Thomas Campbell

>>18520503
There are different stages of awakening. If you are truly set on becoming enlightened you must also face your inner darkness.

Great book.

>>18520509

Yeah, I've been working on that for some time.

>>18520519

Have you practiced any of it? Projected?

Whats this? Gimme a runthru, been having sum dreams, meditative visions and experiences

>>18520554

My understanding (I watched about 6 hours of his videos before starting the book) is that we live in a computer simulation and can view/interact with the computer code. Now I only say computer because we get that reference in today's society, but I really mean consciousness. That all of our physical material reality exists within our consciousness.

We can view the non-physical material reality through meditation/astral projection/remote viewing, etc.

>>18520503
Utter shit. Trying to link science, paranormal and Christian beliefs together. Watched a few of his videos and had to stop.

>>18520578

I'm sorry you feel that way. I have yet to get a Christian feel from any of this, where did you get that idea?

>>18520588
From watching one of his lectures and listening to him talk on a couple radio shows. Can't remember which ones exactly, but I remember filing it in my head under "person who puts religious beliefs on the paranormal and uses pseudoscience to explain both".

I remember from his radio interviews he seemed reasonable, until I watched one of his videos.

Maybe I am mistaking him with someone else, but I don't think so. If I have time I'll try to listen to him again.

>>18520600

That's just an odd thing since in his book he talks about how severely limiting belief of any kind (political, cultural, or religious) can be. Thus far I get a large impression that he is an atheist or just doesn't associate with any religion in particular.

I would honestly be shocked if he was Christian.

>>18520613
OK fair enough. I watched and listened to the interviews a couple years ago now so it's a bit foggy.

>in his book he talks about how severely limiting belief of any kind (political, cultural, or religious) can be.

This is probably what originally intrigued Mr when listening to him.

I might have dismissed him because (and correct me if I am wrong), he, to some extent subscribes to the concept of law of attraction. Or some form there of. Which is a hard ideology for me to take seriously.

>>18520965

Nothing thus far has been mentioned about the law of attraction. Are you perhaps thinking of Bob Proctor?

Either way, I am not discounting it. I'm practicing and gathering my own data to make my own assessments.

>>18520588
>herp a derp, imma go on /x/ and troll.

>>18521129

Quality comment right here.

>>18520509
No