doesnt magically change depending on what you are trying to argue

>>18603290
You know I'm all about that bass. No treble

>>18603281
How big do you think New Mexico is?
>>18603293
I'm not the one posting this video as proof of the Earth's curvature.

Honestly, if you people aren't shills (and I know that you are) you are unforgivably dense.

Nice compilation of spacewalks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6IZUq6v92I#t=33

>>18603290
>>18603299
Shills flirting with each other.

It's funny, these people don't know how transparent their posts are. They don't understand that the history of 4chan is its own unique defense against newfaggery.

File: xra.png (1MB, 1454x836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1454x836px

>>18603302
>mfw no cute gril to take in a space walk

File: felix-baumgartner-red-bull-stratos_64243_600x450.jpg (301KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 600x450px

Again, how big is New Mexico?

>>18603301
>I'm not the one posting this video as proof of the Earth's curvature.
I thought the implication of your red circle here
>>18603260
was to show how big the earth would be if you extended the image. no?
I therefor wondered why you would be amazed at the distortion in one screencap and the go on to assume everything has the right proportions in the other one

File: AS11-40-5924HR.jpg (497KB, 2349x2373px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 2349x2373px

Zoom in to see the 1969 american engineering

File: yo5136f998.jpg (107KB, 661x414px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 661x414px

>>18603310
Why do all the space agencies in the world have the same star-trek vector in their logo? Is it a convoluted way to tell us that everything we see relating to space is a SCI-FI show?

>>18603325
Huh? These are UN related agencies, so I don't get the point

>>18603315
>>18603318
>>18603325
>>18603323
This literally gets explained to you every single thread. Every fucking time. But you keep posting it. Just the pic. That must mean you are trolling.

>>18603329
>>18603325
>>18603323
>>18603321
>>18603318
>>18603315
>>18603310
>>18603302

Thanks bro, these captchas are getting too much for me.

>>18603310
wow. really makes you think

>>18603334
Literally the only argument you'll ever hear from these lazy fucking shills.

>>18602135
The visible roundness of the horizon is parallax distortion. That there is a horizon is proof of a round earth though.

>>18603301
>>18603321
about 122 000 square miles

File: 1485188345984.jpg (420KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 700x467px

>>18603329
Space was cloudy that night, no stars :(

File: ChKCtMRW4AAJ_Kt.jpg (74KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x450px

>>18603335
No problem bro. Still, it will take much much more than this to convince the plebs to look into the flat earth.

The globe conditioning is very strong, we were indoctrinated since we were ~5yo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNVvRxQWb6g

>>18603328
Jesus Christ. Is part of your job simply to infuriate us and waste our time? Heh, makes sense I guess.

The video was posted as proof that the world is a sphere. I posted screenshots that prove that the curvature is simply from the curved lenses. What are you arguing exactly?

>>18603342
>That there is a horizon is proof of a round earth though.

Holy crap now that's a scary level of stupid!

>>18603339
No, explaining your misunderstandings and non sequiturs to you simpletons isnt making an argument. It is trying to teach highschool level education to adults. No, actually it is like talking to a wall.
Like how many times do we need to go over things like "hurr there arent stars in this picture with that large bright object in the foreground!" or simple laws of perspective until we can actually have an honest discussion about this. When will we actually hear something about the supposed flat earth theory? Because those threads are never about flat earth. They are always about explaining basics and denying reality

I'm a scientist on the International Space Station, I can confirm the earth is round

>>18602479
Looks pretty concave to me at 2:23

File: 121,000 feet Little Piggy .webm (2MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x576px

>>18603314
probably the same autist samefagging for NASA.

>>18603318
Also these stills were supposedly made from 95,000 feet high while high altitude balloons have proved time and again that there is no curvature visible at 121,000 feet

>>18603352
I really hope you are not the same poster as
>>18603173

>>18603357
I know this is bait but,
how did you guys know?!?!?!?!?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmafEhWUfNY

File: bannedearth.png (162KB, 1085x581px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1085x581px

>>18603350
I'm not so sure about that. The movement has a lot of traction but they still keep up appearances that we're only a fringe minority.

I started a thread the other day stating that /x/ was a flat earth board because at this point it's psychological warfare but it got pulled within a minute which makes me think I was on to something.

>>18603366
What curvature do you expect to see at this altitude according to the "globe model"?

>>18603357
We knew that, Bob, a disc is round.

File: samefag.png (8KB, 380x101px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 380x101px

>>18603367
I am. Why not?

>>18603370
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT A GIANT FAGGOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA KYS DUMBASS

>>18603381
Why you say that?

>>18603377
Well, then I am not really sure why you needed an explanation in the first place and reacted in such a way >>18603260 to statements you agree with

>>18603173

>Why is space now a sphere?

Why would space be anything but a sphere you dingus. Do you believe in flat space too?

>>18603370
>but they still keep up appearances that we're only a fringe minority.
Youtube fucks shamelessly with the likes/viewers counters. It became apparent to /pol/ during the presidential period and I personally witnessed a visits counter going down after a page refresh, coincidentally it was a flat earth video. But this doesn't matter, they are just trying to buy time doing the only thing they know, perception management but they are weak and scared shitless.

Riddle me this Globetrotters, you say you can't see the Earth's curvature and yet you also say that when you see a ship sink below the horizon it's due to the curvature. Which one is correct?

>>18603370
Probably just a butthurt globehead modfag.


It is quite sad that most people simply refuse to look into it.

Flat earth is the ultimate pandora's box.

As long as you stay away from it, you can ridicule it and throw people under the bus for even bringing it up, but the time will come when _you will_ open it, and there is no coming back to the globe earth.

>>18603396
So Youtube are flat earthers?

>>18603390
Que? I'm really struggling to understand this entire strand of argument.

File: FE - ISS harness.webm (342KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 720x576px

>>18603372
according to the official records featuring the Austrian jumping from 95,000 ft, much much more curvature that visible through that piggy cam (i.e nothing).

>>18603372
10 feet across 424 miles. So... 10/2.239e+6*100 percent difference between the edges and the centre of the visible horizon in that video.

File: FE - ISS bubbles1.webm (464KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 720x576px

>>18603400
>a visits counter going down after a page refresh, coincidentally it was a flat earth video
>going down

shills, ladies and gents.

>>18603368
>I don't feel the need to point out the green screen problems

Because there aren't any

>I'd like to know when

Presumably on the last resupply mission, they happen every month or two.

>last was dec 9th

Right. They were sent a jersey for every team in the NFL. 32 of them. Which was explained in the actual video itself.

>how much does it cost?

About 27,000 per lb. Though crew are also allowed their own personal possessions up to a point. Furthermore, many resupply missions are commercial in nature, so the NFL may have paid for some of it, at least in part. Furthermore, jerseys double as clothing, which is a necessity.

Yes, the ISS has a few silly things on board, like bagpipes and a gorilla suit. But then again, there are humans on board, and they need to have fun and relax from time to time.

>>18603399
People actually despise/mock this idea BECAUSE they looked into it. There is always someone like you implying that this whole thing is much more complex and convincing than it appears. But then all there ever comes out of it are shitposts looping "u r shill" like a broke record and flat earthers contradicting each other and failing at even communicating the very basics of their theory. There is never someone having any kind of measurements or sharing observations that cant be explained better by the globe model. Meanwhile flatearthers are never interested in addressing question about their own model. For pandoras box, it is really shallow

>>18602611
>>18603344
>>18603366
>>18603377
>>18603399

Check these dubs, folks. They don't lie.

>>18603416
Shill doesn't work both ways, my friend. Who do you envisage funding the flat earth movement?

>>18603405
Me neither. You saw the obvious distortions in the vid, still asked and then got mad because somebody told you the exact same thing you already knew. Dont know what you were going for and what you needed to be explained

>>18603408
Yeah, I guessed so. But what did you expect and why? Because I did a simple calculation and it doesnt seem like the curvature would be very noticable at that altitude

If earth was flat it literally could have any shape, for example a square, yet you still force round flat disk. Also on that UN map australia is nearly as big as africa.
And honestly who the fuck would profit from lying about the earths shape. Who cares if you live on a globe or a disc. That literally doesnt change anything in nobodys life.

File: fuckme.png (356KB, 701x591px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 701x591px

>>18603434
Even less clear.

Look at the shit I gotta do just to post now.

Mandela Effect explains flat earthers in this reality the earth is a ball flying around a bigger ball orbiting a giant toilet called the milky way. We might be getting flushed.

>>18603431
It works both ways since it is not like anybody uses the term accurately anymore anyway.

>>18603445
Thats not a captcha, you are posting too fast my man.

>>18603454
Too fast for you maybe!

*teleports behind you*

>>18603423
I know, but flat earthers will hang onto any piece of silly "evidence", like the hatches between the modules are always open.

Flat earthers believe that would somehow be a great hazardous in case of a micro-meteor impact.

It shows the level of ignorance flat earthers bathe in

File: o-FELIX-BAUMGARTNER-JUMP-570.jpg (29KB, 570x320px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 570x320px

>>18603443
>But what did you expect and why?

Already told you, attached still is what is presented to the public as legit curvature from 91,000 ft.
Now look at
>>18603366
compare and realize that fake news is a real thing but doesn't stop at your DEM/CON muppet show. The world is a literal theater.

File: 8768575.jpg (5KB, 268x188px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 268x188px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDsW2Gr1NUA

The Actors on the iss are playing with water not giving half a shit that bubbles fly everywhere near electronic equipment.

>inb4 iss is waterproof from inside

>>18603372
Imagine a circle that's 10 m in diameter. Now you're an average person standing in the middle of it. That's about the same curvature you'd see at 121,000 ft. So plenty.

File: 1486069840626.jpg (33KB, 480x764px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x764px

>>18603444
>yet you still force round flat disk.
Because there is a lot of hints about the general aspect of Earth in the Bible and other scriptures like the Vedas with so far no reason to discard any of them.

File: tim_peake_balls.jpg (42KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x360px

>>18603502
WHERE ARE YOU Tim Peake?

>>18603499
>diameter.

Excuse me. Radius of 10 m.

>>18603460
I really hope this is nothing personel

File: ISS-scubatank.webm (501KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 720x576px

>>18603493
>they don't fear water
Because they are secretly scuba divers xD

>>18602616
That's a big landmass

>>18603484
>Already told you
nope. You gave me a vague "more" and no explanation why. The pic is obviously made with a wide angle lens. It obviously doesnt depict the curvature as you would see it at that altitude with your unaided eyes. come the fuck on now

>>18603499
Thats wrong though.

>>18603515
China took the lead on water bubbles in space

part1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBL98p0wZ7g

part2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVbBFwdmldA

File: graphy mathy.png (51KB, 969x563px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 969x563px

I'm just going to assume that this is flat earth general and post this here.

TL;DR: I made a specific prediction using both the flat earth model and the round earth model and the round earth model came out the winner.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/yzvfzbvgzj

This is a mathematical model I created of the position of the moonlight shadow of a 1m high stick over the course of a lunar cycle. The thesis was that if the earth is a spinning ball, then the change in position of the observer relative to the moon over the course of twelve hours would cause a slight "wobble" in the moon's position. It would only amount to a degree or so (a centimeter on my measurement device). Small, but measurable nonetheless.

If the earth is a globe, then the wobble (which can be exaggerated or nullified by using the A variable slider in the linked graph) will be observed when tracking the moon's shadow over the course of a night. After the model was complete, I knew that if I observed a wobble, then the earth was a ball. If not the former, then the latter.

I stayed up all night with a friend and experimentally verified that my model was correct, and the wobble was apparent. It's official, the traditional flat earth model is FALSE. Even if you don't want to believe that my experimental data proves a round earth (even though the predictions were made specifically taking into account the earth's spherical shape) then at the very least it DISPROVES the current flat earth model.

>>18603536
Nice experiment, mate. Sadly this is where flatfriends begin to deny reality.
Just watch:

>>18603536
>The thesis was
>if the earth is a spinning ball ...
>If the earth is a globe ...

> After the model was complete, I knew that if I observed a wobble, then the earth was a ball. If not the former, then the latter.

the latter being a globe then. So either a ball or a globe.

>>18603536

You could be making this up. You can set the numbers however you want to get your "prediction" to match up with reality.

>>18603562

Shit man, my bad. If it's not obvious what I meant then let me clarify. I meant that if I observed a wobble then the earth is a ball. If not, then either it's not a ball or my prediction wasn't correct.

File: ISS - fake door2.webm (733KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 720x576px

>>18603530
their fake door that totally protects the inside of the station. xD

>>18603302

I guess bubbles in space don't go up or down they just float randomly.

File: FE - rocketinspace.webm (753KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 720x576px

How are rockets supposed to work in a vacuum if all the thrust is instantly sucked without finding any resistance?

>>18603499
You're wrong, actually.

The radius of the circle would be just above 300m. So really not a lot.

(Your height)/(Radius of ball) = (Altitude)/(Radius of earth)

>>18603551
What reality? All I see here is a simulation.

>>18603583

The demonstration video is a bad example because the vacuum machine does not only suck the jet of air out of the balloon, but it also creates an opposite thrust due to excess suction.

A rocket motor's ability fo work in a vacuum is demonstratable because all you have to do is imagine throwing a bunch of shit behind you. If you were in a shopping cart and you hurled a medicine ball behind you as fast as you could, you would move in the opposite direction. In the case of a rocket, the "medicine ball" is the literal tons of fuel per second that it hurls behind it fast as fuck (around 14 kilometers per second, actually). if you chuck a car behind you at literally 30 times the speed of sound, even if you yourself literally weigh 10,000 pounds you're going to have some serious speed at the end of the endeavor.

>>18603594

A simulation that has been experimentally verified. If you want me to i will literally send a picture of the data that i collected.

>>18603583
Because when the fuel travels out one side, it makes the craft go the other direction. Vacums make it come out faster and work more effectively.

>>18603603
Do you have any proof that this data is accurate?

>>18603600
Found the CIA shill

>>18603604

This is true. Atmosphere actually creates a negative pressure against the nozzle of the rocket, MAKING IT PERFORM WORSE. You can actually calculate out exactly how terrible your rocket will be depending on the atmospheric pressure as it flies the fuck off earth.

This is the reason that second stage rocket engines look different than first stagers. They're designed to work in a less pressurized environment, and they actually work better.

>>18603600
>the vacuum machine does not only suck the jet of air out of the balloon, but it also creates an opposite thrust due to excess suction.
As opposed to the vacuum of space?

>If you were in a shopping cart and you hurled a medicine ball behind you as fast as you could, you would move in the opposite direction.
Completely different to how a rocket works.

>>18603604
>Because when the fuel travels out one side, it makes the craft go the other direction
You mean it's not the actual explosion that creates the thrust but the mere movement of the fuel? That's actually funny xD

>>18603600
>but it also creates an opposite thrust due to excess suction.
that's how a vacuum works, Nature hates emptiness and sucks in order to level up. In the case of a hypothetical rocket in a hypothetical space pushing against an infinite emptiness, all the thrust would just be sucked just like this poor fuck

https://youtu.be/EjZ7Cb5WDLM?t=95

>>18603615
How the fuck would you know atmosphere creates a negative pressure against the nozzle of the rocket??????

You never seen any telemetry datasheet from a rocket, you never been to space.
All you know is what NASA told you how rockets behave.
(((YOU))) don't know anything my friend

You have been fed __DATA__

>>18603588
6/1044=120000/20898240
or approx. 0.068 inches or 1.7cm
You would not be able to see it.

>>18603642
Pretty sure you are trolling, but ackshually air pressure is something very fucking easy to show that it exists. You can either feel the difference in it directly with your body, you can observe things getting pushed/crushed by it and so on. It is like saying the sky isnt blue, NASA is lying about that

File: 654645636.jpg (191KB, 1086x239px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1086x239px

>>18603600
Remember this my friends

>>18603642

I'm a fucking aerospace engineering grad student lol. I have literally done experiments MYSELF (Well technically with a team) where we measured the atmospheric pressure, calculated the internal pressure, and did all the calculations which we are all able to rederive ourselves from scratch. We literally measured to three significant digits the total thrust, instantaneous thrust per time, mass loss, mass flow rate, and exhaust velocity of our rocket motor. The math checks out: Atmospheric pressure decreases the thrust and efficiency of rocket motors of all types.

>>18603633

It's apparent you know nearly nothing about how rockets actually work. In rockets, the net movement of the fuel is one of the only sources of thrust. The pressure difference created by an explosion is negligible since the cross-sectional area of the rocket is not nearly enough to absorb a usable amount of force from the pressure gradient created by the explosion. The exact acceleration and thrust of the rocket can be calculated ignoring all producers of thrust EXCEPT the movement of the fuel. As the matter of fact.

>>18603623

The vacuum of space does not create a directional negative pressure gradient. thus, no thrust is produced.

> Completely different to how a rocket works.

It's literally EXACTLY how a rocket motor works. The main mode of thrust from a rocket is the fuel getting thrown out the back of the rocket. The velocity of the exhaust and the average mass of the velocity per second are used to precisely calculate the thrust of the rocket.

>>18603697
>I'm a fucking aerospace engineering grad student
This is how I know you are a lying piece of shit

>>18603697
When was the last time you've been to space and tested your puny booklet theories?

Oh that's right, never, and you never will.

Do you have any proovable science that we mortals can verify?

I thought so

>>18603702

What's so unbelievable about being an aerospace engineering major? It's not some uber-exclusive field only for the most loyal CIA shills out there.

If you're smart and you do well on the standardized tests (32 on the act) then you get to go to college and study whatever you want. I chose aerospace engineering because I've liked airplanes ever since I was a kid and I'm big into engineering and stuff. If you get more good grades then they let you into grad school where you get to work on shit that only a few people have ever worked on before.

>>18603710

Do exact measurements from my various projects over the years count? If I know that my rocket will produce 2 kilonewtons of thrust over the course of two minutes isn't it safe to say that it will go about 100 or so Km up in the air?

We've been playing the game so long that by now we know that you don't actually have to go and experimentally verify EVERYTHING. Some things we can be sure about enough to extend our thinking and be nearly 100% sure that in a different scenario specific and predictable things will happen.

>>18603712
Please stop, you are emberrasing yourself.
Move on to /pol/, i promise you will achieve your quota

>>18603633
But anon, the aleum gets pushed out the hole by the air inside. The vacuum outside isn't providing any force.

>>18603730

Should i keep indulging you? It's clear that you're trolling.

>>18603712
>>18603729
Nice damage control Mr. Smith

In the near future your close family members will address the flat earh.
You can shill as many chans and forums as you like, but at some point you will have to lie to your family as well

>>18603588
Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon#Curvature_of_the_horizon

>>18603760

That formula only predicts the apparent curvature of the horizon, not the needed radius of a ball to create the same effect. Using my formula you get a much more reasonable answer.

>>18603769
Your "formula" is just their ratios. It says nothing about the apparent curvature, which is what the question was about in the first place.

>>18603769
Your formula works only on paper, it has no relation to observable reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzeUhc8xQ3U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PueURw-Twg0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql_TTguKxnE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHvkyfE2eQc

>>18603774

Dude, you're straight up wrong. The answer of a ten-meter radius you gave was literally wrong as shit.

The actual computation of the exact amount of apparent curvature is irrelevant. What matters is the ratios.

With the formula from wikipedia i got 425.247

With my formula I got 424.733

This is why it's important to learn why formulas work instead of just plugging and chugging.

File: Bluemarb.jpg (84KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 720x960px

>>18603769
according to this chart of the supposed curvature of the spinning testicle, there should be a 2meters at a distance of 3 miles.

>>18603841
That's only giving you the ratio of the radius to the height.

It literally says nothing about how horizon appears to curve.

And we're not even talking about a ball, but a flat circle drawn on the ground. Did you even read the simple single paragraph, you faglord?

>>18603848
That formula is something else entirely, the vertical drop at tangential difference.

Do you even understand what these words and numbers mean?

File: FE - sea 5km no curve.webm (3MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x576px

>>18603848

But in real life, such curvature can't be observed.

>>18603854
look here
>>18603858
where is the vertical drop?
there is none

File: wrong.png (63KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x600px

>>18603849

for the last fucking time yes it does. If you want you can plug my results right back into the equation to confirm this yourself unless you failed out of math.
Plugging it back into the equation, a height of 2m and a radius of 425m yield the exact same curvature as a height of 30km and a radius of 6371 km.

>>18603739
>buut anon the force involved is oriented outward not inward

The way you look at it doesn't matter, the underlying problem still remains the same. The vacuum of the hypothetical space doesn't offer any resistance and as a result you don't get any push back to propel your rocket, that very reaction force from which the name reactor was made.

As described by the third of Newton's laws of motion of classical mechanics,

>all forces occur in pairs such that if one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object exerts an equal and opposite reaction force on the first.

In your hypothetical empty space, there is no object hence as a result you get no reaction force, no thrust to propel your rocket.

>>18603863
>no vertical drop
>opposite beach is below the horizon

Did you even think about this before you posted it, retard?

>>18603873
Good job, anon. You've calculated now for the radius of sphere. We were talking, however about a flat circle on the ground.

So if you were standing on a sphere with a radius of 425m , it would appear to extend out to about the same as if there were a circle of radius 10 m at your feet.

>>18603370
>Posting in all caps how a board is X and telling anyone who thinks differently to get out
>Surprised when you get banned
It's called shitposting, retard

>>18603889
>the way you look at it doesn't matter

Indeed it does. Do you admit that vacuum provides no force? That all the force in your alien example comes from the air molecules escaping? We'll get to the rest later.

File: FE - sunrise ecuador.webm (422KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 720x576px

>>18603899
there is no opposite beach, balltard.
I see you are feeling nervous, that's very good and expected.
Let's celebrate with another undeniable proof the spinning testicle model is just a load of bullshit. That amazing "sun rise" filmed in Ecuador showing the solar disc growing up as the small orb is nearing closer to the camera.

>>18603904
Sure, I can concede that.

>>18602608
>>18602611
Proof of hollow earth. Globe and flat earthers BTFO.

Jk. Globe earthers are retarded and don't know what a fish eye lense does.

>>18603907

let's try a second time

> if one object exerts a force on another object, then the second object exerts an equal and opposite reaction force on the first.

your space is empty and doesn't count as an object hence you get no reaction force. No reaction force implies you get no thrust to propel your rocket.
How is a rocket supposed to work in your SCIFI space if not from a reaction force?

>>18603930
Only shills can't detect a fish eye lens.
You do not seem to realize it but you are giving yourselves everytime.

We always argue about the same fucking shit, it's boring.

If the earth is flat, then what is there beyond our world? What is the sun and what is the moon? Why are other planets globes, but not ours?

>>18603962
>If the earth is flat, then
your sciences are a load of shit
the world has been badly deceived by very dark forces exactly as described in the Bible and the Vedas
That world was created
God is real and is watching you right now.
Stop fapping.

>>18603972

Funny, I expected exactly this kind of reply. Nice work.

>>18603071
>balltard
kek, what's next?
>gravtard
>tfw you still believe in gravity

>>18603962
If the earth is round what is beyond our world? And beyond that? And beyond that?

What are the sun and moon to you?

How do you know the planets are globes?

>>18603981
What about "gorilloids"? as a reference to that other lie, evolution.
Gravity is a lot of bullshit, you don't need it at all to explain what you observe in your life.

>>18603071
My fucking sides. Wouldn't you think a rocket going as fast as they're going hitting a glass dome you know... fucking smash into pieces? Like the "Evidence" shown at the end of the video? It's a pressure based mechanism that breaks when the pressure around it is low enough that activates a counter lever and stops the rocket from spinning to get good footage.

File: 1479441673654.jpg (10KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 240x240px

>>18604003
>hitting a glass dome you know..
that's interesting because nobody ever mentioned the dome was made of glass...
What made you come to this conclusion? and why not an electro magnetic field force for instance?

>>18603985

None of these actually answer my question.

Have you or have you not established theories and observations concerning the laws to which your flat earth is subjected to and what is beyond this flat earth of ours?

Don't answer my questions with questions, especially if these questions are just meant to divert attention from the subject I've brought up.

Just a general question.

What do the powers at be (whoever you believe is lying to us) gain by lying to us?

In what way would a flat earth vs a round earth benefit them in anyway?

I've never once seen this answered.

>>18603995
>unironically uses word "life"
>lifetard
>2017
>still believes in life

>>18604020
But do you have answers for these questions yourself within your own worldview? If not, then it's not fair to ask them of me.

>>18603310
It feels more like, someone or something is actually deceiving Nasa, rather than the other way around.

>>18604074

I don't think we are clear on every detail of what I've asked.

I asked that you tell me if you have established theories and observations regarding the origin of the flat earth, understanding the purpose of the sun and the moon as well as what lies beyond the limits of the flat earth.

Not as in "Do you believe there is something", specifically as in "Have you observed what's out there?"

Have you tried studying the sun and the moon?
Are there people going to be exploring the out reaches? Has anyone planned on launching their own independant space craft to have accurate and unbaised observation of the world from above?

Are these not legit questions? If the earth is flat, then I think such questions only come naturally.

So the earth is flat, what does that imply for us? Where does it come from? How did it come into existence? What is our world?

Do you only care about being right or do you actually care to explore and study the unknown? Do you realize how important a discovery like this would be to the entire human race? To be able to demonstrate without a doubt that the earth is flat to the entire world? Not just superstitious nerds on an image board, THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD!

If you are right, it is your responsibility to do what needs to be done to show the entire world. What are you still doing on /x/?

didn't eratosthenes prove that the earth is round with simple math?

how exactly do flat earthers refute this again?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8On7yCU1EjQ

>>18603331
Have you ever seen footge of what a rocket launch looks like?

https://www.google.com/search?q=rocket+laucnh+trail&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtn8j7lf3RAhUT6GMKHc0yAT4Q_AUICCgB&biw=1600&bih=772

How the fuck does satellites stay up if they are not in orbit around the earth?

>>18604024
I lurk these threads to see if anyone will acknowledge this point but they avoid it like the plague.

>>18602135
I don't get it. Every planet we see is roughly spherical (you can even see them through cheap binoculars), but why Earth should not be the same?

>>18604115
I've seen this exact line of shitty reasoning pop up in plenty of these threads before, leading me to believe that it's one of the go-to responses taught to shills everywhere.

>Are there people going to be exploring the out reaches? Has anyone planned on launching their own independant space craft to have accurate and unbaised observation of the world from above?

Do you not understand how ridiculous a demand this is? I bet there's tens if not hundreds of thousands, perhaps even millions of people out there who would love to be able to go out and see for themselves, but my god man, do you think we're all Richard Branson or something?

>So the earth is flat, what does that imply for us? Where does it come from? How did it come into existence? What is our world?

The realization that the world is flat has lead a lot of people to God, in one form or another. The globe Earth lead a lot of people away from God. Personally it has made me feel a lot safer and more comfortable in this world. We live on Terra Firma, and that is the surest thing you can rely on. Feels good, man.

>Do you only care about being right or do you actually care to explore and study the unknown?

I spend most of my free time studying the unknown.

>Do you realize how important a discovery like this would be to the entire human race? To be able to demonstrate without a doubt that the earth is flat to the entire world? Not just superstitious nerds on an image board, THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD!

Wasn't too long ago that the world still believed this, and I bet there's still many people around the world who never stopped. Where do you suggest we go? If this is the response we get from superstitious nerds, how do you think the normies react?

>If you are right, it is your responsibility to do what needs to be done to show the entire world.

Did your daddy help out at NASA before the Saturn missions? Your Grandpappy? They were equally responsible for proving the Earth is round, weren't they?

>>18604382
No need for satellites on a flat earth.

>>18604024
>>18604631
To leave people feeling insignificant? To instill in them the fear that their whole world could be wiped out in a moment by a passing asteroid? To take power away from the church and give it to the institution of scientific academia? To convince people that mythology == lies?

It's not hard to answer this question really, and it's a terrible argument.

>>18604024
ahah that's true, fucking retarded people

tl;dr - the thread

>>18604024
Church bashing really. Trying their best to split the church and "science". It's like evolution, it's all wrapped in half-truths to try to disprove the church.

That's the explanation I got from a drunk flat-earther one time, makes sense to me.

>>18604739
>literally no answers, his theory is unable to explain anything
I rest my case

When does it say outside temperature is -450 when it is impossible to go below -273?

Fake and gay confirmed, try harder sphereheads.

>>18604752
Which church?
What about armageddon?
What about science denialism and the rise of populist world leaders?
It seems easier to control stupid people based on "God did it" than trying to understand the universe

>>18603503
>Taking religious texts as serious scientific documents.
>Now flat earthers make sense to me.

Make sure you chop the dicktips off your children and sacrifice animals too, ya fuckin dink

>>18603536

CGI my dude that's full of CGI right there

File: IMG_2312.jpg (849KB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

849KB, 2592x1936px

>>18603944

Have you considered that the force isn't between the fuel and something outside of the rocket, rather, it is between the fuel and the rocket itself?

File: IMG_3268.png (105KB, 378x378px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 378x378px

I'm pretty sure flatearthers suffer from schizophrenia.

They are paranoid everyone is part of a grand conspiracy, they believe religious text over scientific evidence, and they think everyone who argues with then is an actor/shill.

If anyway was watching the HWNDU stream, a lot of our schizo guys doxxed all the /pol/ trolls on the stream because they were convinced they were deep cover actors paid by Shia Lebouff.

I think it's a sickness that a lot of /ourguys/ have to varying degrees, like autism.

>>18605617
Have you ever considered that for every force, there is an equal and opposite counter force?

>>18605687
What is the equal and opposite force to the Earth's spin?

>>18603231
people need to start dying, anon.

>>18604739
>millions of people out there who would love to be able to go out and see for themselves


You don't need to observe from space in order to determine the earth is round.

>lead a lot of people to God

If a false claim leads people to god, it can only be a false God.

>a lot of time studying on my own

I wouldn't call it studying.

>wasn't too long ago that the world believed this

Mmm, no, it's been thousands of years since we figured out it was round.

>>18605690
>spin is a force

I think you're confused about the very basics.

Christ almighty you flat earthers are idiots.

>>18603301
>shills
how does /x/ so horribly misuse an already derogatory term? also, i see these flat earth shits occasionally, at first i thought it was more annoying rp nonsense but it kept happening. the fuck is wrong with people?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW__MZXMA7A

Whether at sea-level, the top of Mount Everest, or flying a hundred thousand feet in the air, the always horizontal horizon line always rises up to meet the eye-level of the observer and remains perfectly flat.

You can test for yourself on a beach or hilltop, in a large field or desert, aboard a hot-air balloon or helicopter; you will see the panoramic horizon ascend with you right at eye level and remain completely flat all around.

If the Earth were actually a big ball, however, the horizon should sink as you ascend, not rise to your eye-level, and it would dip at each end of your periphery, not remain flat all around. Standing in a rising balloon, you would have to look downwards to the horizon, more and more the further you ascended; the highest point of the ball-Earth would be directly beneath you and declining on each side.

>>18605696
I think you really wanted to say "the Big-bang"

You would have been wrong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXkCgB0cOGc

Many people understand how the fisheye lens and wide angle lens work.

Unfortunately many more people still think they are seeing authentic curvature while viewing a video filmed with a GoPro or a TomTom

NASA uses (((only))) fish-eye lens, they seem to love them very much

>>18605697
How could you know that? you are but an ape evolved from a mere bacteria, a product of chaos, a spark of nothingness with no purpose.
to sum it up, a scum.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0NS4FVI3pU

Simple example of eye level horizons on flat earth. Shows how geometry is wrong. Perspective has been ignored. Globe geometry debunked.

File: 1484685367682.jpg (110KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x500px

>>18605715
>>18605717

it's flat, friend xD

>>18603259
>You say that people say that aliens say the earth is flat
This is your reasoning for flat earth?
Is this a joke?

File: 1484684589190.jpg (144KB, 800x552px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 800x552px

>>18605722

so flat

>>18605702
>horizon always meets eye level

No it doesn't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5wvLeRVKpo

>you would have been wrong

Well yes, obviously i'd have been wrong. Since the Big Bang has nothing to do with the spin of the earth, the Big Bang wasn't a reactionary force to anything, and the spin of the earth isn't a force in the first place.

Why on earth would you even think Big Bang? It's a total non-sequitor.

>>18605713
>NASA only uses fisheye lens

No, though they often use wide eye lenses on the ISS, for practical reasons.

>>18605733
Sorry to break it to you m8 but there is no ISS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e-RnKAN9qY

>>18605718
Then it looks like we're on the same boat friendo :^)

>>18605737
Sure there is. I've seen it with my own two eyes.

Are you really the sort of guy who believes everything he hears on youtube without checking for himself?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nIRMTMMf84

>>18605743
>I've seen the ISS with my own two eyes

And this is how i know you're a shill

>>18605745
>anybody not as lazy as me is a shill

That's a whole lot of shills.

File: ISS - vomit comet.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18605733
>they often use wide eye lenses
LOL
not when they shoot from the inside of their vomit plane

>>18605749
This alone proves she could not possibly be on the ISS

>>18605752
exact, they shoot some of their fake 0g clips with their a 0g plane, their so called vomit comet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQ1ZozXp2tw

>>18605749
>vomit plane

You mean the vomet comet. And the vomet comet only lasts about 20 seconds. There are many videos of weightlessness lasting several minutes in duration.

>>18605752
mmm, no it doesn't.

>>18605773
No i really meant vomit comet, but words do not really matter. I know that's the only tool left to shill for NASA :(

http://www.livescience.com/29182-what-is-the-vomit-comet.html

> And the vomet comet only lasts about 20 seconds.
Yes you are right and this is the reason why they use harnesses for longer clips as shown here
>>18603408

>mmm, no it doesn't.
mmmmmmmm, yes it definitely does.

File: FE-musicprogramming.png (414KB, 1275x857px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1275x857px

>>18605745
nobody has ever seen the ISS with their own eyes
but the scuba divers at NASA.

>>18605782
Except there isn't any of the rigging needed for harnesses.

You keep getting more and more desperate and silly with your excuses.

File: issfromground.jpg (45KB, 533x404px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 533x404px

>>18605784
On the contrary, anybody can go out on a clear night and see the ISS. They publish schedules of when it will be over your house. There are smart phone apps for it.

Amateur photographers enjoy taking pictures of it.

>>18605790
Not playing devil's advocate.

But watching a projection of it, it's not the same as watching the actual ISS.

>>18605790
IT'S A FUCKING DRONE

>>18605787
>Except there isn't any of the rigging needed for harnesses.

Details are edited out with a software. You are the only one sounding desperate, LOL.

>>18605793
>it's a hologram

That's not playing devil's advocate, anon, that's going full retard.

>>18605794
No, you can triangulate it's speed, position, and size.

>>18605795
>it's all more holograms

So then why even bother with the vomet comet in the first place? First it's the vomet comet, then it's harnesses, then it's magic invisible harnesses.

You keep making a fool of yourself, and only because you can't admit that you're wrong.

>>18605790
>On the contrary, anybody can go out on a clear night and see the ISS
Yeah but nobody ever did, LOL
for some reasons.
>Amateur photographers enjoy taking pictures of it.
nice story bro.

>>18605799
>No, you can triangulate it's speed, position, and size.
Because a computer told you so?
are you an idiot?

>>18605799
>e vomet comet in the first place?
one more time, it is "vomit comet"

>>18605799
>holograms
do you even After Effects?

>>18602135
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3GD9gXzUBk
Proof the earth isn't flat

>>18605800
>nobody ever did

Thousands of people do. Anybody who wants.

You could yourself if you weren't lazy.

>>18605720

> geometry is wrong
> denying litterall mathematical proof

Litterally confirmed flat earthers are the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet.

Geometry has been MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN. you litterally cannot ask for better proof than mathematical proof. If something hasn't been mathematically proven then it isn't just true beyond all reasonable doubt, it isn't true. period.

Even if the video is fake, the earth isn't flat! Why the fuck would it be flat? Why can't we find the end. Are all the other planets just projections? You are a moron if you think the earth is flat

>>18603509
i love them. they think they are entertaining us, but now i'm being entertained by them. so funny. haha

Wow, globe cucks are really winning this fight. It's funny because all your arguments lack evidence. Flat earthers have provided much more evidence sorry chumps

>>18605910

Aw, princess not getting his way??

>>18606111
Trips confirms

>>18605825
proof?

File: timelapse - Sunset.webm (606KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 720x576px

>>18603919
Let's have another beautiful clip that definitely destroy the spinning ball model. This time showing the Sun going further way from the camera with a shrinking angular size as a result of perspective, what balltards call a sunset.

File: 1486298802771.png (102KB, 1437x773px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1437x773px

>>18606138
oh noo goyim. stop it.

File: Timelapse - Sunset2.webm (546KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 720x576px

>>18606138
*further away

and another one fake "sunset" showing the solar disc shrinking as the Sun rotates over the flat Earth disc.

File: Timelapse - Moonrise.webm (1MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x576px

>>18606146
don't kill yourself just now, shill.
I have a nice "moonrise" to offer showing the lunar disc's relative size growing as the orb come closer consistently with the law of perspective.

File: history.jpg (145KB, 960x859px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 960x859px

>>18606153
>>18606149
don't worry. everyone lies. people with money the most. i'm poor.

>>18606153
anyways, do you know more about those experiments where they were bombarding the edge of dome? why did they stop and who stopped them? any theory behind why all govs are cooperation with US in this? was it because they were scared of them?

>>18606187
the "fishbowl" operation, No I don't know much about what they did during that period. the official story is a load of bullshit. There is no nuclear bombs.
My guess is they tried to penetrate the first layer, an electro magnetic field at ~70 miles but most probably failed

>>18606205
There are no nuclear bombs?
Revisionist history at it's pinnacle

>>18606244
Oh yeah, I heard this one before. It's related to the conspiracy theory that Japan won WWII.

>>18606149
>>18606153

>disc
>glare

File: angry pepe.jpg (65KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 900x900px

>>18602135
FAKE FAKE FAAAAAAKE

THE EARTH IS FLAT SO ANYTHING THAT PROVES OTHERWISE MUST BE FAKE

>>18606205
you mean like hiroshima & nagasaki didn't happen? i would not be surprised, but amused yes. do you think that soros still didn't know this, when he stated that he has powers like a god? also, how do you think the email in podesta dump that has attached the alien cgi vid fits into this? trying to play another distraction game?

File: flat earth trig.jpg (2MB, 2340x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2340x4160px

>>18602135
BTFOing flatfgas really isn't that hard. Their model is mathematically impossible, and this is using their own figures.

Not that they would ever admit they were wrong. They have too much personally invested in this conspiracy.

>>18606280
i don't understand. are you trying to bash the theory by creating an experiment that is based on false premise? not false, but rather one that is not measured yet?

high school? it's 8th grade perhaps.

>>18606293
>based on a false premise

As the picture clearly says, this is based on claims made by flat earthers. It's taking their premise, drawing conclusions from it, and showing them that it is absurd.

Yes, the premise is false. That's the point. The flat earth is false.

>>18606304
you are confused. false premise doesn't imply false theory. please, educate before contributing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-cEeJKiqDA

File: erot earth.jpg (91KB, 1729x1200px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1729x1200px

>>18606293
It is measured. Why are you so ignorant about your own conspiracy?

Eratosthenes measured the circumference of the Earth thousands of years ago using the relative angle of shadows.
The only way to explain his observations on a Flat Earth model would be if the Sun were much closer (roughly 3000k), and moved independently of the Earth


Yet basic trigonometry shows that the Sun could NOT be this close and still appear to disappear behind the horizon. Therefore the current flat earth model is flawed.

Do you disagree with any what I said?

>>18606317
you know. pushing any videos from orbit or from antarcica are out of the scope of anything that has anything to do with proof. you cannot even remotely be trying to influence flat earthers into believing you as these were always source of deceit. it doesn't make any sense to be proving your point by pushing these. it's actually even worsening your case.

Flat brainer pls explain:
- Winter sky different from summer sky
- Circumpolar constellation changing when you move north to south
- Seasons
- Tides
- Phases of the moon

File: hull-down-03[1].png (2MB, 2154x994px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2154x994px

>>18606138
-Place a thumb near the sun at midday (sun at it's closest) and take note of it's size
- Place a thumb near the sun at mid afternoon (sun farther away) and take note of it's size
- Place a thumb near the sun at sundown (sun about to "disappear") and take note of it's size
- Kill self

Also here you have a nice picture of 1 ship, 1 "half ship" and a "submarine". Retard.

>>18606332
LOL I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about

File: 1486274819364.png (106KB, 968x725px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 968x725px

>>18606323
>>18606338
>>18606368
>>18606387

Don't be so attached to your ozone layer reality.

>>18606368
Gotta love that "curve" I also love how it sinks straight down, not tilted just down.

>>18606012
Because MUH SATANIC ILLUMINATI NASA COVERUP!

>>18606396
Great argument, you must have been top of your class

>>18606254
Since this flat earth circle jerk isn't going anywhere, what's the idea behind that? It sounds pretty far fetched too, but at least there would be a possible reason to cover that up

>>18606407
If you have believe in a reality that is false, it is at the expense of those who made up this reality.

They don't need to do anything but censor videos and news. Since they also control the money i don't think anyone is going to try and go to "space" anytime soon

>>18606426
*you are at the expense of those who made it

>>18606407
I think the general idea is that there are no such thing as nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons were just a myth to control and scare people during the cold war, huge conspiracy, yada yada yada.

And since there were no such things as nukes, that means Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't happen. And therefore the U.S. didn't win. And therefore, "logically" Japan won. And that's why all those U.S. military bases are over there, because they're captured U.S. Armies. And Japan uses them for its own purposes. That's why they're rich. Yada yada yada.

It's basically the same flat earth stupidity, just applied to 20th century history.

This guy's a big proponent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YCTxxKbTOM

It's often self-contradictory.

>>18606407
one. another obvious one.
1) difference between goyim and masters
2) proof of possibliity to indoctrinate to anything. thus lets indocrinate goyims to raise a litle sheep for us. lets also fund this 23andme program so we can selectively breed and locate ones we want easier. harvesting is then much faster.

>>18606430

Hiding the truth can greatly hinder how you see things and how you do things.

However I wouldn't expect you to understand that....

>>18606398
That's the joke, you ingrate.

Hey OP?

Have any more to post love everything you have been putting (thank you).

Truth is out there

>>18606438
http://pastebin.com/FXcsRFZr

>>18606433
>Globe Earth is Science, and Science is AN HOAX
>Computers has been created by science
Pls explain

>>18606450

WHAT????

SInce when did I say in text that science was a hoax? People have been saying that modern scientific discoveries are false however

NOT the same thing sherlock

>>18606430
Well that's about as stupid as I expected. It could make for an interesting "Man in the High Castle" style universe if things were streamlined and written coherently

>>18606433
Hiding the truth of the shape of the earth is impossible.

The outcome of the second world war also impossible.

>>18606450
Comeputer

Come pute her

>>18606317
FAKE!!! CGI!!!!
Ban this shill mods! This can't possibly be true because theres a standing battle fleet guarding Antarctica at all times making sure we don't discover it's secrets. Nice try.

>>18606472
>>18606470
>>18606467
>>18606457

Samefag please stop derailing the thread, ca we please get back on topic?

>>18606472
wow, are we living in some Stargate episode?

>>18606477
Full disclosure.
Full disc? Oh sure.

Because god is a DJ.

>>18606477
I'm just >>18606457 (You) #
It doesn't matter though, people will present the same evidence as always. Anyone with accurate evidence or photos will be called a shill, the pictures and videos are all cgi, none of the flat earth points will be elaborated
The circle jerk rolls on, unimpeded

File: smallsaturnmysterybox2.png (162KB, 544x351px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 544x351px

Either saturn is hiding something really interesting or really shity 3d modeling. The "planet" pictures that are the clearest is mars, most of the other ones are like this. Will post more

(not OP)

>>18606503
All fake CGI.

http://pastebin.com/FXcsRFZr

>>18602135
>there are people ironically in this thread believes earth is flat..

I dunno what in the flying fuck you guise are smoking but ya'll better stop before someone calls ya'll a fukin nutcase

>>18606541
Television told you a vision. Q Brick the old mofo. Wake up. Reality is the real ET

>>18603642
And so have you. TRUE knowledge comes from within.

>>18606555
What?
I dunno whaddya mean by that but seek help mate cuz sooner the better

File: flat-earth-memes-74-4.jpg (54KB, 565x318px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 565x318px

>>18604024

>>18605694
>You don't need to observe from space in order to determine the earth is round.
You don't need to observe the world from space in order to determine that it's flat.

>If a false claim leads people to god, it can only be a false God.
All religions come from people who believed the world is flat, except maybe Scientology. Are you a Scientologist?

>I wouldn't call it studying.
Wouldn't call what studying? I don't know shit about what you do in your spare time, I wish you wouldn't make assumptions about me.

>Mmm, no, it's been thousands of years since we figured out it was round.
Learn some history, retard.

>>18605259
You have no case. All you have are straw-men.

THE SHILLS HAVE NO ARGUMENTS, ONLY LOGICAL FALLACIES.

File: dg7.jpg (38KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x600px

>>18606012
There's explanation for all of these in FE, you're just to lazy to look it up and won't

>>18606693
>explanations

There aren't explanations, just handwaving. "oh we can't go to the edge because of a secret fleet of UN warships."

That's not an explanation, that's a transparent dodge.

>>18606688
>You don't need to observe the world from space in order to determine that it's flat.

You can't determine it's flat, either from space or on the surface. Because it's not falt.

>All religions come from people who believed the world is flat

No they didn't.

>Are you a scientologist

No. Do you believe in aliens and flying saucers?

>learn some history, retard

I did. That's how I know they've known the earth is round for thousands of years.

>>18606280
"it's science bruh"

>>18606703
Correct, Rhesusmonkey. Its not falt, its flat. You are fighting on a sinking ship.

Better catch the SOS ring he?

>>18606711
You seem pretty proud of catching typos.

I guess that has to substitute for losing every actual argument.

>>18606703
Btw.

Aliens is an anagramm for nsa-lie.

Nice b8 tho.

>>18606712
Science is the brother of fiction. Funny eh? Truth hurts and you unintentionally spoke it.

>>18606714
And Jesus spelled backwards is sausage.

Bait? You brought up scientology in the first place. Not that flat earthers have much business making fun of anybody else's intelligence.

>>18602135
nice paranormal prank
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVDoz4O9bx0

>>18606716
>science is the brother of fiction

Um, no it isn't.

>>18606726
You know you are retarded if Hawkings the cripple that would have been kicked off the cliff in sparta is your god substitute.

Cheers much love

File: edge.jpg (3MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3872x2592px

>>18606698
There is no edge

>>18606734
Really? I would have thought kicking crippled people of cliffs like the Spartans did would be the retarded thing. I mean, it's not like you have to be a star quarterback in order to be smart.

>your god substitute

I'm not sure you understand how any of this works. Nobody worships Stephen Hawking. Personally, I don't even like the guy. Second, he's not famous because of who he is, but of the high quality of work that he's done.

Science isn't a subject that relies on arguments from authority.

>>18606747
Exactly. Because it's round.

File: tumblr_n10zp4pL3Y1t3o3fvo1_400.gif (2MB, 365x273px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 365x273px

>>18606734
>if Hawkings the cripple that would have been kicked off the cliff in sparta is your god substitute
go to bed and come back when you recover from your stroke

>>18606748
are you serious? guy who was seen in podesta pics? guy that is still talking about worm holes that don't exist? science is a subject that rely on arguments from authority as the authority says what you are allowed to do. this is nuts. are you this blind?

File: Map Sun Moon flat earth.jpg (48KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x400px

>>18606747
Round or a sphere? My flat earth is also round dummie.

File: 5.jpg (37KB, 458x523px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 458x523px

>>18606758
>>18606749
my bad i meant to reply to you

>>18606705

This isn't hard to understand. You're just waving your hands by saying that you cant understand it therefore it must just be a bunch of scientific lingo trying to scare you into accepting the truth. This isn't so. It's easy to understand and saying otherwise just proves you're an idiot.

>>18606756
>podesta

Oh you're one of those retarded pedophile guys, aren't you

>still talking about wormholes that don't exist

Proof they don't exist?

>rely on arguments from authority

No it doesn't. Provide evidence the authority is wrong, he loses.

>>18606758
Spheres are round.

But a sphere, to be specific.

File: BOB-Earth-Is-Flat-Meme.png (668KB, 810x798px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 810x798px

>>18606770
Yeah we'll have to disagree on that one

File: poornips.jpg (443KB, 1396x986px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1396x986px

>>18606430
Yes, nukes are a myth. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were still bombed to shit, but not by nukes. It still takes a good squadron of planes to carpet bomb a city, not a single bomber with the magical power of Thor's hammer in its fuselage. Here's a picture of Hiroshima after the bombing. Oh, wait. That's Tokyo after it was firebombed. My mistake, they look so similar.

Also, thanks for that interesting video. Never seen that one before. It's funny that they don't deny the existence of nukes or their use at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the video. He talks about them as though they happened, just that they were a strategic failure. The video talks about Japan's successes in biological warfare and how America was completely undermanned in the Pacific and was going to need to send the rest of their forces from Europe through the Panama canal to reinforce them which the Japs knew and anticipated. Apparently the Japs were gonna destroy the canal with their submarines and even gave the US 2 of their subs just to show them that they could, leading the US to negotiate surrender. Very interesting, I suggest you watch it since you obviously haven't. I'll have to look into this stuff further!

>>18604019
BecauseElectro-MagnetSDONTworkthatway

File: poornips2.jpg (237KB, 2000x616px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 2000x616px

>>18606784
Here's Hiroshima. Notice the lack of a single blast radius? Looks more like a carpet bombing, no? Even the footage in that video you posted proves there was no nuke at Hiroshima. The footage shows two distinct cloud plumes rising up in totally different places, even though there was only supposed to be the one bomb. You can see that they got the effect right in the Nagasaki bombing where it lines up to look like one single, larger explosion, but apparently they only had one take on that sucker.

>>18603260
"Just how big is New Mexico supposed to be?"
Holy fuck you're retarded.

>>18606808
How so?

>>18603344
Space doesn't look like that when you're up there you stupid fuck.

File: stephen hawkings.png (796KB, 552x927px) Image search: [Google]

796KB, 552x927px

>>18606748
>Stephen Hawking. Personally, I don't even like the guy. Second, he's not famous because of who he is, but of the high quality of work that he's done.

Which one?

seriously how retarded you have to be to think earth is flat.holy shit.

>>18606841
where's the curvature buddy?

>>18606841
The shills are really running out of steam.

>>18604024
>>18604631

If they can prove the earth is flat and everything revolves around us, that means religion is right. No more atheists, more people worshiping God, less people for lucifer to populate his domain.

>>18606837
These points are not mutually exclusive

>>18606850
Also they deny our creator so science can become the new religion

>>18606847
not what shill means. you people are as bad as those that spout cuck.

>>18606850
But does that prove your god is right. It doesn't even prove that there is a god, it would just prove that our model of the universe needs to be updated.

>>18603858
The curvature is observed because you lose sight of the shore after you travel a certain distance away from it.

"I-It's just because it's far away."
Then why don't telescopes help?

Because the Earth is curved.

Really, what reason would EVERY WORLD GOVERNMENT have for hiding the "fact" that the Earth is flat?

If anyone gives you the countless evidence that jt isn't, you throw out your shitty "nuh-uh" or say "Th-that's not right".
You faggots are dumber than my 11 year old sister.

But your "evidence" is so UNDENIABLE right?
Prove flat earth to me with actual evidence.
Or as some faggot earlier said: "Prove your theories with evidence from one of your own experiments".