I'm looking to dial out of the matrix

>>18493552
The Matrix is a fictional film anon, and a shitty one at that. Get a grip.

>>18493595
Right...A movie...

>>18493552

I'm not sure were you heard that but it's a load of fucking crap.

Someone has to dial you out from the other side. The only exception is if you you have in depth knowledge of the matrix's coding and bypass the layers. No offense but if you are asking on 4chan of all places you obviously don't have any idea what you are doing.

Just keep enjoying the ride. There's a reason so many of us are dialed into the matrix. You are better off not seeing what the world really is.

>>18493595
You can call The Matrix fictional, but you can't deny that it was a creative, well thought out and fucking great movie.

File: bb8b4917c78664e6ed7d371b7a73498bf41c1c6f73720d9305795cecdac139d6.jpg (136KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 900x675px

Just put your latitude and longitude itt.

>>18493658
I can. Keanu Reeves is one of the worsrlt actors Ive ever seen, my opinion of course, but there isnt a screenplay or story in the world that can save a film with him cast in the lead.

That aside, if we are living in a simulation, as some physicists think is possible, there is no leavinh. Physical "you" doesn't exist, anywhere.

>>18493674
I'm not OP and I don't even believe in any of this simulation stuff, I just think The Matrix is a damned good movie. Maybe Keanu is a bit cheesy at times, but I feel like it bodes well with his character and how he's seeing the "unreality" of things.

File: girls making love to other girls.jpg (64KB, 550x831px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 550x831px

>mfw dialing a number and screaming your coordinates to the controller of an armed drone is the only way out of the matrix.

>>18493706
I'm hungry now.

>>18493706
Eh. Personal preference I guess. At least youre not blitheringly retarded.

Where can I learn more about the possibility that this reality is a simulation, cosmic dream or illusion?

I know quantum physics basically say that atoms stop existing when you do not observe them (they become waves, or something like that), which is the same method efficient computers use for rendering to "save" energy or processing power.

If this universe was designed to be efficient when it is not being observed, does that means it is being simulated?

How can I learn more about this? It all makes more sense the most I learn from this theory.

>>18494121
As a theorist, it's much more likely that we are NOT inside any form of simulation. Though there are some interesting theories on Google. I'll post all theories I have on 4chan one day..

>>18495264
actually, mathematically, its much much more likely that we are in a simulation, than that we aren't.

File: 1465322182686.png (424KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1280x1024px

>>18493552
Is this what you mean? And if I'm right it is not a trap but /x/-tan.

>>18495264
I don't know... If a real universe with an advanced civilization has at least 9 simulations, then there is chance our reality is the real one by just 10%.

You do not have even to create a simulation of the universe, but maybe just of a mind and the physical senses.

>>18495450
Yes, this is the pic, thank-you kind anon!

>>18495450
10/10 kek anon, i hope someone will actually do this.

>>18495293
post proof

>>18495450
That's the Boston FBI phone number hy shit I'm laffin

File: Screenshot_2017-01-06-15-06-48.png (164KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 540x960px

>>18496358
Forgot pic