http://www.lawofone.info/ Guys, please educate me.

I've read quite a bit and have understood the truths in it by personal experiences.

Ask away

>>18440729
Edgar cayce seems more legit than ths wilcock

>>18441027
Both of them say the same thing though...

Why do people immediately try to discredit the Law of One texts based on how they were acquired? Not even reading what it is really about

>>18440729
The author problematically imports malapropism into his ontology. Reserve those terms so ubiquitous in science for the philosophy of mathematics.

>>18441113
>i want to seem smart so i use big boy words

Bump. Is OP here?

>>18440729
There's already a thread on that here >>18435498

And it's been thoroughly BTFO by an anon who knows how to google.

>>18441262
>I can't n2 big words, so I'll just act condescending to mask how fucking retarded I am
You're on the fucking internet, just use a dictionary you lazy nigger, and maybe learn something today?

>>18441079
>Why do people immediately try to discredit the Law of One texts based on how they were acquired?
Because there's yet to be a case of channeling that turned out to be legit. What reason is there to believe someone when they say aliens or god told them something telepathically?

>Not even reading what it is really about
So what IS it about? Besides the typical new age woo woo?

>>18442206
>so what is it about?
The single concept that All is One

Ra mentions this over and over. Saying that really nothing else matters in the channeling but the concept of the Law of One.

Everything else stems from this

>>18442203

The lack of proper sentence structure and misuse of words renders it gibberish, you pretentious cockwart.