Evidence for time travel found. A letter from future self stuck

File: letter 2.jpg (265KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1600x1200px

This website has the full letter: rosycarricktimetraveller . blogspot . com

None of the ink has faded other than what rubbed off on the paper. Talk about a shitty fucking fake.

"a rogue meteor storm"
what the fuck does that even mean?

still, obviously legit, anyone who says otherwise is a reptillian disinfo

>>18534121
O yeah, definitely legit...........

>>18534095
>>18534109
this is homosexual
sage

>staining paper with tea to make it look like an old letter
I remember that assignment in school.

what makes people think it comes from the future other than the letter saying it did? any predictions made that came true? any secrets unknown at that time but we learned now? i could write on old paper an say im from 100 years in the future, would be just as credible as this one. i also wont read through all the letter until someone states why i should believe it

Fake and gay. If future you had managed to make a.time machine he would know they wormholes wouldn't do shit nor could you traverse one safely. If youbhad a few million dollars to invest in me I would show you.

File: 12361235123.jpg (22KB, 263x261px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 263x261px

>>18534095
>>18534109

>A woman making a time machine and telling nobody about it.
They can't even keep their mouths shut to their friends most of the time.

This is probably fake, I guess.

It was written by a girl with a bs fountain pen or felt tip pen.

Paper was stained with tea or coffee

>>18534244
Underrated.

>>18534095

why was it written after it was torn?

>>18534095
Back to the Future already did this 30 years ago

>>18534121
It means they caused the Tunguska event 0_0

>>18534109
nice blog

Someone named Rosy was sent through a time machine, not anyone else?

You'd think that after a year she could've found some paper that didn't have random text printed throughout.

>>18534204
She mentions Cern, but there's no reason it had to be written before 2017.

>>18537318
You'll note she doesn't commit herself. She crosses out "all" in reference to who is in the past.

File: moment_040.jpg (13KB, 203x270px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 203x270px

>>18534095
WTF? WHY WOULD YOU SUBJECT EVERYONE TO THIS SHIT? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT OP? YOU FUCKING SERIAL RAPIST! I WOULDN'T PISS ON YOU IF YOU WERE ON FIRE. I HOPE YOU DROWN IN A BUCKET OF AIDS.

>>18534095
It says 1930, not 2030